Change of Control Provisions

Private Credit & Direct Lending

Definition

Change of Control provisions are debt covenants triggered when borrower ownership structure changes materially—typically defined as: (1) Sponsor ownership falling below 35-50% threshold, (2) Sale of company to unrelated third party, (3) Merger where existing shareholders don't control resulting entity, (4) Sale of substantially all assets (typically >35% of asset base), or (5) Change in board control. Upon trigger, typical remedies include: mandatory prepayment offer at 101-102% of par, event of default requiring lender consent to proceed, ratcheting interest rates (additional 200-300 bps), or automatic acceleration. Provisions protect lenders from credit deterioration following ownership changes and provide exit opportunity when underwritten sponsor/management team departs.

Why it matters

Change of control provisions determine sponsor flexibility for exits and portfolio company sales—directly impacting private equity fund liquidity and returns. During 2017-2022 PE boom, sponsors frequently negotiated 'portability' provisions allowing company sales without loan prepayment (loan transfers to buyer, avoiding 101% repayment premium). Without portability, $100M sale might require $50M debt repayment at 101% = $50.5M cash outflow reducing sponsor proceeds $50.5M. With portability, debt transfers to buyer, sponsor receives full $100M. This difference can swing transaction IRRs by 300-500 bps. For direct lenders, change of control provisions provide crucial exit rights—if company sold to weaker sponsor or merged with deteriorating business, lenders can demand repayment rather than continuing exposure. Understanding these mechanics explains why some sponsors pay 50-75 bps premium for portable debt—flexibility worth $2-3M on $50M loan over 5 years.

Common misconceptions

  • Change of control doesn't automatically terminate debt—it creates option for lenders to demand prepayment or withhold consent. Many transactions complete with debt transferring to new owner.
  • 101% prepayment premium isn't penalty—it's negotiated consideration for lenders giving up favorable credit they underwrote. Compensates for lost yield and prepayment optionality.
  • Not all ownership changes trigger provisions. Sponsor selling 20% stake to co-investor typically exempt. Only material control changes (crossing 35-50% threshold or complete sponsor exit) trigger provisions.

Technical details

Change of control definitions and triggers

Ownership threshold triggers: Most common definition: sponsor ownership falling below 35% of voting equity (some deals 40-50% threshold). Example: PE firm owns 60% of company post-LBO. Sells 30% through secondary sale to new investor. Sponsor now owns 30% (below 35% threshold) → change of control triggered. Alternatively, sponsor sells company entirely to strategic buyer → clear change of control regardless of percentages.

Board control tests: Alternative definition focuses on board composition. Change of control if sponsor loses right to elect majority of board or designate key officers (CEO, CFO). Useful for structures with dual-class shares or complex voting arrangements. Example: Sponsor owns 40% equity but maintains 60% voting rights through Class B shares. Selling Class B shares triggering board loss constitutes change of control even if economic ownership stable.

Asset sale triggers: Sale of 'substantially all' assets typically defined as >35-50% of consolidated assets or >50% of EBITDA. Prevents borrower from avoiding change of control by selling company in pieces rather than single transaction. Example: Company with three divisions generating $10M EBITDA each. Selling two divisions ($20M of $30M EBITDA) triggers change of control even though parent company continues operating remaining division.

Permitted transfers and exemptions: Typically exclude from change of control: (1) Transfers among sponsor's affiliated funds, (2) Public market purchases by unaffiliated investors below 10% threshold, (3) Estate planning and charitable transfers by founders, (4) Pledge of equity to secure sponsor-level debt (as long as no foreclosure), (5) IPO or SPAC transaction where sponsor maintains >35% ownership post-transaction. These carve-outs provide sponsor operational flexibility without triggering provisions.

Remedies and lender rights upon trigger

Mandatory prepayment offers: Most common remedy—borrower must offer to prepay 100% of outstanding principal at 101-102% of par within 30-60 days of change of control. Each lender decides individually whether to accept. Example: $100M loan outstanding. Borrower offers 101% prepayment ($101M). 70% of lenders accept ($70.7M payment), 30% remain ($30M outstanding). Borrower must fund accepted amounts from transaction proceeds or equity.

Consent rights and event of default: Some facilities make change of control an event of default requiring affirmative lender consent (majority or supermajority). Gives lenders negotiating leverage—can demand fee (25-50 bps), interest rate increase (25-50 bps), or amortization schedule changes as condition of consent. Sponsor faces binary choice: meet lender demands or restructure transaction to avoid trigger.

Automatic acceleration provisions: Aggressive terms make change of control an automatic event of default triggering immediate acceleration of all debt. Rare in modern sponsored deals but common in non-sponsor middle market. Creates blocking right—transaction cannot proceed without refinancing entire debt stack. Forces borrower to refinance at market rates (often higher than existing deal), potentially killing transaction economics.

Step-up pricing: Alternative to prepayment—interest rate increases 200-300 bps upon change of control. Allows transaction to proceed with debt remaining in place but at penalty rate. Example: Existing loan at L+400. Upon change of control, rate increases to L+650 for remaining loan life. Present value loss to borrower ~$10M on $100M loan over 5 years—substantial penalty but avoids upfront repayment.

Portability provisions and sponsor negotiations

Sponsor-to-sponsor portability: Allows debt to transfer to qualified buyers without triggering change of control. Typically requires: (1) Buyer is 'approved sponsor' (institutional PE firm with $1B+ AUM), (2) Pro forma leverage maintained or reduced, (3) No diminution in collateral value, (4) Buyer assumes all borrower obligations. Example: Apollo sells portfolio company to KKR for $200M. Debt portable, transfers to KKR without prepayment. Seller receives full $200M, buyer assumes $100M debt.

Restricted vs unrestricted portability: Restricted portability limits transfers to pre-approved sponsor list or sponsors meeting credit criteria. Unrestricted portability allows transfers to any buyer maintaining financial covenants. Unrestricted typically costs 50-75 bps in upfront fees or ongoing spread. Restricted more common—balances sponsor flexibility with lender credit protection.

Strategic buyer exclusions: Portability often excludes strategic/corporate buyers—only allows sponsor-to-sponsor transfers. Rationale: corporate buyers may have existing debt obligations, integration risks, or weaker covenant packages. Lenders prefer portfolio company maintaining standalone credit profile with financial sponsor backing. Strategic sale triggers full repayment offer.

IPO carve-outs: Portability may extend to IPOs if sponsor maintains minimum ownership (35-40%) post-transaction. Allows company to go public without prepaying debt. Example: Sponsor takes company public, retains 45% ownership. Loan remains outstanding as public company debt. If sponsor subsequently sells below 35%, change of control triggers. Creates two-step exit path—IPO first, sponsor sell-down second after debt refinanced in public markets.

Negotiation dynamics and market standards

Leverage in negotiations: Sponsor leverage strongest in competitive deals with multiple lender bids. Can negotiate full portability, high prepayment premiums (102-103%), and wide permitted transfer exceptions. Lender leverage strongest in sole-source situations or when borrower needs lender relationship for future financings. Results in restrictive change of control with limited portability and event of default triggers.

Market standard evolution: 2010-2015: Change of control typically event of default, limited portability, 101% prepayment. 2016-2022: Portability became standard for institutional sponsors, prepayment offers instead of defaults. 2023-2025: Pendulum swinging back to lenders—restricted portability (pre-approved list), lower premiums (101%), more transfer restrictions. Reflects lender negotiating power in tighter markets.

Strategic considerations: Sponsors evaluate change of control provisions at portfolio company acquisition. More restrictive provisions reduce exit optionality and increase hold period risk (if can't sell without refinancing debt). Sponsors may pay 25-50 bps higher interest rate for portable debt—present value ~$5M cost on $100M loan but worth it for $50.5M prepayment savings at exit. Math: 50 bps × 5 years × $100M = $2.5M cost vs $50.5M prepayment = obvious benefit.

Lender mitigation strategies: Direct lenders protect against portability risk through: (1) Minimum equity requirements for transferee (40%+ sponsor equity), (2) Financial covenant tightening upon transfer, (3) One-time consent fees (25-50 bps), (4) Approval rights over transferee identity, (5) Enhanced reporting requirements post-transfer. These provisions balance sponsor flexibility with lender credit protection—allows transfers but with guardrails ensuring credit quality maintenance.

Related Terms

See in context