Percent
Percent reports a 0.90% charge-off rate on its public track record page, and it remains accurate — realized losses are still just 12 deals. What AltStreet's full-platform captures (all 1,125 deals as of October 6, 2026) find is the part the public page doesn't surface: deals in workout or reperforming rose from 49 in May to 70 in August and 72 in October, holding the lifetime distress rate, workouts and charge-offs combined, at 7.5% by count. Every new distressed deal since May is an unrealized workout, not a charge-off; the two added since August are both Edly student-loan notes. Both numbers matter; only one is foregrounded on the public track-record and deal-page interface.

No platform response on record for this review. Is this your platform? Respond or claim it.
What the data actually shows - TL;DR
Percent carries the strongest regulated infrastructure AltStreet has documented among direct-deal private-credit marketplaces: SEC-registered broker-dealer since August 2023, FINRA member, three years of annual reports filed on Form X-17A-5, $2.02B funded across 1,125 deals, 60,000+ investors, and a self-reported 0.90% charge-off rate that AltStreet's $-weighted analysis confirms at 1.10%. The platform's edge versus competing private credit marketplaces is real — structured Credit Snapshot rubrics, deal-level surveillance reports, third-party underwriter disclosures, and the new (Feb 2026) secondary market.
Read the full assessmentShow less
The friction point: deal-state transitions like Workout exist in the investor-api but are not surfaced on the public deal page UI, and the trajectory is now visible — workouts rose from 49 to 70 between AltStreet's May and August 2026 captures and to 72 by October 6. The headline charge-off rate is accurate. The lifetime distress rate, which includes deals in active workout, is 7.47%, not visible on the deal-by-deal interface.
Lifetime funded across all deals from 12/28/2018 through capture date (2026-10-06, AltStreet's scheduled scraper). Percent's own page reports $1.95B / 1,048 deals as of 3/31/26; the delta reflects continued funding since.
Charge-off rate. 0.90% is Percent's self-reported figure (3/31/26). AltStreet's full-deal-book recalculation yields 1.10% by $ on completed deals (October 2026); both methodologies confirm strong realized credit performance. Still 12 charged-off deals: none of the new distress since May has become a realized loss.
Lifetime distress rate, workout plus charge-off, by count, across all 1,125 deals (4.35% by $). Includes 72 workouts and reperforming deals where the final outcome is not yet realized, up from 49 in May 2026 and 70 in August. This is not surfaced on individual deal pages.
Distress rate by advertised coupon band: 2.1% for deals under 14%, rising monotonically to 26% at 20-22% coupons and 45% above 24%. The coupon prices the risk — yield-chasing on this platform has measurably ended badly.
Investor Service Fee — Percent retains 10% of every interest payment to investors as servicing fee. Uniform across all 575 deals where disclosure was found. Net coupon ≈ headline × 0.9.
AltStreet tracks all 1,125 Percent deals via authenticated /investor-api captures (directory + body + borrower endpoints; 2026-05-29 baseline, 2026-08-04/05 refresh, 2026-10-06 scheduled capture, with state-transition diffing), plus Percent's own /our-track-record-of-performance disclosures (3/31/26), plus SEC EDGAR for Percent Securities LLC (CIK 0001863789, annual Form X-17A-5 filings FY2023-FY2025).
What's Actually Happening
In plain English, here is what is actually happening.
- 1You are lending money to private companies (or their loan books) for 6-36 months at high interest rates — typically 14-18% annualized coupons.
- 2Percent acts as the broker-dealer arranging each loan, packaging it as a structured note inside its own LLC, and selling slices to you and other accredited investors at $500 minimums.
- 3You receive monthly interest payments. Percent retains 10% of that interest as its servicing fee, so a 16% headline coupon means roughly 14.4% net to you.
- 4Most deals are asset-based — the loan is backed by inventory, receivables, equipment, or merchant cash advances. Some are corporate loans backed only by the borrower's credit.
- 5When deals go bad, you may see partial recovery (workout), full recovery after delay (reperforming), or partial loss (charge-off). On the platform's history, 0.90% of deals end in charge-off — low relative to many public high-yield default benchmarks, though methodologies are not directly comparable.
Quick Verdict
Is this platform right for you?
Percent gives accredited investors direct private credit access with a $500 minimum, monthly distributions, and a registered broker-dealer wrapper that most marketplace competitors lack. Realized losses have been low: $2.02B funded across 1,125 deals (854 repaid in full in AltStreet's 10/6/26 capture), with just 12 charge-offs under either Percent's or AltStreet's methodology.
Read the full assessmentShow less
The friction is that workout states exist in the underlying API but are not displayed on the public deal-page UI — and the workout count is rising (49 in May 2026, 70 in August). Distress also concentrates sharply by financing type, coupon band, and underwriter, detailed in the data insights below. The platform is well-suited for accredited investors with $25K-$100K building a 20-deal diversified portfolio across asset-based deals, sized by underwriter quality, coupon band, and deal type.
Best for
- Accredited investors with $25K-$100K seeking diversified private credit exposure through 20-50 deals across multiple borrowers and asset types
- Investors prioritizing short-duration credit (6-36 months) over multi-year private equity-style commitments to capture current high coupon rates
- Investors comfortable evaluating deal-level credit metrics (overcollateralization, simple loss coverage, TTM default rate) on a per-deal basis
- RIAs and family offices with $1M+ allocating via Percent's Separately Managed Account product (1% annual management fee on committed capital)
Avoid if
- You need genuine liquidity within 12 months — the secondary market (Feb 2026 launch) is too new to depend on for guaranteed exit
- Your available capital is under $5K — meaningful diversification across 10+ deals requires $5K-$10K minimum, and concentration risk on single deals is binary
- You hold significant taxable assets in high-tax states — ordinary interest income at 50%+ effective tax rates dramatically erodes the headline 14-18% coupon
- You want passive set-and-forget exposure — marketplace deals require ongoing evaluation of new offerings, monitoring, and reinvestment decisions
Top strengths
- FINRA-supervised broker-dealer (Percent Securities, LLC, SEC CIK 0001863789, three years of compliant X-17A-5 filings) — institutional credibility most marketplaces lack
- $2.02B funded across 1,125 deals since 2018 with 854 repaid in full (AltStreet 10/6/26 capture), a substantial track record, with realized losses still at just 12 deals
- Deal-level Credit Snapshot rubric (10-criterion structured disclosure) on modern deals — includes overcollateralization %, cash reserve %, simple loss coverage multiple, TTM default rate
- Secondary market launched February 2026 — order book with bid/ask depth charts gives some deals genuine pre-maturity liquidity (~4.3% of deals enabled at the May 2026 capture)
Key limitations
- Deal-state transitions (Workout, Charged Off) are exposed in the investor-api but not surfaced on the public deal-page UI — and the workout count rose from 49 in May 2026 to 70 in August and 72 in October
- Corporate Loan deals carried 25.35% distress vs 3.79% for Asset-Based (May 2026 capture) — investors must underwrite by financing type, not at the platform aggregate
- Third-party underwriter quality varies dramatically: Aluna Partners 31.58% distress vs Percent self-underwritten 4.42%, relevant for the 31.6% of platform deals not underwritten by Percent itself
- Tax inefficiency — all coupon income is ordinary interest taxed at marginal rates plus 3.8% NIIT for high earners, materially eroding after-tax returns in taxable accounts
Video Review
Percent Review Video
A short video breakdown of Percent's private credit marketplace, historical performance data, workout exposure, secondary market, and the risks to understand before investing.
Where It Fits
Where Percent fits relative to the alternatives.
Marketplace direct deals
If you want
Pick your own private credit deals deal-by-deal, $500 minimums, see borrower-level data
Use
Percent marketplace — accredited investors, monthly distributions, secondary market for some deals
Managed private credit
If you want
Hands-off institutional management of a private credit portfolio with $1M+ to deploy
Use
Percent Separately Managed Accounts (1% annual fee) — built on the same deal universe
Liquid public credit exposure
If you want
Daily liquidity, no accreditation, and broader diversification across hundreds of bonds
Use
BDCs like ARCC, MAIN, or HYG / JNK high-yield bond ETFs — public market correlation tradeoff
Compare Before Deciding
Where Percent fits against alternatives
Use these hooks to pressure-test whether this is the right platform, or whether a nearby alternative matches the job better.
How this compares to EquityMultiple
EquityMultiple
Accredited-only commercial real estate platform spanning Alpine Notes, Ascent Income Fund, and EMIP equity vehicles. The Percent vs EquityMultiple guide compares private credit notes against CRE debt and equity across fees, tax reporting, liquidity, and disclosure architecture.
How this compares to Willow Wealth
Willow Wealth
Rebranded Yieldstreet multi-asset marketplace with broader asset class coverage (real estate, art, legal finance, transportation) vs. Percent's private credit focus. The Percent vs Willow Wealth guide compares the two across track record, charge-offs, regulatory history, disclosure, taxes, and liquidity.
How this compares to Cadre
Cadre
Institutional-quality commercial real estate platform for accredited investors. Complementary asset class (real estate equity vs. Percent's private credit debt) enabling cross-platform diversification but fundamentally different structure — direct property ownership vs. debt obligations, longer hold periods (5-10 years vs. 6-36 months).
Quick Answers
What most investors want to know first
The highest-signal facts first: minimums, liquidity reality, K-1 timing, and whether distributions are actually part of the experience.
Liquidity
Secondary Market launched February 2026 with order book infrastructure. Enabled on approximately 4.3% of deals as of capture date. Order-book depth, execution spreads, and completion rates are not publicly disclosed. Treat as optional upside, not primary exit path.
K-1 Timing
Default delivery is 1099-INT by January 31; K-1 for the 48 fund/SMA-structure deals may extend depending on the underlying fund close cycle.
Distributions
Monthly interest payments per the deal terms. Principal amortization begins after the initial interest-only period (typically 1-4 months from close).
Overview
Platform Overview
A concise read on what the platform is, how the structure works, and where the practical friction shows up for real investors.
Private credit marketplace and SEC-registered broker-dealer (Percent Securities, LLC, FINRA member since August 2023, SEC CIK 0001863789) connecting 60,000+ accredited investors with short-duration alternative lending opportunities unavailable through traditional banks. Platform sources asset-based financings (consumer loans, SMB lending, merchant cash advances, discounted receivables, equipment leases, litigation finance), corporate loans, and fund structures from specialty lenders and originators worldwide, structures each deal as a dedicated Delaware Series LLC under Cadence Group Platform, LLC, and facilitates investor access through (a) the marketplace at $500 minimums per deal with self-directed allocation, or (b) Separately Managed Accounts at $1M+ minimums with 1% annual management on committed capital. Since 2018 inception through 2026-10-06, AltStreet has documented $2.02B funded across 1,125 deals, 854 repaid in full (75.9%), 174 currently outstanding and performing, 70 in active workout or restructuring, 12 charged off, 8 in active funding.
Historical weighted-average coupon: 14.76% (Percent disclosure, 3/31/26); average advertised yield 14.24% on exited deals vs 16.39% on the currently outstanding book (AltStreet ingest). Secondary market launched February 2026 with order book and bid/ask depth charts — enabled on approximately 4.3% of deals at the May 2026 capture.
The platform operates as Percent Securities, LLC — an SEC-registered, FINRA-member broker-dealer (since August 2023, SEC CIK 0001863789) — and has facilitated $2.02B across 1,125 deals from December 2018 through October 2026. Investors access deals at $500 per-deal minimums via the marketplace, or delegate to professional management via Separately Managed Accounts at $1M+. Returns are paid as monthly interest at headline coupons of 10-20% (weighted-average 14.76% historical), less the platform's 10% Investor Service Fee.
Realized charge-off rates are genuinely strong — 0.90% per Percent's own track-record disclosures, 1.10% by AltStreet's $-weighted recalculation, while unrealized distress is rising: 72 workouts and reperforming deals in October 2026, up from 49 in May and 70 in August. Secondary market launched February 2026.
Investment Structures
Marketplace ($500 per deal, self-directed) | SMA ($1M+ minimum, 1% annual management fee)
Platform Scale (AltStreet capture 2026-10-06)
$2.02B funded · 1,125 deals · 854 repaid in full (75.9%) · 138 borrower families · 29 underwriters · 60,000+ investors (Percent claim)
Target Returns
10-20% annual coupons · 14.76% historical weighted-average (Percent 3/31/26) · 16.95% outstanding WA coupon
Deal Duration
6-36 months typical · 9-month historical average · 17.25-month outstanding WA term (Percent 3/31/26)
Credit Performance
0.90% charge-off rate (Percent) · 1.10% $-weighted on completed (AltStreet, 10/6/26) · 7.47% lifetime distress including 72 workouts and reperforming deals (49 in May, 70 in August)
Asset Types
Asset-Based ($1.62B / 870 deals) · Corporate Loans · Funds / Blended Notes
Investor Service Fee
10% of interest earned · uniform across all 575 deals where disclosed · deducted from coupon
Liquidity
Monthly interest + amortizing principal · Secondary market live since Feb 2026 (~4.3% of deals enabled at May 2026 capture)
Regulatory Status
Percent Securities, LLC — SEC-registered broker-dealer (CIK 0001863789), FINRA member since Aug 2023
Tax Document Type
1099-INT for marketplace deals (1,052 of 1,067 at the May 2026 ingest) · K-1 for select fund/SMA structures (48 deals)
ASPrivate Credit Democratization Through Regulated Infrastructure
- Percent's broker-dealer architecture removes the structural disadvantages most private credit marketplaces face — the unregistered peer-to-peer competitors operate without FINRA suitability oversight, AML programs, or BCP requirements. The annual cost to maintain this (estimated $2M-$5M) is real, but the platform's $2.02B cumulative volume across 1,125 deals justifies the overhead.
- Short-duration focus and book-building Dutch auction price discovery enable investors to set their own yield targets — a real advantage over traditional private credit funds where the GP sets terms and you accept them. The flip side: you bear deal-selection risk that a professional manager would absorb.
- The 60,000+ investor base (per platform claims on /modern-private-credit) creates network effects: more investors → faster deal funding → more attractive economics for borrowers → more deals → more diversity for investors. Percent's competitive moat is the dual-sided network plus the regulatory wrapper most competitors lack.
- Asset-based collateral concentration ($1.62B of $1.95B = 84% per Percent's 3/31/26 disclosure) reflects Percent's structural emphasis on recovery cushion — and the data validates this preference: Asset-Based deals showed 6.7x lower distress than Corporate Loans at the May 2026 capture. The platform's product-market fit is asset-backed lending, not unsecured corporate credit.
- Each deal is its own Delaware Series LLC under Cadence Group Platform, LLC — a structure designed to isolate your recourse in one deal from problems in another. This is institutional-standard securitization architecture intended to prevent contagion across deals.
Mental Model
How Percent actually works — simplified.
Percent (or a third-party underwriter) sources a borrower
Most deals come from non-bank specialty lenders looking to fund their loan books — Steadypay, The Smarter Merchant, Wall Street Funding, Pollen VC, and dozens of others. Percent underwrites 68.4% of deals in-house (770 of 1,125); the rest come from 28 third-party underwriters like Aluna Partners.
A dedicated Series LLC is formed
Each deal sits inside its own Delaware Series LLC under Cadence Group Platform, LLC (the parent's legacy name). The LLC purchases a participation interest in the borrower's underlying loans or receivables.
Investors fund the SPV through unsecured notes
You and other accredited investors buy notes issued by the Series LLC. The notes are unsecured but the SPV's claim to the underlying assets provides the structural protection. Pricing is set via Dutch auction in newer deals; rates are pre-set on older ones.
You receive monthly interest, less the 10% service fee
Cash flow from the underlying loans funds your coupon payments. Percent retains 10% of interest earned as the Investor Service Fee. After an initial interest-only period, most deals begin amortizing principal back.
The deal repays, refinances, defaults, or enters workout
Outcomes break down as (October 6, 2026): 75.9% repaid in full, 15.7% currently outstanding and performing, 6.4% in workout, restructuring or reperforming, 1.1% charged off, 0.9% funding or allocating.
Investor Operations
The practical questions investors actually care about: when tax documents arrive, how cash distributions work, and whether capital can be exited before the underlying asset is sold.
Tax Documents
K-1 Timing
What to expect
Default delivery is 1099-INT by January 31; K-1 for the 48 fund/SMA-structure deals may extend depending on the underlying fund close cycle.
Confidence: Medium
Cash Flow
Distributions
Frequency
monthly
Timing
Monthly interest payments per the deal terms. Principal amortization begins after the initial interest-only period (typically 1-4 months from close).
Consistency
Coupon payments are contractually scheduled per each deal's terms. If a deal enters Work-out state, payment schedule may be modified or interrupted pending restructuring.
Liquidity
Exit Reality
Holding period
6-36 month deal terms typical (9-month historical average; 17.25-month outstanding WA term per Percent 3/31/26 disclosure).
Exit options
- Hold to maturity — principal returns as the underlying borrower repays the loan or as the SPV amortizes back to investors.
- Secondary Market (launched Feb 2026) — order book with bid/ask depth for ~4.3% of deals; pricing in % of par value.
- Call by the borrower — most deals callable at par + accrued interest starting from a deal-specific date (typically the 1st monthly anniversary).
Secondary market
Secondary Market launched February 2026 with order book infrastructure. Enabled on approximately 4.3% of deals as of capture date. Order-book depth, execution spreads, and completion rates are not publicly disclosed. Treat as optional upside, not primary exit path.
Confidence: Medium
Investment Structures
Asset-Based Deals (Consumer Loans, SMB Financing, Merchant Cash Advances, Discounted Receivables)
Short-duration loans (6-24 months typical) backed by underlying portfolios of consumer loans, small-business receivables, merchant cash advances, equipment leases, or discounted receivables. Represent the dominant share of platform deal flow — Percent self-reports $1.62B across 870 deals in this category (84% of platform $ volume, 3/31/26). Target yields 12-16% reflecting collateral backing.
AltStreet's May 2026 cross-cut confirms strongest credit performance in this category: 3.79% lifetime distress (27 of 712 completed-or-distressed). Subcategories include SMB Financing (428 deals), Consumer Loans (215), Discounted Receivables (88), Consumer Advances (41), SMB Leases (27).
Corporate Loan Deals (Senior or Junior Direct Lending)
Senior secured or junior subordinated loans to private companies — typically 12-36 months at 16-20% headline coupons. Higher yield reflects elevated risk: AltStreet's May 2026 cross-cut found 25.35% lifetime distress on this category (36 of 142 completed-or-distressed), 6.7x the Asset-Based rate, and the August seniority cut confirms the direction — subordinated deals run 12.3% distress vs 8.5% senior secured across the full book. The naming convention (e.g., 'Sr.' vs 'Jr.') indicates seniority. Investors should size Corporate Loan exposure materially smaller than Asset-Based deals — same allocation ($500-$2,500 per deal) but fewer positions in this category.
Fund Structures / Blended Notes
Diversified exposure across multiple underlying assets through a single offering — typically 36-month terms targeting 11-13% net returns with $5,000 minimums. Sold as 'Blended Notes' for marketplace investors seeking diversified entry without picking individual deals, or as fund-structure vehicles for institutional investors. Tax document is K-1 rather than 1099-INT. AltStreet's May 2026 cross-cut found 0% distress in this category (55 deals, all performing at capture) — but the category is younger and less mature than the marketplace single-deal categories.
Separately Managed Accounts ($1M+)
Institutional-grade managed portfolios for RIAs, family offices, and accredited investors with $1M+ deploying. Percent Advisors constructs and manages the portfolio across the same deal universe with diversification by asset type, underwriter, and vintage. Fee: 1% annual management on committed capital.
Targets monthly/quarterly distributions with customizable risk parameters and mandate restrictions. Tax document is typically K-1. Suits institutional allocators wanting outsourced operational complexity at competitive fees vs. traditional private credit funds at 1.5-2% + carry.
Risk
Risk Structure
This is where the marketplace pitch gives way to the actual operating reality: delayed exits, limited disclosure, fee drag, and path-dependent outcomes.
Deal-State Transparency Asymmetry
Percent's investor-api exposes a state field on every deal: Funding → Outstanding → Repaid OR Work-out → Charged Off. The marketplace UI displays Funding and Outstanding but does not foreground Work-out or Charged Off on individual deal pages. AltStreet's May 2026 audit confirmed zero of the charged-off or workout deals carried public distress language in their deal-body text.
The state lives only in the API. This is the central structural observation: the platform's underlying data layer contains more deal-state information than the deal-page interface surfaces — and that API-only layer now holds 70 active workouts, up from 49 in May.
Underwriter Quality Variance
Percent self-underwrites 68.4% of deals (770 of 1,125) and shows 4.42% lifetime distress on its own book as of October 2026, up from 2.59% in May on recent-vintage workouts. Third-party underwriters perform very differently: Aluna Partners 31.58% distress (24 of 76 deals), Quiq Capital 41.67% (5 of 12), and a third small underwriter at 57.14% (4 of 7), while third-party underwriters covering 212 deals combined show zero distress to date. The underwriter is disclosed on every deal page but the comparative track record is not provided. Investors filtering for Percent self-underwritten deals still capture a materially lower-risk subset.
Financing Type Risk Concentration
Distress is not evenly distributed. AltStreet's May 2026 cross-cut: Corporate Loans 25.35% lifetime distress, Asset-Based 3.79%, Fund 0%. The August refresh adds two consistent cuts: subordinated 12.3% vs senior secured 8.5%, and a monotonic coupon-band gradient from 2.1% (under 14%) to 45% (24%+).
Platform-aggregate metrics (0.90% charge-off rate) obscure this dispersion. Effective default exposure is far more about portfolio mix than about platform-level aggregate.
Investor Service Fee Drag
10% of every interest payment is retained by Percent as Investor Service Fee — uniform across all 575 deals where disclosure could be extracted. Fixed cost, not performance fee. Modeling at gross coupon overstates net returns by ~10%. Fully disclosed per-deal but not summarized at the platform level.
Secondary Market Maturity
February 2026 launch with order book infrastructure — structurally legitimate but enabled on only ~4.3% of deals at the May 2026 capture. Order-book depth, execution spreads, completion rates, and stress-period performance are not publicly disclosed. Practical effectiveness should be considered emerging, not established.
Limited Full-Cycle Stress Testing
Deal book runs December 2018 through October 2026, covering COVID 2020 and the 2022-2024 rate-hike cycle but not a sustained deep recession with simultaneous defaults. Historical 0.90% charge-off rate reflects benign macro conditions. Workouts rose from 49 to 70 between the May and August captures and to 72 by October; the early signal flagged in May is now a measured trend, though no new charge-off has been realized, and the platform has not been tested under sustained credit stress.
Workouts Visible in API, Not Surfaced on Deal Pages
72 deals in workout, restructuring or reperforming ($69.5M funded) per Percent's investor-api are not surfaced on the public deal-page UI, up from 49 at AltStreet's May 2026 capture and 70 in August. Workout outcomes are not yet realized; some will recover to par, some will charge off. Lifetime distress rate including workouts is 7.47% by count vs the 0.90% realized charge-off rate.
Why it matters
Investors evaluating new deals from a borrower whose prior deals are in workout will not see that distress signal on the deal-page interface. The top 6 of 138 borrower families represent 41% of platform $ volume — concentrated dependence on a small number of large borrower relationships — and 53.1% of the book refinances at least one prior Percent deal. Distress clusters in a handful of borrower families — including FAT Brands (7 distressed deals, flagged since the May review) and several recent-vintage families with the newest transitions dated through early 2026 — visible only via deeper navigation to borrower profiles, not on deal-page views.
Mitigation / verification
Before investing in any new deal, search the borrower's legal entity name across the platform and check the state of every prior deal — including any refinance chain the new deal extends. Distressed prior deals from the same borrower are a primary risk signal. Treat borrower-level concentration as a sizing input — do not over-weight a small number of large borrowers. Consider AltStreet's tracked borrower-level distress data as supplementary context when the deal-page UI is silent on prior distress.
Third-Party Underwriter Quality Dispersion
Aluna Partners-underwritten deals show 31.58% distress across 76 deals; Quiq Capital 41.67% across 12; a third small underwriter 57.14% across 7; Percent self-underwritten 4.42% across 770 (October 2026, up from 2.59% in May). The underwriter is disclosed on every deal page but the comparative track record is not — investors must aggregate across deals manually to surface this signal. This is not a pure underwriter skill ranking because borrower mix, deal type, and sample size differ — but the dispersion is large enough to treat underwriter identity as a primary risk input.
Why it matters
Treating all deals as having equivalent underwriting rigor would systematically understate risk on the 31.5% of deals not underwritten by Percent itself. Aluna Partners-underwritten deals have failed at roughly 7x the rate of Percent-underwritten — a dispersion that remains large even after Percent's own distress rate nearly doubled this quarter on recent-vintage workouts. For a borrower like Steadypay (underwritten by Aluna Partners), the structural risk profile is fundamentally different from a Percent-underwritten deal of equivalent stated terms.
Mitigation / verification
Establish a per-underwriter risk tier in your underwriting framework. Filter for Percent self-underwritten deals, where the empirical distress rate (4.42%) remains the institutional-grade end of the range — while monitoring its trajectory. Treat Aluna Partners, Quiq Capital, and other high-distress third-party underwriters as elevated-risk requiring smaller position sizes or avoidance. The underwriter field is on every deal page; the relative quality is not — cross-reference with AltStreet's tracked underwriter-level distress before sizing.
Tax Inefficiency in Taxable Accounts
All marketplace returns are ordinary interest income (1,052 of 1,067 deals issued 1099-INT at the May 2026 ingest) taxed at marginal federal rates up to 37%, plus state income tax, plus 3.8% NIIT. Illustrative math for a California investor at a 54.1% combined marginal rate: a 16% advertised coupon becomes roughly 14.4% after Percent's 10% service fee and roughly 6.6% after tax — competitive with municipal bonds but far less compelling than headline numbers suggest.
Why it matters
Investors comparing Percent's headline 14-18% coupons to municipal bond yields or qualified dividend stocks may overstate Percent's relative appeal in taxable accounts. The structure does not benefit from depreciation, 1031 exchanges, or capital gains treatment. In tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k via self-directed custodians), the dynamics reverse — Percent's coupon income is fully shielded.
Mitigation / verification
Compute your effective after-tax return at your specific marginal bracket and state of residence before sizing the allocation. High-bracket investors in high-tax states should either limit Percent exposure to tax-advantaged accounts or accept that after-tax math may underperform municipal bond alternatives. Consider self-directed IRA placement through Equity Trust or IRA Financial — setup and maintenance costs amortize over $25K+ allocations.
Credit Cycle Sensitivity and Limited Stress Testing
Percent's deal book runs primarily through benign macro conditions (2018-2026 with COVID 2020 as the only meaningful stress test). The 0.90% charge-off rate reflects favorable underwriting environment. Future stress periods may show charge-off rates 2-3x current levels and reduced recovery rates.
Why it matters
Private credit performance varies dramatically by macro environment: defaults rise, recoveries fall, secondary market liquidity evaporates during recession. Investors treating current credit metrics as a permanent baseline may be unprepared for stress-period dynamics. The workout count rose from 49 to 70 between AltStreet's May and August 2026 captures — a measured rising trend, though none of the new distress has yet converted to a realized charge-off.
Mitigation / verification
Size your Percent allocation conservatively as one component of a diversified credit allocation, not the primary credit exposure. Stress-test your portfolio assuming charge-off rates triple during recession and recovery rates fall to 40%. Maintain capacity to absorb a 5-10% allocation loss without forced portfolio rebalancing.
Secondary Market Liquidity Uncertainty
Secondary Market launched February 2026 with order book infrastructure but enabled on only approximately 4.3% of deals. Order-book depth, execution spreads, and completion rates are not publicly disclosed. The feature is too new to have established performance under stress.
Why it matters
Investors viewing 'secondary market available' marketing may treat it as guaranteed pre-maturity exit and size positions accordingly. For ~95% of deals not yet enabled, no secondary exists. Even for enabled deals, thin order books could force material discounts (15-30% below par) or extended fill times — particularly during stress when multiple investors might simultaneously seek exits.
Mitigation / verification
Underwrite every Percent deal as hold-to-maturity. Treat secondary market access as optional upside, not primary exit assumption. Test the feature with small positions before depending on it. Maintain external liquidity sufficient to absorb 12-18 months of needs without forcing private credit sales.
Biggest Misconceptions & What Actually Happens
- Verify the underwriter on every deal: Percent self-underwritten 4.42% distress vs Aluna Partners 31.58%. The underwriter is disclosed on every deal page.
- Check the borrower's prior-deal history before investing — search by borrower name and review state transitions across all prior deals. Distressed prior deals from the same borrower are not foregrounded on new deal pages.
- Compute the effective after-tax return at your marginal bracket — Percent's headline coupon is ordinary income, materially less tax-efficient than municipal bonds for high-bracket investors in taxable accounts.
- Model returns at 90% of headline coupon — the 10% Investor Service Fee is uniform and predictable.
- Treat secondary market access as optional upside, not a primary exit path — the feature is new (Feb 2026), enabled on only ~4.3% of deals.
Regulatory & Legal Posture
Security Status
Securities Offering under Regulation D (Rule 506c primarily, Rule 506b for older vintages) — Accredited Investors Only
Percent Securities, LLC is the broker-dealer entity — SEC-registered, FINRA member, registered since August 2023. SEC CIK 0001863789. The platform has filed annual reports on Form X-17A-5 for three consecutive fiscal years (FY2023 filed 2024-02-29, FY2024 filed 2025-03-17 with amendment 2025-05-13, FY2025 filed 2026-02-27) — consistent with a broker-dealer in good standing per EDGAR.
AML program per FINRA Rule 3310. BCP per FINRA Rule 4370. Chief Compliance Officer: Richard Egan ([email protected], 516-668-8121).
Form CRS, Reg BI disclosures, AML program, and BCP all publicly posted on percent.com. Listed on FINRA's regulated firms directory at 145 East 57th Street, New York, NY 10022. Modern deals (777 since 2022) use Reg D 506(c) permitting general solicitation with accredited verification; earlier vintages (274 from 2019-2021) used 506(b) with established relationships. Tax treatment: 1099-INT for marketplace structured notes (default, 1,052 deals); K-1 for select fund and SMA structures (48 deals).
Disclosure Quality
Strong. Modern deal pages include a structured Credit Snapshot rubric (10 criteria including Overcollateralization %, Cash Reserve %, Simple Loss Coverage multiple, TTM Default Rate, Largest Obligor %, Latest Financials date, Latest Portfolio Data date), Borrower Overview, Underwriter Overview, Offering Structure, Payment Structure, Security Details, and Underlying Asset Exposure / Reporting / Risks sections. Surveillance reports posted to borrower profile pages. Investor Service Fee disclosed per-deal in Additional Details / Security Details. Critical gap: deal-state transitions (Outstanding → Work-out → Charged Off / Reperforming) are exposed in the platform's investor-api but are NOT surfaced on the public deal-page UI — material transparency observation. The state field exists; the consumer interface does not display it on individual deal views.
Custody Model
Per-Deal Delaware Series LLC under Cadence Group Platform, LLC | Investor-Owned Unsecured Notes | Percent Securities Holds Customer Funds
Regulatory Backing
Each deal sits inside its own Delaware Series LLC (137 unique Series identifiers documented at the May 2026 capture), under the umbrella entity Cadence Group Platform, LLC (the parent's legacy name). The Series LLC purchases a participation interest in the underlying borrower's loan portfolio or receivables; investors receive unsecured notes issued by the Series LLC. Per Percent's Business Continuity Plan (FINRA Rule 4370 required filing): Percent Securities, LLC maintains custody of customer funds and securities; in the event of significant business disruption, customers would be directed to contact issuers directly to verify the status of closings and their holdings. SPV-level recourse: the series structure is designed so that investors in one Series have no claim against another Series's underlying assets — institutional-standard isolation architecture, though series-LLC separateness has limited case-law testing in some scenarios.
The notes themselves are unsecured but the SPV's participation claim against the underlying borrower's collateralized assets provides the structural recovery path. Audit/administration: Marketplace deal SPVs do not consistently disclose independent CPA audit relationships in deal body materials reviewed by AltStreet. The parent broker-dealer entity (Percent Securities, LLC) files annual reports on Form X-17A-5 as required of broker-dealers, but the individual Series LLCs that hold investor notes are not separately audited per public-facing deal pages.
SMA and fund structures may have separate audit relationships disclosed in offering documents. There is no separately-named third-party fund administrator at the marketplace deal level — Percent operates as both broker-dealer and technology platform administering investor accounts, payment flows, and reporting. Custodian: Percent Securities, LLC itself per BCP disclosure — no separately-named third-party custodian holding investor assets independent of Percent Securities. SIPC membership per Percent's public disclosures, with standard limitations ($500K per customer including $250K cash limit) — but SIPC does not protect against loss of value due to credit defaults on the underlying private debt; its protections are against broker-dealer insolvency and asset misappropriation only, and coverage of these private notes should be confirmed with Percent directly.
Tax Treatment
Reporting
1099-INT for marketplace structured notes (default, 1,052 of 1,067 deals at the May 2026 ingest) | K-1 for select fund / SMA structures (48 deals)
Per Percent's terms and conditions, tax forms are furnished by January 31st of the year following the calendar year to which the tax form relates (or the first business day after January 31st if it falls on a weekend or holiday), with availability through October 15th of the same year. Default cadence is straightforward 1099-INT delivery — most investors will not face K-1 timing complexity. K-1 timing for fund and SMA structures can extend into March-April or later depending on the underlying fund's financial close cycle. AltStreet's confidence on K-1 timing: medium — explicit signals on percent.com indicate variable timing for K-1 structures.
Income Character
Ordinary Interest Income (1099-INT) for Marketplace Notes | Schedule K-1 Distributions for Select Fund/SMA Structures
Marketplace deal coupons are reported as interest income on 1099-INT and taxed at marginal federal rates (10-37%) plus state income tax plus 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax for taxpayers above the AGI thresholds. There is no qualified dividend treatment, no long-term capital gains treatment on principal repayment (since these are debt instruments returning par), and no depreciation deductions. For high-bracket investors, combined marginal rates can exceed 50% depending on state of residence — illustratively, a 16% advertised coupon becomes ~14.4% after Percent's 10% service fee and ~6.6% after an illustrative 54.1% combined marginal rate.
Additive rate stacks are approximations; actual burdens vary with deductibility and individual circumstances. For select fund and SMA structures, K-1 reporting may include passive activity income with different characterization depending on the underlying fund's tax election; consult the specific offering's tax appendix or your CPA.
Limitation
Tax inefficiency is the single largest drag on Percent's after-tax appeal for high-bracket investors. The structure does not benefit from depreciation shelter (no real assets owned), 1031 exchanges (debt instruments don't qualify), or qualified dividend rates (these are interest payments, not dividends). The standard mitigations: (a) place Percent allocations in tax-advantaged accounts (Traditional IRA, Roth IRA, 401k) through self-directed custodians like Equity Trust or IRA Financial — setup fees $50-$500, annual maintenance $100-$300, transaction fees $25-$50 per deal — typically only economic at $25K+ allocations; (b) limit taxable account exposure for high-bracket investors to a small portion of fixed-income allocation; (c) prioritize municipal bonds for the tax-efficient portion of fixed income and use Percent for the inefficient-but-higher-yield portion.
Special Considerations
- Marketplace deals report on 1099-INT — no K-1 administrative complexity for the typical investor. This is a meaningful operational advantage over many private credit alternatives that require K-1 processing.
- Net Investment Income Tax (3.8%) applies to all interest income for taxpayers with AGI above $200K single / $250K married — adds 3.8% to the effective tax burden on top of marginal federal and state rates.
- State taxation varies dramatically — Florida, Texas, Nevada, Washington, Wyoming have no state income tax (interest income taxed at federal rate only); California (up to 13.3%), New York (up to 10.9%), New Jersey (10.75%), Oregon (9.9%) impose materially higher rates. Effective state taxation determines whether Percent's after-tax return is competitive.
- Tax-advantaged account placement is the most efficient holding structure but requires self-directed IRA custodians (mainstream custodians like Fidelity, Vanguard, Schwab do not support marketplace lending platforms). Setup costs and annual maintenance need to be amortized over a sufficient allocation to be economic.
- K-1 fund/SMA structures may pass through additional tax characteristics depending on the underlying fund's elections — review each offering's tax appendix carefully if investing in the 48 non-1099-INT deals.
Before You Invest
Get AltStreet's weekly briefing on Percent and its peers
Changes to fees, liquidity and investment terms across alternative platforms, including Percent, read against the filings. One email a week.
- Weekly platform research focused on tax timing and liquidity reality.
- Signals on distributions, risks, and structural tradeoffs before capital is locked up.
- Coverage of adjacent platforms so you can compare better options faster.
Get weekly platform signals
Track fee changes, liquidity updates, risk flags, and adjacent platforms before you invest.
Independent intelligence from AltStreet. No hype. No sponsor spin.
AltStreet Data Layer
What the data actually shows
AltStreet's authenticated ingests of the full Percent platform, all 1,125 deals as of 2026-10-06, diffed against the 2026-08-05 and 2026-05-29 captures, surface seven findings that the public deal-page UI does not foreground.
Workouts rose from 49 to 70 in ten weeks and to 72 by October; none has become a charge-off
State-transition diffing between AltStreet's May and August 2026 captures shows active workouts rising from 49 to 70 deals ($68.5M funded), and the October 6 capture adds two more (72 deals, $69.5M), while realized charge-offs stayed at exactly 12. Lifetime distress is 7.47% by count (4.35% by $). The new workouts concentrate in a small set of recent-vintage borrower families rather than spreading evenly across the book.
What this means
The realized loss rate remains excellent; the unrealized distress pipeline is growing. Whether the 70 workouts recover to par or convert to charge-offs is the single most important open question on the platform — and none of it is visible on the deal-page UI.
The advertised coupon prices the risk — distress rises monotonically with yield
Distress by coupon band across all 1,095 deals at the August 2026 cross-cut: 2.1% under 14% (9 of 428), 7.0% at 14-15.9%, 9.1% at 16-17.9%, 12.2% at 18-19.9%, 28.2% at 20%+ (24 of 85), and 45.5% above 24% (5 of 11).
What this means
A 20%+ coupon on this platform has historically carried a better-than-one-in-four chance of distress. Yield-chasing is measurably penalized — treat the advertised rate as a risk disclosure, not just a return.
Percent's own underwriting distress nearly doubled between May and August, to a still-low 4.42% in October
Percent self-underwritten deals show 34 of 770 distressed (4.42%) as of October 2026, after 34 of 750 (4.53%) in August and 19 of 733 (2.59%) in May, as recent-vintage workouts landed on the platform's own book and the two October additions came from a third-party underwriter (Edly). Third-party dispersion persists: Aluna Partners 31.58% (24 of 76) and Quiq Capital 41.67% at the high end, while third-party underwriters covering 212 deals combined remain at zero. Caveat: borrower mix, deal type, and sample size differ across underwriters.
What this means
Underwriter identity remains a primary risk input (~7x spread between Percent and the worst third parties), but the self-underwritten book is no longer immune — the trajectory deserves monitoring alongside the level.
Over half the book refinances a prior Percent deal
597 of 1,125 deals (53.1%, October 2026) refinance at least one prior Percent deal, in documented chains up to 8 deals deep at the August mapping. Refinance chains mean a 'new' deal's risk is often a continuation of an existing borrower exposure rather than fresh underwriting.
What this means
Chain position is an underwriting input the deal page does not surface: a deal that refinances a chain whose earlier links entered workout carries inherited risk. Trace the chain before sizing.
Investor Service Fee is uniformly 10% — across all 575 disclosed deals
AltStreet extracted the Investor Service Fee from the deal body text for 575 of 1,095 deals at the August 2026 capture. In every single case, the fee is 10% of interest earned. The remaining deals (mostly older vintages) do not disclose the fee in extractable form but Percent's general practice documentation confirms the same uniform rate.
What this means
Net coupon = headline coupon × 0.90. The fee is structural and predictable. Investors modeling at gross coupon overstate returns by approximately 10%.
Top 6 borrower families represent 41% of platform $ volume
Across 138 borrower families, the top 6 by funded volume (led by The Smarter Merchant at $266.8M and Wall Street Funding at $194.8M) account for 41.0% of lifetime platform $; the top 10 account for 51.2%.
What this means
Platform-level credit performance is heavily influenced by a small number of large borrower relationships. A single major borrower-family default could materially impact aggregate loss metrics. Evaluate borrower-level concentration when building diversified portfolios.
Corporate Loan distress ran 6.7x the Asset-Based rate at the May cross-cut
AltStreet's May 2026 financing-type cross-cut: Corporate Loans 25.35% lifetime distress (36 of 142 completed-or-distressed), Asset-Based 3.79% (27 of 712), Fund 0% (55 deals). The August refresh adds a consistent seniority cut: subordinated 12.3% vs senior secured 8.5%.
What this means
Investors should size Corporate Loan and subordinated exposure materially smaller than senior asset-based exposure. A platform-aggregate sizing rule systematically over-allocates to the high-distress segments.
Data as of 2026-10-06 . AltStreet review evidence layer . Public-source analysis
Full datasetSo What?
What to do differently because of this.
What this means
Distress is concentrated in Corporate Loans at 6.7x the asset-based rate
What to do
Maintain a meaningfully different sizing rule for Corporate Loan deals — perhaps half the typical position size — and concentrate diversification across Asset-Based deals where collateral provides recovery cushion.
What this means
The same borrower can appear in multiple deals — and earlier deals from a borrower now in workout may not surface on the new deal's page
What to do
Before investing in a new deal, search the borrower's name across the platform and check the state of every prior deal. A borrower with prior workouts deserves scrutiny even if the new deal looks clean.
What this means
Third-party underwriter quality varies materially
What to do
Aluna Partners-underwritten deals show a 31.58% distress rate (24 of 76 deals) vs 4.42% for Percent-underwritten (34 of 770, Oct 2026). Treat the underwriter identity as a primary risk input, not a footnote.
What this means
Over half the book refinances a prior Percent deal: 597 of 1,125 deals (53.1%) as of October 2026 sit in refinance chains up to 8 deals deep
What to do
Trace the chain before investing: a new deal that refinances a prior deal from the same borrower inherits that history. Chains where earlier links entered workout deserve materially more scrutiny than the new deal page alone suggests.
What this means
The 10% Investor Service Fee is a fixed drag, not a variable performance fee
What to do
Model every Percent deal at 90% of headline coupon. The fee comes out whether the deal performs at target, underperforms, or workouts to par. There's no waterfall.
Decision Fit
Investor Fit
Who this works for, who it does not, and what level of patience and complexity tolerance the platform really demands.
Diversified Private Credit Allocators with $25K-$100K Available Capital
Well-suited for accredited investors building a 20-50 deal diversified private credit portfolio across multiple borrowers, financing types, and underwriters. With $25K-$100K available, an investor can construct meaningful diversification ($500-$2,500 per deal across 20-50 positions) while concentrating in Asset-Based deals where empirical distress rates are lowest. The platform's regulatory wrapper (FINRA broker-dealer, three years of compliant X-17A-5 filings) provides institutional protections rare in this asset class. Best practice: 70% Asset-Based / 30% other financing types; favor Percent self-underwritten over third-party underwritten; verify borrower history across prior deals.
RIAs and Family Offices with $1M+ Seeking Outsourced Private Credit Management
Well-suited for RIAs, family offices, and institutional investors with $1M+ deploying via Percent's Separately Managed Account product (1% annual management on committed capital). The SMA structure delegates deal selection, monitoring, and reinvestment to Percent's investment team while providing institutional-grade reporting and dedicated relationship management. For RIAs serving accredited clients who want private credit exposure without operational burden, the SMA wraps the marketplace's underlying deal universe in professional management — typically targeting 20-50 underlying positions with diversification across asset types and underwriters. Fee comparison: 1% management is competitive vs. typical private credit fund 1.5-2% + carry structures.
Active Yield-Focused Investors Comfortable with Ongoing Deal Evaluation
Well-suited for accredited investors who treat private credit allocation as an active position — reviewing new deal offerings weekly, evaluating Credit Snapshot rubrics, monitoring deal-level performance, and reinvesting principal as deals repay. The marketplace requires ongoing engagement, and investors who view this as an analytical asset class (rather than passive income generation) extract the most value. Dutch auction price discovery rewards investors who set their own yield targets rather than accepting GP-set terms. Compounding mechanics — reinvesting principal as deals repay at 6-36 month intervals — favor active monitors.
High-Income Investors in High-Tax States Seeking Maximum After-Tax Yield
Neutral fit for high-bracket investors in high-tax states (California, New York, New Jersey, Oregon). Percent's headline coupons (14-18%) are reduced first by the 10% service fee and then by ordinary-income taxation: illustratively, a California investor at a 54.1% combined marginal rate (37% federal + 13.3% state + 3.8% NIIT, additive and approximate) converts a 16% advertised coupon to ~14.4% after fee and ~6.6% after tax. Municipal bond ladders (~4-5% tax-exempt) deliver competitive after-tax returns with materially better credit quality.
The fit becomes attractive only with tax-advantaged account placement (self-directed IRA) or for investors whose marginal bracket is more moderate. Run the after-tax math at your specific marginal rate before sizing.
Retirees Seeking Monthly Income Enhancement Beyond Traditional Fixed Income
Neutral fit for retired accredited investors seeking enhanced monthly income beyond Treasury / municipal yields. The 14-18% headline coupons (10-14% after Investor Service Fee and taxes) offer meaningful income enhancement, and monthly payment cadence aligns with retirement spending patterns. However, three factors temper suitability: (a) credit risk during recession could disrupt income at the worst time for retirees with limited capacity to absorb losses; (b) ongoing reinvestment decisions as deals repay create operational burden many retirees don't want; (c) the 70 active workouts on the platform (August 2026, up from 49 in May) represent income interruption risk that fixed Treasury bond ladders don't carry. The SMA structure ($1M+, 1% fee) addresses operational burden but not the underlying credit risk.
Investors Below $5K Available Capital
Poor fit for investors with under $5K available capital. While Percent's $500 per-deal minimum is technically accessible, meaningful diversification requires 10-20 positions to mitigate single-deal default risk. With $5K, an investor could fund 10 positions at $500 each — but a single default at 50% recovery loss produces 2.5% portfolio impact, while concentration at $1,500-$2,500 per deal produces 7.5-12.5% impact.
Investors below $5K should accumulate larger capital before entry, or use traditional high-yield bond funds (HYG, JNK) providing instant diversification at any dollar amount. The platform is not designed for token-allocation use; diversification requires meaningful capital.
Investors Requiring Guaranteed Near-Term Liquidity
Poor fit for investors who may need capital access within 12-18 months. While the Secondary Market launched February 2026 provides structural liquidity infrastructure (order book with bid/ask depth), it is enabled on only approximately 4.3% of deals and the order-book depth is unverifiable. For the ~95% of deals not enabled, no secondary exists.
Investors with imminent liquidity needs should maintain those funds in money market accounts, Treasury bills, or liquid securities — not in Percent positions, which should be underwritten as hold-to-maturity 6-36 month commitments. Test the secondary market with small positions before depending on it.
Non-Accredited Retail Investors
Poor fit by regulatory requirement. Percent operates under Reg D Rule 506(c) and 506(b) — accredited investor status required ($200K annual income / $300K married, or $1M+ net worth excluding primary residence). Non-accredited investors are prohibited from accessing the marketplace.
Alternatives accessible to non-accredited investors include public BDC stocks (ARCC, MAIN), high-yield bond ETFs (HYG, JNK), and the few remaining peer-to-peer platforms with reduced minimums. None match Percent's institutional infrastructure or deal-level transparency, but accreditation status is a hard regulatory gate.
Tradeoffs
Key Tradeoffs
The attraction of pre-IPO access is real, but every benefit comes bundled with a corresponding liquidity, transparency, or pricing cost.
Private Credit Market Scale and Growth
Morgan Stanley reports private credit as a $3.5 trillion asset class with projected growth to $5 trillion by 2029. Institutional demand from pension funds, endowments, and insurance companies has driven the asset class from niche to mainstream. Percent's role as the accredited-retail marketplace gateway captures the segment between liquid public credit (HYG, BDCs) and institutional private credit funds (Apollo, Blackstone, Ares). Tradeoff: as more retail capital enters private credit, returns may compress and underwriting standards may loosen — the same dynamic that affected peer-to-peer lending in 2014-2018.
Regulatory Infrastructure Burden
Percent's broker-dealer registration is genuinely distinguishing — most private credit marketplace competitors operate as unregistered platforms. The annual cost to maintain broker-dealer status (estimated $2M-$5M for compliance, capital, examinations) requires substantial deal volume to justify. The flip side: unregistered fintech competitors operate with lighter overhead and may offer cheaper deal economics, but lack FINRA supervisory framework, suitability obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Investors should weigh whether the regulatory wrapper justifies any incremental cost embedded in deal economics.
Credit Cycle Sensitivity
Private credit performs best during stable-to-rising rate environments where short-duration assets repay quickly at attractive yields. Recession dynamics shift the calculus: defaults rise, recoveries fall, secondary liquidity evaporates, and originator quality variance amplifies. Percent's $2.02B / 1,125-deal track record exists primarily during benign macro conditions (2018-present, with COVID 2020 as the only meaningful stress test) — and the rising workout count (49 → 70 between May and August 2026) is the first sustained distress trend in the data. Investors should assume future stress periods may show charge-off rates 2-3x current levels and reduced recovery rates.
Originator and Underwriter Relationships
Percent's deal flow depends on relationships with non-bank originators (Steadypay, The Smarter Merchant, Pollen VC, Wall Street Funding, FAT Brands, dozens of others) and third-party underwriters (Aluna Partners, Quiq Capital, others). These relationships are commercial — originators evaluate multiple distribution channels and may shift volume away if competing marketplaces offer better economics. The 30 inactive borrowers in AltStreet's borrower-record ingest represent borrowers who have ceased originating new deals on Percent — some left after losses, some after success, some unknown. The deal pipeline depends on continuous relationship maintenance.
Avoid
Who This Is Not For
This section should be read as a filter, not an afterthought. If you need income, simplicity, or near-term access to capital, the structure is working against you.
Non-Accredited Investors
Regulation D (506b / 506c) offerings require accredited status. Percent legally cannot accept non-accredited investors. Alternatives: public BDC stocks (ARCC, MAIN), high-yield bond ETFs (HYG, JNK), or platforms accepting non-accredited capital under Regulation A or crowdfunding rules.
Investors Requiring Capital Access Within 12 Months
Even with the February 2026 Secondary Market launch, only approximately 4.3% of deals are enabled for secondary trading and order-book depth is unverifiable. The remaining 95% of deals are functionally hold-to-maturity. Investors with near-term liquidity needs should keep those funds in money market accounts or short-duration Treasuries.
Tax-Sensitive High-Income Investors in High-Tax States Without IRA Capacity
All marketplace returns are ordinary interest income. Illustratively, for a California investor at a 54.1% combined marginal rate, a 16% advertised coupon becomes ~14.4% after Percent's service fee and ~6.6% after tax — competitive with municipal bonds but far less compelling than headline numbers suggest. Without tax-advantaged account placement, the after-tax math may not justify the credit risk.
Passive Income Investors Who Won't Monitor Deal-Level Performance
The marketplace requires ongoing engagement: reviewing new offerings, monitoring deal-level state transitions (not surfaced on the UI), tracking borrower-level prior-deal history, and reinvesting principal as deals repay every 6-36 months. The SMA structure ($1M+ minimum) addresses this but requires substantially larger capital. Passive investors with smaller capital should use BDCs or high-yield bond funds instead.
Investors With Less Than $5K Available Capital
Meaningful diversification across 10-20 deals requires $5K-$10K minimum. Concentration at $500-$2,500 per deal with too few positions creates binary exposure: a single default at 50% recovery produces disproportionate portfolio impact. Below $5K, use traditional bond funds that diversify at any allocation size.
Risk-Averse Capital Preservation Investors
Despite strong realized charge-off rates (0.90%), private credit carries genuine principal loss risk. The 72 workouts and reperforming deals on the platform (October 2026, up from 49 in May and 70 in August) represent unresolved distress — some will charge off, some will recover. Investors prioritizing absolute capital preservation should use FDIC-insured deposits, Treasury bonds, or short-duration investment-grade corporate bonds where principal-at-risk dynamics are materially different.
Editorial View
AltStreet Perspective
The compressed version of the review: what matters, what marketing tends to obscure, and how we would frame the platform for a serious allocator.
Verdict
Percent carries the strongest regulated infrastructure AltStreet has documented among direct-deal private-credit marketplaces — SEC-registered broker-dealer, three years of annual X-17A-5 filings, $2.02B funded across 1,125 deals, 0.90% charge-off rate that AltStreet's independent recalculation confirms. The platform has earned its position. The friction is structural: deal-state transitions like Workout (72 deals, $69.5M as of October 2026, up from 49 in May and 70 in August) exist in the underlying API but are not surfaced on the public deal-page UI. Distress concentrates dramatically by financing type (Corporate Loan 25.35% vs Asset-Based 3.79% at the May capture), by coupon band (2.1% under 14% vs 28% at 20%+), and by third-party underwriter (Aluna Partners 31.58% vs Percent self-underwritten 4.42%). These asymmetries are not deal-breakers — they're underwriting inputs. The investor who treats Percent as a passive private credit ETF will systematically underperform; the investor who treats it as an active asset-by-asset allocation problem will likely do well.
Positioning
AltStreet has captured the full Percent platform three times via its authenticated /investor-api: 1,067 deals on 2026-05-29, all 1,095 deals on 2026-08-04/05, and all 1,125 deals on 2026-10-06 by its scheduled scraper, with state-transition diffing between captures, cross-referenced with Percent's own /our-track-record-of-performance page (3/31/26), SEC EDGAR filings for Percent Securities LLC (CIK 0001863789, three years of X-17A-5 reports), FINRA broker-dealer registry, and Percent's regulatory disclosures (Reg BI, Form CRS, AML, BCP). The platform is best suited for accredited investors with $25K-$100K building a 20-50 deal diversified portfolio concentrated in Asset-Based deals underwritten by Percent itself (4.42% distress on the 770-deal self-underwritten book, still about 7x better than the worst third-party underwriters), sized down as advertised coupons rise. The single largest underwriting mistake on this platform is treating all deals as having equivalent underwriting rigor — the variance by underwriter, financing type, and coupon band is in the data but not foregrounded by the UI.
The Bottom Line
The deal page won't tell you it's in workout — and the workout count is rising.
Underwrite by underwriter, by financing type, by coupon band, and by borrower-level prior-deal history — not by platform-aggregate metrics.
Action
Next Steps
If you still want to engage after reading the review, these are the practical next moves that reduce avoidable mistakes.
Verify your accreditation status and create an account at percent.com — full marketplace access requires verification per Reg D 506(c).
Set a per-deal sizing rule before browsing offerings — $500-$2,500 per deal across 20-50 positions for a $25K-$100K allocation is the diversification baseline.
Concentrate in Asset-Based deals over Corporate Loans — the empirical distress rate dispersion (3.79% vs 25.35%) is large and consistent across vintages.
Filter for Percent self-underwritten deals — the third-party underwriter quality variance is dramatic (Aluna Partners 31.58% distress vs Percent 4.42%). The underwriter is disclosed on every deal page.
Before investing in any new deal, search the borrower name and check the state of every prior deal — distressed prior deals from the same borrower are a primary risk signal not surfaced on new deal pages.
Model returns at 90% of headline coupon — the 10% Investor Service Fee is uniform and predictable. Gross-coupon modeling systematically overstates.
Compute your effective after-tax return at your marginal bracket before sizing — Percent's tax inefficiency in taxable accounts can convert a 16% advertised coupon to roughly 6.6% net (after the service fee, at an illustrative 54.1% combined marginal rate) for high-bracket investors.
Treat the Secondary Market as optional upside, not a primary exit path — it launched Feb 2026, enabled on only ~4.3% of deals, and order-book depth is not publicly disclosed.
Final Answer
What this means for your decision.
Finding
Realized charge-off rate is 0.90% (Percent self-reported) or 1.10% by $ on completed deals (AltStreet-computed, Oct 2026)
Meaning
Both Percent's and AltStreet's methodologies indicate low realized losses to date — still just 12 charged-off deals as of October 2026 — although neither should be compared directly with annual public-market default rates, which use different numerators and denominators.
Action
Treat the charge-off rate as a real signal of underwriting discipline. Do not treat it as the full picture of distress on the platform.
Finding
72 deals are in workout or reperforming as of October 6, 2026 (6.4% of the platform): 49 in May, 70 in August, 72 now
Meaning
These are deals where borrowers stopped paying on schedule and are being restructured. They are exposed in the platform's investor-api but the public deal pages do not surface workout status. The count rose from 49 to 70 between AltStreet's May and August captures and to 72 by October 6 (two Edly IBR student-loan notes, $849,824 combined, entered workout), a rising trajectory, though none of the new distress has yet become a realized charge-off.
Action
When evaluating a borrower's prior deal history, check whether prior deals to the same borrower are in workout. The deal page won't tell you; the borrower-level profile may.
Finding
Corporate Loan deals showed 25.35% distress vs. Asset-Based at 3.79% (May 2026 capture)
Meaning
Distress is not evenly distributed across deal types. Corporate Loans concentrated distress at 6.7x the rate of Asset-Based deals at the May cross-cut. The August refresh adds a seniority cut: subordinated deals run 12.3% distress vs 8.5% for senior secured. The platform-wide aggregate masks this dispersion.
Action
Underwrite Corporate Loan and subordinated deals to a higher bar than senior asset-based deals. Do not size them equally.
Finding
Investor Service Fee is 10% of interest earned — uniform across all 575 deals where disclosed
Meaning
Your 18% headline coupon nets to roughly 16.2% after this fee. Modeling at gross coupon overstates your return by ~10%.
Action
Always model net coupon as headline × 0.9. The fee is consistent and predictable; the math is simple.
Finding
Secondary market launched February 2026 — penetration is currently low (~4.3% of deals enabled)
Meaning
Liquidity before maturity is now technically available for a subset of deals via an order book with bid/ask depth. But the feature is new and depth is unverifiable.
Action
Underwrite every deal as hold-to-maturity. Treat secondary market access as a bonus, not a primary exit path.
If you read nothing else
Percent's realized loss performance has been unusually strong for a marketplace serving this segment — 12 charge-offs across a 1,125-deal book, subject to methodology differences and 72 unresolved workouts. The platform is also more transparent than most private credit competitors: 60,000+ investors, $500 minimums, monthly distributions, FINRA-supervised broker-dealer, deal-level Credit Snapshot disclosures with structured rubrics. The friction point isn't realized credit quality — it's that the public deal pages don't surface deal-state transitions (workout, charge-off) that exist in the platform's underlying data, and the workout count is rising: 49 in May 2026, 70 in August, 72 in October. Distress doesn't equal loss, but distress is information the underlying API exposes that the consumer UI does not. Investors building a multi-deal Percent portfolio should treat that asymmetry — and the trajectory — as underwriting inputs, not deal-breakers.
AltStreet Research Desk
About to invest in Percent, or in an offering we haven't covered?
Commission an independent diligence report: the same filing-based analysis behind this review, applied to the specific investment in front of you before you wire the money.
- Built from primary sources: SEC filings, court records, capital structure, and marketing-versus-filings comparison.
- From $750; full reports from $1,495. Fixed price confirmed up front, delivery in 3-5 business days.
- Independent by design: we work for investors and accept no compensation from the companies we cover.
Percent is in Deal Intelligence detection. Subscribers get the alert the day a new Percentoffering appears, with the sponsor's filed record attached, and the investment committee memo once an analyst approves it.
Deal Intelligence →Appendix
Sources, Disclosures, and Supporting Context
The lower section is structured like a report appendix: relationship context first, adjacent reading second, and evidence last.
Report Appendix
Disclosure
Relationship and compensation context
+
Report Appendix
Disclosure
Relationship and compensation context
Report Appendix
Comparison Guides
Head-to-head guides featuring Percent
+
Report Appendix
Comparison Guides
Head-to-head guides featuring Percent
Report Appendix
Related Resources
Adjacent platform comparisons, frameworks, and category links
+
Report Appendix
Related Resources
Adjacent platform comparisons, frameworks, and category links
Further Reading
Related Resources
Adjacent frameworks and reviews that help place the platform in a broader allocation or due-diligence context.
Explore Asset Class
Private Credit & Alternative DebtSimilar Platform Reviews
- EquityMultiple
Accredited-only commercial real estate platform spanning Alpine Notes, Ascent Income Fund, and EMIP equity vehicles. The Percent vs EquityMultiple guide compares private credit notes against CRE debt and equity across fees, tax reporting, liquidity, and disclosure architecture.
- Willow Wealth
Rebranded Yieldstreet multi-asset marketplace with broader asset class coverage (real estate, art, legal finance, transportation) vs. Percent's private credit focus. The Percent vs Willow Wealth guide compares the two across track record, charge-offs, regulatory history, disclosure, taxes, and liquidity.
- Cadre
Institutional-quality commercial real estate platform for accredited investors. Complementary asset class (real estate equity vs. Percent's private credit debt) enabling cross-platform diversification but fundamentally different structure — direct property ownership vs. debt obligations, longer hold periods (5-10 years vs. 6-36 months).
- Eagle Point Credit
Public closed-end fund (CLO equity and debt) accessible to non-accredited investors with daily liquidity vs. Percent's accredited-only marketplace. Different structure (managed fund with $0.05 minimum vs. direct deal selection at $500), different liquidity profile (daily NYSE trading vs. hold-to-maturity), but similar yield range (10-13% distribution yields historically).
Report Appendix
Tracked Offerings
1,129 Percent offerings with disclosed terms in the AltStreet database
+
Report Appendix
Tracked Offerings
1,129 Percent offerings with disclosed terms in the AltStreet database
- TBF Fund Membership Interests 2026-5
- CAP SMB Financing Sr. 2026-3Hollywood
- PBN Global Asset-Based 2026-2
- SCN Receivables Sr. 2026-7London
- MNT SMB Financing Sr. 2026-9Monroe
- FMX Invoice Factoring Sr. 2026-2Guadalajara
- CAD SMB Financing Sr. 2026-8Miami
- GIG SMB Financing Sr. 2026-6Miami
- FTL Receivables Sr. 2026-3Boston
- WSF SMB Financing Jr. 2026-6New York
- WSF Corporate Loan Sr. 2026-7New York
- ARV Trade Financing One Sr. 2026-3Dover
Report Appendix
Evidence & Methodology
Sources, scope, and how the review was assembled
+
Report Appendix
Evidence & Methodology
Sources, scope, and how the review was assembled
ASReview Evidence
Methodology
AltStreet combined Percent's public performance disclosures with three authenticated investor-api captures of deal directory, deal body, and borrower endpoints (2026-05-29 baseline, 2026-08-04/05 refresh, 2026-10-06 scheduled capture, with state-transition diffing between them), then cross-checked regulatory status against SEC EDGAR and FINRA BrokerCheck.
Scope
Full Percent platform review covering all 1,125 captured deals, 138 borrower families, 575 extracted fee-layer disclosures, refinance-chain mapping across the full book, Percent public track-record pages, and Percent Securities LLC regulatory filings.
AltStreet Data Layer
AltStreet full-platform ingest (capture date 2026-10-06; state transitions diffed vs the 2026-08-05 and 2026-05-29 captures)
AltStreet has captured Percent's deal directory, deal body, and borrower endpoints three times: all 1,067 deals on 2026-05-29, all 1,095 deals on 2026-08-04/05, and all 1,125 deals on 2026-10-06 (the first capture by AltStreet's scheduled scraper, which now runs weekly), with state-transition diffing between the captures. This is a full platform credit-performance ingest, not an exit-realization database.
- Total deals captured: 1,125 (12/28/2018 → 2026-10-06); 34 notes listed since the August capture, $54.5M funded
- Lifetime funded: $1,977,923,819
- METRIC DEFINITIONS — Percent charge-off 0.90%: Percent's own methodology (3/31/26) · AltStreet 1.10%: $18.3M charged off ÷ completed-deal funded $ · 1.38%: 12 charged-off deals ÷ 868 completed deals · 1.07%: 12 ÷ 1,125 all deals · 7.47% distress: (72 workouts and reperforming + 12 charge-offs) ÷ 1,125 · 4.35% distress by $: $87.8M ÷ $2.02B funded (October 6, 2026 capture)
- Borrower families: 138 · Unique underwriters / structuring agents: 29
- Average deal size: $1.80M (AltStreet denominator includes all 1,125 deals)
- Repaid in full: 854 deals (75.9%, $1.64B, 14.31% avg advertised yield)
- Active (outstanding, performing): 177 deals (15.7%, $286.2M, 16.33% avg advertised yield)
- Restructured / workout / reperforming: 72 deals (6.4%, $69.5M), up from 49 at the May baseline and 70 in August; the two added since August are Edly IBR Student Loans Sr. 2024-1 ($621,000) and 2024-2 ($228,824), both underwritten by Edly
- Defaulted (charged off): 12 deals (1.1%, $18.3M), unchanged since May
- Open (funding): 8 deals (0.7%), plus 2 allocating; 24 notes moved to repaid between the August and October captures
- Charge-off rate (count, completed only): 1.38%
- Charge-off rate ($, completed only): 1.10%
- Lifetime distress rate (workout + charge-off / all deals): 7.47% by count, 4.35% by $
- Distress by coupon band: <14% → 2.1% (9 of 428) · 14-15.9% → 7.0% · 16-17.9% → 9.1% · 18-19.9% → 12.2% · 20%+ → 28.2% (24 of 85) · 24%+ → 45.5% (5 of 11)
- Distress by seniority: senior secured 8.5% (65 of 761) · subordinated 12.3% (13 of 106) · mixed 0% (58)
- Percent self-underwritten distress: 34 of 770 = 4.42% (34 of 750 = 4.53% in August; 19 of 733 = 2.59% in May)
- Aluna Partners underwritten distress: 24 of 76 = 31.58% · Quiq Capital: 5 of 12 = 41.67% · one additional small underwriter: 4 of 7 = 57.14%
- Zero-distress third-party underwriters to date: 18 firms covering 212 deals combined (October 2026)
- Refinance chains: 597 of 1,125 deals (53.1%) refinance at least one prior Percent deal as of October 2026; chains up to 8 deals deep at the August mapping
- Top 6 of 138 borrower families = 41.0% of platform $ volume (top 10 = 51.2%)
- Investor Service Fee: 10% of interest earned (uniform across all 575 deals where disclosed)
- Corporate Loan distress 25.35% vs Asset-Based 3.79% (May 2026 cross-cut; financing-type field not re-extracted in the August refresh)
- Reg D 506(c): 777 deals · 506(b): 274 (May 2026 cut) · Tax: 1099-INT default (1,052), K-1 fund/SMA (48)
- Secondary market enabled: ~4.3% of deals (May 2026 capture) · 137 unique Series identifiers under Cadence Group Platform, LLC (May 2026)
Source: AltStreet authenticated captures of Percent /investor-api (directory + body + borrower endpoints), 2026-05-29, 2026-08-04/05 and 2026-10-06
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
High-intent search questions answered directly, without making users hunt through the full review.
Is Percent legit?
Yes. Percent sells its notes through Percent Securities, LLC, an SEC-registered broker-dealer and FINRA member since August 2023 (SEC CIK 0001863789) that has filed three years of annual reports on Form X-17A-5, which is more regulatory infrastructure than most direct-deal private credit marketplaces carry. AltStreet's capture of the full deal book shows $2.02 billion funded across 1,125 deals since December 2018 (October 6, 2026), 12 charge-offs (0.90% self-reported, 1.10% by dollars completed on AltStreet's recalculation) and a 7.47% lifetime distress rate by count once the 72 deals in workout or reperforming at the October 2026 capture are included. In a FINRA Acceptance, Waiver and Consent dated June 9, 2026, Percent Securities was censured and fined $60,000, without admitting or denying the findings, for filing offering documents late on 372 private placements by issuers owned and controlled by its parent; the rule is procedural and the fine small. The legitimacy question is settled; the diligence questions are the 10% Investor Service Fee taken from every interest payment and the distress rate on deals advertising coupons above 20%.
Has Percent faced any regulatory action?
One regulatory action is on record. FINRA published an Acceptance, Waiver and Consent dated June 9, 2026 (case 2024080953801) in which Percent Securities, LLC was censured and fined $60,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to findings that, as placement agent, it filed offering documents with FINRA late for 372 private placements issued by companies owned and controlled by its parent, between at least three and 164 days after first giving them to prospective investors. It is the first enforcement action against Percent that AltStreet has recorded. The rule is procedural; what the findings document is the structure, in which a captive broker-dealer places notes issued by entities under the same parent.
What is Percent and how does the private credit marketplace work?
Percent is an SEC-registered broker-dealer (Percent Securities, LLC, FINRA member since August 2023) operating a private credit marketplace where accredited investors fund short-duration loans (6-36 months) to non-bank borrowers at headline coupon rates of 10-20%. Each deal is structured as a dedicated Delaware Series LLC under Cadence Group Platform, LLC. Investors purchase unsecured notes ($500 minimum per deal) issued by the SPV; the SPV purchases participation interests in the borrower's underlying loans or receivables. Returns flow monthly as interest payments, less Percent's 10% Investor Service Fee. Platform has facilitated $2.02B across 1,125 deals since December 2018 (AltStreet capture of October 6, 2026).
What returns can investors expect from Percent?
Historical weighted-average coupon is 14.76% per Percent's own track record disclosure (as of 2026-03-31); outstanding deals carry a 16.95% WA coupon. Headline range is typically 10-20% annual yield. The Investor Service Fee of 10% reduces gross coupon by ~10% — so a 16% headline coupon nets to roughly 14.4% pre-tax. For high-bracket investors in high-tax states, the effective after-tax return falls further: illustratively, a California investor at a 54.1% combined marginal rate would see approximately 6.6% after-tax on that 14.4%. Coupon income is taxed as ordinary interest, not capital gains or qualified dividends.
What is Percent's actual default and charge-off rate?
Percent self-reports a 0.90% charge-off rate and 3.70% default rate (30+ days past due methodology) as of 2026-03-31. AltStreet's independent recalculation using authenticated investor-api captures of all 1,125 deals (October 2026) finds: 1.10% $-weighted charge-off rate on completed deals (12 charged off, $18.3M); 7.47% lifetime distress rate by count including 72 workouts and reperforming deals, up from 49 at the May 2026 capture and 70 in August, with no new realized charge-off in between. Both methodologies agree the realized losses are low. Distress concentrates dramatically by financing type (Corporate Loans 25.35% vs Asset-Based 3.79% at the May cross-cut), by coupon band (2.1% under 14% vs 28% at 20%+), and by underwriter (Aluna Partners 31.58% vs Percent self-underwritten 4.42%).
How does Percent's Secondary Market work and is it actually liquid?
Percent launched its Secondary Market in February 2026 (announced 2/26/2026, 2/27/2026, 3/2/2026) — an order book with bid/ask depth charts allowing investors to indicate interest in buying or selling positions in eligible deals before maturity. Pricing is expressed as a percentage of par value with visibility into supply and demand depth. The feature is structurally legitimate (distinct from informal note-sale features most marketplaces offer) but enabled on only approximately 4.3% of deals at AltStreet's May 2026 capture. Order-book depth and execution statistics are not publicly disclosed. Best practice: underwrite every deal as hold-to-maturity; treat secondary market access as optional upside, not a primary exit path.
When does Percent send tax documents?
Per Percent's terms and conditions, tax forms are furnished by January 31st of the year following the calendar year to which the tax form relates (or the first business day after January 31st if it falls on a weekend or holiday). Tax forms remain available through October 15th. Default form for marketplace deals is 1099-INT (1,052 of 1,067 deals at the May 2026 ingest); a smaller number of fund and SMA structures issue K-1 (48 deals) with potentially different timing depending on the underlying fund's close cycle. For the typical marketplace investor, expect straightforward 1099-INT delivery by end of January — no extension complexity.
What is Percent's Investor Service Fee?
Percent retains 10% of every interest payment to investors as the Investor Service Fee — deducted before the investor receives the coupon. This fee is verified uniform across all 575 deals where AltStreet could extract it from the deal body text, and Percent's general disclosure confirms the same rate across the platform. The fee is fully disclosed in each deal's Additional Details / Security Details section. Modeling: net coupon = headline coupon × 0.90. Investors modeling at gross coupon overstate net returns by approximately 10%. This is a fixed servicing fee, not a performance fee — it applies regardless of whether the deal performs at target or under-performs to par.
Should I use Percent's marketplace ($500 minimum) or Separately Managed Account ($1M+ minimum)?
The decision turns on available capital, time availability, and credit-analysis confidence. Choose marketplace if: you have $25K-$100K and are willing to actively evaluate new offerings, monitor deal-level performance, and reinvest principal as deals repay every 6-36 months. Choose SMA if: you have $1M+, prefer institutional-grade professional management, and are comfortable paying 1% annual on committed capital to delegate deal selection and monitoring to Percent's investment team. SMAs typically construct 20-50 underlying positions with diversification across asset types and underwriters. RIAs and family offices favor SMA structure for client portfolios; sophisticated individual investors often start with marketplace and graduate to SMA as capital grows.
How is Percent's regulatory status different from unregistered private credit marketplaces?
Percent Securities, LLC is SEC-registered, FINRA member (since August 2023, SEC CIK 0001863789), and has filed annual reports on Form X-17A-5 for three consecutive fiscal years (FY2023 filed 2024-02-29, FY2024 filed 2025-03-17 with amendment, FY2025 filed 2026-02-27). This provides a materially stronger compliance framework than unregistered competitors: FINRA suitability oversight, AML program per Rule 3310, Business Continuity Plan per Rule 4370, Form CRS and Reg BI disclosures, FINRA arbitration for dispute resolution, and SIPC membership per Percent's disclosures (with standard limitations — SIPC does not protect against credit defaults on the underlying private debt). Most private credit marketplace competitors operate as unregistered platforms — they may offer cheaper deal economics but lack this regulatory framework.
What's the difference between Asset-Based, Corporate Loan, and Fund deals on Percent?
Asset-Based deals are backed by underlying collateral — consumer loans, SMB receivables, merchant cash advances, equipment leases, discounted receivables, litigation finance. The collateral provides structural recovery in default. AltStreet's May 2026 cross-cut found these show 3.79% lifetime distress. Corporate Loan deals are senior or junior debt to private companies, often unsecured or supported only by general corporate credit. These showed 25.35% distress in the same cross-cut — 6.7x the Asset-Based rate. Fund deals (or Blended Notes) provide diversified exposure across multiple underlying assets through a single structure, with typical $5,000 minimums and 36-month terms targeting 11-13% net returns. Asset allocation: $1.62B / 870 deals are Asset-Based, $329M+ are Corporate Loans, with a smaller Fund slice (per Percent's own track record disclosure).
Why does AltStreet's distress rate differ from Percent's reported default rate?
The two methodologies measure different things. Percent's 3.70% default rate uses a 30+ days past due (DPD) methodology — counting any deal that has missed payments by more than 30 days. Their 0.90% charge-off rate counts only deals where Percent has formally written off the loan as uncollectable. AltStreet's 7.47% lifetime distress rate combines the distress categories from the investor-api state field: Charged Off (realized loss, 12 deals) and Work-out/Restructured (active restructuring, outcome unresolved, 70 deals as of August 2026). The 1.10% AltStreet charge-off rate uses $-weighted methodology on completed deals only. Both methodologies are internally consistent; they measure different windows of credit performance. The 70 active workouts are not yet realized losses but represent deals where borrowers have stopped paying on schedule — and the count rose from 49 in the ten weeks between AltStreet's May and August captures.
Update History
What's changed in this Percent review
New data, new findings, corrections, and confirmations as they emerge. Most recent updates appear first.
- New data
Scheduled capture of the full Percent book (1,125 deals, $2,021,159,017 funded as of 2026-10-06) replaces the hand-run August capture; every figure in the data-insights block, the stat callouts and the evidence section is restated to October 6. State transitions since August 5: 24 outstanding to repaid, 7 funding to outstanding, 1 funding to repaid, 2 outstanding to work-out (Edly IBR Student Loans Sr. 2024-1 and 2024-2, $849,824 combined, 14% coupon, asset-based, maturing March and May 2027). Data Insights
- New data
Distress by financing type at the October cross-cut: Corporate Loans 36 of 152 (23.68%) against Asset-Based 48 of 776 (6.19%); the May cross-cut (25.35% vs 3.79%) stays in the text as the baseline. Refinance chains: 597 of 1,125 deals (53.1%) refinance a prior Percent note. Data Insights
