Regulation & Compliance in Alternative Investments
Compliance is not paperwork—it's investor protection. Understanding SEC Marketing Rules, quarterly disclosure requirements, and preferential treatment prohibitions distinguishes institutional-grade offerings from high-risk sponsors.
Is Your Sponsor Following the Law or Just Selling?
The 2024-2025 SEC Private Fund Adviser Rules represent the most significant regulatory shift in alternative investments in over a decade. New quarterly statement requirements, audit mandates, and preferential treatment restrictions fundamentally change investor protection standards.
The AltStreet Standard: Regulatory compliance is a minimum threshold, not an achievement. Sponsors who view SEC rules as obstacles rather than investor protections reveal their priorities.
Important Note: Regulatory compliance reduces fraud risk and operational failures—not market or investment risk. Strong compliance protects against manager misconduct but does not guarantee returns.
See our Risk & Red Flags FrameworkDisclaimer: This content is educational and does not constitute legal, investment, or tax advice. Consult qualified professionals for guidance on specific situations.
If You Only Read One Thing
- 1.Net-of-fees performance is now mandatory. The SEC Marketing Rule requires sponsors to show returns after all fees with equal prominence to gross returns. Sponsors showing only gross performance are violating federal law.
- 2.Quarterly statements must disclose all fees. The 2024-2025 Private Fund Adviser Rules require detailed quarterly breakdowns of management fees, performance fees, fund expenses, and portfolio company fees.
- 3.Preferential treatment is restricted. Side letters giving certain investors better redemption rights or information access are prohibited if they materially harm other investors.
- 4.Verify registration on IAPD and EDGAR. Check Form ADV Part 2A for disciplinary history and conflicts. Confirm Form D filing for the specific offering. Search principals for "bad actor" disqualifications.
- 5.Reg D 506(b) vs 506(c) matters. 506(b) prohibits general advertising but allows self-certification of accredited status. 506(c) permits marketing but requires third-party verification. Most sponsors use 506(b) to reduce friction.
The Regulatory Compliance Framework
SEC Registration
- Form ADV Part 2A disclosure
- Form D filing verification
- FINRA BrokerCheck for principals
- Bad actor disqualification check
Marketing & Disclosure
- Net-of-fees performance reporting
- Performance substantiation
- Testimonial disclosure requirements
- Conflict of interest disclosure
Ongoing Compliance
- Quarterly statement requirements
- Annual fund audit mandate
- Preferential treatment restrictions
- Fairness opinion for secondaries
Registered Investment Adviser (RIA)
An investment adviser registered with the SEC (typically managing $110M+ in AUM) or state securities regulator. Subject to fiduciary duty, Form ADV disclosure requirements, and SEC examination. Must comply with Marketing Rule, custody rule, and Private Fund Adviser Rules if managing private funds.
Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA)
An investment adviser exempt from full SEC registration (typically advising only private funds or venture capital funds). Still must file Form ADV and provide limited disclosures. "Exempt" does not mean unregulated—ERAs remain subject to anti-fraud provisions and certain reporting requirements.
How AltStreet Applies Compliance Standards
Regulatory compliance is the first filter in our due diligence process. Sponsors who fail basic disclosure requirements never reach our platform reviews or return analysis.
Registration Verification
We verify every platform's Form ADV, Form D filings, and principal backgrounds before coverage. Unregistered or non-compliant sponsors are excluded.
Disclosure Standards
Our platform reviews assess PPM quality, fee transparency, and risk factor adequacy. Boilerplate disclosures trigger compliance red flags.
Marketing Rule Enforcement
We flag platforms showing only gross returns, using unsubstantiated performance claims, or failing to disclose testimonial compensation.
Our Commitment: No manager relationships, no affiliate incentives, no conflicts. This framework protects capital, not commissions.
Remember: Regulatory compliance is necessary but not sufficient. Compliant sponsors can still exhibit operational red flags, structural misalignment, or excessive risk-taking.
View Our Risk & Red Flags FrameworkThe Regulatory Landscape: The Big Picture
Alternative investments operate under a complex regulatory framework involving the SEC, FINRA, and state securities regulators. Understanding registration requirements, exemptions, and disclosure obligations is foundational to assessing sponsor credibility.
Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) vs. Exempt Reporting Advisers (ERAs)
Most alternative investment sponsors operate as either RIAs or ERAs. The distinction affects regulatory oversight, disclosure requirements, and investor protections.
| Characteristic | Registered Investment Adviser (RIA) | Exempt Reporting Adviser (ERA) |
|---|---|---|
| Registration Threshold | $110M+ AUM (SEC); varies by state | Advises only private funds or VC funds |
| Form ADV Filing | Full Part 1 & 2A/2B required | Limited Part 1A filing only |
| SEC Examination | Subject to periodic SEC exams | Not subject to routine exams |
| Fiduciary Duty | Yes - full fiduciary obligation | Yes - but lighter oversight |
| Marketing Rule | Full compliance required | Full compliance required |
| Private Fund Adviser Rules | Applies (if managing private funds) | Limited application |
| Custody Rule | Strict custody requirements | Custody rule exemptions available |
Key Takeaway
"Exempt" status (ERA) does not mean unregulated. ERAs remain subject to anti-fraud provisions, Form ADV filing requirements, and the Marketing Rule. However, RIAs face stricter oversight, periodic SEC examinations, and more comprehensive disclosure obligations. For investors, RIA-managed funds typically offer stronger regulatory protections.
Reg D 506(b) vs 506(c): Private Placement Exemptions
Regulation D provides exemptions from securities registration for private placements. Rule 506 has two sub-provisions with different requirements for general solicitation, investor verification, and accreditation.
Rule 506(b): No General Solicitation
- Prohibited: No advertising, public marketing, or general solicitation
- Allowed: Up to 35 non-accredited investors (rarely used)
- Verification: Self-certification of accredited status acceptable
- Relationship: Must have pre-existing relationship with investors
Most Common: ~95% of private placements use 506(b) to avoid third-party verification costs and maintain flexibility in investor outreach.
Rule 506(c): General Solicitation Permitted
- Permitted: Advertising, social media, public marketing allowed
- Restricted: Sales only to verified accredited investors
- Verification: Mandatory third-party verification required
- Relationship: No pre-existing relationship required
Less Common: Used by sponsors prioritizing marketing reach over verification friction. Crowdfunding platforms commonly use 506(c).
Compliance Red Flag
If a sponsor is advertising publicly but claims to be using 506(b): This is a violation. General solicitation (social media ads, public webinars, online marketing) is only permitted under 506(c), which requires third-party accreditation verification. Sponsors mixing 506(b) exemptions with public marketing are non-compliant.
The SEC Marketing Rule: The "Anti-Hype" Shield
Effective May 2021, the SEC Marketing Rule fundamentally changed how investment advisers can advertise performance, use testimonials, and promote their services. This rule directly targets misleading marketing practices common in alternative investments.
Four Core Marketing Rule Requirements
1. Performance Substantiation: Reasonable Basis Required
Rule: Any performance claim must have a "reasonable basis" supported by objective data. Hypothetical or backtested performance must be clearly labeled and include prominent disclosure of limitations.
Red Flag: Sponsors showing "projected returns" or "target IRR" without historical data backing the assumptions. Claims like "historically returns 15-18%" without audited track record.
Example Violation: "Our real estate fund has averaged 20% annual returns" when fund has only been operating for 8 months, or returns are extrapolated from single property performance.
2. Net-of-Fees vs. Gross Returns: Equal Prominence Mandate
Rule: If showing gross returns (before fees), advisers must also show net returns (after all fees and expenses) with equal or greater prominence. Net returns must be easily comparable to gross returns.
Why It Matters: Fees in alternatives can exceed 3-4% annually (2% management + 20% carry). A 15% gross return becomes 10-11% net—materially different investor experience.
Common Violation: Pitch deck shows "18% Average Annual Returns" in 48pt font, with tiny footnote "*returns shown are gross of fees" in 8pt font. Net returns buried on page 37 of PPM.
3. Testimonials & Endorsements: Compensation Disclosure
Rule: If using investor testimonials or influencer endorsements, advisers must: (a) disclose any compensation provided, (b) disclose that the endorser is a current client (if applicable), (c) include statement that testimonial may not be representative of all client experiences.
Red Flag: Social media "influencers" promoting alternative investments without #ad or #sponsored disclosure. Video testimonials from "satisfied investors" without compensation disclosure.
Example Scenario: Real estate syndicator pays $5,000 to financial influencer for Instagram post promoting their fund. Post must disclose: (1) compensation received, (2) whether influencer is actually invested, (3) "results not typical" disclaimer.
4. Material Facts: Context & Limitations Required
Rule: Advisers cannot make statements that are materially misleading by omission. Must provide context, limitations, and risk factors alongside performance claims.
Red Flag: Showing fund performance during bull market (2017-2021) without disclosing performance during prior downturn. Cherry-picking best vintage years without showing full track record.
Example: Private credit fund shows "0% default rate" but omits that fund is only 18 months old and holds primarily short-term (6-12 month) loans. Context matters.
Compliance Requirement
Advisers must maintain written policies and procedures for reviewing all marketing materials. Someone (typically CCO or compliance officer) must approve materials before use. Advisers must retain copies of all advertisements for 5 years from last date of use.
Real Estate Syndicator Fined $125,000 for Marketing Rule Violations
In 2023, the SEC sanctioned a real estate syndication sponsor for multiple Marketing Rule violations discovered during routine examination.
Violation 1: Gross-Only Performance
Website showed "22% average annual returns" in large font. Net returns (after 2% management fee and 20% carry) were 14% but only disclosed in footnote. SEC found this violated equal prominence requirement.
Violation 2: Unsubstantiated Claims
Marketing materials claimed "conservative underwriting" and "below-market risk" without objective basis. Comparison to market benchmarks was not documented or reasonable.
Violation 3: Undisclosed Testimonial Compensation
Five investor testimonials on website did not disclose that investors received fee discounts (1.5% vs 2% management fee) in exchange for testimonial. Also failed to include "not representative" disclaimer.
Outcome: $125,000 civil penalty, mandatory compliance consultant engagement, and required submission of all marketing materials for SEC pre-approval for 2 years. Sponsor's reputation significantly damaged.
Source: SEC Administrative Proceeding 2023-089 (details anonymized). Demonstrates SEC's active enforcement of Marketing Rule.
The 2024-2025 Private Fund Adviser Rules
The SEC adopted comprehensive Private Fund Adviser Rules in August 2023, with compliance dates phased through September 2024 and March 2025. These rules represent the most significant regulatory change for alternative investments in over a decade, fundamentally increasing transparency and limiting preferential treatment.
Rule 1: Quarterly Statement Requirements
Compliance Date: May 15, 2024 (for fiscal quarters beginning on/after November 15, 2024)
What Must Be Disclosed Quarterly:
1. Fund-Level Fees and Expenses
- •Management fees (dollar amount, not just percentage)
- •Performance fees (carried interest allocated or paid)
- •Organizational and offering expenses
- •Legal, accounting, and compliance fees
- •Administrator and custodian fees
2. Portfolio Investment-Level Fees
- •Fees paid by portfolio companies to the adviser (e.g., transaction fees, monitoring fees, director fees)
- •Break-up fees, consulting fees, or other compensation received
- •Whether fees were offset against management fees or retained by adviser
3. Performance Metrics (Net of Fees)
- •Annual net total return for prior 1, 5, and 10 year periods
- •Inception-to-date net total return
- •For illiquid funds: gross IRR and gross MOIC (multiple on invested capital)
4. Adviser Performance Compensation
- •Detailed calculation of carried interest and how it was determined
- •Any "catch-up" provisions and how they affected distribution
Why This Matters
Before these rules, many private funds disclosed fees only annually or in vague percentage terms. Quarterly dollar-amount disclosure makes fee burden transparent and allows investors to identify excessive expenses, undisclosed portfolio company fees, and carried interest calculations that favor the GP.
Rule 2: Mandatory Annual Fund Audit
Compliance Date: For fiscal years beginning on/after March 15, 2025
Audit Requirements:
- Annual financial statement audit by independent public accountant (PCAOB-registered preferred)
- Audited financials must be distributed within 120 days of fiscal year-end
- Audit must be conducted in accordance with GAAP or, for non-U.S. funds, a comprehensive basis of accounting used in jurisdiction
- Upon liquidation, final audited financials required within 1 year
Exemptions (Limited)
Funds are exempt from annual audit requirement if:
- •Fund is subject to financial statement audit requirement under ERISA
- •Fund is a registered investment company (1940 Act fund) or business development company (already audited)
Most private funds do NOT qualify for exemptions and must conduct annual audits.
Compliance Red Flag
If a fund launched after March 15, 2025 claims "we're working on getting an audit": This is non-compliant. The rule is mandatory, not optional. Funds have 120 days post-fiscal year-end to deliver audited financials. Failure to audit = violation.
Rule 3: Preferential Treatment & Side Letter Restrictions
Compliance Date: September 14, 2024
What Is Prohibited:
Prohibited: Redemption/Liquidity Preferences That Harm Others
Advisers cannot provide certain investors with preferential redemption or liquidity rights if it would have a material, negative effect on other investors.
Example: Giving "Investor A" quarterly redemption rights while all other LPs have 3-year lock-ups creates run-on-the-bank risk and is prohibited.
Prohibited: Preferential Information Access That Harms Others
Advisers cannot provide certain investors with information about portfolio holdings or positions if it would negatively affect other investors.
Example: Giving "Investor B" real-time portfolio updates allowing them to front-run redemptions while other investors receive quarterly reports is prohibited.
Allowed: Side Letters With Transparency
Side letters are still permitted for things like fee reductions (for large commitments), excuse rights, or non-material terms—BUT all side letters must be disclosed to all investors.
Disclosure Requirement: If ANY investor receives a side letter, the adviser must deliver written notice to all other investors describing the material terms within 45 days.
Investor Action
Request all side letters: You have the right to see summaries of all side letter terms affecting the fund. If sponsor refuses or claims "that's confidential," they may be violating the preferential treatment rule. Transparency is now mandatory.
Rule 4: Restricted Fee Practices
Certain fee practices that reduce transparency or shift costs inappropriately to investors are now prohibited.
Prohibited: Charging Regulatory/Compliance Costs to the Fund
Advisers cannot charge investigation costs, regulatory fines, or settlements to the fund. These are business costs of the adviser and must be absorbed by the GP, not passed to LPs.
Prohibited: Non-Pro-Rata Fee Reductions for "Clawback" Payments
If GP must return carried interest (clawback), adviser cannot reduce future management fees on a non-pro-rata basis to recoup the clawback amount unless all investors agree in writing.
Restricted: Borrowing from the Fund
Advisers cannot borrow money, securities, or other fund assets unless every investor receives written notice and adviser receives fairness opinion confirming terms are fair.
Rule 5: Adviser-Led Secondary Transactions (Fairness Opinion Requirement)
When advisers lead secondary transactions (continuation funds, tender offers, or other transactions where adviser has conflict of interest), strict disclosure and fairness opinion requirements apply.
Required Disclosures:
- Written notice to all investors describing the transaction and adviser's financial interests
- Fairness opinion from independent financial expert evaluating whether transaction is fair to LPs
- Summary of material business relationships between adviser and opinion provider (last 2 years)
What Is an Adviser-Led Secondary?
Common in private equity: instead of selling portfolio company to third party, GP creates new "continuation fund" and transfers assets into it. Existing LPs can either: (a) sell their stake at valuation set by GP, or (b) roll into continuation fund with new fees/terms. High conflict of interest—GP controls both sides of transaction.
Red Flag
If adviser proposes secondary without fairness opinion:This is a violation. Fairness opinions are not optional—they are mandatory for adviser-led secondaries. Lack of opinion suggests adviser is avoiding independent validation of terms.
Disclosure Standards: What Must Be in the PPM
The Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) is the foundational disclosure document for alternative investments. While no single template is required, SEC anti-fraud rules demand comprehensive, accurate, and non-misleading disclosures. Generic or boilerplate PPMs are red flags.
1. Risk Factors: Deal-Specific vs. Boilerplate
Every PPM must include a "Risk Factors" section. However, copy-pasted generic risks signal sponsor lacks institutional sophistication or is hiding deal-specific concerns.
Deal-Specific Risk Factors (Good)
- •"This property's main tenant (40% of NOI) has lease expiring in 18 months with no renewal option secured"
- •"GP has no prior experience managing farmland assets; this is first agricultural investment"
- •"Fund's largest position (25% of NAV) is in pre-revenue biotech with binary FDA approval risk"
- •"Property requires $2M in deferred maintenance; construction cost overruns could exceed reserves"
These risks are asset-specific, quantified where possible, and reveal actual vulnerabilities.
Boilerplate Risk Factors (Red Flag)
- •"Real estate investments are subject to market volatility"
- •"Past performance is not indicative of future results"
- •"There is no guarantee the investment will be profitable"
- •"Economic conditions may adversely affect returns"
These risks apply to every investment ever made. Zero specificity = insufficient disclosure.
The "Count the Risks" Test
Read the Risk Factors section and count how many risks are specific to THIS deal vs. generic. If more than 50% are boilerplate, the sponsor either: (a) doesn't understand their own risks, or (b) is intentionally obscuring them. Both are disqualifying.
2. Conflicts of Interest: Affiliated Service Providers
Conflicts of interest are common in alternatives—what matters is disclosure and mitigation. Red flags emerge when conflicts are buried, minimized, or not disclosed at all.
Common Conflict: Sponsor Uses Own Construction Company
Scenario: Real estate syndicator owns construction firm. Syndicator hires own company to perform $1.5M renovation on fund property at market-rate pricing.
Proper Disclosure: PPM states:
- • Sponsor owns ABC Construction (entity name, ownership %)
- • ABC Construction may be hired for property renovations
- • Pricing will be based on competitive bids from 2-3 contractors
- • Sponsor has incentive to maximize construction fees vs. minimize costs
- • Independent property manager will oversee work quality
Red Flag: Buried or Absent Conflict Disclosure
Warning Signs:
- PPM mentions "affiliated entities" without naming them or disclosing ownership structure
- Conflict buried on page 67 in 8pt font footnote, not highlighted in summary
- No disclosure that property manager, legal counsel, or other service providers are related parties
- Sponsor claims "we use best-in-class service providers" but doesn't disclose they own them
Investor Action
Ask directly: "Do you, any GP, or any affiliate own or receive compensation from any service provider (legal, accounting, construction, property management, brokerage) being used by this fund?" Evasive or incomplete answers are walk-away signals.
3. Fee Transparency: The Distribution Waterfall
The distribution waterfall defines who gets paid and when. Opaque or complex waterfalls hide excessive fees and GP-favorable terms.
Example: Clear Distribution Waterfall
Return of Capital
100% to LPs until all invested capital returned
Preferred Return (8% Hurdle)
100% to LPs until cumulative 8% annual return achieved
GP Catch-Up
100% to GP until GP has received 20% of total profits (catch-up to 80/20 split)
Carried Interest Split
80% to LPs, 20% to GP for all remaining distributions
Red Flags in Waterfall Structure
- No hurdle rate: GP receives carried interest from first dollar of profit without preferred return threshold
- Excessive catch-up: GP gets 150% or 200% of distributions during catch-up phase (standard is 100%)
- Vague language: "Distributions will be made at GP's discretion based on fund performance" without specific mechanics
- Hidden fees: Waterfall doesn't specify whether management fees are paid before or after preferred return calculation
Due Diligence Question
Ask sponsor to model waterfall with scenarios:"Show me distribution splits at 10%, 15%, and 20% IRR." If sponsor can't provide clear numerical examples, the waterfall is either intentionally opaque or poorly designed.
Compliance Due Diligence Checklist for Investors
Use this step-by-step checklist to verify regulatory compliance before committing capital. Each step includes specific databases, search methods, and red flags to watch for.
1Request Form ADV Part 2A (The "Firm Brochure")
What to Request:
Ask sponsor: "Please provide your most recent Form ADV Part 2A filed with the SEC." This is the firm brochure containing business practices, fees, conflicts, and disciplinary history.
How to Verify Online:
- 1.Visit SEC IAPD: adviserinfo.sec.gov
- 2.Search by firm name or CRD number
- 3.Download complete Form ADV (Part 1 and Part 2A/2B)
- 4.Verify filing date is within past 12 months (annual update required)
What to Look For in Part 2A:
- Item 4 (Advisory Business): Types of clients, AUM, investment strategies
- Item 5 (Fees): Management fee structure, performance fees, other compensation
- Item 9 (Disciplinary Information): Any "Yes" answers require investigation
- Item 11 (Code of Ethics, Participation): Personal trading policies, affiliated transactions
2Verify Form D Filing on SEC EDGAR
Why This Matters:
Form D is required notice of Reg D private placement. Failure to file Form D is a violation and may disqualify offering from exemption protections. Verify filing is current and accurate.
How to Check:
- 1.Visit SEC EDGAR: sec.gov/edgar
- 2.Search for sponsor company name or CIK number
- 3.Look for "Form D" filings matching the fund you're considering
- 4.Verify filing date is within 15 days of first sale
What Form D Reveals:
- Total offering amount and amount already sold
- Whether offering is 506(b) or 506(c)
- Names and addresses of related persons (executives/promoters)
- Intended use of proceeds
Red Flag: No Form D Filed
If you cannot find Form D for the offering on EDGAR, ask sponsor directly for confirmation and filing number. If sponsor claims "we don't need to file Form D," this is almost certainly wrong. Walk away.
3Check "Bad Actor" Disqualification Status
What Is Bad Actor Disqualification?
SEC Rule 506(d) disqualifies offerings from Reg D exemption if certain "covered persons" (issuer, directors, officers, general partners, beneficial owners with 20%+ interest) have specific criminal convictions, regulatory sanctions, or court orders.
How to Check Principals:
- 1.
FINRA BrokerCheck
Visit brokercheck.finra.org and search each principal by name
- 2.
SEC Litigation Releases
Search sec.gov/litigation for enforcement actions involving principals
- 3.
State Securities Regulators
Check NASAA investor protection website for state enforcement actions
- 4.
Federal Court Records (PACER)
Search for bankruptcy filings, criminal cases, or civil fraud allegations
Disqualifying Events Include:
- Criminal conviction related to securities fraud or false statements
- SEC or state securities regulator final order (within past 10 years for felonies, 5 years for misdemeanors)
- Suspension or expulsion from broker-dealer or investment adviser registration
- Final order based on fraudulent, manipulative, or deceptive conduct
Critical
If any principal has a disqualifying event, the ENTIRE offering loses Reg D exemption. This means securities are being sold illegally. Investors may have rescission rights (right to demand return of capital). Walk away immediately.
Compliance Due Diligence: Quick Reference
| Check | Where to Look | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| SEC Registration | adviserinfo.sec.gov | Not registered or ERA claiming full RIA status |
| Form D Filing | sec.gov/edgar | No filing found or filed late (15+ days after first sale) |
| Disciplinary History | Form ADV Item 9, BrokerCheck | Recent sanctions, undisclosed violations |
| Bad Actor Status | FINRA, SEC litigation releases | Criminal convictions, regulatory bars, fraud findings |
| Performance Claims | Marketing materials vs. audited financials | Gross-only returns, unsubstantiated projections |
| Quarterly Statements | Request from sponsor (2024-2025 rule) | Refusal to provide or vague fee disclosures |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Reg D 506(b) and 506(c) offerings?
Reg D 506(b) prohibits general solicitation and allows sponsors to accept up to 35 non-accredited investors (though most don't). Verification of accredited status is not required. Reg D 506(c) permits general solicitation and advertising but restricts sales to accredited investors only, with mandatory third-party verification of accredited status. Most private placements use 506(b) to avoid verification costs.
What are the SEC Private Fund Adviser Rules for 2024-2025?
The SEC Private Fund Adviser Rules require quarterly statements disclosing all fees and expenses, mandate annual fund audits, restrict preferential treatment through side letters, prohibit certain fee arrangements, and require fairness opinions for adviser-led secondaries. These rules apply to SEC-registered investment advisers managing private funds and significantly increase transparency and investor protections.
What is the SEC Marketing Rule and how does it affect alternative investments?
The SEC Marketing Rule requires investment advisers to substantiate all performance claims with reasonable basis, show net-of-fees performance with equal prominence to gross returns, disclose all material facts when using testimonials or endorsements, and maintain policies for reviewing marketing materials. This prevents misleading performance advertising common in alternative investments.
How do I verify if a private fund is registered with the SEC?
Check the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website to search for the adviser's Form ADV. Verify the Form D filing for the specific fund offering on the SEC's EDGAR database. Review Form ADV Part 2A (the firm brochure) for disciplinary history, conflicts of interest, and fee structures. Confirm the adviser's registration status and any regulatory actions.
Is a real estate syndication considered a security under SEC rules?
Yes. Real estate syndications typically meet the definition of a security under the Howey Test (investment of money in a common enterprise with expectation of profits derived from efforts of others). This means they must either: (1) register with the SEC, or (2) qualify for an exemption (usually Reg D 506(b) or 506(c)). Syndicators claiming 'this isn't a security' to avoid registration are violating federal law.
What are accredited investor verification requirements under Reg D 506(c)?
Under Rule 506(c), sponsors must take reasonable steps to verify accredited status through third-party verification. Acceptable methods include: reviewing IRS tax returns (Form 1040) for prior 2 years showing $200K+ income ($300K+ joint) with reasonable expectation of same in current year, obtaining written confirmation from registered broker-dealer, SEC-registered investment adviser, licensed attorney, or CPA that they have verified accredited status within prior 90 days, or reviewing account statements showing $1M+ net worth (excluding primary residence). Self-certification alone does NOT satisfy 506(c) verification requirements.
What marketing materials require SEC Marketing Rule substantiation?
ANY statement that could be considered an advertisement requires substantiation. This includes: website content (homepage, about page, investment strategy descriptions), social media posts (LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook), email campaigns and newsletters, pitch decks and investor presentations, video content (YouTube, webinars, promotional videos), and testimonials from clients (paid or unpaid). Exemptions: One-on-one communications and live oral presentations to a single client are not considered advertisements. However, once recorded or distributed broadly, substantiation rules apply.
Related Due Diligence Resources
Due Diligence Framework
Comprehensive guide to evaluating alternative investment managers, reviewing offering documents, and conducting operational due diligence.
View FrameworkRisk & Red Flags
Learn to identify walk-away signals, manager risk, operational failures, and structural red flags before committing capital.
Learn MoreTax Treatment Guide
K-1 partnerships, UBTI, capital gains treatment, and tax-efficient structures for alternative asset allocations.
Explore Tax StrategiesPlatform Reviews
In-depth analysis of alternative investment platforms, applying compliance and risk frameworks to real offerings.
View PlatformsCompliance Is Not Paperwork—It's Investor Protection
The 2024-2025 SEC Private Fund Adviser Rules represent a fundamental shift toward transparency. Sponsors who resist quarterly disclosures, audit requirements, and preferential treatment restrictions reveal their priorities. Choose managers who embrace regulation as investor protection, not obstacle.
Critical Distinction: Regulatory compliance protects against fraud, operational failures, and disclosure deficiencies. It does not protect against poor investment strategy, market risk, or manager underperformance.
A fully compliant sponsor can still exhibit red flags in manager alignment, operational infrastructure, or fee structures. Compliance is the foundation—not the ceiling—of due diligence.
Next: Risk & Red Flags FrameworkImportant Links:
Disclaimer: This content is educational and does not constitute legal, investment, or tax advice. Consult qualified professionals for guidance on specific situations. Information current as of December 2024.