Arrived vs EquityMultiple 2026
These two platforms represent the widest possible divide in retail real estate investing: a $100 non-accredited residential platform versus a $5,000+ accredited-only commercial CRE operation. The comparison matters because both appear in the same search results — but they serve different investors, different capital levels, and different risk profiles. This guide compares what the primary source data actually shows.
Guide Thesis
The platforms don't compete. They serve different investors entirely.
Arrived: $100 minimum, non-accredited, 1099-DIV, residential real estate, going-concern on equity entities, Debt Fund clean audit. EquityMultiple: accredited only, K-1, 12.10% verified IRR, commercial real estate, fees not always disclosed on product pages.
The real comparison isn't residential vs. commercial. It's whether you qualify for EquityMultiple at all — and whether the material fee details in the offering documents change the math.
Arrived: open to non-accredited investors at $100. EquityMultiple: accredited only, $1,000–$15,000 minimums, with material fee structures disclosed primarily in offering documents rather than on product pages.
Who each platform is for
Arrived
- 👤 WhoNon-accredited and accredited investors
- 💵 Entry$100 minimum — individual property or Debt Fund
- 🎯 GoalPassive monthly income, residential real estate exposure
- 📄 Tax1099-DIV — no K-1, no partnership complexity
- ⚠️ KnowGoing-concern on equity entities (manager-level, not property-level)
- ✅ Best forFirst-time real estate investors, income-seekers, non-accredited
EquityMultiple
- 👤 WhoAccredited investors only (net worth $1M+ or income $200K+)
- 💵 Entry$1,000 (notes) · $5,000 (fund) · $15,000 (equity SPVs)
- 🎯 GoalCommercial CRE returns — debt, fund, or equity exposure
- 📄 TaxK-1 (fund/equity) · 1099-INT (notes)
- ⚠️ KnowMaterial fee details primarily in offering documents; 12.10% verified IRR vs 17% marketed
- ✅ Best forAccredited investors comfortable with CRE complexity and K-1s

The Core Decision
Different investor, different platform.
For non-accredited investors, Arrived is the only option. For accredited investors allocating to real estate, the choice is residential equity/credit (Arrived) versus commercial real estate across three distinct risk profiles (EquityMultiple). The fee structures, tax documents, and audit quality differ materially between the platforms — and between products within each platform. Both require reading the offering documents, not only the product pages.
Access
Arrived wins
$100 minimum, non-accredited eligible, open to 100% of adult investors under Reg A. EquityMultiple: accredited only, $1,000–$15,000 minimums.
Verified IRR
EquityMultiple 12.10%
Post-IC net IRR from Q1 2025 track record PDF, 58 realized deals. Arrived equity: not individually profitable at entity level (going-concern).
Tax simplicity
Arrived wins
1099-DIV for all products. EquityMultiple: K-1 for Ascent Fund and EMIP equity — K-1 delivery qualified by 'commercially reasonable efforts.'
TL;DR
The comparison in two sentences
Arrived is the most accessible fractional real estate platform for retail investors — $100 minimum, non-accredited, 1099-DIV, Bezos-backed — but every equity entity it operates carries a going-concern qualification for the second consecutive year, and the Debt Fund is the only product with an audited clean opinion and verified income. EquityMultiple is an accredited-only commercial real estate platform with a verified 12.10% post-IC net IRR across 58 realized deals — not the marketed 17% — and material fee disclosures that appear in offering documents but not on product pages.
If you read nothing else: jump to the head-to-head sections →
Arrived: what the data shows
- → Open to non-accredited investors, $100 minimum
- → Debt Fund: clean audit, 8.7% monthly yield, $3.55M FY2025 net income
- → All equity entities: going-concern for 2nd consecutive year
- → 1099-DIV — no K-1, no tax extensions required
- → 966K registered investors, $77M distributed to date
EquityMultiple: what the data shows
- → Accredited investors only — $1,000–$15,000 minimums
- → 12.10% verified post-IC net IRR (not the marketed 17%)
- → Camp Creek: $18.8M foreclosure, full loss reserve YE2025
- → Alpine Notes fee (4%) and Ascent Fund carry (20%) not on product pages
- → K-1 for Ascent Fund and EMIP — delivery qualified by "commercially reasonable efforts"
Quick decision
If you are non-accredited
Arrived
EquityMultiple is not available to you. Arrived's $100 minimum, 1099-DIV, and Regulation A structure make it the relevant platform. Start with the Debt Fund for verified income.
If you want monthly cash flow
Arrived Debt Fund
8.7% monthly yield, clean audit, $100 minimum, stable $10.00 NAV. The strongest audited income product available to retail investors between both platforms.
If you want commercial CRE exposure
EquityMultiple
12.10% verified net IRR on realized deals. Accredited investors only. Read the PPMs — the Ascent Fund carry (20%) and Alpine Notes adviser fee (4%) are not on the product pages.
$100
Arrived minimum investment — non-accredited eligible
966K registered investors. $414M total invested, $77M distributed. Regulation A Tier 2 — open to all adult investors subject to 10% income/NW cap.
12.10%
EquityMultiple verified post-IC net IRR — not the marketed 17%
58 realized deals, Q1 2025 track record PDF. Nine negative-return deals. Hudson Yards Luxury Condo II: -86.19% IRR in 23 months.
4% + 20%
Material fee details primarily disclosed in offering documents
Alpine Notes: 4% EM Advisor annual fee (offering doc page 42). Ascent Fund: 20% carried interest after 8% hurdle (PPM only). On a long-duration fund, a 20% carry after an 8% hurdle can materially reduce net investor returns relative to the headline yield — especially in quarters where the fund underperforms its hurdle.
9 / 9
Arrived equity entities with going-concern qualifications
FY2024 and FY2025 — second consecutive year. Auditor: Stephano Slack LLC. Debt Fund is the only clean-opinion entity. The going-concern reflects the manager entity's reliance on continued fundraising — not distress at the individual property level. Properties still hold positive equity. The risk is operational disruption if fundraising slows, not immediate loss of principal.
At a glance
Side-by-side at a glance
| Feature | Arrived | EquityMultiple |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory structure | Regulation A Tier 2 — open to all investors | Regulation D 506(b)/506(c) — accredited only |
| Investor eligibility | Non-accredited and accredited (10% income/NW cap for non-accredited) | Accredited investors only |
| Minimum investment | $100 (equity series, Debt Fund); $20,000 (SFR Genesis) | $1,000 (Alpine Notes); $5,000 (Ascent Fund); $15,000 (EMIP funds) |
| Asset class | Residential SFR, STR, private credit | Commercial real estate — hotel, office, multifamily, industrial |
| Primary data source | Regulation A 1-K annual reports (SEC EDGAR) | Form D filings, PPMs, quarterly reports (SEC EDGAR) |
| Tax document | 1099-DIV (equity + Debt Fund) | 1099-INT (Alpine Notes), K-1 (Ascent Fund, EMIP) |
| Verified return | Debt Fund: 8.7% (clean audit). Equity: going-concern | 12.10% post-IC net IRR (58 realized deals, Q1 2025) |
| Audit status | Debt Fund: clean. Equity entities: going-concern (8 of 9, FY2025) | No going-concern — but Ascent Fund has credit events |
| Carried interest | None — investors receive 100% of property economics after fees | Ascent Fund: 20% after 8% hurdle (PPM only). EMIP: 30% promote |
| Secondary market | PPEX ATS quarterly windows after 6-month hold | Alpine Notes: maturity (3–9 months). Ascent Fund: 1-yr lockup then quarterly. EMIP: locked |
| Corporate backing | Bezos Expeditions, Marc Benioff, $40M+ venture funding | Marcus & Millichap strategic investor (2023); Wefunder SAFE offering (2023) |
| Broker-dealer | Dalmore Group LLC (1% fee on Reg A offerings) | EM Advisor LLC (SEC-registered RIA). EM Manager LLC (managing member) |
| Auditor | Stephano Slack LLC (equity entities — going-concern). Debt Fund: clean. | BDO USA LLP (corporate). No independent audit confirmed in EMIP 26 PPM. |
Final read
Bottom Line Up Front
For non-accredited investors, there is no comparison — EquityMultiple is unavailable. Arrived is the platform, and the Debt Fund is the only audited-profitable product at $100 minimum with monthly distributions and a clean audit opinion. For accredited investors choosing between residential and commercial, the question is whether the EquityMultiple fee disclosures in the offering documents change the return math — and whether K-1 complexity is worth the commercial real estate exposure.
The structural insight from primary sources: both platforms have material disclosures that don't appear prominently in marketing. Arrived's going-concern is a forward-looking risk at the manager entity level, not evidence of property losses. EquityMultiple's undisclosed Ascent Fund carry (20%) and Alpine Notes adviser fee (4%) are documented in SEC-filed offering documents — investors evaluating from the product page are missing those terms.
Arrived: who should consider it
Non-accredited investors seeking real estate exposure at low minimums. Investors who want 1099-DIV simplicity. Income-oriented investors targeting the Debt Fund (8.7% monthly, clean audit). Investors who want individual property-level selection rather than pooled exposure. Anyone not yet meeting accredited investor thresholds.
EquityMultiple: who should consider it
Accredited investors seeking commercial real estate exposure across debt and equity. Investors comfortable with K-1 complexity and partnership structures. Investors who have read the Ascent Fund PPM (20% carry, 8% hurdle, GP-controlled NAV) and sized positions accordingly. Investors who want institutional CRE deal flow without direct ownership — and understand the 12.10% verified IRR vs. the 17% marketed figure.
Comparison hub
Head-to-head decision map
Five dimensions where the platforms diverge most sharply — sourced from primary SEC documents.
Each section isolates a decision dimension that is either absent from or understated in platform marketing. The data is from audited 1-K filings, Form D documents, and PPMs — not from arrived.com or equitymultiple.com product pages.
$100 non-accredited vs $5,000 accredited-only
Arrived vs EquityMultiple: Investor Access
The access gap between Arrived and EquityMultiple is the most fundamental difference between the platforms — not a feature comparison but a structural one. Arrived's Regulation A Tier 2 structure opens the platform to all adult investors, non-accredited and accredited alike, at $100 per property series. EquityMultiple's Regulation D structure is exclusively for accredited investors (net worth over $1M or income over $200K/$300K joint) with minimums starting at $1,000 for Alpine Notes and $15,000 for equity fund vehicles. For the majority of retail investors who do not meet the accredited standard, the comparison ends here.
Practical answer
For non-accredited investors: Arrived is the only option. The 10% income/net worth cap under Reg A Tier 2 limits maximum allocation, but $100 entry into individual property series is a genuine structural innovation. For accredited investors: both platforms are available. The choice becomes asset class (residential vs commercial), risk profile, tax tolerance (1099-DIV vs K-1), and return target.
| Decision factor | What changes |
|---|---|
| Regulatory structure | Arrived: Regulation A Tier 2 — open to all investors. EquityMultiple: Regulation D 506(b)/506(c) — accredited investors only. |
| Minimum investment | Arrived: $100 (equity series, Debt Fund). EquityMultiple: $1,000 (Alpine Notes), $5,000 (Ascent Fund), $15,000 (EMIP funds). |
| Income cap | Arrived: 10% income/net worth cap for non-accredited investors under Reg A. EquityMultiple: no income cap — accredited only. |
| Asset class | Arrived: residential SFR, STR, and private credit. EquityMultiple: commercial real estate — office, hotel, multifamily, industrial. |
Double layer fees vs layered affiliate fees — both buried in offering docs
Arrived vs EquityMultiple: Fees
Both platforms have fee structures that are more complex than their product pages convey. Arrived's SFR equity series carry a 3–5% acquisition fee, 1% annual management, and 8% property management on gross SFR rents — rising to 20% on STR 2. EquityMultiple's EMIP funds stack a 1% EM Manager LLC servicing fee on top of sponsor-level fees averaging 1.5%+ management, 2.5% acquisition, 1.5% disposition, and a 30% promote after a preferred return — totaling approximately 2.5% annually before deal carry. The Alpine Notes program carries a 4% EM Advisor annual management fee disclosed in the offering documents. The Ascent Income Fund carries a 20% carried interest after an 8% hurdle disclosed in the PPM. On a long-duration fund like the Ascent, a 20% carry after an 8% hurdle can materially reduce net investor outcomes relative to the headline yield — particularly in periods where the fund returns cluster near the hurdle rate.
Practical answer
Neither platform's fee story is fully told on its product pages — both have material terms disclosed primarily in offering documents. Arrived's affiliate fees (8–20% property management) are the largest single drag for income-oriented investors. EquityMultiple's double management fee layer plus carried interest on the Ascent Fund are the most structurally significant terms to understand before allocating. For investors focused on total fee drag: read the offering documents for both platforms, not the homepage.
| Decision factor | What changes |
|---|---|
| Management fee | Arrived SFR equity: 1% annual. Arrived Debt Fund: 2.40% (dual parallel fees — 1.20% on NAV + 1.20% on gross portfolio). EquityMultiple Ascent: 1.5% on NAV. EMIP funds: 1% EM Manager + sponsor fees. |
| Carried interest | Arrived: no carry — investors receive 100% of property-level economics after fees. EquityMultiple Ascent: 20% carry after 8% hurdle (PPM only, not on product page). EMIP: 30% promote with 30% catch-up. |
| Property / adviser fee | Arrived SFR: 8% of gross SFR rents (20% on STR 2) paid to Arrived Fund Manager LLC. EquityMultiple Alpine Notes: 4% EM Advisor annual fee on net assets — deferred, page 42 of offering docs. |
| Acquisition / disposition | Arrived: 3–5% one-time acquisition per property. EquityMultiple EMIP: 2.5% acquisition, 1.5% disposition at sponsor level (min $100K each). |
12.10% verified CRE IRR vs residential income + appreciation
Arrived vs EquityMultiple: Returns
The return comparison is not apples-to-apples — the platforms invest in fundamentally different asset classes with different return structures. EquityMultiple's verified post-IC net IRR is 12.10% across 58 realized deals, including nine negative-return deals and three with losses over 20% (average -59.85% for those three). Arrived's equity entities target total return through rental income plus appreciation but are not individually profitable at entity level — all equity series carry going-concern qualifications. The Arrived Debt Fund is the outlier: 8.7% current yield, $3.55M FY2025 net income, clean audit, $10.00 stable NAV. That is the only audited-income product at comparable scale between the two platforms.
Practical answer
For income investors: Arrived Debt Fund (8.7% monthly, clean audit) is the most transparently supported income product at retail minimums. For total return on commercial real estate: EquityMultiple's 12.10% verified IRR — with the loss scenarios understood — is the relevant figure. The marketed 17% figure cannot be reconciled with the Q1 2025 track record document. Use 12.10%.
| Decision factor | What changes |
|---|---|
| Verified IRR | Arrived equity: not profitable at entity level — going-concern qualifications on all equity entities. Arrived Debt Fund: 8.7% (clean audit). EquityMultiple: 12.10% post-IC net IRR (58 realized deals, Q1 2025 track record PDF). |
| Marketing vs verified | Arrived: does not publish a realized IRR track record. EquityMultiple: markets 17% net IRR — AltStreet verified 12.10% from the same source document. Methodology difference not explained. |
| Worst realized deal | Arrived: no realized asset losses in equity portfolio to date. EquityMultiple: Hudson Yards Luxury Condo II — -86.19% IRR in 23 months. Nine of 58 realized deals produced negative returns. |
| Current income | Arrived Debt Fund: 8.7% monthly. Arrived SFR equity: 3.6%–7.0% quarterly distributions (varies by series). Ascent Income Fund: 9.64% Q1 2025, 5.84% Q2 2025 (Camp Creek default). Alpine Notes: 5.84%–7.72% at maturity. |
Going-concern on equity entities vs undisclosed fund credit issues
Arrived vs EquityMultiple: Audit Quality
Both platforms have material audit-adjacent disclosures that investors should understand before allocating. Arrived's going-concern qualifications appear on every equity entity for a second consecutive year — a structural reflection of the manager's fundraising dependency, not individual property distress. Properties still hold positive equity. EquityMultiple's equity entities do not carry going-concern flags, but the Ascent Income Fund's nine-quarter performance record shows the fund has not sustained its 11–13% target for a full quarter, the Camp Creek position ($18.8M) is in full loss reserve following a foreclosure on October 7, 2025, and the Holmdel office loan has no remaining extension options as of April 2026.
Practical answer
Arrived's going-concern is a forward-looking risk at the manager level — not evidence of property losses. EquityMultiple's Ascent Fund credit issues are realized and ongoing: a documented foreclosure, two loans with execution risk, and a -0.34% monthly return recorded in September 2024. Neither platform has a clean audit story across all products. The Arrived Debt Fund and EquityMultiple Alpine Notes are the cleanest products on each platform respectively.
| Decision factor | What changes |
|---|---|
| Audit status | Arrived equity: going-concern on 8 of 9 entities (Stephano Slack LLC, FY2025). Arrived Debt Fund: clean. EquityMultiple: no going-concern — but Ascent Fund carries undisclosed credit events. |
| Portfolio incidents | Arrived: STR 2 — first impairment ($25,339 on Vita series). No realized asset losses. EquityMultiple: Camp Creek foreclosure ($18.8M, full loss reserve YE2025). Holmdel office: hard April 2026 maturity, no extensions. Beacon Hotel: loan modified upward $3.3M due to tariff cost overruns. |
| NAV integrity | Arrived: NAV determined quarterly by manager, explicitly 'not based on GAAP fair value standards.' EquityMultiple Ascent: GP self-values Level 3 assets; fund administrator does not verify valuations — NAV 'conclusive and binding' per partnership agreement. |
| Fund profitability | Arrived Debt Fund: $3.55M net income FY2025 (audited). Arrived equity entities: not profitable. Ascent Income Fund: average net yield 8.39% since inception through Q2 2025 — below 11–13% target every quarter. |
1099-DIV simplicity vs K-1 complexity
Arrived vs EquityMultiple: Tax Reporting
Tax reporting is one of the most underweighted factors in platform selection and one of the clearest Arrived advantages. Arrived issues 1099-DIV for all equity series and the Debt Fund — the same tax form investors receive from dividend-paying stocks. No K-1s, no partnership tax returns, no extensions required. EquityMultiple issues K-1s for the Ascent Income Fund and EMIP equity funds (partnership structures) — with delivery committed by April 30 each year, qualified by 'commercially reasonable efforts.' Historically, K-1 delays at CRE crowdfunding platforms have forced investors to file tax extensions. The real estate crowdfunding K-1 vs 1099 question is one of the highest-searched pain points in the category.
Practical answer
For investors who file their own taxes or have straightforward situations: Arrived's 1099-DIV structure is a meaningful operational advantage. For accredited investors with CPA support who are comfortable with K-1 complexity: EquityMultiple's tax structure is manageable. The Alpine Notes (EquityMultiple) issue 1099-INT — simpler than K-1 but less familiar than 1099-DIV for equity investors.
| Decision factor | What changes |
|---|---|
| Tax document | Arrived equity + Debt Fund: 1099-DIV. EquityMultiple Alpine Notes: 1099-INT. EquityMultiple Ascent Fund + EMIP: Schedule K-1. |
| Delivery commitment | Arrived: standard 1099 timeline (January 31 for most). EquityMultiple K-1: 'commercially reasonable efforts' by April 30 — qualifying language that has historically led to extensions. |
| UBTI risk | Arrived equity: no UBTI (REIT/Reg A structure). EquityMultiple EMIP equity: UBTI explicitly expected — 'most of the income generated by the Company will be UBTI' (EMIP 26 offering docs). Not suitable for IRAs. |
| Section 199A | Arrived: not a REIT — no Section 199A deduction. EquityMultiple: partnership K-1 income may qualify for QBI deduction under Section 199A subject to limitations — consult a tax adviser. |
Best real estate crowdfunding for non-accredited investors?
Short answer
Between Arrived and EquityMultiple, only Arrived is available to non-accredited investors. More broadly, Arrived's $100 minimum and Regulation A structure make it the most accessible fractional real estate platform in the market alongside Fundrise. For investors with under $5,000, Arrived's individual property series and Debt Fund are the practical choices. EquityMultiple starts at $1,000 (Alpine Notes) but requires accredited investor status — making it unavailable to approximately 87% of American households.
Scenario Analysis
Best way to invest $5,000–$10,000 in real estate
What each platform offers across common retail allocation sizes — May 2026.
| Metric | Arrived Debt Fund | Arrived SFR Equity | EquityMultiple Alpine Notes | EquityMultiple Ascent Fund |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | $100 | $100 per property | $1,000 | $5,000 |
| Accredited required? | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Current yield | 8.7% monthly | 3.6%–7.0% quarterly (varies) | 5.84%–7.72% at maturity | 5.84%–9.64% quarterly (Q2 2025 low) |
| Tax document | 1099-DIV | 1099-DIV | 1099-INT | K-1 (partnership) |
| Liquidity | Quarterly Secondary Market after 6-month hold | Quarterly Secondary Market after 6-month hold | 3–9 month term; early exit forfeits accrued interest | 1-year lockup, then quarterly at GP discretion |
| Audit status | Clean opinion (FY2025) | Going-concern (FY2025) | No going-concern | No going-concern — but Camp Creek foreclosure, credit events |
| Est. annual income on $10K | ~$870 (8.7% net) | ~$360–$700 (varies by property) | ~$584–$772 (at maturity, 3–9 months) | ~$584–$964 (quarterly, Q2 2025 = $584) |
For non-accredited investors with $10,000: Arrived Debt Fund is the only currently available option with audited income at 8.7% monthly. For accredited investors: Alpine Notes offers competitive short-term rates with simpler tax treatment (1099-INT) and no lockup risk. Ascent Fund offers higher targeted yield with more structural complexity — read the PPM before allocating.
What are EquityMultiple's realized returns vs Arrived?
Short answer
EquityMultiple's marketing cites 17% net IRR. AltStreet's analysis of the Q1 2025 track record PDF — the platform's own source document — shows 12.10% post-IC net IRR across 58 realized deals. The methodology behind the 17% figure is not explained in marketing. Nine of 58 deals produced negative returns. Hudson Yards Luxury Condo II: -86.19% IRR in 23 months. Three deals with losses over 20% averaged -59.85% IRR. Investors should use 12.10% for comparative analysis.
⚠ EquityMultiple IRR: 12.10% verified vs 17% marketed
AltStreet verified the 12.10% post-IC net IRR from EquityMultiple's Q1 2025 track record PDF covering 58 realized deals. The platform's marketing cites 17% net IRR without explaining the methodology. The 17% figure cannot be reconciled with the 12.10% figure from the same investment period. Use 12.10% for any comparative analysis.
| IRR bucket | Deal count | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Loss >20% | 3 deals | Average -59.85% IRR. Includes Hudson Yards Luxury Condo II (-86.19% in 23 months). Concentrated in NYC luxury condo, 2021–2023. |
| Loss 0–20% | 6 deals | Negative returns, less than 20% loss. Hotel, office, and value-add multifamily exposure dominant. |
| Break-even | 1 deal | Approximately 0% IRR. |
| Gain 10–20% | 35 deals (60%) | The largest bucket — core realized performance for the platform. |
| Gain 20%+ | 9 deals | Outperformers. Concentrated in select multifamily and industrial. |
| Overall average | 58 deals | 12.10% post-IC net IRR. Average hold: 28.2 months. 48 positive, 9 negative, 1 break-even. |
The 60% of deals returning 10–20% IRR is the most relevant figure for investors underwriting a new EquityMultiple allocation. The loss deals are real — three deals at average -59.85% represent genuine capital loss at scale — but the dominant experience across the track record is 10–20% returns on a 28-month average hold. Why this matters: the 12.10% verified figure versus the 17% marketed figure is not a rounding difference — it represents a meaningful gap that compounds over a multi-year hold. Investors sizing allocations based on the 17% figure may be overstating expected returns. Arrived does not publish a comparable realized IRR track record.
How do fees compare — Arrived vs EquityMultiple?
Short answer
Neither platform's fee story is fully told on its product pages. Arrived SFR equity: 3–5% acquisition, 1% annual management, 8% property management on gross SFR rents (20% on STR 2), 6–7% disposition fee. Arrived Debt Fund: 2.40% annual dual parallel fees — net of both, the 8.7% yield is what you receive. EquityMultiple Alpine Notes: no investor-level fee, but the underlying structure carries a 4% EM Advisor fee (offering doc page 42). Ascent Fund: 1.5% management + 20% carry after 8% hurdle (PPM only). EMIP equity funds: ~2.5% annually before deal-level carry. Read the offering documents.
Fee detail
Fee structures: what the offering documents actually say
The fee stack on both platforms is more complex than the product pages convey. The table below reflects what appears in SEC-filed offering documents — not homepage disclosures.
| Fee | Arrived SFR Equity | Arrived Debt Fund | EM Alpine Notes | EM Ascent Fund | EM EMIP Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management fee | 1% annual | 2.40% annual (dual parallel) | None at investor level | 1.5% on NAV (Accretiv sponsor) | 1% EM Manager + sponsor fees ~1.5%+ |
| Adviser / platform fee | 8% property mgmt (SFR); 20% (STR 2) | N/A — credit fund | 4% EM Advisor annual on net assets (page 42 of offering docs) | Disclosed in PPM | Layered — see offering docs |
| Carried interest | None | None | None at investor level | 20% after 8% hurdle (PPM only) | 30% promote with 30% catch-up |
| Acquisition fee | 3–5% per property | Not disclosed separately | N/A | 2.5% (min $100K) at sponsor level | 2.5%/$15M then 2.0% |
| Disposition fee | 6–7% of gross sale price | None | None | 1.5% (min $100K) | 1.5%/$15M then 1.0% |
| Disclosed on product page? | Partially — acquisition and management shown | Yes — 8.7% yield net of fees | No — 4% adviser fee not on product page | No — 20% carry not on product page | Partially — fee layers in offering docs |
Why this matters: the distinction between fees disclosed on product pages and fees disclosed in offering documents affects how investors model net returns. A 20% carried interest after an 8% hurdle, combined with a 1.5% management fee and a 2.5% acquisition fee, can reduce investor net returns by 2–4 percentage points annually relative to the gross deal return. Investors who read only the product page summary will underestimate total cost.
Real estate crowdfunding K-1 vs 1099 — which platform is simpler?
Short answer
Arrived issues 1099-DIV for all equity series and the Debt Fund — the same form as dividend-paying stocks, no partnership complexity. EquityMultiple issues 1099-INT for Alpine Notes (simpler) and Schedule K-1 for the Ascent Fund and EMIP equity funds — K-1 delivery committed by April 30 with 'commercially reasonable efforts' qualifying language. The real estate crowdfunding K-1 vs 1099-DIV question is one of the most-searched pain points in the category. For investors who file their own taxes or want to avoid extensions: Arrived's 1099 structure is a genuine operational advantage.
Primary sources
Research methodology
EquityMultiple sources
- ›201 Form D filings (2015–2026) — CIKs 0001661143–0002090026. 198 enriched entity profiles. $285.4M total verified capital raised from 8,463 investor-slots. EDGAR ↗
- ›7 PPMs (EMIP 26, Ascent Fund, Alpine Notes series) — Carried interest (20%/8% hurdle), adviser fee (4%), BPD Notes security, EMIP waterfall structures. AltStreet internal dossier.
- ›9 Ascent Fund quarterly reports (Q3 2023–Q3 2025) — Performance history, Camp Creek foreclosure (Oct 7 2025), Holmdel extension, Beacon Hotel loan modification.
- ›Q1 2025 track record PDF — 58 realized deals, 12.10% post-IC net IRR, 28.2-month avg hold. Source of the 17% vs 12.10% discrepancy.
- ›Form C/A — CIK 0001637278 — FY2023 corporate financials. Revenue $9.66M, net loss $5.57M, cash $3.7M, $31.6M Alpine Notes on balance sheet. EDGAR ↗
Arrived sources
- ›Form 1-K (FY2025) — all nine entities — Going-concern on 8 equity entities (Stephano Slack LLC). Debt Fund clean audit, $3.55M net income, $70.3M assets, $10.00 NAV. EDGAR ↗
- ›Arrived Debt Fund 1-K (FY2025) — CIK 0002007995. Clean opinion. 59 loans at 9.125%–12.50%. 3x YoY growth ($24.4M → $70.3M). EDGAR ↗
- ›Regulation A Offering Circulars — Fee disclosures: 8% property management (SFR), 20% (STR 2), 1% annual management, 3–5% acquisition fee. Reg A Tier 2 10% income/NW cap terms.
- ›arrived.com platform scrape (May 2026) — 966K registered investors, $414M total invested, $77M distributed, secondary market structure, Debt Fund terms.
FAQs
Arrived vs EquityMultiple: Common questions
What is the minimum investment for Arrived vs EquityMultiple?+
Arrived: $100 for individual SFR and STR property series and the Debt Fund; $20,000 for the SFR Genesis Fund institutional product. EquityMultiple: $1,000 for Alpine Notes (short-term fixed-rate notes); $5,000 for the Ascent Income Fund; $15,000 for EMIP equity fund vehicles. The platforms serve fundamentally different investors — Arrived is built for low-minimum retail access, EquityMultiple is designed for accredited investors making meaningful commercial real estate allocations.
Can non-accredited investors use EquityMultiple?+
No. EquityMultiple is exclusively for accredited investors across all three product pillars — Alpine Notes, Ascent Income Fund, and EMIP equity funds. All offerings are Regulation D 506(b) or 506(c), which require accredited investor status. If you are not accredited, Arrived is the relevant platform — it operates under Regulation A Tier 2, which permits non-accredited investors subject to a 10% income or net worth investment cap.
What is the real IRR on EquityMultiple investments?+
EquityMultiple's marketing cites a 17% net IRR. AltStreet's analysis of the Q1 2025 track record PDF — sourced directly from EquityMultiple's own document — shows a 12.10% post-IC (post-Investment Committee) net IRR across 58 realized deals (2019–Q1 2025). The methodology behind the 17% figure is not explained in marketing materials. AltStreet uses 12.10% for comparative analysis. The track record also shows nine deals with negative returns, including Hudson Yards Luxury Condo II at -86.19% IRR in 23 months.
Does Arrived have going-concern issues?+
Yes — on its equity entities. Every Arrived equity entity (Core SFR, SFR Genesis, STR, STR 2, Homes 3, Homes 4, Homes 5, Seattle Fund) carries a going-concern qualification from auditor Stephano Slack LLC in FY2024 and FY2025 annual reports. The going-concern reflects the manager entity's reliance on continued Regulation A fundraising to cover operating expenses — not distress at the individual property level. Arrived's Debt Fund is the single exception: it holds a clean audit opinion, $70.3M in assets, and $3.55M net income in FY2025. EquityMultiple equity entities do not carry going-concern flags, but several Ascent Fund loans (Camp Creek, Holmdel, Beacon Hotel) have disclosed performance issues.
Is EquityMultiple's Alpine Notes really fee-free?+
At the investor level — yes, investors do not pay a fee on Alpine Notes directly. However, the underlying lending structure carries a 4% annual management fee paid to EM Advisor LLC (an affiliated SEC-registered investment adviser), deferred and subordinated until the notes are repaid. This fee is disclosed on page 42 of the offering documents, not on the product page. EquityMultiple's own disclosure language acknowledges: 'The Management Fee may give EM Advisor an incentive to propose Company Investments that are riskier or more aggressive than would be the case in the absence of the Management Fee.' Investors should read the offering documents, not only the product page, before allocating.
What tax documents do Arrived and EquityMultiple issue?+
Arrived issues 1099-DIV for all equity series and the Debt Fund — a significant operational advantage for retail investors. No K-1s, no tax extensions, no pass-through complexity. EquityMultiple issues Schedule K-1 for the Ascent Income Fund and EMIP equity funds (partnership structures), and 1099-INT for Alpine Notes (promissory notes). K-1s are promised within 120 days of fiscal year-end with 'commercially reasonable efforts' — qualifying language that has historically resulted in investors needing to file tax extensions. The real estate crowdfunding without K-1s narrative is a genuine Arrived differentiator.
Which platform has better liquidity: Arrived or EquityMultiple?+
Neither platform offers reliable near-term liquidity — both are fundamentally illiquid alternative investments. Arrived equity series offer quarterly Secondary Market trading windows via PPEX ATS after a 6-month hold, but volume and pricing are not publicly disclosed. The Debt Fund offers the same quarterly mechanism. EquityMultiple's Alpine Notes (3–9 months) are the closest to liquid — but early redemption forfeits all accrued interest unless reinvested in EM products. The Ascent Income Fund has a 1-year lockup then quarterly redemptions at GP discretion. EMIP equity funds are fully locked for the investment term. For investors who prioritize current income without principal access, the Arrived Debt Fund's 8.7% monthly yield is more relevant than the redemption window discussion.
Which platform is better for monthly cash flow?+
Arrived Debt Fund: 8.7% current yield with monthly distributions, $100 minimum, clean audit, $10.00 stable NAV. This is the standout income product for retail investors between the two platforms. EquityMultiple's Alpine Notes offer competitive short-term rates (5.84%–7.72%) but are not monthly — they pay at maturity (3–9 months). The Ascent Income Fund targets 11–13% annualized but has averaged 8.39% since inception and pays quarterly, with Q2 2025 at 5.84% following the Camp Creek default. For consistent monthly cash flow at low minimum, Arrived Debt Fund is the stronger option. For accredited investors seeking commercial real estate income at scale, Ascent Fund is the relevant vehicle — with the performance and credit risk understood.
Best real estate crowdfunding for non-accredited investors?+
Between Arrived and EquityMultiple, only Arrived is available to non-accredited investors. More broadly, Arrived's $100 minimum and Regulation A structure make it one of the most accessible fractional real estate platforms in the market — alongside Fundrise, which also uses Regulation A. For investors with under $5,000 to allocate, Arrived's individual property series and Debt Fund are the practical choices. The 10% income/net worth cap under Reg A Tier 2 limits position sizing for non-accredited participants, but this is a regulatory constraint, not a platform policy.
Does EquityMultiple have hidden fees?+
Not hidden in the legal sense — all fees are SEC-filed. But the disclosure hierarchy is structured such that the most economically significant terms appear deep in offering documents rather than on product pages. The Ascent Income Fund's 20% carried interest after an 8% hurdle is in the 105-page PPM, not on the product page. The Alpine Notes' 4% EM Advisor fee is on page 42 of the offering document, not the homepage. The EMIP equity funds carry double management fee layers — EM Manager LLC's 1% annual servicing fee plus sponsor-level fees of 1.5%+ — that aggregate to approximately 2.5% annually before deal-level carry. Investors evaluating EquityMultiple from the marketing layer are missing material structural information. Read the PPMs.
Full Platform Analysis: Arrived and EquityMultiple
Both reviews are sourced from primary SEC filings — Regulation A 1-K annuals, Form D documents, PPMs, quarterly reports, and EDGAR entity data. No marketing language, no affiliate framing.
Arrived Full Review
9-entity SEC analysis, going-concern findings on equity series, Debt Fund clean audit, 8.7% yield, affiliate fee structure, $100 minimum deep-dive.
EquityMultiple Full Review
201 EDGAR entities, 12.10% verified IRR, Alpine Notes fee disclosure, Ascent Fund carry gap, Camp Creek foreclosure, 9-quarter performance record.
Arrived vs RealtyMogul
Two Reg A platforms compared — going-concern vs audited foreclosure, suspended redemptions, NAV decline, and platform ownership conflict.
Fractional Real Assets
Full category coverage — farmland, residential fractional, alternative REITs, and energy infrastructure platforms across the real assets universe.
