---
title: "EquityZen Review"
url: https://altstreet.investments/platforms/reviews/equityzen
kind: platform-review
updated: 2026-10-23
description: "Is EquityZen legit or worth it? Review from 1,967 SEC-filed SPVs and $1.592B raised: 2.5% fees, the $5K minimum, its funds, vs Equitybee, K-1 taxes."
publisher: AltStreet (https://altstreet.investments)
license: Public factual pages may be read, quoted and cited with attribution and a link. Bulk redistribution is not permitted.
---

# EquityZen Review

EquityZen is not a pre-IPO trading platform; it's a packaged private equity product with retail access. Morgan Stanley-owned, 2.5% transaction fees (post-2026), $5K-$50K minimums, K-1 tax reporting, multi-year illiquidity. AltStreet has enumerated the platform's complete funded-SPV census from SEC Form D: 1,967 SPVs, $1.592B, 2015-2026, as of October 23, 2026.

AltStreet score: 47.1 (C+), scored August 14, 2026. Method: https://altstreet.investments/platforms

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Platform | EquityZen |
| What it is | Pre-IPO Secondary Marketplace |
| Asset class | Private Company Equity - Late-Stage Pre-IPO |
| Website | equityzen.com |
| Review first published | January 14, 2026 |
| Last updated | October 23, 2026 |
| AltStreet relationship | None: no affiliate, sponsorship or partnership |

## The short version

EquityZen is not a pre-IPO trading platform — it's a packaged private equity product with retail access, now owned by Morgan Stanley. The fee cut to 2.5% post-acquisition makes it the lowest-cost entry point in the pre-IPO secondary market.

- **Not shares** In most Standard and Express offerings you buy SPV membership interests, not the company's shares directly (Direct acquisitions are the exception). IPO does not mean liquidity — sale may be delayed until the later of the post-IPO lockup expiry or one year from the fund's purchase date.
- **2.5%** Buyer fee post-Morgan Stanley acquisition (February 2026), down from the prior 5% tiered structure — now the lowest among major pre-IPO platforms. Sellers pay a separate 2.5%, so EquityZen collects roughly 5% of platform-level friction per completed transaction. The buyer directly bears 2.5%; the seller-side fee may be reflected in asking prices but is not an additional charge against the buyer.
- **74%** Platform-stated net aggregate return across realized investments. It excludes the unresolved portion of the portfolio, and EquityZen does not disclose the return distribution, vintage composition, hold periods, capital weighting, or how write-offs are treated. Whether failed positions are excluded is not established — a written-down company could still count as a realized exit.
- **$5,000** Advertised entry minimum post-acquisition (February 2026). Minimums vary materially by deal and by deal type. AltStreet observed Standard listings at a $10,000 minimum on 13 July 2026, while older platform materials cite $50,000 as the standard single-company minimum. Direct listings observed the same day ranged from roughly $152,000 to $300,000, against platform materials citing $200,000+. Express listings carry irregular, to-the-cent minimums because each represents an entire existing SPV position being resold. Treat any single published minimum as indicative.
- **1,943 SPVs** EquityZen's complete funded-SPV census, enumerated from SEC EDGAR Form D filings — $1.578B raised across 49,950 subscription positions, 2015-2026 (census as of September 16, 2026). Fund I is the retail engine (1,859 SPVs, $1.354B, $29,197 average subscription). Fund II is a separate institutional product (28 SPVs, $116.2M, $123,858 average). They are not the same experience and they are moving in opposite directions.
- **20.5%** Share of EquityZen's sequentially numbered Fund I series that were allocated but have no corresponding Form D. AltStreet observes the absence of a filing; it does not observe whether every allocated number represented a staged, investor-facing deal. The rate ran near 2% in 2018-2021, hit 68% for series staged between June 2022 and March 2023, and recovered to roughly 9% by 2024-2026. AltStreet observes that a series was numbered and no filing followed; it does not observe why.

Data note: Form D data sourced from SEC EDGAR via quarterly master index enumeration (2014-2026 filings; funded vintages 2015-2026), not sampling. Coverage spans Growth Technology Fund LLC, Growth Technology Fund II LLC, Growth Access Fund LLC (first filing July 2026), Growth Opportunity Funds II-XI, Thematic Fund LLC, and the pre-2016 per-company legacy vehicles. Investor figures throughout are subscription counts, not unique investors — Form D does not permit de-duplication across SPVs.


## Key figures

| Figure | What it is | Context |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2.5% | Buyer fee post-Morgan Stanley acquisition (February 2026) | Down from 5% tiered structure — now lowest among major pre-IPO platforms |
| 74% | Platform-stated net aggregate return on realized investments | Realization bias: excludes the unresolved portfolio. Distribution, hold periods, weighting and write-off treatment all undisclosed. |
| $5,000 | Industry-lowest minimum post-acquisition | Advertised floor. AltStreet observed Standard listings at $10,000 and Direct at $152K-$300K on 13 July 2026; minimums vary materially by deal. |
| 1,933 | Funded SPVs — complete census enumerated from SEC EDGAR | $1.565B raised across six fund families and 49,673 subscription positions, 2015-2026 (census as of 2026-08-24). Not a sample. |
| 20.5% | Fund I series numbers allocated with no corresponding Form D | Near 2% in 2018-2021; 68% for series staged June 2022-March 2023; ~9% by 2024-2026 |
| $66.0M | Series 2300 — the largest SPV in EquityZen history, by 4x | 402 subscriptions at a $164,178 average, inside the retail fund. 51.5% of all Fund I capital raised in 2026 H1. |


## Verdict

EquityZen is the most retail-packaged pre-IPO secondary platform — lowest fees post-2026 (2.5%), ROFR handled at the platform level, and the simplest SPV structure in the market. The Morgan Stanley acquisition adds institutional credibility and distribution reach. The tradeoffs are real: illiquidity measured in years, K-1 complexity, and a 74% aggregate return that cannot be annualized, weighted, or verified. Best for first-exposure pre-IPO investors who want simplicity over price discovery.

**Best for**

- First-time pre-IPO investors who want simplicity and platform-administered ROFR handling
- High-income accredited investors with 3-7 year time horizons and K-1 tolerance
- Investors who want diversified exposure via Opportunity Funds or themed baskets
- Investors prioritizing fee efficiency over maximum price transparency

**Look elsewhere if**

- You need liquidity within 3 years
- You expect to trade in and out of positions — this is buy-and-hold only
- You are investing primarily to chase one marquee name like SpaceX or OpenAI
- You cannot absorb multi-year K-1 complexity or potential tax extension requirements

**Strengths**

- Lowest transaction fees in the pre-IPO secondary market post-2026 (2.5%)
- ROFR administered at the platform level — EquityZen manages the process, though the buyer remains exposed to the deal being blocked or terminated
- Morgan Stanley ownership adds institutional credibility and $5K entry minimum
- Fund II institutional product ($208,039 average subscription) for larger allocations
- Deepest SPV issuance record in the category — 1,933 funded vehicles and $1.565B since 2014, versus 104 vehicles for Hiive
- Opportunity Funds provide diversification across multiple names (the Thematic Fund appears inactive, with no new Form D since May 2024)

**Limitations**

- Indicative pricing only — a Reference Price and aggregate bid/ask volume are shown, but there is no executable order book, and EquityZen states this market data is proprietary and confidential
- EquityZen reports serving 450+ companies historically, while Hiive advertises a substantially larger company catalog — the figures are differently defined and are not a direct inventory comparison
- K-1 reporting with timing that varies by vehicle type and may require extensions
- 74% aggregate return covers realized investments only; hold periods, weighting and write-off treatment are undisclosed, so it cannot be annualized or independently verified
- SPV structure means you own membership interests, not direct equity
- Portfolio company is never named in the Form D — platform-level concentration cannot be verified from primary sources by anyone
- Retail subscription size has fallen 44% since 2015 ($28,143 to $15,651 median) while the institutional product moved the other way


## Who it fits

| Investor | Fit | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Accredited investors seeking alternatives allocation with long time horizons | well-suited |  |
| High-net-worth individuals and family offices building diversified private equity exposure | well-suited |  |
| Investors seeking specific company exposure with strong conviction | well-suited |  |
| Financial advisors managing HNW client portfolios | neutral |  |
| Income-focused investors requiring regular distributions | poor-fit |  |
| Risk-averse investors seeking principal protection or stable returns | poor-fit |  |
| Investors requiring liquidity for emergencies or near-term goals | poor-fit |  |
| Passive investors seeking set-and-forget strategies | poor-fit |  |


## Questions

**Is EquityZen legit?**

Yes. EquityZen runs its marketplace through EquityZen Securities LLC, an SEC-registered broker-dealer, FINRA member (CRD 281820) and SIPC member, and it has been a wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management since the acquisition closed on January 27, 2026. Its activity is on the public record: AltStreet's census of its Form D filings counts 1,967 funded SPVs that raised $1.592 billion across 50,548 subscription positions as of October 23, 2026. Legitimate is not the same as low risk. In most deals you buy a membership interest in an SPV rather than shares, the money is usually tied up for years, the platform's own documentation says a company's right of first refusal can end a transaction after you commit, and most SPVs send a K-1.

**What do EquityZen reviews say?**

Many EquityZen reviews repeat two platform figures: a $5,000 minimum and a 74% net aggregate return on realized investments. AltStreet's review checks them against the filing record. Minimums vary by deal: AltStreet saw Standard listings at $10,000 on July 13, 2026 and Direct listings from roughly $152,000 to $300,000. The 74% covers realized investments only, and EquityZen publishes no hold periods, so it cannot be turned into an annual return. Since about 2016 EquityZen's Form Ds no longer name the company an SPV holds, and 20.5% of the Fund I series numbers in the matured range never produced a Form D. On cost, the buyer fee has been 2.5% since February 19, 2026.

**Is EquityZen worth it?**

It depends on what you need from the money. The cost is a 2.5% buyer fee up to $1 million and 2.0% above, so a $50,000 investment requires a $51,250 wire, with no carried interest or ongoing management fee on single-company SPVs. What you get is usually an SPV interest held for several years: an IPO does not end the wait, because sale can be delayed until the later of the lockup expiry or one year from the fund's purchase date, and most SPVs send a K-1. It can make sense for an accredited investor who wants exposure to a specific late-stage company, can leave the money untouched for years and can accept losing all of it on a single position. It does not suit anyone who needs liquidity or income.

**Can I buy EquityZen stock?**

No. EquityZen has been a wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management since January 2026, so there are no EquityZen shares to buy. Searches for EquityZen stock usually mean the private-company stock sold on the platform. In most Standard and Express offerings you buy a membership interest in an SPV that holds the company's shares, not the shares themselves; Direct acquisitions, at much higher minimums, are the exception.

**What are EquityZen funds?**

EquityZen files its SPVs under a few fund families, each series a separate LLC. EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC (Fund I) holds most single-company series: 1,883 SPVs and $1.369 billion as of October 23, 2026. Growth Technology Fund II LLC carries larger tickets: 28 SPVs and $116.2 million as of September 16, 2026. The Growth Opportunity Funds (17 vehicles, $68.7 million) are curated multi-company portfolios, the Thematic Fund (15 SPVs, $25.3 million) has not filed since May 2024, and Growth Access Fund LLC filed for the first time on July 22, 2026. Buying into a fund series gets you an interest in that LLC and a K-1, not shares of the company.

**EquityZen vs Equitybee: what is the difference?**

They sell different things. EquityZen is a secondary marketplace: an existing shareholder sells, and you usually buy an SPV interest that holds the shares, paying a 2.5% buyer fee. Equitybee funds an employee's stock-option exercise through a Series LLC; you hold a contingent claim on that employee's proceeds, never the shares, and pay a 5% front-end brokerage fee plus 5% carried interest on the interest and equity-share portions of proceeds. On EDGAR, EquityZen's census stands at 1,967 funded SPVs and $1.592 billion as of October 23, 2026, and Equitybee's at 1,093 series reporting $231.1 million sold to 3,634 investor slots as of October 22, 2026. AltStreet's Equitybee vs EquityZen guide covers fees, returns, taxes and exits side by side.

**Where can I find news on EquityZen?**

This review keeps a dated update history at the bottom of the page. Recent entries: Morgan Stanley closed its acquisition of EquityZen on January 27, 2026; the fee cut to 2.5% on each side took effect on February 19, 2026; and the October 23, 2026 census refresh added 24 new Growth Technology Fund series filed between September 22 and October 22, bringing the count to 1,967 SPVs and $1.592 billion. For company announcements, EquityZen's own site is the primary source.

**What is EquityZen and how does it work?**

EquityZen is a secondary marketplace connecting accredited investors with pre-IPO shares in late-stage private companies. Existing shareholders sell equity, and EquityZen typically wraps the purchase in an SPV LLC so investors buy membership interests rather than direct stock. Investors usually realize value only when the company is acquired, goes public, or in limited cases when an eligible Express Deal resale occurs.

**What is the EquityZen minimum investment?**

EquityZen advertises entry minimums as low as $5,000, but minimums vary materially by deal and by deal type. AltStreet observed Standard listings at a $10,000 minimum on 13 July 2026, while older platform materials cite $50,000 as the standard single-company minimum. Direct listings observed the same day ranged from roughly $152,000 to $300,000, against platform materials citing $200,000+. Express listings carry irregular, to-the-cent minimums because each represents an entire existing SPV position being resold. Treat any single published minimum as indicative. Enhanced access ($10,000 minimum, waitlist priority, early deal access) requires maintaining a $50,000 platform balance. Multi-company funds have $20,000 limited slots on a first-come basis.

**What fees does EquityZen charge?**

Post-February 2026 (Morgan Stanley acquisition): Investors pay 2.5% up to $1M, 2.0% above $1M. Example: $50,000 investment requires $51,250 wire. Sellers separately pay 2.5% at close. Platform does not charge carried interest or ongoing management fees on single-company SPVs. Platform-level friction is roughly 5% per completed transaction, but the buyer directly bears 2.5% of it — the seller-side fee is not an additional charge against the buyer, though it may be reflected in asking prices. Reduced from the prior 8-10% structure.

**How long do I have to hold EquityZen investments?**

Typical underwriting assumption is a multi-year hold, often 2-5+ years, but actual liquidity can take longer. If a company goes public, sale timing may still be constrained until the later of the post-IPO lockup expiry or one year from the fund purchase date. Express Deal resale can happen sooner in some cases, but it is not broadly available and should not be treated as guaranteed liquidity.

**Who can invest on EquityZen?**

SEC-defined accredited investors only: $200K+ annual income ($300K+ joint with spouse) in each of prior two years with reasonable expectation of same, OR $1M+ net worth excluding primary residence. Entity investors require $5M+ assets or qualifying status. Verification method varies by offering structure: 506(b) offerings generally rely on investor questionnaires and binding representations, while 506(c) offerings may require additional documentation to satisfy the SEC's reasonable-verification standard. Non-accredited investors cannot access the platform.

**What are EquityZen's historical returns?**

Platform reports 74% net aggregate return across realized investments. This carries realization bias — it covers the realized portion of the portfolio and excludes the unresolved portion — and it cannot be annualized, because EquityZen publishes no hold periods. Whether written-down positions are counted as realized exits is not disclosed, so you cannot assume failures are excluded. Capital weighting and the return distribution are also undisclosed. Third-party sources cite individual outcomes ranging from total loss to 450%+ gains with a highly skewed distribution. Past performance is not predictive of future returns.

**Can you buy SpaceX stock on EquityZen?**

Sometimes, yes—but not reliably. EquityZen may periodically feature companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, Stripe, or Anthropic when existing shareholders want liquidity and the company allows the transfer structure. In practice, the deals many users care about are inconsistent, supply-driven, often oversubscribed, and not something you should assume will be available exactly when you want them.

**How often are companies like OpenAI actually available on EquityZen?**

Availability is opportunistic rather than dependable. A marquee company can appear because a seller is active, then disappear because the allocation fills, the company blocks or limits transfers, or the economics stop making sense. If you are joining primarily to buy one specific name, expect frustration: EquityZen is better understood as access to occasional late-stage secondary opportunities, not guaranteed access to whatever private company is currently trending.

**What do EquityZen's returns look like in annualized terms?**

No reliable annualized return can be calculated from what EquityZen publishes. The platform does not disclose the holding periods behind its 74% net aggregate figure, and a 74% gain over three years is a very different investment from the same gain over seven or ten. The figure is also described as net without defining what net includes, so subtracting the buyer fee from it again risks double-counting. And because it covers realized investments only — with no distribution, no vintage composition and no capital weighting disclosed — it cannot be independently verified. A large total-return number tells you very little without the clock, the weighting and the denominator.

**What companies can I invest in through EquityZen?**

EquityZen reports serving more than 450 companies historically, but the number currently available to investors is materially smaller and changes with shareholder supply. Companies that have appeared on the platform include SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, Stripe, Databricks, Anduril Industries, xAI, Perplexity, Groq, Figure AI and Shield AI. Focus is on tech companies (AI, fintech, SaaS, defense tech, biotech) with significant VC backing. A company appearing in the catalog does not mean it is currently investable — availability depends on shareholders willing to sell and on company approval.

**How does EquityZen compare with Forge Global, Hiive, and SharesPost?**

EquityZen is generally the more retail-packaged option, with lower advertised minimums and more SPV-based access. Forge Global is more market-infrastructure-heavy, with stronger price discovery and larger direct transaction orientation. Hiive emphasizes a live marketplace, anonymity, and institutional buyer/seller interaction. SharesPost is mostly historical context now because Forge completed its merger with SharesPost in November 2020, so modern comparisons usually mean EquityZen vs Forge vs Hiive rather than EquityZen vs a standalone SharesPost platform.

**How do I exit my EquityZen investments?**

The primary exit path is a company liquidity event such as an IPO, merger, or acquisition. If the company IPOs, your shares may still be subject to a standard 180-day lockup and restricted-security timing rules that can extend actual saleability until the later of lockup expiry or one year from purchase. A secondary exit may be possible through an eligible Express Deal, but those resales depend on company approval, a qualified seller position, and a single buyer for the full block.

**What are the main risks of investing through EquityZen?**

Major risks: Illiquidity (2-5+ years minimum, no guaranteed exit); binary outcomes (100% loss if company fails); valuation risk (late-stage entry at $10B+ valuations limits upside); information asymmetry (minimal disclosure vs public companies); fee drag (buyer directly bears 2.5%; ~5% platform-level friction per transaction post-February 2026, down from 8-10%); company ROFR uncertainty (deals can fail after commitment); sector concentration (tech-heavy). Suitable only for sophisticated investors with long horizons and loss tolerance.

**How many deals has EquityZen actually done?**

AltStreet enumerated EquityZen's complete SEC Form D filer population from EDGAR's quarterly master index and keeps it current against new filings: 1,967 funded SPVs raising $1.592B across 50,548 subscription positions, funded 2015 to 2026 (census as of October 23, 2026). The bulk sits in Growth Technology Fund I (1,883 SPVs, $1.369B as of October 23), with Growth Technology Fund II (28 SPVs, $116.2M as of September 16), the Growth Access Fund (first filing $10.39M, July 2026), Growth Opportunity Funds (17), Thematic Fund (15) and a handful of pre-2016 per-company vehicles making up the rest. This is a census of the filing record rather than a platform-reported figure. Note that Form D reports subscription positions, not unique investors: the same person appearing in twelve SPVs is counted twelve times.

**Can I find out which company an EquityZen SPV holds?**

Not from SEC filings. EquityZen registers its Fund I vehicles under anonymous serial names — 'EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC - Series 2245' — with the portfolio company disclosed nowhere in the Form D. You learn the company from the platform's own offering materials once you are inside the deal, but no external party can audit platform-level company concentration. Notably, EquityZen did name companies in its filings before roughly 2016 (EquityZen Palantir Fund LLC, EquityZen Lyft Fund LLC), and competitor Hiive still does ('HII Anthropic-01'). The opacity is a choice, not a rule.

**Do EquityZen deals ever fail to close?**

The filing record suggests so, though the platform does not disclose a figure. EquityZen numbers its Fund I series sequentially, and AltStreet found that 20.5% of the series numbers allocated through the matured range never produced a Form D at all — near 2% during 2018-2021, spiking to 68% for series staged between June 2022 and March 2023, and back to roughly 9% by 2024-2026. AltStreet can observe that a series was numbered and no filing followed; it cannot observe why, and some fraction of any recent gap may be deals still working rather than deals that died. Separately, the platform's own documentation confirms that company ROFR can terminate a transaction after an investor has committed capital.

**How are EquityZen investments taxed?**

Most EquityZen SPV investments are taxed as partnership interests, so investors may receive Schedule K-1 reporting for income, gains, losses, and deductions even without cash distributions. Timing depends on structure: standard single-company funds often issue K-1s only in taxable-event years, diversified funds generally issue annual K-1s, and dual-layer structures can be delayed into August or September, making extensions common. Tax handling can also involve phantom income, passive-loss limits, and possible multi-state filing, so this is materially more complex than holding public stocks in a normal brokerage account.

**What is EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC?**

It is the Delaware series LLC under which EquityZen registers most of its single-company SPVs with the SEC. Each numbered series (Series 2300, for example) holds shares of one private company and files its own Form D, and investors receive an interest in that series plus a K-1 rather than shares of the company. In AltStreet's July 2026 census the fund family accounted for 1,830 of the platform's funded SPVs, $1.284 billion raised and 45,229 subscription positions, with a $30,955 average and $21,284 median subscription. Since 2016 the Form Ds no longer name the underlying company; AltStreet's platform data page shows how the series map to companies where the filings allow it. A second family, Growth Technology Fund II LLC, carries the larger-ticket vehicles ($118,298 median subscription), and Growth Access Fund LLC first filed in July 2026.

**Who are EquityZen's competitors and alternatives?**

Forge Global (Schwab-owned, $5,000 fund minimum, $100,000 direct minimum), Hiive (now Clarity, commissions of up to 4.85% for buyers and 5.75% for sellers, $25,000 direct minimum) and UpMarket are the closest alternatives for accredited investors buying pre-IPO shares. EquityBee is often listed as a competitor but does something different: it funds employees' option exercises in exchange for a share of the upside. Nasdaq Private Market and Augment serve mostly institutional and tender-offer flow. AltStreet's EquityZen vs Forge vs Hiive, EquityBee vs EquityZen and EquityZen vs UpMarket guides compare fees, minimums, ROFR exposure and tax reporting side by side.


## Update history

**October 23, 2026: Census refresh: 1,967 SPVs, $1.592 billion, 50,548 positions; 24 new Growth Technology series since September 16, all captured automatically**

AltStreet triaged the 24 signals its monitoring attached to EquityZen between September 17 and October 22, 2026, every one a new Form D registration by a numbered series of EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC (Series 2365 through 2412, filed September 22 to October 22). All 24 are in the census with their filed amounts, so the running count moves from 1,943 funded SPVs, $1,577,831,351 and 49,950 subscription positions on September 16 to 1,967 SPVs, $1,592,287,119 and 50,548 positions on October 23, a gain of 24 vehicles, $14,455,768 and 598 positions. Forty-five entity profiles the nightly sync had created without a platform link were linked during the sweep. The score is unchanged.

**September 16, 2026: Census refresh: 1,943 SPVs, $1.578 billion, 49,950 positions; ten new Growth Technology series since August 24, all captured automatically**

AltStreet triaged the ten signals its monitoring attached to EquityZen between August 24 and September 12, 2026, every one a new Form D registration by a numbered series of EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC (Series 2377, 2381, 2316, 2325, 2341, 2371, 2360, 2362, 2361 and 2368, filed August 24 to September 11). All ten are already in AltStreet's census with their filed amounts, so the running count moves from 1,933 funded SPVs, $1,565,205,422 and 49,673 subscription positions on August 24 to 1,943 SPVs, $1,577,831,351 and 49,950 positions on September 16, a gain of ten vehicles and about $12.6 million in three weeks. Fund I remains the retail engine at 1,859 series-numbered SPVs, $1,354,171,123 and 46,381 positions, an average position of $29,197. Year to date, 132 SPVs with 2026 first-sale dates account for $230,191,051. The census description, family structure and historical entries are unchanged; the counts are updated in place. Scores are unchanged.

**August 24, 2026: Census maintenance: 43 new funded SPVs, a sixth fund family appears, and series numbering reaches 2473**

Six weeks of new Form D filings moved the census from 1,890 funded SPVs and $1.484B (July 13) to 1,933 SPVs and $1.565B across 49,673 subscription positions (August 24). Two filings stand out. EquityZen Growth Access Fund LLC (CIK 2142814) filed its first Form D on July 22 disclosing $10,389,611 sold across 51 positions, making it a new, sixth fund family and the fourth-largest single EquityZen filing on record; its structure beyond the Form D is not yet disclosed and AltStreet is watching for offering materials. Growth Technology Fund II Series 35 filed August 7 at $10,405,242 across 33 positions, the third-largest filing on record and Fund II's largest ever. The retail engine kept its cadence: the remaining new filings are Growth Technology Fund I series in the 2270-2388 numbering range, and allocated series numbering has been observed as high as 2473. Post-acquisition filings still carry EquityZen entity names only; no Morgan Stanley filer has appeared. Fund II's cumulative profile is now 28 SPVs, $116.2M, 938 positions, which brings its average subscription to $123,858, roughly four times Fund I's $29,088 (the previously published seven-times gap reflected the smaller July investor-count base).

**July 13, 2026: Complete Form D census replaces AltStreet's 150-SPV sample: 1,890 funded SPVs, $1.484B**

AltStreet enumerated EquityZen's entire SEC Form D filer population by walking EDGAR's quarterly master index across 2014-2026 — 2,211 filings, 1,928 distinct CIKs — and ingested every offering that disclosed sales. The result is a census, not a sample: 1,890 funded SPVs and $1,484,549,936 raised across 48,614 subscription positions, funded vintages 2015-2026. AltStreet's prior figure of 150 SPVs and $230.8M represented roughly 8% of the population and 16% of the capital. Four load-bearing claims in the previous review were contradicted by the full data and have been corrected or removed.


## Evidence appendix

Platform website captured July 13, 2026.

Review synthesized from multiple source categories: (1) EquityZen platform materials (equityzen.com) including investor, shareholder, about, institutional, and legal pages; (2) EquityZen Help Center documentation covering investment process, fees, accreditation requirements, deal types, and FAQs; (3) the April 23, 2026 EquityZen dossier updates supplied for this review, which materially clarified tax timing, extension expectations, lockup mechanics, and Express Deal eligibility constraints; (4) comparator platform materials from Forge Global and Hiive, plus Forge's merger history with SharesPost for current-market positioning; (5) third-party platform reviews from FinanceBuzz, BullishBears, Fintorial, YieldTalk, TradingBrokers, and MoneyMade; and (6) SEC/FINRA regulatory records. Analysis focuses on investment structures, fee models, accreditation requirements, liquidity mechanics, tax treatment, investor suitability, and current competitive positioning.

**Highlights**

- CONFIRMED (Morgan Stanley press releases + Reuters): Morgan Stanley acquired EquityZen in January 2026 (announced October 29, 2025; closed January 27, 2026). First acquisition under CEO Ted Pick. Terms undisclosed; ~$100M integration costs expected over two years. EquityZen Securities LLC and EquityZen Advisors LLC are wholly-owned subsidiaries of EquityZen Inc., which is now owned by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management.
- CONFIRMED (Morgan Stanley press release February 19, 2026): Transaction fees cut to 2.5% (buyer and seller) effective immediately, down from prior tiered structure (5%/4%/3% buyer, 5% seller). Industry-lowest $5,000 minimum maintained. Fee reduction also applies to Express Deals.
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Scale metrics refreshed in April 2026 materials: 850K+ total subscribers, 450+ companies served, and 53K+ company-approved transactions since 2013.
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Investment minimums: $10,000 for enhanced access members maintaining $50,000 balance; $20,000 limited slots for multi-company funds on first-come-first-serve basis; $50,000 standard minimum for single-company funds (per platform terms of service and Help Center).
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Fee structure updated February 19, 2026 following Morgan Stanley acquisition: 2.5% buyer fee on investments up to $1M, 2.0% above $1M; 2.5% seller fee at close; no carried interest or ongoing management fees on single-company SPVs. Prior structure (5%/4%/3% tiered) no longer applicable. For Direct Share Acquisitions: 2.5% up to $10M, 2.0% above $10M (per Morgan Stanley press release February 2026 and EquityZen Help Center).
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: 74% net aggregate return across realized investments (per platform investor page). AltStreet characterizes this as realization bias rather than survivorship bias: the figure covers the realized portion of the portfolio and excludes the unresolved portion, but whether written-down or liquidated positions are counted as realized exits is not disclosed. Hold periods, capital weighting, vintage composition and the return distribution are all undisclosed, so the figure cannot be annualized, weighted, or independently verified.
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Investment process details as described in platform materials; company ROFR approval processes and transaction timelines vary by offering. Investors should not assume platform-level timing guidance overrides deal-specific documents.
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Accreditation requirements: $200K+ annual income ($300K+ joint) in prior two years with reasonable expectation of same, OR $1M+ net worth excluding primary residence; verification methods vary by offering structure (per Help Center accreditation page).
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Examples of companies featured on platform homepage include SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, Stripe, Databricks, Anduril Industries, xAI, Perplexity, Groq, Figure AI, Lambda (per platform homepage as of January 2026); specific inventory varies based on shareholder supply and deal flow.
- PLATFORM-CONFIRMED: Three investment structures: Single-company funds (standard and Express Deals), multi-company funds (Growth Opportunity and Thematic), and direct share acquisitions for $200K+ investors (per investor page).
- THIRD-PARTY REPORTED: Historical returns range from 100% loss to 450%+ gains per FinanceBuzz and BullishBears analyses; distribution highly skewed with few winners driving aggregate returns.
- THIRD-PARTY REPORTED: Typical hold periods 2-5 years though many extend longer as companies delay IPOs; 2018-2021 vintages remained illiquid through 2024 as IPO markets closed (per third-party analyses and market observations).
- THIRD-PARTY REPORTED: SPV structures generally mean investors receive LLC membership interests and K-1 tax reporting rather than direct stock ownership, though actual issuance timing depends on vehicle type (per YieldTalk, TradingBrokers, and dossier-supported review synthesis).
- RESEARCH-SUPPORTED: Secondary marketplace liquidity is conditional rather than dependable. Express Deals are real, but availability depends on ownership size, holding period, buyer demand, and company approval, making them a weak liquidity assumption for many smaller investors.
- RESEARCH-SUPPORTED: K-1 timing is vehicle-specific: standard single-company funds usually issue only in taxable-event years, diversified managed funds generally issue annual K-1s, and dual-layer funds can be delayed into August or September because upstream reporting must arrive first.
- RESEARCH-SUPPORTED: Post-IPO liquidity can still be delayed by the later of a standard lockup expiry or one year from the fund purchase date, so an IPO does not necessarily create immediate saleability.
- ALTSTREET ASSESSMENT: The 74% net aggregate figure cannot be annualized from published data. EquityZen discloses no hold periods, so any annualization requires assuming one. It describes the figure as net without defining what net includes, so deducting the buyer fee again risks double-counting. It publishes no return distribution, no vintage composition and no capital weighting. Four inputs are missing, and only EquityZen can supply them.
- COMPARATOR-SUPPORTED: Forge currently positions itself around deeper private-market data and larger direct transactions, Hiive emphasizes a live anonymous marketplace with institutional participation, and SharesPost now mainly matters as legacy context because Forge completed its SharesPost merger in November 2020.
- THIRD-PARTY REPORTED: Platform focus on late-stage companies valued $500M+ with significant VC backing and perceived proximity to IPO/acquisition (per TradingBrokers and other reviews).
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR quarterly master index, 2014-2026): EquityZen's complete Form D filer population was 2,211 filings across 1,928 distinct CIKs at the July 13, 2026 enumeration. Maintained against new filings, the census stands at 1,933 funded SPVs totaling $1.565B across 49,673 subscription positions as of August 24, 2026. The first Form D filing dates to Q1 2014; the first filing disclosing sales is 2015. This is an enumerated census, not a sample.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): Growth Technology Fund I median subscription has declined from $28,143 (2015) to $15,651 (2025) — a 44% fall across 1,830 SPVs and $1.284B. Over the same period Growth Technology Fund II median subscription rose from $75,107 (2024) to $133,987 (2025). The retail and institutional channels are moving in opposite directions.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): EquityZen assigns Fund I series numbers sequentially. Of 2,199 series numbers allocated through the matured range, 1,748 produced a Form D and 451 (20.5%) did not. The rate is near 2% across the 2018-2021 blocks, 68% for series staged between June 2022 and March 2023, and roughly 9% for 2024-2026. A further 18 series filed a Form D disclosing no sales amount. AltStreet observes the absence of a filing; it does not observe cause and does not characterize these as failures.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC - Series 2300 raised $65,999,375 across 402 subscription positions in 2026 — the largest SPV in EquityZen's history by a factor of four, and 51.5% of all Fund I capital raised in the first half of 2026. The next largest is Growth Opportunity Fund VII Series 2 at $16.4M (2021). Excluding Series 2300, the remaining 88 Fund I SPVs of 2026 H1 averaged $707K, below the 2021 peak average of $1.12M. Aggregate 2026 statistics for this platform are dominated by a single deal.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): Fund I capital raised by vintage — $383.0M (2021), $157.8M (2022), $64.3M (2023), $62.2M (2024), $101.5M (2025), $128.2M (2026 H1). Volume fell 83% from peak to the 2023 trough and has grown in each of the three years since. Because recorded figures are amount sold at the latest filing and can only rise with amendments, each is a floor.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): EquityZen registered its pre-2016 vehicles under company-specific names (EquityZen Palantir Fund LLC, EquityZen Lyft Fund LLC, EquityZen DocuSign Fund I LLC, and others). Every Fund I vehicle since is registered as an anonymous serial — 'EquityZen Growth Technology Fund LLC - Series 2245' — with the portfolio company named nowhere in the filing. Hiive, a directly comparable platform, names the company in the filer name ('HII Anthropic-01'). Platform-level company concentration is therefore unverifiable from primary sources for EquityZen and verifiable for Hiive.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): Across every EquityZen Growth Opportunity Fund XI amendment on file, total offering amount and total amount sold are amended to identical figures — Series 2 moved through $1,485,000, $2,152,000, $2,727,000 and $6,198,847 on both fields simultaneously between November 2025 and June 2026. EquityZen restates the offering size to match settled subscriptions rather than declaring a target and filling against it, which means an EquityZen offering can never appear undersubscribed on EDGAR.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (SEC EDGAR Form D): Post-acquisition filings continue under EquityZen entity names. No Morgan Stanley filer appears on any Form D through August 2026, including the new Growth Access Fund LLC filer.
- ALTSTREET IDENTIFIED (EquityZen platform materials, accessed 2026-07-13): EquityZen Growth Opportunity Fund II LLC (2016 vintage, CIK 1680698, $1,058,750 raised from 39 subscription positions) is fully realized — 15 investments, 15 exited. EquityZen publishes per-company returns for 14 of them: median 2.07x, mean 2.08x, range 0.15x to 4.20x, with 2 of 14 returning less than capital (14.3% loss rate). These are multiples, not IRRs. Hold periods are not disclosed, returns are gross of carried interest per the platform's own footnote, and the figures are equal-weighted by company rather than capital-weighted. This is the only EquityZen vehicle with published realized returns and the only one in which portfolio companies are named.

**Primary source pages**

- equityzen.com (homepage, investor page, shareholder page, about page)
- help.equityzen.com (investment process, fees, accreditation, deal types)
- equityzen.com/terms (terms of service including enhanced access program)
- forgeglobal.com/investors and forgeglobal.com/faqs
- forgeglobal.com/press-releases/forge-completes-merger-with-sharespost-showcasing-unprecedented-depth-of-private-market-data/
- hiive.com/funds-investors and hiive.com/seller
- FinanceBuzz - EquityZen Review (June 2025)
- BullishBears - EquityZen Review 2025 (October 2025)
- Fintorial - EquityZen Review (April 2024)
- YieldTalk - EquityZen Review (November 2025)
- TradingBrokers - EquityZen Review (July 2025)
- MoneyMade - EquityZen profile page
- FINRA BrokerCheck - EquityZen Securities LLC verification


## Related

- Full review (HTML): https://altstreet.investments/platforms/reviews/equityzen
- Every platform review: https://altstreet.investments/platforms/reviews
- Methodology and scoring: https://altstreet.investments/platforms
- Category hub: https://altstreet.investments/categories/secondary-pre-ipo-markets

---

Source page: https://altstreet.investments/platforms/reviews/equityzen
Machine index: https://altstreet.investments/llms.txt
AltStreet reads what platforms, funds and issuers file with the SEC and what they tell investors, and publishes the difference. Figures are as filed or as captured on the date stated; nothing here is investment advice.