Carbon Equity Review 2026: What the Access Fee Buys, What Performance Can Be Evaluated, and What Protections Come With a Twelve-Year Commitment
Carbon Equity is a Dutch fund manager, licensed by the AFM since December 2023, that pools individual investors in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany into closed-end vehicles committing to third-party climate venture, private equity, infrastructure and debt funds, at a EUR 100,000 minimum on most funds and EUR 20,000 on a retail fund authorized under the European long-term investment fund rules. The fee tables are on every fund page and every fund has a named depositary in the public register. No fund-level result for any of the thirteen vehicles is in the public material AltStreet reviewed, so a prospective investor cannot assess the track record without asking for it.

No platform response on record for this review. Is this your platform? Respond or claim it.
What the data actually shows - TL;DR
Three questions decide this review. What does the access layer buy?
Read the full assessmentShow less
A licensed Dutch manager with a depositary on every fund, a foundation holding title, named institutional climate funds that several underlying managers confirm at EUR 200 million to EUR 2 billion, a selection process the firm describes in detail, and twelve years of capital calls, reporting and depositary administration, priced at a tiered annual fee on the commitment (0.95% at EUR 100,000 on the current flagship), a 1% setup fee on top, an expense cap, and the underlying managers' own fees and carry. What net performance can a prospective investor evaluate? From the public material, none: no TVPI, DPI, IRR, NAV per unit or distribution for any vehicle appears on the site, in the press releases, event pages or four annual reports, and the only valuation statement is the manager's own, EUR 37 million invested worth EUR 34 million at the end of 2023.
Investors receive quarterly capital account statements, so the figures exist; the earliest vehicles are now five years old and the first portfolio fund closed nearly four years ago, which is long enough for dated, vehicle-level marks to be asked for and judged. What protections and dependencies come with the commitment? Strong structural protections at the fund level, retail protections on one fund only, zero liquidity by design, front-loaded capital calls, a manager that reported a EUR 3.53 million loss on EUR 2.38 million of revenue in 2025 and whose going-concern note says management expects profitability in early 2028, and an open question about whether the retail fund pays a second Carbon Equity fee layer on its holding in the firm's own co-investment fund.
AltStreet checked the funds index, the five open fund pages, the FAQ, fourteen press releases, thirteen event pages, four annual reports and 30 archived snapshots. None publishes a TVPI, DPI, IRR, NAV per unit, called percentage or distribution for any Carbon Equity vehicle. The 2023 annual report states that EUR 37 million invested across all funds had a total value of EUR 34 million at December 31, 2023; the 2024 and 2025 reports give invested amounts without a value.
The fund pages carry target net IRRs of 7% to 25%. Statements go to investors quarterly, so the figures exist and can be requested.
The fee stack on Climate Tech Portfolio Fund IV at a EUR 100,000 commitment as the site states it: a 0.95% annual Carbon Equity fee on the commitment (1.00% below EUR 100,000, down to 0.40% above EUR 20 million), a 1% one-off setup fee invoiced on top of the commitment, fund expenses capped below 0.3% a year on average, then the underlying managers' 2% management fee and 20% carried interest on their own bases. If the fee and the expense cap run on the full commitment for the stated twelve-year life, the Carbon Equity layer is up to EUR 16,000; whether the fee steps down after the investment period is not stated publicly.
Total costs on a EUR 100,000 commitment over the twelve-year recommended holding period in the key information document for Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II dated January 1, 2023, the only all-in cost document in the public record. The same document states a reduction in yield of 8.5 percentage points a year in its moderate scenario, an all-in ongoing charge of 2.5% a year covering Carbon Equity's fee and administration plus the underlying funds' average fees, underlying carried interest of 12.0% of the gross return, a 1% entry fee and exit costs of 0% to 20% for leaving before the recommended period. It is a historical figure for one closed fund, not a verified cost of today's offerings.
The AFM register of licensed AIFMs lists Carbon Equity B.V. with a full license under article 2:65 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act and seventeen fund rows, all but one marked for professional and retail investors, each with a named depositary (Apex Depositary Services for most, CACEIS for the retail fund, Belfius for the Belgian vehicles). Before that date the firm was a light-regime registrant, and its own 2022 and 2023 pages said the investment fell outside AFM supervision. The retail fund, Access to Climate Tech Fund II, is authorized as a European long-term investment fund with a EUR 20,000 minimum.
Commitments under management at December 31, 2025 on a signed-subscription basis, the number of commitments, and the capital deployed into 29 climate funds and 8 co-investments, from the audited 2025 annual report. The website stated EUR 470 million and 1,900 or more investors on October 30, 2026; AltStreet carries the audited figure.
The manager's result on EUR 2.38 million of revenue, per the audited report signed June 30, 2026 with an unqualified opinion. The company reported a loss in each filed year, held EUR 6.6 million of cash at year end after a EUR 6.4 million equity round in September 2025, and the report's going-concern note records management's expectation that profitability will be realized in early 2028. Investor assets sit in separate partnerships with a depositary; the manager is the party that runs them for twelve years.
Regulatory facts are from the AFM and ESMA registers downloaded October 30, 2026. Manager financials are from Carbon Equity B.V.'s audited annual reports for 2022 through 2025 as published on its own site. Fund terms, fees and eligibility are from carbonequity.com captured October 30, 2026 and from Wayback Machine snapshots dated as cited. Fund sizes are the platform's own statements with their dates; where the platform has published two figures for the same fund, both are recorded. Money is in euros, the funds' currency, except the US dollar co-investment fund and the Form D, which are in dollars.
Quick Verdict
Is this platform right for you?
Carbon Equity is a properly licensed Dutch manager selling a sensible idea, pooled access to institutional climate funds at EUR 100,000 and now EUR 20,000, with the scaffolding most access platforms never build: a full AIFM license in the public register, a depositary on every fund, a foundation holding title, a supervisory board, a suitability assessment for everyone, Kifid membership, audited accounts of the manager published every year, and fee tables tier by tier on every fund page. The underlying funds are named and several are confirmable at institutional scale.
Read the full assessmentShow less
What the public record does not let a prospective investor do is evaluate what the access has earned: no fund has a published result, the one valuation statement is the manager's own from the end of 2023, and the one all-in cost document is a January 2023 key information document for a closed fund showing EUR 60,761 of costs on EUR 100,000 over twelve years. Those figures exist in the quarterly statements the firm sends its investors, and the oldest vehicles are old enough for them to mean something; the practical step is to ask for them, dated and by vehicle, along with the key information document of the fund in question. The commitment also carries dependencies to weigh: a manager that reported a loss in each filed year and expects profitability in early 2028, with fund assets segregated behind depositaries; a retail fund that holds the firm's own co-investment fund on fee terms the public record does not state; zero liquidity for twelve years; and a first call that for a minimum investor is the whole commitment on day one.
Best for
- Dutch, Belgian or German investors with EUR 100,000 they will not need for twelve years, who want named institutional climate funds under a licensed manager with a depositary, and who will obtain the key information document and dated capital account statements of the closed funds before signing.
- Retail investors considering the EUR 20,000 ELTIF who have read its key information document and received a written answer on the fees charged on the fund's holding in Carbon Equity's own co-investment fund.
Avoid if
- You will not ask for fund-level results; none are published.
- You may need the money before the mid-2030s, or you cannot absorb the default penalties on later capital calls.
- You are a US person who has not confirmed eligibility, US tax classification and reporting with the firm.
- You want the current all-in cost in writing before registering; it is behind the login.
Top strengths
- A full Dutch AIFM license in the AFM register since December 11, 2023 with a depositary named on each of seventeen fund rows, an ELTIF authorization for the retail fund, and passporting to Belgium and Germany.
- Fee tables tier by tier on every open fund page, with the setup fee, its discounts, the expense caps and the underlying 2% and 20% stated plainly.
- Four years of the manager's own audited accounts published on its site, including revenue by fee line, losses, cash, equity raises and going-concern notes.
- Named underlying funds, several confirmable on their managers' own sites at institutional scale, inside Dutch limited partnerships with a foundation holding title and a unanimous investment committee with a non-voting risk officer.
- Plain statements of illiquidity, capital call mechanics, default penalties and the exemption routes used, and no enforcement action, measure, court ruling or complaints ruling located in the sources searched.
Key limitations
- No fund-level performance in the public material for any of thirteen vehicles; one manager-level value statement from 2023; a prospective investor must request dated, vehicle-level statements.
- No fund document for any open fund outside the login; the only all-in cost document is a January 2023 key information document for a closed fund.
- A manager with a loss in each filed year (EUR 3.53 million in 2025) and a going-concern note recording management's expectation of profitability in early 2028, with fund assets protected by structure rather than by the manager's balance sheet.
- The retail ELTIF holds the firm's own co-investment fund, which has a 1.25% fee, a 10% performance fee and team carry, on fee terms and at an allocation not stated in public.
- An access layer illustrated at up to 16% of the commitment over twelve years before underlying fees, a setup fee on top of the commitment, and a first call that for a minimum investor is the whole commitment on day one.
- Nine of thirteen vehicles sold under the light regime beneath a banner that the investment fell outside AFM supervision; no fund auditor named and no fund annual account published since.
- Paired published figures for the same closed funds (EUR 105 million and EUR 107 million; about EUR 100 million and EUR 96 million) and a website AUM of EUR 470 million against an audited EUR 364 million.
Compare Before Deciding
Where Carbon Equity fits against alternatives
Use these hooks to pressure-test whether this is the right platform, or whether a nearby alternative matches the job better.
How this compares to Moonfare Review
Moonfare Review
The European feeder platform at EUR 50,000 to EUR 100,000 minimums; the closest structural comparison.
How this compares to iCapital Review
iCapital Review
US adviser-channel feeders whose terms are not published.
How this compares to Alumni Ventures Review
Alumni Ventures Review
A US venture fund-of-funds model with 2% and 20% and a published returned-capital figure.
Quick Answers
What most investors want to know first
The highest-signal facts first: minimums, liquidity reality, K-1 timing, and whether distributions are actually part of the experience.
Liquidity
There is no market. The firm's FAQ says most funds do not offer liquidity, that it cannot assist in finding a buyer and that there is no guarantee of selling at full value. An investor should treat the commitment as locked until the fund winds up in the mid-2030s, with the retail fund's redemption option as a possibility to be confirmed in writing rather than a feature to rely on.
K-1 Timing
Not described. The public site says nothing about US reporting; a US holder should ask what the fund provides.
Distributions
No distribution has been published for any fund. The 2023 key information document assumes an investor gets the invested amount back after about seven years in the moderate scenario.
Overview
Platform Overview
A concise read on what the platform is, how the structure works, and where the practical friction shows up for real investors.
Carbon Equity B.V. (Dutch Chamber of Commerce 77772784, Amsterdam, with a Berlin office) is an alternative investment fund manager that raises money from individuals and commits it to climate-focused private funds run by other managers. The recent vehicles are Dutch limited partnerships in which a Carbon Equity general partner company per fund is the general partner, investors are limited partners and a separate foundation holds legal title; the earlier funds are funds for joint account with the same foundation.
Each vehicle commits to between one and nine underlying funds plus co-investments alongside them. Investors commit a fixed amount, pay a first capital call of 30% to 70% of it depending on the fund, and meet further calls over roughly five years; fees are included in the calls and the manager invoices its management fee six months in advance. The manager has held a full AIFM license under article 2:65 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act since December 11, 2023, amended in 2025 to permit a direct co-investment fund, and passports its funds to Belgium and Germany.
Thirteen vehicles have been launched since July 2021, five were open to new commitments on October 30, 2026, and the AFM register carries seventeen fund rows including two Belgian vehicles each for the second and third portfolio funds. The manager earns a tiered annual fee on commitments, a 1% setup fee on top of each commitment, and on the co-investment fund a 10% performance fee above a 1.25x distributions-to-paid-in hurdle.
The first vehicle, a EUR 3.6 million feeder into 2150's Urban Tech Sustainability Fund I, launched in July 2021 at a EUR 100,000 minimum; three more single-fund feeders followed into Astanor, Lightrock and ArcTern, then a sequence of diversified portfolio funds. The first, marketed in 2021 as the Decarbonization Fund I, raised EUR 42 million by December 2022 and is now called Climate Tech Portfolio Fund I. The second closed at about EUR 100 million in early 2024, the third at EUR 105 million or EUR 107 million in April 2025 with over 200 investors, and the fourth opened in July 2025 with a final close set for December 31, 2026. A EUR 50 million infrastructure fund of funds closed in January 2026, a EUR 20,000 retail ELTIF opened in May 2025, a US dollar co-investment fund launched in December 2025 after a license amendment, and a EUR 15 million target energy transition debt fund launched in May 2026.
The manager operated as a light-regime registrant until December 11, 2023, when the AFM granted a full AIFM license. The audited record shows commitments under management of EUR 78 million at the end of 2022, EUR 168 million at the end of 2023, EUR 288 million at the end of 2024 and approximately EUR 364 million at the end of 2025 on a signed-subscription basis, with EUR 128.9 million deployed into 29 underlying funds and 8 co-investments and 1,657 commitments; the manager reported a loss of EUR 3.53 million on EUR 2.38 million of revenue in 2025.
Founded & Structure
Carbon Equity B.V., Amsterdam, Dutch Chamber of Commerce 77772784, incorporated 2020 and operating from July 2021, with a Berlin office. Statutory directors per the 2025 annual report: J.L. van den Ende (CEO), L.E. Koole (CFO) and D.G.W. Schafer (Chief Legal and Risk Officer); a three-person supervisory board. Thirty-four staff on the team page. Equity raised: EUR 1.2 million and EUR 1.8 million in 2022 led by 4impact, EUR 6 million in September 2023 led by BlackFin Capital Partners, EUR 6.4 million in September 2025. Share premium EUR 15.75 million; cumulative reserves about minus EUR 9.6 million at December 31, 2025.
What you buy
A limited partnership interest in a Dutch closed-end fund of funds (the recent vehicles are C.V.s with a Carbon Equity general partner company and a foundation holding title; the earlier ones are funds for joint account) that commits to between one and nine third-party climate funds plus co-investments, or a direct interest in the US dollar co-investment fund. The funds elect Dutch fiscal investment institution status and are described by the firm as opaque for Dutch tax. Lifetimes of twelve years (portfolio, infrastructure and retail funds), ten years (co-investment) and eight years (debt), with extensions of up to two times two years stated for the second portfolio fund.
Regulatory position
Full AIFM license under article 2:65 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act, AFM license 15005329, granted December 11, 2023, amended in 2025 to permit a direct-investment fund; seventeen fund rows in the AFM register, each with a named depositary; funds passported to Belgium and Germany; Access to Climate Tech Fund II authorized as a European long-term investment fund; member of Kifid for complaints. Light-regime registrant before December 2023. No US registration; one Form D (Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V., July 3, 2025, Rule 506(b), section 3(c)(7)). No approved prospectus in the AFM register.
Fees, in the firm's own tables
Climate Tech Portfolio Fund IV: 1.00% a year on commitments below EUR 100,000, 0.95% to EUR 250,000, 0.85% to EUR 1 million, 0.75% to EUR 2.5 million, 0.60% to EUR 10 million, 0.50% to EUR 20 million, 0.40% above; 1% setup fee on top of the commitment with a 25% discount for repeat investors; fund expenses capped below 0.3% a year on average; underlying managers 2% and 20% carry. Access to Climate Tech Fund II: 1.1%, reducible by 0.05% per referral to 0.85%; 1% setup; expenses below 0.5%. Climate Infrastructure Fund I: 0.95% to 0.30%, 0.85% at EUR 100,000; underlying 1.5% and 20%. Co-Invest Fund I: 1.25% below $1 million, 1.00% above, stepping down 5 basis points a year after the three-year investment period; 10% performance fee on realized returns above 1.25x distributions to paid-in; 0.2% expenses; no setup fee. Energy Transition Debt Fund I: 0.85% to 0.45%, 0.75% at EUR 100,000; 1% setup; expenses capped at 0.3%.
Scale, audited
Commitments under management approximately EUR 364 million at December 31, 2025 (signed-subscription basis), up from EUR 288 million, EUR 168 million and EUR 78 million at the three prior year ends; 1,657 commitments; EUR 88.6 million raised from 563 investors in 2025; EUR 128.9 million deployed into 29 funds and 8 co-investments; 292 portfolio companies per the 2025 report. Revenue EUR 2.38 million, loss EUR 3.53 million, cash EUR 6.6 million. The website stated EUR 470 million and 1,900 or more investors on October 30, 2026.
Eligibility
Residents of the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany for all funds, France to follow for the co-investment fund; the firm says investors elsewhere may be able to invest on their own initiative under reverse solicitation, subject to local rules. Minimums of EUR 100,000 on the portfolio, infrastructure and debt funds, $250,000 on the co-investment fund, EUR 20,000 on the retail fund; EUR 50,000 for EU and UK residents who opt up to professional status by meeting two of three tests. A suitability questionnaire or interview for every new investor. No statement on US persons.
Investor Operations
The practical questions investors actually care about: when tax documents arrive, how cash distributions work, and whether capital can be exited before the underlying asset is sold.
Tax Documents
K-1 Timing
What to expect
Not described. The public site says nothing about US reporting; a US holder should ask what the fund provides.
Cash Flow
Distributions
Frequency
As the underlying funds distribute, typically from year four onward per the firm's illustration; the debt fund expects first distributions within twelve months of final close.
Timing
No distribution has been published for any fund. The 2023 key information document assumes an investor gets the invested amount back after about seven years in the moderate scenario.
Consistency
Nothing to measure in public. The only realized-event mentions, a first exit in the first portfolio fund and positions in exit processes in the fourth, carry no figures.
Liquidity
Exit Reality
Holding period
The life of the fund: twelve, ten or eight years, with extensions. The webinar pages state that the funds are illiquid so you cannot exit early.
Exit options
- Hold to the end of the fund and receive distributions as the underlying funds exit.
- Find a qualifying buyer yourself and transfer, paying the lower of 1% of the commitment or EUR 500 in administration; the firm will accept the transfer but will not find the buyer and gives no assurance on price.
- In the retail fund only, cancel within two weeks of signing, or request redemption under a limited option whose timelines, restrictions and discounts are not published.
- In the second portfolio fund per its 2023 document, a buy-back window five years after final close, with restrictions and exit costs of 0% to 20%.
Secondary market
There is no market. The firm's FAQ says most funds do not offer liquidity, that it cannot assist in finding a buyer and that there is no guarantee of selling at full value. An investor should treat the commitment as locked until the fund winds up in the mid-2030s, with the retail fund's redemption option as a possibility to be confirmed in writing rather than a feature to rely on.
Investment Structures
Diversified portfolio funds of funds (Climate Tech Portfolio Funds I to IV)
Twelve-year Dutch vehicles committing to seven to ten climate venture and growth funds plus co-investments, EUR 100,000 minimum. Fund I (marketed as the Decarbonization Fund I) raised EUR 42 million by December 2022 and holds nine funds; Fund II closed at about EUR 100 million in early 2024 (EUR 96 million on the 2026 card) with nine funds and one co-investment; Fund III closed in April 2025 at EUR 105 million or EUR 107 million with nine funds and five co-investments; Fund IV opened July 2025 with six funds committed (Energy Impact Partners Frontier II, Activate Capital III, Ambienta V, DCVC Climate Select II, Capricorn Technology Impact Fund III and Technology Impact Growth Fund III), up to 20% in co-investments, a target net IRR of 12% to 15%, a first call of 38% and a final close on December 31, 2026. Fund IV fees: 0.95% at EUR 100,000, 1% setup, expenses below 0.3%, underlying 2% and 20%.
Single-fund feeders (2021 to 2023)
Four early vehicles each committing to one underlying fund: the Built Environment Fund into 2150 Urban Tech Sustainability Fund I (EUR 3.6 million, 2021, EUR 100,000 minimum), the Agrifood Technology Fund into Astanor Ventures II (EUR 5.4 million, 2022, 0.65% fee), the Climate Tech Growth Fund into Lightrock Climate Impact Fund I (EUR 5 million, 2022, EUR 125,000 minimum, 0.65% fee) and the North America Climate Tech Fund into ArcTern Ventures Fund III ($33 million, 2023, $200,000 minimum, 0.55% fee), plus a privately placed Access to Climate Tech Fund I of EUR 3 million into four European venture funds. All closed; all light-regime vehicles not marketed after the license.
Climate Infrastructure Fund I
A twelve-year fund of four infrastructure funds, EUR 50 million per the site card, EUR 100,000 minimum, closed in January 2026. Three underlying funds are named: White Summit Capital's Decarbonisation Infrastructure Fund II (EUR 600 million target, fourth close July 2026 per White Summit), RGreen's Infragreen V (final close above EUR 900 million per RGreen) and Omnes Capenergie 5 (EUR 2.05 billion final close per Omnes). Target net IRR 10% to 12%, cash yield potential from year three or four, first call 68%. Fees 0.85% at EUR 100,000, 1% setup, expenses below 0.3%, underlying 1.5% and 20%.
Access to Climate Tech Fund II (ELTIF, retail)
The firm's retail vehicle, authorized by the AFM as a European long-term investment fund, EUR 20,000 minimum, first call 50% with a EUR 10,000 minimum, twelve years, key information document risk rating six of seven, a two-week withdrawal right and a limited redemption option on unpublished terms, open across the EU under the ELTIF passport. Five investments listed: White Summit's Decarbonisation Infrastructure Fund II, RGreen's Infragreen V, Forbion BioEconomy Fund I (EUR 200 million final close per Forbion), a secondary in 2150's first fund, and Carbon Equity's own Co-Invest Fund I. Target net IRR 8% to 12%. Fees 1.1% (to 0.85% with five referrals), 1% setup, expenses below 0.5%, underlying about 2% and 20%; the charge on the affiliated co-investment slice is not stated.
Co-Invest Fund I (USD, direct)
Launched December 2025 after the license was amended to permit direct investment, a ten-year fund of twelve to fifteen Series B to E climate companies with $20 million or more of revenue, $250,000 minimum, first call 30%, $70 million raised against a $50 million target per the site card. Four companies so far: Voltus, Harbinger, Palmetto and Reverion. Fees 1.25% below $1 million and 1.00% above, stepping down 5 basis points a year after a three-year investment period, a 10% performance fee on realized returns above 1.25x distributions to paid-in, 0.2% estimated expenses and no setup fee.
The firm's first performance fee; the investment team participates in the carry per the 2025 annual report. Also held inside the retail fund and, as separate co-investment vehicles, inside the fourth portfolio fund.
Energy Transition Debt Fund I
Launched May 2026, an eight-year fund for joint account investing through at least three European private debt funds in 45 to 60 project and corporate loans, EUR 100,000 minimum, EUR 15 million target, first call 70%, no first close or investments as of October 30, 2026, target net IRR 7% to 8%, first distributions expected within twelve months of final close. Fees 0.75% at EUR 100,000, 1% setup, expenses capped at 0.3%; the underlying debt funds and their fees are not stated.
Risk
Risk Structure
This is where the marketplace pitch gives way to the actual operating reality: delayed exits, limited disclosure, fee drag, and path-dependent outcomes.
No fund performance in the public material
After five years for the oldest vehicles and about EUR 364 million of commitments, no fund-level return, NAV or distribution figure is published. The only value statement is EUR 34 million on EUR 37 million invested at December 31, 2023. Investors receive quarterly statements; prospective investors must ask for them.
Cost over twelve years
Illustrated at up to 16% of the commitment to Carbon Equity and fund expenses on the fourth portfolio fund if the fee and expense cap run on the full commitment for twelve years, before the underlying 2% and 20%; the step-down and bases are not public. The one all-in document, the January 2023 key information document for the second portfolio fund, shows EUR 60,761 of costs on EUR 100,000 and a reduction in yield of 8.5 percentage points a year in its moderate scenario.
Manager continuity
A loss in each filed year, EUR 3.53 million in 2025 on EUR 2.38 million of revenue, cumulative reserves of about minus EUR 9.6 million, EUR 6.6 million of cash at December 31, 2025 after a EUR 6.4 million raise, and a going-concern note recording management's expectation of profitability in early 2028. Unqualified opinions. Fund assets are ring-fenced by the partnership, foundation and depositary structure; the manager remains the operator for twelve years.
Affiliated vehicles inside the funds
The retail fund holds the firm's own co-investment fund, which charges 1.25% and a 10% performance fee with team carry; the fourth portfolio fund holds Carbon Equity co-investment vehicles. Whether a second Carbon Equity fee layer applies on those slices, and their allocations, are not stated anywhere public.
Illiquidity and default terms
Twelve-year lives with extensions, no secondary market, transfers at the investor's expense, exit costs of 0% to 20% for early departure per the 2023 document, and default penalties of penalty interest, up to 50% of total obligations or forfeiture. The retail fund alone has a two-week withdrawal right and a limited redemption option.
Front-loaded capital calls
First calls of 30% to 70% of the commitment with a EUR 100,000 minimum first payment on the EUR 100,000 funds, so a minimum investor funds the whole commitment plus the 1% setup fee at once while the underlying funds draw over years. Management fees invoiced six months in advance.
Regulatory history
Licensed since December 11, 2023 with a depositary per fund. The vehicles raised from 2021 to 2023 were light-regime funds under a banner stating the investment fell outside AFM supervision, and the second portfolio fund had no depositary when its 2023 key information document was written.
US position
Marketing limited to three countries with reverse solicitation described for others; one Form D showing two US investors in one fund under Rule 506(b) and section 3(c)(7); no public statement on US eligibility, US tax classification or US reporting. Open questions for a US applicant, not findings.
The track record cannot be evaluated from the public material
No Carbon Equity fund has a public TVPI, DPI, IRR or NAV per unit. The 2023 annual report put the value of EUR 37 million invested at EUR 34 million; the 2024 and 2025 reports give invested amounts without a value. The fund pages carry targets with the sentence that expected future performance is not guaranteed, and an event page mentions a first exit and positions in exit processes without figures. The firm reports to its investors quarterly.
Why it matters
The oldest vehicles are five years old and the first portfolio fund closed nearly four years ago, so marks exist for a prospective investor to judge. A reader of the public material cannot see whether the 2021 and 2022 vehicles are tracking their 2x to 3x targets, which is the one thing a track record is for.
Mitigation / verification
Ask for the latest quarterly capital account statement for each closed vehicle, dated, showing called capital, NAV, distributions and TVPI, and for the 2023 value statement updated to the latest date. Ask whether the first exit from the first portfolio fund has been distributed and at what multiple.
The only all-in cost document is three years old and belongs to a closed fund
The key information document for Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II dated January 1, 2023 states total costs of EUR 60,761 on a EUR 100,000 commitment over twelve years, a reduction in yield of 8.5 percentage points a year in the moderate scenario, an all-in ongoing charge of 2.5% a year, underlying carried interest of 12.0% of the gross return, a 1% entry fee and exit costs of 0% to 20%. The current fund pages show Carbon Equity's layer at 0.95% to 1.1% a year plus 1% setup plus up to 0.3% or 0.5% expenses, and the underlying 2% and 20%, and no total.
Why it matters
Two layers of management fee and a layer of carry are the price of access, and the firm discloses each layer. What a reader cannot see without an account is the current total under the PRIIPs methodology, which the key information document for each open fund would show.
Mitigation / verification
Download the key information document for the fund you are considering from the account environment before committing, read the costs-over-time table and the reduction in yield, and compare the moderate scenario with the target net IRR on the fund page. Ask how the Carbon Equity fee is charged after the investment period and on what base the expense cap runs.
The manager is the operating dependency, and it is not yet self-funding
Carbon Equity B.V. reported a loss of EUR 3.53 million in 2025 on revenue of EUR 2.38 million, cumulative reserves of about minus EUR 9.6 million against EUR 15.75 million of share premium, and EUR 6.6 million of cash at December 31, 2025 after raising EUR 6.4 million in September 2025. The report's going-concern note records management's expectation that profitability will be realized in early 2028; the 2022 and 2024 reports also carried going-concern notes. The audit opinions are unqualified.
Why it matters
The funds are separate partnerships with a foundation holding title and a depositary, and the fund agreements provide for a replacement manager, so a manager failure is not a fund loss. It would still mean a change of the party that monitors the underlying funds, pays capital calls on time, prepares statements and runs the co-investment program, in the middle of a twelve-year commitment.
Mitigation / verification
Read the going-concern note in the 2025 annual report on the firm's site, ask what the September 2025 round funds and for how long, and ask for the replacement-manager provisions in the fund agreement, including who pays for a transition and what happens to the Carbon Equity fee.
The retail fund holds the firm's own fund, and the fee on that slice is unstated
Access to Climate Tech Fund II lists Carbon Equity Co-Invest Fund I, managed by the Carbon Equity investment team, as one of its five investments; the 2025 annual report confirms it. Co-Invest Fund I charges 1.25% or 1.00% a year and a 10% performance fee above 1.25x, and the investment team participates in the carry. The ELTIF charges 1.1%, 1% setup and up to 0.5% expenses. Nothing public says whether the affiliated layer is charged or waived on the ELTIF's holding, or how large the holding is.
Why it matters
The EUR 20,000 retail investor is the least able to negotiate and the most protected by the ELTIF rules. A second Carbon Equity fee and a performance fee inside a fund that the firm's older pages describe as carrying no performance fee would be a material cost if charged; it may be waived. The point is that the public record does not answer it.
Mitigation / verification
Ask in writing whether the ELTIF pays Co-Invest Fund I's management fee and performance fee on its holding, what share of the ELTIF that holding is, and whether any Carbon Equity fee applies to the co-investment vehicles inside the fourth portfolio fund. The answer should be in the ELTIF key information document and the fund agreement.
The exit is the end of the fund
The FAQ states that most funds do not offer liquidity, that the firm cannot help find a buyer and that there is no guarantee of selling at full value; the webinar pages state that the funds are illiquid so you cannot exit early. The 2023 key information document puts exit costs for early departure at 0% to 20% and describes a buy-back window five years after final close subject to restrictions. Transfers carry an administrative fee of the lower of 1% of the commitment or EUR 500. The retail fund has a two-week withdrawal right and a limited redemption option with timelines, restrictions and discounts that are not published.
Why it matters
Twelve years plus up to four of extensions is the horizon, and the firm says so. A holder who needs the money in year six has a transfer the firm will process but not arrange, or a buy-back at terms that are not public.
Mitigation / verification
Size the commitment as money you will not need before the mid-2030s. Ask for the redemption terms of the retail fund in writing, including the discount, before relying on them.
A minimum investor pays the whole commitment on day one
First capital calls are 38% of the commitment on the fourth portfolio fund, 50% on the retail fund, 68% on the infrastructure fund, 70% on the debt fund and 30% on the co-investment fund, each with a minimum first payment equal to the EUR 100,000 minimum on the EUR 100,000 funds, plus the 1% setup fee on top. The balance sits in a reserve account per the firm's 2024 article. Management fees are invoiced six months in advance. Defaulting on a later call carries penalty interest, a penalty of up to 50% of total obligations or forfeiture.
Why it matters
The underlying funds draw capital over four or five years, so for a EUR 100,000 investor the money waits inside the structure while the fee on the full commitment accrues from the start. The firm's own J-curve illustration shows the position at minus EUR 89,000 net in year four.
Mitigation / verification
Ask what the reserve account earns and who holds it, and for the actual call schedule of the closed funds against the illustration. If you commit above the minimum, know the penalty terms before the first later call arrives.
For a US applicant, eligibility, tax classification and reporting are unanswered
One US filing exists, a Form D for Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V. under Rule 506(b) and section 3(c)(7) covering two US investors for $216,368 at a $108,184 minimum. The site limits active marketing to three countries and says investors elsewhere may be able to invest on their own initiative under reverse solicitation, subject to local rules. It says nothing about US persons, the funds' US tax classification or any US reporting.
Why it matters
A Form D shows that one fund admitted US investors who qualified; it does not show that any US applicant can invest. The Dutch description of the funds as opaque fiscal investment institutions does not determine their US classification, which depends on the vehicle, its elections and the fund agreement, none of which is public. The reporting a US holder would receive is likewise not described.
Mitigation / verification
A US person should ask before committing whether they can invest, how the fund is classified for US tax purposes and what election, if any, it supports, and what annual US reporting it provides. AltStreet is not a tax adviser.
Regulatory & Legal Posture
Security Status
Interests in alternative investment funds managed by a fully licensed Dutch AIFM. Carbon Equity B.V. holds license 15005329 under article 2:65 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act, granted December 11, 2023 and amended in 2025 to permit a direct-investment fund; the AFM register lists seventeen fund rows under the license, each with a depositary, sixteen marked for professional and retail investors. Access to Climate Tech Fund II is authorized as a European long-term investment fund under Regulation (EU) 2015/760 and may be offered to retail investors across the EU under the ELTIF passport. The firm describes the other funds as offered at a EUR 100,000 minimum that it treats as a professional investment, to professionals who opt up at EUR 50,000, or under the fewer-than-150-investors route; AltStreet records the firm's description and has not assessed its legal basis. In the United States, Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V. filed a Form D under Rule 506(b) and section 3(c)(7); no other vehicle has a US filing and no US registration exists.
The AFM spreadsheet of licensed AIFMs dated October 19, 2026 carries the license number, type, manager name and date, and the fund rows with their depositaries; the light-regime spreadsheet of the same date has no Carbon Equity row; the ESMA entity register shows the same manager under the AFM with an authorization date of December 11, 2023. The company's own statements agree: the 2023 annual report records the license on that date, the 2025 report records the amendment and the ELTIF, the footer cites article 2:65 and the registration number. Before December 2023 the firm was a light-regime registrant under article 2:66a and said so.
AltStreet did not locate the ELTIF authorization in a register readable by script and relies on the company's statement plus the fund's row in the AFM register with CACEIS as depositary. No approved prospectus exists in the AFM register.
- The register entry can be checked in a minute: license 15005329, AIFM license, Carbon Equity B.V., December 11, 2023, and a depositary named on each of seventeen fund rows.
- The firm's own history is on its own pages: the 2022 and 2023 banner that the investment fell outside AFM supervision, the 2023 press release boilerplate describing the firm as an AIFMD-light manager, and the 2024 boilerplate citing article 2:65.
- The retail protections apply to one fund. The ELTIF page states that the fund has a lower minimum, a suitability assessment, a withdrawal right and a limited redemption option because it is structured as an ELTIF, and that the other funds are structured differently and do not offer the same retail-investor protections. The professional opt-up page states that opt-up investors receive less investor protection than retail investors.
- The exemptions are named in the annual reports: the fewer-than-150-investors route for the third portfolio fund and the infrastructure fund, and the professional opt-up for every fund launched since December 2023, both used to enable investors to commit below EUR 100,000.
- The license amendment in 2025 for direct investment was followed within the year by a direct fund with the firm's first performance fee, and that fund was then placed inside the retail fund. The sequence is disclosed across three documents.
- No fund annual account is published although the 2023 key information document said one would be available free of charge if prepared, and no fund auditor is named. For a licensed manager with a depositary on every fund, those are the two documents a reader would most expect to find.
Disclosure Quality
Strong on the manager and the regime, limited on the funds in public. Published: the fee tables tier by tier, the setup fee and discounts, expense caps, underlying fee levels, minimums, first-call percentages, fund lifetimes, target returns, named underlying funds, eligibility rules, the exemption routes used, four years of audited manager accounts with revenue, losses, cash, equity raises and going-concern notes, and the register entries. Behind registration or absent from public: every fund document for the open funds, every fund-level result, every fund annual account, the fund auditor, the administrator's role, the valuation policy, the redemption terms of the retail fund, the fee treatment of affiliated holdings, and the amounts raised by two of the five open funds. Documents behind registration are less accessible to an independent reviewer; their location alone does not establish deficient disclosure to prospective investors who register.
Custody Model
Each recent fund is a Dutch limited partnership with a Carbon Equity general partner company and a separate foundation holding legal title to the assets; the earlier funds are funds for joint account with the same foundation (Stichting Carbon Equity Climate Funds II for the second portfolio fund; Stichting Carbon Equity Climate Funds IV registered in May 2025). A depositary is appointed per fund under the license: Apex Depositary Services B.V. for most funds, CACEIS Bank Netherlands Branch for the retail fund, Belfius for the Belgian vehicles. The administrator is identified on the for-professionals page by a tile reading AssetCare independent NAV; AssetCare describes itself as providing administration, capital calls and reporting for funds. Uncalled balances of minimum investors are held in a reserve account per the 2024 article; what that account earns and who holds it is not stated.
Regulatory Backing
The Dutch Financial Supervision Act and the AIFMD as implemented in the Netherlands: AFM conduct supervision of the licensed manager, depositary oversight of cash flows and assets per fund, annual audited accounts of the manager, Kifid membership for complaints, passporting to Belgium and Germany, and for the retail fund the ELTIF regulation with its key information document, suitability assessment and withdrawal right. No US regulatory layer and no SIPC cover.
Tax Treatment
Reporting
Dutch investors: the funds are described as opaque fiscal investment institutions taxed in Box 3. US holders: no reporting is described publicly
The FAQ states that the funds are treated as non-transparent for Dutch tax, qualify as fiscal investment institutions confirmed with the Dutch tax authorities, and fall in Box 3 for Dutch individuals, with quarterly capital account statements as the investor's record. No US tax form or statement is mentioned on the public site; whether the firm provides US reporting to the US investors it has admitted is not stated and should be asked.
Income Character
Capital gains and distributions from a non-US closed-end fund of funds; US classification not determinable from the public record
The funds hold interests in other funds and co-investments and distribute as the underlying funds exit. For a Dutch individual the firm's answer is Box 3, a deemed-return wealth tax, and the capital account statements. For a US taxable holder the classification depends on how the vehicle is treated for US purposes, which turns on its form, any elections and the fund agreement; the Dutch description of the fund as opaque does not settle it.
A non-US fund of funds can fall under the passive foreign investment company rules, with Form 8621 and a choice of elections that depend on information the fund provides, or be treated as a partnership with its own reporting. Which applies to a given Carbon Equity vehicle is not stated anywhere public.
Limitation
AltStreet is not a tax adviser. The characterization depends on the holder's residence, the fund's US entity classification and elections, and the fund agreement, none of which is public. The firm's public pages provide nothing on US treatment to anchor any of it.
Special Considerations
- The classification question comes before the fee question for a US person: ask the firm how the fund is treated for US tax purposes, what election if any it supports, and what annual statement it provides, before weighing the position.
- The 1% setup fee is paid on top of the commitment and the management fee is charged on the commitment, not on net asset value; how either is treated for a holder's basis is not addressed.
- Currency: the funds are in euros except the co-investment fund in US dollars, the firm does not hedge currency at fund level, and a non-euro holder reports in their own currency on euro-denominated calls and distributions spread over twelve years.
- Dutch Box 3 taxes a deemed return on net wealth regardless of actual distributions; a Dutch investor pays tax on a position that may distribute nothing for four years. The firm's FAQ points to Box 3 and to a tax adviser.
- German and Belgian investors are served through the AIFMD passport and the firm's Berlin office; the site does not describe the tax treatment in either country.
Account Suitability
Taxable
The only account type the structure contemplates. A Dutch investor is in Box 3. A US investor should obtain the fund's US classification and reporting in writing before committing.
Roth IRA
No US custodian route is described and a non-US fund interest with a twelve-year lock and capital calls is not a practical IRA asset; the firm offers no retirement account access.
Traditional IRA
Same answer, with the added problem that required minimum distributions cannot be funded from an interest that cannot be sold.
HSA
Inappropriate. Funds intended for medical spending should not sit in a twelve-year closed-end fund of funds with no published value.
Before You Invest
Get Carbon Equity investor insights before you invest
K-1 timing, distribution updates, yield insights, and risk signals for Carbon Equity and similar platforms.
- Weekly platform research focused on tax timing and liquidity reality.
- Signals on distributions, risks, and structural tradeoffs before capital is locked up.
- Coverage of adjacent platforms so you can compare better options faster.
Get weekly platform signals
Track fee changes, liquidity updates, risk flags, and adjacent platforms before you invest.
Independent intelligence from AltStreet. No hype. No sponsor spin.
AltStreet Data Layer
What the data actually shows
Four years of the manager's audited accounts read against the fee tables on its fund pages, the one key information document in the public record and the AFM register. The pattern: the regulatory and manager-level record is unusually complete for the category, and the fund-level record is not public.
Commitments grew 4.7 times in three years; the manager's loss grew with them
Commitments under management from the audited reports: EUR 78 million (2022), EUR 168 million (2023), EUR 288 million (2024), approximately EUR 364 million (2025, signed-subscription basis). Management fee revenue: EUR 294,746, EUR 705,000, EUR 1,261,053, EUR 1,947,482. Result 2025: a loss of EUR 3.53 million on EUR 2.38 million of revenue, with a loss in each filed year and cumulative other reserves of about minus EUR 9.6 million. Cash EUR 6.6 million at December 31, 2025 after a EUR 6.4 million round in September 2025.
What this means
Fee revenue tracks commitments at roughly 0.5% to 0.6% a year of the end-year base. The 2025 cost base was more than twice revenue, and management's own forecast in the going-concern note is profitability in early 2028. The investor's exposure is continuity rather than loss of fund assets: the funds are segregated behind depositaries, and the fund agreements provide for a replacement manager on terms that are not public.
The one all-in document is a January 2023 KID for a closed fund
Key information document, Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II, January 1, 2023, EUR 100,000 over twelve years: total costs EUR 60,761; moderate scenario value after costs EUR 212,582; reduction in yield 8.5 percentage points a year; underlying carried interest 12.0% of the gross return; ongoing charges 2.5% a year all-in; entry fee 1% on top; exit costs 0% to 20% for early departure.
What this means
The reduction-in-yield figure follows the PRIIPs methodology with the document's capital-call schedule and cannot be reproduced from the two ending values by simple arithmetic; AltStreet quotes it as printed. It is a historical figure for one fund under terms that differ from the current fund pages (the Carbon Equity fee was 0.30% to 0.85% then). The document that would show the current total for an open fund is behind the login.
The Carbon Equity layer illustrated at up to 16% of the commitment
Climate Tech Portfolio Fund IV at the EUR 100,000 tier over its stated twelve-year life: 0.95% a year on the commitment is EUR 11,400; the 1% setup fee is EUR 1,000 (EUR 750 for repeat investors) on top of the commitment; fund expenses capped below 0.3% a year are up to EUR 3,600. Access to Climate Tech Fund II at 1.1% with up to 0.5% expenses: up to EUR 20,200. Climate Infrastructure Fund I at 0.85%: up to EUR 14,800. Energy Transition Debt Fund I at 0.75% over eight years: up to EUR 9,400.
What this means
These are illustrations under stated assumptions: the fee and the expense cap applied to the full commitment for the stated life, because the FAQ says the fee is charged on the commitment and no step-down, expense base or extension term is stated publicly for the fund-of-funds vehicles. They are not contractual maxima. If the fee steps down after the investment period, the fund documents will say so; the co-investment fund page does. The underlying 2% and 20% are charged on the underlying funds' own bases and come on top.
Thirteen vehicles of different ages, none with a public result
Vehicles and ages at October 2026: the 2150 feeder (July 2021, five years), the Astanor and Lightrock feeders (2022, about four years), the first portfolio fund (closed December 2022, nearly four years since close), the ArcTern feeder and Access to Climate Tech Fund I (2023), the second portfolio fund (closed early 2024), the third (closed April 2025), the infrastructure fund (closed January 2026), and the fourth portfolio fund, the retail ELTIF, the co-investment fund and the debt fund (all launched since May 2025). Published results for any of them: none. Value statement: EUR 34 million on EUR 37 million invested at December 31, 2023.
What this means
The newest vehicles have nothing to report yet. The 2021 and 2022 vehicles hold positions in funds that report quarterly, and the first portfolio fund has had a first exit per an event page. Those are the vehicles whose dated statements a prospective investor should request; publishing TVPI and DPI by vehicle would cost the firm nothing it does not already produce.
The first call is the whole commitment for a minimum investor
First capital calls on October 30, 2026: 38% with a EUR 100,000 minimum (Climate Tech Portfolio Fund IV; 33% in May 2026), 50% with a EUR 10,000 minimum (Access to Climate Tech Fund II), 68% with a EUR 100,000 minimum (Climate Infrastructure Fund I; 70% in May 2026), 70% with a EUR 100,000 minimum (Energy Transition Debt Fund I), 30% (Co-Invest Fund I). Setup fee 1% on top. Management fee invoiced six months in advance. The site's J-curve illustration for EUR 100,000: calls of EUR 25,000, 25,000, 20,000, 13,000, 8,000, 5,000, 3,000 and 1,000 in years zero to seven, distributions from year four, net position minus EUR 89,000 in year four and plus EUR 74,000 in year eleven.
What this means
A minimum investor's cash arrives in full on day one while the illustration's own schedule draws it over eight years; the difference sits in a reserve account whose terms are not stated. For investors above the minimum the first call is a third to two thirds. In both cases the fee on the full commitment runs from the start.
Nine of thirteen vehicles were raised under the light regime
AFM register dates: the first seven fund rows all carry December 11, 2023, the license date, which is when they were brought under the license; Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III (January 17, 2024) and everything after were launched under it. The 2023 annual report states that the earlier funds were AIFMD-light funds not marketed after the license. Vehicles raised before the license: the four feeders, Access to Climate Tech Fund I, Decarbonization Fund I and most of Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II, about EUR 160 million of commitments on the platform's own figures.
What this means
For today's investor the regime is the licensed one with a depositary per fund. For the record, most of the unpublished track record was built under the light regime, and the second portfolio fund's 2023 document said it had no depositary.
The performance fee entered through the co-investment fund and into the retail fund
Company policies page: the manager receives a fixed management fee for all its investment products. 2024 fee article: Carbon Equity does not charge a performance fee. 2023 key information document: performance fee 0%, Carbon Equity has none.
Co-Invest Fund I, December 2025: 10% of realized returns above 1.25x distributions to paid-in, with team carry per the 2025 annual report. Access to Climate Tech Fund II, the retail ELTIF: one of five investments is Co-Invest Fund I.
What this means
The retail fund now carries, indirectly, the firm's only performance fee. Whether the ELTIF pays it and the co-investment fund's management fee on its holding, and how large the holding is, are the questions a prospective ELTIF investor should put in writing; the answers belong in the ELTIF key information document and fund agreement behind the login.
The website's figures run ahead of the audited ones
Home page, October 30, 2026: EUR 470 million under management, 1,900 or more investors, 13 funds. Press release May 13, 2026: over EUR 420 million from more than 1,600 investors. Audited at December 31, 2025: approximately EUR 364 million on a signed-subscription basis (a change from the commercial-close basis used before), 1,657 commitments, 29 underlying funds.
Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III: EUR 105 million and EUR 107 million in the same release. Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II: about EUR 100 million (2024) and EUR 96 million (2026 card).
What this means
Ten months of fundraising can explain EUR 364 million becoming EUR 470 million, and the basis change explains some movement in the other direction. The pairs of figures for the same closed fund cannot both be right. AltStreet carries the audited figure and records both platform figures where they differ.
Data as of 2026-10-30 . AltStreet review evidence layer . Public-source analysis
Full datasetDecision Fit
Investor Fit
Who this works for, who it does not, and what level of patience and complexity tolerance the platform really demands.
Dutch, Belgian or German investors who want named institutional climate funds at EUR 100,000 and will hold for twelve years
This is what the firm is for, and the wrapper is better than the category norm: a licensed manager, a depositary per fund, a foundation holding title, a supervisory board, published manager accounts and a fee table on every page. The underlying funds are real and several are confirmable at EUR 200 million to EUR 2 billion on the managers' own sites. The investor pays an access layer illustrated at up to 16% of the commitment over twelve years before the underlying 2% and 20%, must ask for the track record rather than read it, and takes a view on a manager that is not yet self-funding.
Retail investors with EUR 20,000 drawn to the ELTIF
The retail fund carries the protections the others lack: a key information document rated six of seven, a suitability assessment, a two-week withdrawal right and a limited redemption option. It also charges the highest Carbon Equity fee in the range, 1.1% plus 1% setup plus up to 0.5% expenses, and one of its five positions is the firm's own co-investment fund, on fee terms not stated in public. Read the key information document in the account environment and get a written answer on that slice before signing.
Anyone who needs to see a track record before committing
None is in the public material: no TVPI, DPI, IRR, NAV or distribution for any of thirteen vehicles, and one sentence valuing EUR 37 million at EUR 34 million at the end of 2023. The firm sends statements to existing investors and can be asked for dated, vehicle-level figures; a reader who will not ask has nothing to evaluate.
Investors who may need the money before the mid-2030s
Twelve-year funds with extensions, no secondary market, transfers the investor must arrange, exit costs of up to 20% for early departure in the one public document, and default penalties of up to half the commitment. The firm says you cannot exit early and means it.
US investors
Active marketing is limited to three European countries, with reverse solicitation described as a possibility subject to local rules; one Form D shows two US investors admitted to one fund; and nothing public addresses US eligibility, the funds' US tax classification or US reporting. All three are questions for the firm before any fee comparison.
Minimum-ticket investors who assume the commitment is drawn over years
On the EUR 100,000 funds the first call equals the minimum, so a minimum investor pays the whole commitment plus the 1% setup fee at once and the management fee on the full amount runs from day one while the underlying funds draw over four or five years. The firm's own illustration has the position at minus EUR 89,000 net in year four.
Tradeoffs
Key Tradeoffs
The attraction of pre-IPO access is real, but every benefit comes bundled with a corresponding liquidity, transparency, or pricing cost.
Regulation and custody
Nine of thirteen vehicles were raised under the light regime beneath a banner that the investment fell outside AFM supervision, the second portfolio fund had no depositary when its 2023 document was written, no fund auditor is named and no fund annual account is published.
Fees
An access layer illustrated at up to 16% of the commitment over twelve years before underlying fees, a setup fee charged on top of the commitment, a fee base of commitment rather than net asset value, step-downs and bases not public, and a single all-in document that is three years old and belongs to a closed fund.
Track record and disclosure
No fund-level result in the public material for any vehicle; one value statement from 2023; raised amounts missing for two open funds and inconsistent for two closed ones; a website figure of EUR 470 million against an audited EUR 364 million.
Liquidity
Twelve years plus extensions, no market, transfers at the investor's expense, exit costs of up to 20% for early departure in the one public document, default penalties of up to half the commitment, and redemption terms for the retail fund that are not published.
Alignment and continuity
A manager with a loss in each filed year and a going-concern note pointing to early 2028, a retail fund holding the firm's own co-investment fund on unstated fee terms, a performance fee and team carry introduced while older pages still say the firm charges none, and a skin-in-the-game claim with no stated basis.
Avoid
Who This Is Not For
This section should be read as a filter, not an afterthought. If you need income, simplicity, or near-term access to capital, the structure is working against you.
Anyone who wants to read a fund result before committing
None is in the public material; the only value statement is EUR 34 million on EUR 37 million invested at the end of 2023. Ask for dated, vehicle-level statements.
Investors who may need the money before the mid-2030s
Twelve-year funds with extensions, no market, and exit costs of up to 20% for early departure in the one public document.
US persons who have not confirmed eligibility, US tax classification and reporting with the firm
None of the three is addressed on the public site.
Anyone who needs the current all-in cost before registering
No key information document for an open fund is public; the one that is belongs to a closed fund and is dated January 2023.
Minimum-ticket investors expecting a drawn-down commitment
The first call on the EUR 100,000 funds equals the minimum, so the whole commitment plus the 1% setup fee is paid on day one.
Retail investors in the ELTIF who have not asked about the affiliated slice
One of five positions is the firm's own co-investment fund with a 1.25% fee and a 10% performance fee, and the fee treatment of that holding is not stated.
Investors who require the manager to be self-funding
A loss in each filed year, EUR 3.53 million in 2025, and a going-concern note recording management's expectation of profitability in early 2028.
Editorial View
AltStreet Perspective
The compressed version of the review: what matters, what marketing tends to obscure, and how we would frame the platform for a serious allocator.
Verdict
The regulatory work is real and the public disclosure stops at the fund door. Carbon Equity has done what the category mostly skips: it got licensed, appointed depositaries, published its own audited accounts and put the fee tables on the page. Those are the conditions under which a fund-of-funds track record could be trusted if it were shown, and in the public material it is not shown. A prospective investor is asked to commit EUR 100,000 for twelve years on targets, a 2023 cost document for a different fund, and the names of the underlying managers, unless they ask for more. The names are good and checkable; the statements exist and can be requested. The right reading is that the structure is sound, the price of access is high and partly undocumented in public, and the largest open question in this review, what the first funds are worth and what they have returned, is one the firm could close by publishing what it already sends its investors every quarter.
Positioning
Among the access platforms AltStreet has scored, Moonfare (4.1, C) and iCapital (4.2, C) publish less about fees and nothing about their feeders' results; Alumni Ventures (3.4, D+) publishes a 2% fee and 20% carry and a returned-capital figure. Carbon Equity publishes more about its regulation and its own finances than any of them and the same amount about fund performance in public, which is nothing. Its closest structural analogue in the US record is a registered fund of private assets such as Private Shares Fund, which files audited fund accounts and a daily NAV; Carbon Equity's funds do neither in public.
The Bottom Line
A licensed Dutch climate fund-of-funds manager with a depositary on every fund and fee tables on every page, whose thirteen vehicles have no published result, whose only all-in cost document is a 2023 key information document for a closed fund, and whose own accounts show a loss in each filed year.
Action
Next Steps
If you still want to engage after reading the review, these are the practical next moves that reduce avoidable mistakes.
Check the AFM register of licensed AIFMs (afm.nl, registers, AIFM licenses spreadsheet) for Carbon Equity B.V., license 15005329, and the depositary named for the fund you are considering.
Register in the account environment and download the key information document and information memorandum for your fund before committing. Read the costs-over-time table and the reduction in yield, and compare the moderate scenario with the target net IRR on the fund page.
Ask for the latest dated capital account statements of Climate Tech Portfolio Funds I and II and the 2021 and 2022 feeders: called capital, NAV, distributions, TVPI, and the current version of the 2023 statement that valued EUR 37 million at EUR 34 million.
If you are considering Access to Climate Tech Fund II, ask in writing whether the fund pays Co-Invest Fund I's management fee and 10% performance fee on its holding, how large that holding is, and what the redemption option's timelines, restrictions and discounts are.
Read the 2025 annual report of Carbon Equity B.V.
on the firm's site: the going-concern note, the September 2025 round, the fee revenue lines and the risk paragraph. Ask what happens to the management fee and who pays for a transition if a replacement manager is appointed.
Compute your own first-day cash: the first-call percentage with its minimum, plus 1% setup on top, and the management fee on the full commitment from day one. Ask what the reserve account earns and who holds it, and whether the fee steps down after the investment period.
If you are a US person, ask whether you can invest, how the fund is classified for US tax purposes and what election it supports, and what annual US reporting it provides. AltStreet is not a tax adviser.
For the fund you choose, open the underlying managers' own sites for the named funds and confirm what they state about size, stage and SFDR classification.
Compare with the Moonfare review for the EUR 50,000 to EUR 100,000 feeder model and with the Private Shares Fund review for what a registered fund of private assets publishes about NAV and audited accounts.
AltStreet Research Desk
About to invest in Carbon Equity, or in an offering we haven't covered?
Commission an independent diligence report: the same filing-based analysis behind this review, applied to the specific investment in front of you before you wire the money.
- Built from primary sources: SEC filings, court records, capital structure, and marketing-versus-filings comparison.
- From $750; full reports from $1,495. Fixed price confirmed up front, delivery in 3-5 business days.
- Independent by design: we work for investors and accept no compensation from the companies we cover.
Want this on every new deal, not one? Deal Intelligence sends the alert the day a new offering appears on a covered platform and follows with an analyst-approved investment committee memo.
Deal Intelligence →Appendix
Sources, Disclosures, and Supporting Context
The lower section is structured like a report appendix: relationship context first, adjacent reading second, and evidence last.
Report Appendix
Disclosure
Relationship and compensation context
+
Report Appendix
Disclosure
Relationship and compensation context
Report Appendix
Related Resources
Adjacent platform comparisons, frameworks, and category links
+
Report Appendix
Related Resources
Adjacent platform comparisons, frameworks, and category links
Further Reading
Related Resources
Adjacent frameworks and reviews that help place the platform in a broader allocation or due-diligence context.
Similar Platform Reviews
- Moonfare Review
The European feeder platform at EUR 50,000 to EUR 100,000 minimums; the closest structural comparison.
- iCapital Review
US adviser-channel feeders whose terms are not published.
- Alumni Ventures Review
A US venture fund-of-funds model with 2% and 20% and a published returned-capital figure.
- Private Shares Fund Review
A registered US fund of private assets that files audited accounts and daily NAV, for what a regulated wrapper publishes.
Report Appendix
Evidence & Methodology
8 cited passages on file; sources, scope, and how the review was assembled
+
Report Appendix
Evidence & Methodology
8 cited passages on file; sources, scope, and how the review was assembled
Evidence on file
8 supporting passages on file for Carbon Equity and its offerings from 5 source documents, 8 verified by an analyst through 2026-10-30, no discrepancies flagged. Each passage records the metric it supports, the value read from the document, the page, and the verbatim text where the document has it. Terminal subscribers read the passages; open them in the terminal.
- Cited passages
- 8
- Source documents
- 5
- Analyst verified
- 8
- Discrepancies flagged
- 0
Latest analyst verification 2026-10-30; latest extraction 2026-10-30. A discrepancy is a disagreement between two sources, or between a document and a marketing claim, recorded rather than resolved silently.
ASReview Evidence
Methodology
Regulatory status comes from the AFM register of licensed AIFMs (register-aifm.xlsx, dated October 19, 2026, downloaded October 30, 2026), the AFM light-regime register of the same date, which has no Carbon Equity row, and the ESMA entity register. Manager financials come from Carbon Equity B.V.'s audited annual reports for 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, published at carbonequity.com/legal/annual-financial-reports and read from the PDFs. Fund terms, fee tables, minimums, first-call percentages, eligibility rules, FAQs, legal pages, fourteen press releases and thirteen event pages were captured from carbonequity.com on October 30, 2026, with 30 Wayback Machine snapshots dated 2021 to 2026 for historical terms and banners. The key information document for Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II dated January 1, 2023 was recovered from a March 27, 2023 snapshot of that fund's page, together with its SFDR annex and website disclosure. The Form D of Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V. was read from the raw XML on EDGAR; EDGAR full-text and company searches found no other filing. Underlying fund facts were captured from the underlying managers' own sites on October 30, 2026. A legal and regulatory scan of AltStreet's enforcement tables (33,984 actions, 38,226 parties), the AFM measures and warnings pages and site search, the Dutch published court rulings database, the Kifid complaints search and CourtListener opinions and dockets located no action, measure, ruling or complaint naming the company, its funds or its executives in the sources searched. PACER was not searched; three executive-name searches on CourtListener returned empty responses and are recorded as not completed. The Dutch Chamber of Commerce and Luxembourg registry web searches render by script and were not readable; Chamber of Commerce numbers come from GLEIF records and the company's own filings. No fund document for an open fund was accessed and none was requested; the firm's fund documents sit behind registration.
Scope
Carbon Equity B.V. (Chamber of Commerce 77772784, AFM license 15005329) and the seventeen fund rows under its license, including the thirteen vehicles marketed on carbonequity.com since 2021 and the four Belgian vehicles; the manager's audited annual reports 2022 to 2025; carbonequity.com as captured October 30, 2026; the 2023 key information document and SFDR documents for Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II; the Form D of Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V.; the AFM and ESMA registers; and the underlying managers' own statements about the funds Carbon Equity names.
Key Findings
- *AFM register of licensed AIFMs, October 19, 2026: 'Vergunningnummer 15005329 | Vergunningtype AIFM vergunning | Naam Beheerder Carbon Equity B.V. | Datum 11-12-2023', with seventeen fund rows each naming a depositary and all but one marked for professional and retail investors.
- *Key information document, Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II, January 1, 2023: total costs at the end of the recommended twelve-year holding period 'EUR 60.761', effect on return '8,5% p.j.'; ongoing charges '2,5%' described as the total annual costs including Carbon Equity's management fee and administration (cap 0.3% a year) and the average fees of the underlying funds; carried interest of the underlying funds '12,0%' of the gross return in the moderate scenario; entry costs 1% on top of the investment; exit costs '0-20%' for leaving before the recommended holding period; 'Er is momenteel geen depositaris voor dit Fonds' (there is currently no depositary for this fund).
- *Annual report 2025, going-concern note, stating that management expects profitability to be realized early 2028. Result 2025: loss EUR 3.53 million on revenue EUR 2.38 million; management fees EUR 1,947,482; setup fees EUR 431,613; cash EUR 6.6 million; share premium EUR 15,750,126. Audit opinion unqualified.
- *Annual report 2025: 'members of the investment team participate in a carried interest arrangement with respect to Carbon Equity Co-Invest Fund I. No other employees, contractors or directors of Carbon Equity receive carried interest from the funds managed by Carbon Equity.' Against the 2024 fee article: 'Carbon Equity does not charge a performance fee', and the company policies page: 'Carbon Equity receives a fixed management fee for all its investment products.'
- *Annual report 2025, Access to Climate Tech Fund II: 'the first ELTIF fund in the Netherlands ... Open, investments made in 5 funds per end of 2025, of which 1 secondary and 1 Carbon Equity Fund (Co-Invest Fund I).' Fund page: 'Co-Investment Fund I, managed by Carbon Equity Investment Team.'
- *Annual report 2023: 'Carbon Equity received its AIFMD license to operate as a fund manager under article 2:65 Wft on 11 December 2023 ... All other funds are AIFMD-light funds and were not marketed by Carbon Equity after receiving the license.' Wayback, home and funds pages October 2022 to December 2023: 'Attention! This investment falls outside AFM supervision. No license required for this activity.'
- *Annual report 2025: 'AUM is now reported on a signed-subscription basis ... rather than the commercial close basis used in previous years'; 'approximately EUR 364 million'. Home page, October 30, 2026: 'EUR 470m Assets under management', '1900+ Investors', '13 Funds'. Annual report 2025: 'contributing to the capital base of 29 climate funds'.
- *FAQ, October 30, 2026: 'Most of our funds do not offer liquidity. You may be able to sell your investment to a third party, but we cannot assist in finding a buyer for you. There is no guarantee you would be able to sell at full value.' Webinar pages: 'is illiquid so you cannot exit early.' FAQ on default: 'penalty interest on the outstanding amount, a penalty of up to 50% of your total obligations, or in the most severe case, forfeiture of your existing investment in the fund.'
- *FAQ, October 30, 2026, reporting: 'We provide quarterly financial updates including capital account statements, commitment summaries and performance updates.' And on timing: 'we expect your updated capital account statements to be ready in late April or early May.'
- *Professional opt-up page: 'Professional investors have access to a different range of investment opportunities and receive less investor protection than retail investors.' 'Carbon Equity has voluntarily put most of these protections in place as a part of its license under Article 2:65.' 'if Carbon Equity were to offer its funds to retail investors, Carbon Equity would have to publish half-yearly figures and a more detailed prospectus.'
- *Fund page, Access to Climate Tech Fund II: 'Access to Climate Tech Fund II is structured as an ELTIF, which is why it has a lower minimum, a suitability assessment, a withdrawal right, and a limited redemption option.' 'Our other funds are structured differently and do not offer the same retail-investor protections.'
- *Form D, July 3, 2025, Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V.: Rule 506(b) and section 3(c)(7); total offered and sold $216,368; two investors; minimum $108,184; 'Reflects sales to U.S. investors only using conversion rate of 1 EURO = US$1.08184'; no sales compensation; signed by Louise Elizabeth Koole, Director.
- *Press release May 1, 2025: 'raised EUR 105 million' in the summary and 'closed ... with EUR 107 million in capital commitments' in the body, for the same fund. Press release March 5, 2024: Climate Tech Portfolio Fund II 'closed at ca EUR 100 million'; funds card October 30, 2026: 'Raised EUR 96m'.
- *For-professionals page tiles, October 30, 2026: 'AssetCare / Independent NAV', 'Quarterly reporting / NAV + capital account', '2.5-3% / Skin in the game', '13 Fund commitments'. Annual report 2025 balance sheet: no fund investments held by the manager; 'CE Employee Commitment IV' EUR 87,750.
Primary Source Pages
Comparable Platforms
- Moonfare
The European feeder platform at EUR 50,000 to EUR 100,000 minimums; less published on fees, the same on fund results.
- iCapital
US adviser-channel feeders whose terms are not published.
- Alumni Ventures
A US venture fund-of-funds at 2% and 20% that publishes a returned-capital figure.
- Private Shares Fund
A registered US fund of private assets with audited accounts and daily NAV, for what a regulated wrapper publishes.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
High-intent search questions answered directly, without making users hunt through the full review.
What is Carbon Equity and what do you actually own?
Carbon Equity B.V. is an Amsterdam fund manager, licensed by the Dutch AFM since December 11, 2023 under article 2:65 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act, that pools commitments from individuals into closed-end funds of funds investing in climate venture capital, private equity, infrastructure and private debt funds run by other managers, plus one direct co-investment fund. You own a limited partnership interest in a Dutch vehicle (recent funds are limited partnerships with a Carbon Equity general partner company and a separate foundation holding title; older ones are funds for joint account), not an interest in any underlying fund. Each vehicle has a depositary named in the AFM register. Thirteen vehicles have been launched since July 2021, five were open in October 2026, and the audited 2025 report puts commitments at approximately EUR 364 million from 1,657 subscriptions, with EUR 128.9 million deployed into 29 funds and 8 co-investments.
What does Carbon Equity charge?
Three layers of its own plus the underlying funds'. An annual management fee on the commitment, tiered by size: on Climate Tech Portfolio Fund IV 1.00% below EUR 100,000, 0.95% from EUR 100,000, down to 0.40% above EUR 20 million; 1.1% on the retail fund reducible to 0.85% by referrals; 0.85% at EUR 100,000 on the infrastructure fund; 0.75% on the debt fund; 1.25% or 1.00% on the co-investment fund. A one-off setup fee of 1% invoiced on top of the commitment, with a 25% discount for repeat investors, none on the co-investment fund. Fund expenses capped below 0.3% a year (0.5% on the retail fund, 0.2% estimated on the co-investment fund). Then the underlying managers' fees, which the firm puts at about 2% a year and 20% carried interest for venture and private equity and 1.5% and 20% for infrastructure. The co-investment fund adds a 10% performance fee on realized returns above a 1.25x hurdle. If the fee and expense cap run on the full commitment for twelve years, Carbon Equity's own layer on a EUR 100,000 commitment to the fourth portfolio fund is up to EUR 16,000 before any underlying fee; whether the fee steps down is not stated publicly. The only all-in figure in public is the January 2023 key information document for the second portfolio fund: EUR 60,761 of total costs on EUR 100,000 over twelve years, a reduction in yield of 8.5 percentage points a year, for that fund under its 2023 terms.
Is Carbon Equity regulated, and by whom?
Yes, by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets, as a fully licensed alternative investment fund manager. The AFM's register of licensed AIFMs lists Carbon Equity B.V. under license 15005329 dated December 11, 2023, with seventeen fund rows each naming a depositary (Apex Depositary Services for most, CACEIS for the retail fund, Belfius for the Belgian vehicles), and the ESMA register shows the same. The license was amended in 2025 to permit a direct co-investment fund. Access to Climate Tech Fund II is authorized as a European long-term investment fund and can be offered to retail investors across the EU. Before December 2023 the firm was a light-regime registrant, and its own 2022 and 2023 pages said the investment fell outside AFM supervision; the earlier funds were brought under the license and were not marketed afterward. The firm is a member of Kifid for complaints. There is no US registration; one fund filed a Form D in July 2025 for two US investors.
What returns have Carbon Equity's funds delivered?
Nothing is published. No TVPI, DPI, IRR, NAV per unit, called percentage or distribution figure for any fund appears on the site, in the press releases, on the event pages or in the four annual reports. The only value statement is one sentence in the 2023 annual report: EUR 37 million of invested capital had a total value of EUR 34 million at December 31, 2023. The fund pages carry targets, 12% to 15% net IRR for the fourth portfolio fund, 8% to 12% for the retail fund, 10% to 12% for infrastructure, 25% for co-investments and 7% to 8% for debt, each with the sentence that expected future performance is not guaranteed. An event page mentions a first exit in the first portfolio fund without a number. Investors receive quarterly capital account statements and performance updates, so the figures exist; the oldest vehicles are five years old and the first portfolio fund closed nearly four years ago. Prospective investors should ask for dated, vehicle-level statements before committing.
Can you sell a Carbon Equity fund position?
Not in any practical sense before the fund ends. The firm's FAQ states that most funds do not offer liquidity, that you may be able to sell to a third party but the firm cannot help find a buyer, and that there is no guarantee of selling at full value; its webinar pages say the funds are illiquid so you cannot exit early. Fund lives are twelve years for the portfolio, infrastructure and retail funds, ten for the co-investment fund and eight for the debt fund, with up to two two-year extensions stated for the second portfolio fund. A transfer to a qualifying buyer you find yourself costs the lower of 1% of the commitment or EUR 500 in administration; the 2023 key information document puts exit costs for early departure at 0% to 20% and describes a buy-back window five years after final close with restrictions. The retail fund alone has a two-week withdrawal right after signing and a limited redemption option whose timelines, restrictions and discounts are not published. Defaulting on a later capital call carries penalty interest, a penalty of up to 50% of your total obligations or forfeiture.
Who can invest, and what is the minimum?
Residents of the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany for all funds, with France to follow for the co-investment fund; the firm says investors elsewhere may be able to invest on their own initiative under reverse solicitation, subject to local rules that may require accredited or qualified investor status, and the join form asks you to confirm you found Carbon Equity yourself. Minimums are EUR 100,000 on the portfolio, infrastructure and debt funds, $250,000 on the co-investment fund and EUR 20,000 on the retail fund, Access to Climate Tech Fund II. EU and UK residents who meet two of three tests (a portfolio above EUR 500,000, a year in a financial-sector role, or ten significant private-market transactions a quarter for a year) can opt up to professional status and commit EUR 50,000, with the firm's own page stating they then receive less investor protection than retail investors. Everyone takes a suitability questionnaire or interview. On the EUR 100,000 funds the first capital call equals the minimum, so a minimum investor pays the whole commitment plus the 1% setup fee at once.
Is Carbon Equity itself financially sound?
It is audited, transparent about it, and not yet profitable. The 2025 annual report, with an unqualified opinion from KLMN Audit B.V., shows revenue of EUR 2.38 million (management fees EUR 1.95 million, setup fees EUR 0.43 million), a loss of EUR 3.53 million, cash of EUR 6.6 million at December 31, 2025, share premium of EUR 15.75 million and cumulative other reserves of about minus EUR 9.6 million. The firm reported a loss in each year of its filed record, raised EUR 1.2 million and EUR 1.8 million in 2022, EUR 6 million in September 2023 led by BlackFin Capital Partners and EUR 6.4 million in September 2025, and its going-concern note records management's expectation that profitability will be realized in early 2028; the 2022 and 2024 reports carried going-concern notes too. Investor money sits in separate partnerships with a foundation holding title and a depositary, and the fund agreements provide for a replacement manager, so a manager failure is not a fund loss, but it would mean a change of the party monitoring the underlying funds and running capital calls in the middle of a twelve-year commitment.
How does Carbon Equity compare with Moonfare?
Both are European platforms pooling individuals into institutional private funds through feeder or fund-of-funds vehicles with minimums in the EUR 50,000 to EUR 100,000 range, and Carbon Equity adds a EUR 20,000 retail ELTIF. On what is published, Carbon Equity does more: a full AIFM license with a depositary per fund in the public register, tier-by-tier fee tables on every fund page including the setup fee and the underlying 2% and 20%, and four years of its own audited accounts; Moonfare, which AltStreet scored 4.1 (C), directs readers to each fund page for fees and publishes no accounts. On fund results both publish nothing. Carbon Equity is climate-only and smaller, at about EUR 364 million of commitments audited against Moonfare's stated several billion, and is not yet profitable by its own account.
Can a US investor use Carbon Equity, and how is it taxed?
Both are questions for the firm. The FAQ limits active marketing to the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany and says investors elsewhere may be able to invest on their own initiative, subject to local rules that may require accredited or qualified investor status. One US filing exists: Climate Tech Portfolio Fund III C.V. filed a Form D on July 3, 2025 under Rule 506(b) and section 3(c)(7), covering two US investors for $216,368 at a $108,184 minimum. That shows one fund admitted US investors who qualified; it does not show that any US applicant can. Nothing on the public site addresses US persons, the funds' US tax classification or US reporting, and the Dutch description of the funds as opaque fiscal investment institutions does not determine their US treatment. A US person should ask whether they can invest, how the fund is classified for US tax purposes and what election it supports, and what annual US reporting it provides. AltStreet is not a tax adviser.
