Platform Comparison Guide · October 2026

YLDS vs Franklin Benji (FOBXX) 2026

YLDS means the Figure Transferable Certificates issued by Figure Certificate Company, a subsidiary of Figure Technology Solutions. Benji means Franklin Templeton's platform and its US product, the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund (FOBXX), whose shares are BENJI tokens.

Both are SEC-registered, both pay a dollar yield to a wallet, and both are open to US retail investors from almost nothing. One is a debt certificate backed by a thinly capitalized issuer and its parent's letter; the other is a money market fund you own a slice of.

Guide Thesis

Benji is a share of a fund's Treasuries. YLDS is Figure's promise, with reserves behind it and a parent behind those.

Start here

What you actually own: a certificate or a fund share

Both tokens are worth a dollar per hundred or per one, and both pay interest. What stands behind that dollar is different, and so is who can hold it and how it comes back.

TokenWhat you ownWho can buy, minimumHow you get outTax form
YLDS (Figure Certificate Company)An unsecured debt certificate of FCC at a $0.01 face, paying SOFR minus 0.35%US retail after Figure's KYC; no minimum; eligibility may be global per the FAQSurrender to FCC any time; cash in up to 5 days1099-INT, 1099-DA
BENJI (FOBXX shares)A share of an SEC-registered government money market fund that seeks to maintain a $1.00 NAVUS residents; $20 on Stellar up to $5,000,000 on EthereumRedeem at NAV on business days; the fund seeks to maintain $1.001099-DIV
USDC (for reference)A payment stablecoin; the holder is paid no yieldAnyone with a walletRedeem through Circle or sell on-exchangeNone from the issuer
USDY (for reference)Ondo's yield-bearing tokenized noteNon-US persons only (Regulation S)Redeem through OndoNot available to US holders

TL;DR

The comparison in two sentences

Benji is a conventional, PwC-audited government money fund at a 0.20% cost whose share register happens to run on public blockchains; it has reported a $1.00 NAV since 2021, reported a 3.73% seven-day net yield at September 30, 2026, and five holders were reported, beneficially or of record, for 74.9% of it. YLDS is an unsecured debt certificate of a Figure subsidiary paying SOFR minus 0.35% (3.55% that day), backed by statutory reserves in Treasuries with a surplus under 1%, $994,000 of equity and a parent's support letter to September 2027, and 85.9% of it is classified as held by Figure entities.

If you read nothing else: jump to what stands behind the dollar →

YLDS (Figure Certificate Company) vs Franklin Templeton Benji (FOBXX): yield-bearing certificate or on-chain money market fund, 2026

At a glance

Side-by-side at a glance

FeatureYLDS (Figure Certificate Company)Franklin Benji (FOBXX)
IssuerFigure Certificate Company, formed 2023, San Francisco; a subsidiary of Figure Technology Solutions (Nasdaq: FIGR)Franklin Templeton Trust, a registered investment company; manager Franklin Advisers, sub-advisor Western Asset
SecurityFace-amount certificate: unsecured debt, $0.01 face, 20-year maturityShare of a Rule 2a-7 government money market fund that seeks a stable $1.00 NAV
LaunchedFebruary 20, 2025 on ProvenanceApril 6, 2021 on Stellar
Rate on 2026-09-303.55% (SOFR 3.90% minus 0.35%), simple annual, paid monthly3.73% seven-day net yield (N-MFP3), dividends declared daily
CostNo holder fees; rate fixed at SOFR minus 0.35%0.20% net expense ratio inside the yield; no holder fees
What backs itFCC's statutory reserves (T-bills and repo); surplus $4.2M; equity $994K; parent letter to 2027-09-30The fund's own government securities, owned pro rata
Outstanding$556.0M (2026-06-30), 85.9% related-party$668.0M net assets (2026-09-30), five holders reported for 74.9%
Access / minimumUS retail after KYC; no minimumUS residents; $20 on Stellar to $5,000,000 on Ethereum
ExitSurrender any time; cash up to 5 daysRedeem at NAV on business days; the fund seeks to maintain $1.00
Audit / taxKPMG (annual); 1099-INTPwC (annual); 1099-DIV
AltStreet score6.5 (B+)7.3 (A); see how to read the scores below

Head-to-head

YLDS vs Benji, factor by factor

Eight factors, from what the token legally is to who holds it, with a same-date yield table and a $10,000 example beside the relevant sections.

A debt claim on a Figure subsidiary vs pro rata ownership of a Treasury portfolio

YLDS vs Benji: An Unsecured Certificate or a Share of a Money Fund

Both products are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and that is where the similarity ends. Figure Certificate Company (FCC), formed in 2023 and launched in February 2025, is a face-amount certificate company, a category the prospectus says has only one other member. Its YLDS certificate is 'an obligation of FCC, which are unsecured and solely backed by its assets': a $0.01 face amount, interest at overnight SOFR minus 0.35%, surrender at any time, a 20-year maturity. The holder is a creditor. Franklin Templeton Trust's single series, the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund (FOBXX), is a retail government money market fund under Rule 2a-7 that launched on Stellar in April 2021; one BENJI token is one share at a $1.00 net asset value, and the holder owns a pro rata slice of the fund's Treasuries and repo. In both cases the blockchain is the register, not the asset: FCC's transfer agent, Figure Equity Solutions, keeps 'the official record of Certificate ownership' and can correct it, and FOBXX's shares on Franklin's system are 'under the unilateral control of the transfer agent', with whitelisting and clawback on every network.

Practical answer

Benji gives you a share of the fund's assets; YLDS gives you Figure's promise, backed by reserves it must hold. That one difference drives everything else in this guide, from what happens in a loss to how the yield is set.

Decision factorWhat changes
What you ownYLDS: an unsecured debt certificate of Figure Certificate Company. Benji: a share of FOBXX, a registered government money market fund.
RegistrationYLDS: face-amount certificate company (811-23913), certificates registered under the Securities Act. Benji: open-end fund (811-23471) operating under Rule 2a-7.
PriceYLDS: fixed $0.01 face (100 certificates per dollar), the amount FCC contracts to pay. Benji: a $1.00 NAV the fund seeks to maintain and has reported on every day since April 2021.
Who controls the tokenBoth: the issuer's transfer agent keeps the official record, approves wallets and can reverse transfers.

No minimum after KYC vs $20 to $5,000,000 depending on the network

YLDS vs Benji: Who Can Buy and How Much

YLDS has no minimum purchase and no minimum holding; an account is opened at ylds.com or through Figure Markets, Figure Payments runs the identity checks, and purchases arrive by wire, ACH, a Figure Payments balance or, since August 2026, an accepted stablecoin. The FAQ says eligible holders may be 'global'. FOBXX is intended for sale to US residents through the Benji app (individuals) or a web portal (institutions), and its minimum initial investment depends on which network the shares are recorded on: $20 on Stellar, $100 on Aptos, Base or Solana, $1,000 on Polygon or Arbitrum, $20,000 on Avalanche and $5,000,000 on Ethereum, because the fund's cost per transaction differs by network. YLDS records on Provenance by default, with Solana, Stellar, Avalanche, Sui and Tempo available on request at FCC's discretion.

Practical answer

Either is open to a US individual with a wallet and a bank account. YLDS is the lower bar, with no minimum; Benji's $20 Stellar entry is close, but its other networks start much higher.

Decision factorWhat changes
MinimumYLDS: none. Benji: $20 (Stellar) to $5,000,000 (Ethereum).
WhoYLDS: anyone who passes Figure's KYC; FAQ says eligibility may be global. Benji: US residents through the Benji app or portal.
NetworksYLDS: Provenance primary; Solana, Stellar, Avalanche, Sui, Tempo on request. Benji: nine approved networks, 68.4% of tokens on Stellar.
FundingYLDS: wire, ACH, Figure Payments balance, accepted stablecoin. Benji: linked bank account; USDC conversions since June 2024.

A fixed formula below SOFR vs whatever a Treasury portfolio earns, less 0.20%

YLDS vs Benji: What Each Pays and How the Rate Is Set

YLDS's rate is written into its prospectus: overnight SOFR minus 35 basis points, floor 0.00%, simple interest accrued daily and paid on the first of each month in additional certificates unless the holder elects dollars; the prospectus notes that rounding can leave small balances earning nothing. FCC keeps whatever its reserves earn above that formula, which is its business. FOBXX pays whatever its portfolio of Treasury bills and repo earns, less its 0.20% net expense ratio, declared daily as dividends and reinvested in new shares. On September 30, 2026, with SOFR at 3.90%, YLDS paid 3.55% and FOBXX reported a 7-day net yield of 3.73%. Those are different measures: a stated annual simple rate against the annualized yield of a seven-day period. FOBXX also has an audited total-return record (3.94% for the year to March 2026, 4.81% the year before); YLDS has KPMG-audited financial statements but no comparable fund total-return series, only the formula and the $8.3 million of interest it provided in the first half of 2026.

Practical answer

On the one date AltStreet matched, Benji paid about 18 basis points more than YLDS, with its fee already deducted. YLDS's formula is predictable; FOBXX's yield is whatever short rates and the portfolio deliver.

Decision factorWhat changes
Rate on 2026-09-30YLDS: 3.55% (SOFR 3.90% minus 0.35%). Benji: 3.73% seven-day net yield (N-MFP3).
How it is setYLDS: fixed formula in the prospectus. Benji: portfolio earnings less 0.20%.
How it is paidYLDS: monthly, in new certificates unless dollars are elected. Benji: daily dividends reinvested as new shares.
Audited recordYLDS: audited financial statements, but no fund total-return series. Benji: total returns 2.79%, 5.12%, 4.81%, 3.94% for fiscal 2023 to 2026.

Calculation table

The two yields on one date, September 30, 2026

Marketing pages quote rates captured on different days. AltStreet matched one date: overnight SOFR from the New York Fed, the YLDS formula from its prospectus, and FOBXX's 7-day yields from its September 2026 N-MFP3 report.

MeasureValueWhat it is
Overnight SOFR, 2026-09-303.90%The reference rate both products key off, directly or through Treasury yields
YLDS rate3.55%SOFR minus 0.35%: a stated simple annual rate, accrued daily, paid monthly
FOBXX seven-day gross yield3.91%Annualized yield for the seven days ending September 30, before expenses (N-MFP3)
FOBXX seven-day net yield3.73%The same period after expenses accrued in it. The 0.18-point gap is close to, but not exactly, the fund's 0.20% annual net expense ratio; a seven-day accrual need not match the annual ratio
Gap0.18 points in FOBXX's favorOn this date; FOBXX's yield floats with its portfolio, YLDS's is a fixed spread

A simple annual rate paid monthly and the annualized yield of a seven-day period are not identical measures, so treat the gap as indicative. The N-MFP3 supplies the seven-day gross and net yields; Franklin separately publishes a compounded effective yield, which is not used here. What the table does show: FOBXX's annualized gross yield for the week ending September 30 was 3.91%, close to SOFR, and 3.73% net; YLDS's formula set the holder's rate at 3.55%, and whatever FCC's own reserves earned above that stayed with FCC.

Statutory reserves plus a parent's letter vs a money fund's portfolio rules

YLDS vs Benji: What Stands Behind the Dollar

FCC must hold qualified assets at least equal to a reserve for its certificates plus $250,000 of capital, measured at amortized cost and invested only in what a District of Columbia life insurer may hold. At June 30, 2026 it held $561.9 million against a $557.7 million requirement: $273.1 million of Treasury bills, an $82.4 million overnight repurchase agreement with UMB Bank and a $200.0 million one with Hidden Road Partners, plus cash. The surplus was $4.2 million, about 0.75%, and GAAP equity, which also nets $3.5 million of other liabilities, was $994,000. FCC lost $3.07 million in 2025 and $808,000 in the first half of 2026. Its parent, Figure Technology Solutions, wrote FCC a letter on June 30, 2026 saying it 'will satisfy, on a timely basis all liabilities and obligations of the Company that the Company is unable to satisfy when due' through September 30, 2027; the letter is addressed to FCC, and the filings do not say whether certificate holders could enforce it. FOBXX's assets are held apart from Franklin's: shareholders own the portfolio, which must be at least 99.5% government securities, cash and government-collateralized repo under Rule 2a-7, with daily and weekly liquid assets of 63.47% and 69.72% at August 31, 2026. That separates the fund from its sponsor's balance sheet; it does not remove portfolio or operational risk, Franklin describes the $1.00 share price as an objective rather than a guarantee, and the prospectus says the sponsor 'is not required to reimburse the fund for losses'. The site copy differs too: ylds.com calls YLDS 'principal-protected' and promises 'credit-line-backed liquidity', while FCC's prospectus says 'You could lose money' and that FCC 'does not and does not intend to borrow money'.

Practical answer

Benji's protection is the kind money funds have had for decades: portfolio rules and pro rata ownership. YLDS's is a reserve test that keeps assets equal to obligations at amortized cost, a thin surplus, and a time-limited letter from a parent that is itself a leveraged, newly listed company.

Decision factorWhat changes
Legal protectionYLDS: Section 28 reserves and capital; SEC custody order. Benji: Rule 2a-7 portfolio quality, maturity, diversification and liquidity rules.
Loss absorptionYLDS: $4.2M statutory surplus, $994K GAAP equity, parent letter to 2027-09-30. Benji: losses, if any, borne pro rata; no sponsor support required.
Reserve assets (mid-2026)YLDS: T-bills $273.1M, UMB repo $82.4M, Hidden Road repo $200.0M (36% of assets). Benji: government securities and repo under 2a-7.
Marketing vs filingsYLDS: 'principal-protected' and 'credit-line-backed' on the site; not in the prospectus. Benji: 'natively on-chain', while the prospectus gives the transfer agent unilateral control.

85.9% related-party holdings vs five holders reported for 74.9%

YLDS vs Benji: Who Actually Holds Them

Both registers are concentrated, YLDS's in related-party classifications and FOBXX's in a few large record holders, and in both cases a record holder can represent underlying investors. FCC's balance sheet at June 30, 2026 split its $556.0 million of certificates into $477.5 million 'related parties' and $78.5 million third parties, with 3,450 accounts in total; related parties bought $539.4 million and surrendered $319.8 million in the half, while direct third-party holdings grew $2.6 million. Figure's parent separately reports $347.7 million of YLDS borrowed through Democratized Prime, its loan-collateralized lending marketplace, so related-party holdings can include YLDS lent to Figure as well as Figure's own capital; the filings do not reconcile the two. FOBXX's statement of additional information lists every holder of 5% or more, beneficially or of record: on July 1, 2026 the Stellar Development Foundation (27.30%), Franklin Distributors (15.53%), Franklin Advisers (15.41%), Ondo I LP (9.45%) and a Johnson family trust (7.21%) together accounted for 74.9%. Its August 2026 N-MFP3 report classified 72.22% of shares of record as held by non-financial corporations and 6.91% as retail. Net assets fell from $864.4 million in February 2026 to $668.0 million at September 30 after months of net redemptions.

Practical answer

Neither 'market cap' is a measure of outside retail demand. YLDS is mostly classified as related-party; FOBXX's register is led by a handful of corporate and foundation record holders, two of them Franklin companies.

Decision factorWhat changes
OutstandingYLDS: $556.0M at 2026-06-30. Benji: $668.0M net assets at 2026-09-30.
ConcentrationYLDS: 85.9% classified related-party. Benji: five holders reported for 74.9% (two Franklin companies, 30.94%).
Retail shareYLDS: not reported; 3,450 accounts. Benji: 6.91% of shares of record (August 2026).
FlowsYLDS: related parties drove H1 2026 issuance. Benji: net redemptions March to August 2026; filings do not say which holders.

Surrender any time, paid within days, vs redemption at $1.00 on business days

YLDS vs Benji: Getting Money Out

YLDS can be surrendered to FCC at any time at face plus accrued interest. The August 2026 supplement says surrenders 'will be processed within 24 hours, but surrenders may take longer depending on congestion on the relevant approved blockchain or other technological reasons'; proceeds by wire or ACH 'may take up to 5 days', or up to 10 days as a stablecoin through Figure Payments. FCC paid $762.8 million of surrenders in the first half of 2026 ($499.4 million in the second quarter), $319.8 million of it to related parties: a process that works at volume, not a test of an independent run. FOBXX shares are redeemed at NAV, which the fund seeks to hold at $1.00, on business days through the app or portal, with dollars returned to the linked bank account; the fund met $348.4 million of redemptions from March to August 2026 from its liquid assets. Both allow peer-to-peer transfers between wallets the issuer has approved, and both prospectuses say those transfers are not a public market; FOBXX's adds that they need not occur at NAV, and authorized institutions can swap through BenjiSwap at a fixed 1:1 rate. Neither is listed anywhere.

Practical answer

Both exits run through the issuer, and both have paid out at scale. YLDS's clock starts any hour of any day but can run to five business days for cash; Benji's is a business-day redemption at a NAV the fund has held at $1.00 since 2021, as an objective rather than a guarantee.

Decision factorWhat changes
ExitYLDS: surrender to FCC at face plus accrued interest, any time. Benji: redeem at NAV on business days; the fund seeks to maintain $1.00.
TimingYLDS: processed within 24 hours unless congested; cash up to 5 days, stablecoin up to 10. Benji: business-day processing to the linked bank account.
DemonstratedYLDS: $762.8M paid in H1 2026, $319.8M to related parties. Benji: $348.4M redeemed March to August 2026.
Peer-to-peerBoth: between approved wallets only; no public market. Benji transfers need not be at NAV; BenjiSwap for authorized institutions.

A spread kept by the issuer vs a 0.20% expense ratio deducted from the yield

YLDS vs Benji: Fees and Costs

Neither charges a purchase or redemption fee, apart from an ACH fee FCC passes through on surrender, and both sponsors pay the blockchain gas fees. The economics sit in different places. YLDS's holder receives SOFR minus 0.35%, a fixed rate rather than a fee; FCC's spread is whatever its reserves earn minus the certificate interest, before its own expenses, which include 0.10% of net invested assets to its affiliated adviser, Figure Investment Advisors (down from 0.25% before October 2025), with most of its other bills paid by its parent. The adviser may rebate part of its fee to some holders or intermediaries case by case. FOBXX's cost is explicit: a 0.15% management fee plus other expenses, capped at a 0.20% net expense ratio through July 31, 2027, with network fees paid by Franklin; the fund's reported 7-day net yield is after that charge. Franklin's affiliates collect the management and transfer agent fees; Figure's affiliates collect FCC's advisory, administration, transfer agent and KYC fees.

Practical answer

Benji's cost is a published 0.20% you can see in every annual report. YLDS has no fee line: the holder's rate is fixed at SOFR minus 0.35%, and FCC's spread, its reserve earnings minus certificate interest before expenses, is the issuer's economics rather than a charge to the holder.

Decision factorWhat changes
Holder feesYLDS: none (ACH fee passed through on surrender). Benji: none; no load, no redemption fee.
Where the cost sitsYLDS: no fee; the holder's rate is fixed at SOFR minus 0.35%, and FCC's spread (reserve earnings minus certificate interest, before expenses) is the issuer's. Benji: 0.20% net expense ratio inside the yield.
Gas feesBoth paid by the sponsor.
Affiliate feesYLDS: adviser 0.10%, transfer agent $5,000/month, $2 per KYC review, all Figure companies. Benji: 0.15% management and transfer agency fees to Franklin companies.

Worked example

What $10,000 buys, and what it would pay at September 30 rates

AltStreet arithmetic on the rates above, held constant for a year, which they will not be. Both figures are before tax; neither product charges the holder a fee on top.

ItemYLDSFranklin Benji (FOBXX)
What $10,000 buys1,000,000 certificates at $0.0110,000 shares at $1.00
Income at the 2026-09-30 rateAbout $355 a year (3.55% simple), paid as about $29.58 a month in new certificates or dollarsAbout $373 a year if the 3.73% seven-day net yield held all year; dividends are declared daily and reinvested as new shares
CostNo fee charged. The holder's rate is fixed at SOFR minus 0.35%, about $35 a year below SOFR on this balance. FCC's own spread is its reserve earnings minus the certificate interest, before its expenses, and is not disclosed per certificateThe 0.20% net expense ratio, about $20 a year on this balance, already inside the yield
Value if you exit$10,000 face plus accrued interest from FCC, if FCC pays; cash in up to 5 days10,000 shares at NAV on a business day; the fund seeks to maintain $1.00
What you are relying onFCC's reserves and, through September 2027, Figure Technology Solutions' letterA portfolio of government securities you own pro rata

The $18 difference is small; the difference in what stands behind the $10,000 is not. FCC's own cushion above its reserve requirement was $4.2 million on a $557.7 million obligation at June 30, 2026, and the letter that backstops it ends on September 30, 2027 unless renewed.

10-K and 10-Q with a parent letter vs monthly N-MFP reports and audited annual returns

YLDS vs Benji: Disclosure, Audit, Tax and Governance

FCC files a KPMG-audited 10-K and unaudited 10-Qs whose schedules show its investments, qualified assets on deposit and certificate activity split by related and third parties; its board has five directors, three independent, the chair co-founded Figure and is married to another director, and the prospectus says the board 'may form an Audit Committee in the future'. The adviser, administrator, transfer agent and KYC provider are Figure companies; UMB and Flagstar (custodians) and KPMG are not. FOBXX files monthly N-MFP reports with daily flows and owner categories, semiannual and PwC-audited annual reports, and a statement of additional information naming every 5% holder; JPMorgan Chase Bank is custodian and the trust's board is mostly independent of Franklin. One outside fact: Western Asset, FOBXX's sub-advisor since May 2026, settled an SEC case in June 2026 for $100 million over its former co-CIO's trading, an order that does not concern this fund. Tax follows the structure: YLDS interest on Form 1099-INT (withdrawals on 1099-DA), FOBXX dividends on Form 1099-DIV. AltStreet located no enforcement action naming either issuer.

Practical answer

Benji's reporting is the deeper and more independent of the two; YLDS's is detailed but runs through Figure at every layer except custody and audit.

Decision factorWhat changes
ReportingYLDS: 10-K (KPMG), 10-Q (unaudited) with related-party split; parent support letter filed. Benji: monthly N-MFP3, N-CSR (PwC), SAI with 5% holders.
IndependenceYLDS: 3 of 5 directors independent; no audit committee yet; affiliates run adviser, admin, TA, KYC. Benji: board mostly independent; Franklin affiliates run adviser, admin, TA; JPMorgan custody.
Tax formYLDS: 1099-INT and 1099-DA. Benji: 1099-DIV.
AltStreet scoreYLDS: 6.5 (B+). Benji: 7.3 (A); see how to read the scores below.

The two people also search for

Where USDC and USDY fit

"YLDS vs USDC" and "YLDS vs USDY" are common comparisons. USDC is a different kind of product, and USDY is not available to US persons.

TokenWhat it isWhy it drops out
USDC (Circle)A payment stablecoin redeemable 1:1 through Circle; reserves in cash and short TreasuriesCircle pays holders no yield. Where USDC earns something, it is through a separate rewards, lending or DeFi arrangement with its own terms and risks, so that comparison is between YLDS and the arrangement, not USDC itself.
USDY (Ondo)A yield-bearing tokenized note backed by short Treasuries and bank deposits; AltStreet's Ondo review records its NAV accreting from about $1.012 to about $1.131 over 900-plus daysSold under Regulation S and closed to US and Canadian persons. A US investor cannot hold it; the US-eligible Ondo product is OUSG, for accredited investors who are also qualified purchasers.
BUIDL (BlackRock via Securitize)A tokenized institutional money fund at a $1.00 NAVAccredited and qualified investors at an institutional-scale minimum; not a retail product.

That leaves YLDS and Benji as two SEC-registered options available to US retail investors, which is why this guide puts them side by side.

How to read the scores

What 7.3 against 6.5 does and does not say

AltStreet scores four pillars (methodology). Benji leads on every pillar, and the widest gap is Transparency: FOBXX's monthly reports, named 5% holders and audited returns against FCC's quarterly unaudited reports and a website whose claims run past its prospectus. The scores do not measure which token will pay more next month.

Pillar (0 to 100)YLDSFranklin BenjiWhat drives the difference
Operational Risk64.3 (B+)69.4 (A-)Both Big Four audited; Benji has an independent custodian and a mostly independent board, YLDS an affiliate-run stack and no audit committee yet
Investment Merit64.7 (B+)70.0 (A-)Benji's five audited years at $1.00; YLDS's 20 months, issuer losses and parent dependence
Transparency & Alignment70.9 (A-)81.7 (A+)Monthly N-MFP and named holders vs quarterly unaudited reports and marketing beyond the prospectus
Liquidity & Access59.0 (B)63.0 (B+)Surrender any time with cash in up to 5 days vs business-day redemption at NAV; no public market for either

Final read

Bottom line

For a US investor who wants a dollar balance that earns interest in a wallet, Benji is the more conservative instrument: a money market fund with portfolio rules, pro rata ownership, a $1.00 NAV reported every day since 2021 and a published 0.20% cost, paying slightly more on the date AltStreet matched. YLDS is the more flexible one: no minimum, surrender any hour, a fixed and predictable spread, and a place inside Figure's lending and trading platforms. Its price is that the holder is a creditor of an issuer with under $1 million of its own equity, relying on a reserve test measured at amortized cost and a parent's letter that runs to September 2027.

Neither is a bearer stablecoin: both registers are controlled by the issuer's transfer agent, both require identity checks, and both are concentrated in affiliates or a few large record holders. The choice is between fund-share exposure, with portfolio rules, pro rata ownership and business-day redemption at NAV, and an unsecured certificate obligation, with a fixed spread, round-the-clock surrender and reliance on the issuer's reserves and its parent's support.

Primary sources

Sources and access

YLDS / Figure Certificate Company (SEC EDGAR, public)

Franklin Benji / FOBXX (SEC EDGAR, public)

FAQs

YLDS vs Franklin Benji: Common questions

How does YLDS differ from Franklin Benji?+

They are different securities under the same law. YLDS is a face-amount certificate: an unsecured debt obligation of Figure Certificate Company, a Figure subsidiary registered under the Investment Company Act, paying overnight SOFR minus 0.35% and redeemable at its $0.01 face. A BENJI token is one share of the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund (FOBXX), an SEC-registered government money market fund at a $1.00 net asset value, so the holder owns a pro rata slice of the fund's Treasuries rather than a claim on an issuer. AltStreet scores Benji 7.3 (A) and YLDS 6.5 (B+).

Is YLDS a stablecoin? Is Benji?+

Neither is a stablecoin in the legal sense, and both say so. Figure's own site calls YLDS 'Not a stablecoin. A security that acts like one', and its prospectus says FCC 'does not seek to maintain a stable value of $1.00 per share'; the $0.01 face is the amount FCC contracts to pay on surrender. FOBXX is a money market fund that has held a $1.00 net asset value since April 2021 under Rule 2a-7's portfolio rules; the BENJI token is its share register on public blockchains, not a bearer coin.

Which pays more, YLDS or Benji?+

On September 30, 2026, with SOFR at 3.90%, YLDS's stated rate was 3.55% (a simple annual rate, paid monthly) and FOBXX reported a seven-day net yield of 3.73% (the annualized yield for the seven days ending that date, after expenses, as filed on Form N-MFP3; not Franklin's compounded 'effective' yield). They are different measures, so compare them on one date rather than from marketing pages captured months apart. YLDS's rate is a fixed formula below SOFR; FOBXX's yield moves with what its Treasury portfolio earns.

Which is safer, and what backs each?+

Benji's holder owns a share of a fund that must keep at least 99.5% of assets in government securities, cash and government-collateralized repurchase agreements; losses, if any, are borne pro rata, and the sponsor is not required to cover them. YLDS's holder is a creditor of FCC, which must hold statutory reserves at least equal to its certificate obligations (Treasury bills and Treasury repo at June 30, 2026) but had only $4.2 million of reserves above that requirement and $994,000 of GAAP equity. Its parent, Figure Technology Solutions, committed by a June 30, 2026 letter to cover obligations FCC cannot meet through September 30, 2027; the letter is addressed to FCC, and whether holders could enforce it is not stated. Neither product is insured.

Who can buy them, and what is the minimum?+

Both are open to US retail investors after identity checks. YLDS has no minimum (one certificate is $0.01), is bought at ylds.com or through Figure Markets by wire, ACH, a Figure Payments balance or an accepted stablecoin, and its FAQ says eligible holders may be global. FOBXX is intended for US residents and its minimum depends on the network: $20 on Stellar, $100 on Aptos, Base or Solana, $1,000 on Polygon or Arbitrum, $20,000 on Avalanche and $5,000,000 on Ethereum.

How do I get my money out, and how fast?+

YLDS can be surrendered to FCC at any time at face plus accrued interest; the prospectus says surrenders are processed within 24 hours but may take longer with blockchain congestion, and wire or ACH proceeds can take up to 5 days (a stablecoin payout up to 10). FCC paid $762.8 million of surrenders in the first half of 2026, $319.8 million of it to Figure entities. FOBXX shares are redeemed at NAV, which the fund seeks to hold at $1.00, on business days through the Benji app or portal, with dollars returned to the linked bank account. Both allow peer-to-peer transfers between approved wallets; neither has a public market, and FOBXX's prospectus says such transfers need not occur at NAV.

Who actually holds YLDS and Benji?+

Both registers are concentrated, with the caveat that a record holder can represent underlying investors. At June 30, 2026, $477.5 million of the $556.0 million of YLDS outstanding (85.9%) was classified as related-party holdings and third parties held $78.5 million; FCC reported 3,450 accounts in total. Figure's parent separately reports $347.7 million of YLDS borrowed through its Democratized Prime marketplace. For FOBXX, five holders were reported as beneficial owners or holders of record of 74.9% on July 1, 2026, including two Franklin companies with 30.94% between them, and the August 2026 monthly report classified 6.91% of shares of record as retail.

What are the fees?+

Neither charges a purchase or redemption fee, apart from an ACH fee FCC passes through on surrender, and both sponsors pay the blockchain gas. YLDS charges no fee; its rate is fixed at SOFR minus 0.35%, and FCC's spread is its reserve earnings minus the certificate interest, before expenses that include a 0.10% fee to its affiliated adviser. FOBXX charges a 0.20% net expense ratio (0.15% management fee plus other expenses, capped through July 2027), which is already deducted from its reported yield.

How are they taxed?+

YLDS interest is reported on Form 1099-INT and is taxable when credited, including the monthly interest paid in additional certificates; withdrawals are reported on Form 1099-DA. FOBXX pays daily dividends reinvested as shares, reported on Form 1099-DIV as ordinary income (all $29.96 million distributed in the year to March 2026 was ordinary income). Transferring either token to another person is a disposition. AltStreet is not a tax adviser.

What about USDC and USDY?+

USDC is a payment stablecoin: Circle pays holders no yield, so any 'USDC yield' comes from a separate rewards, lending or DeFi arrangement with its own terms and risks; the relevant comparison is then between YLDS and that arrangement. USDY is Ondo's yield-bearing tokenized note, sold under Regulation S and closed to US and Canadian persons, so a US investor cannot hold it. That leaves YLDS and Benji as two SEC-registered options available to US retail investors.

Related research

Keep comparing tokenized dollar products

Related records on AltStreet

Disclosures:AltStreet has no commercial relationship with Figure Technology Solutions, Figure Certificate Company, Franklin Templeton or any of their affiliates, holds neither token, and received no compensation for this comparison. All figures come from the issuers' SEC filings as cited; yields are for September 30, 2026 and change daily. Calculations labeled as AltStreet arithmetic use the stated rates held constant. Neither product is insured, and either can lose value. This is research, not investment or tax advice.

Last updated: October 16, 2026 · https://altstreet.investments/guides/ylds-vs-franklin-benji