Fund Filings Research|Every Schedule TO final amendment, read from EDGAR
Research

Private Credit Funds Are Rationing Exits: What SEC Filings Show at Blackstone, Blue Owl, Apollo and Others

Among the Schedule TO final amendments AltStreet reviewed across the non-traded business development companies it tracks, none of the 26 readable results for offers that expired in the second half of 2025 showed proration: every fund bought every share tendered. For offers that expired between April and June 2026, nine of seventeen readable results did, at Blackstone, Blue Owl, Ares, Apollo, HPS, Golub, Monroe and BlackRock. This piece sets out the series fund by fund, from the final amendments themselves, with Blue Owl Technology Income's 100%, 14.4%, 13.1%, 12.8% sequence as the sharpest case.

The short version

Tender volumes rose sharply relative to the funds' stated offer sizes.

Each fund's standard offer is 5% of its shares a quarter, and boards enlarged several in late 2025. What changed in 2026 is how many shares were tendered against the stated offer: at HPS Corporate Lending, 18.9 million became 66.7 million in two quarters; at Apollo Debt Solutions, 28.2 million became 101.5 million; at Blue Owl Credit Income, 108 million became 464 million.

Non-traded BDC tender offers prorated by quarter, from SEC Schedule TO final amendments

What the filings establish

Two ratios per offer: how much of the fund asked out, and how much of that was met.

A Schedule TO final amendment reports shares validly tendered, shares accepted, the price and the amount paid. It does not say why holders tendered. Everything on this page is one of those four figures or a ratio of two of them, and every row links to the amendment it came from.

Prorated offers

0 of 26

Readable results for BDC tender offers that expired July to December 2025. Every one bought all shares tendered.

Prorated offers

9 of 17

Readable results for offers that expired April to June 2026. Rates from 13.1% (Blue Owl Technology Income) to 95.2% (BlackRock Private Credit Fund). Of the ten readable July to September results so far, four are prorated.

How many private credit funds are prorating their tender offers?

Short answer

Counting one event per offer and dating each by its expiration: none of the 26 readable results for offers that expired in the second half of 2025 showed proration. Five of seventeen did for offers that expired January to March 2026 (HPS, Apollo, Ares and both Blue Owl funds), nine of seventeen for April to June, and four of the ten readable results so far for July to September, led by Blue Owl Technology Income at 12.8% and Blue Owl Credit Income at 29.8%.

A non-traded BDC has no exchange listing, so the only routine way out is the quarterly tender offer the fund itself makes, almost always for 5% of the shares outstanding. The fund files a Schedule TO-I when the offer opens and a final amendment when it closes, and that amendment is where the result lives: how many shares were validly tendered, how many the fund accepted, at what price, and what it paid. When tenders exceed the offer, the fund generally allocates acceptances pro rata, subject to the offer's exceptions, and the amendment states the fraction.

AltStreet reads those amendments for the 70 BDCs on its registered-fund watch-list, alongside the N-PORT, N-CEN and N-CSR filings of 382 other registered funds. The chart counts tender offers, not documents: each offer is one event, dated by the expiration the final amendment states, and where a fund filed two amendments for the same offer the later, corrected one is used. An offer is "readable" when its amendment states the shares tendered and accepted or the rate itself; older formats that state an amount paid without an accepted count are counted as offers but left out of the rate, which is why the light bars are shorter than the number of offers in each quarter. The table gives the bridge from amendments to offers to funds.

0612182410Apr to Jun 202512Jul to Sep 202514Oct to Dec 2025175Jan to Mar 2026179Apr to Jun 2026104Jul to Sep 2026Offers with a readable final resultof which prorated (accepted below 99.9% of tendered)
Offer expiredOffers (funds)Readable resultsUnreadable formatProratedWhich (result filed)
Apr to Jun 202516 (16)1060none
Jul to Sep 202522 (22)12100none
Oct to Dec 202523 (22)1490none
Jan to Mar 202623 (22)1765HPS Corporate Lending 54.0% (expired Mar 4, filed May 1), Apollo Debt Solutions 45.2% (Mar 16, May 6), Ares Strategic Income 43.1% (Mar 20, Apr 17), Blue Owl Credit Income 22.8% (Mar 31, Apr 27), Blue Owl Technology Income 14.4% (Mar 31, Apr 27)
Apr to Jun 202622 (22)1759Golub Capital Private Credit 58.7% (May 1, May 14), Monroe Capital Income Plus 56.3% (May 29, Jun 5), Blackstone Private Credit 48.5% (May 29, Aug 4), HPS Corporate Lending 37.6% (Jun 8, Aug 4), BlackRock Private Credit 95.2% (Jun 8, Aug 4), Apollo Debt Solutions 29.8% (Jun 15, Aug 6), Ares Strategic Income 34.7% (Jun 18, Jul 28), Blue Owl Credit Income 26.6% (Jun 30, Jul 24), Blue Owl Technology Income 13.1% (Jun 30, Jul 24)
Jul to Sep 2026 (results still arriving)15 (15)1054Monroe Capital Income Plus 77.7% (Aug 31, Sep 4), Ares Strategic Income 38.2% (Sep 18, Sep 25), Blue Owl Credit Income 29.8% (Sep 30, Oct 26), Blue Owl Technology Income 12.8% (Sep 30, Oct 26)

Among the readable results for offers that expired in 2026, the funds that still filled every tender include Barings Private Credit Corp., Fidelity Private Credit Fund, Silver Point Private Credit Fund, Ares Core Infrastructure Fund, Stepstone Private Credit Fund and Golub Capital Private Credit Fund in its July offer, after one prorated offer in May. BlackRock Private Credit Fund's 95.2% counts as prorated under the threshold used here, though it is a different event from the rates in the teens and twenties. The prorated group includes several large retail private-credit funds. Expiration, valuation, payment and filing dates are separate events: Blackstone Private Credit Fund's August 4 amendment reports an offer that expired May 29, values the accepted shares at June 30 and describes payment in July, which is why the chart groups by expiration and the fund tables show filing dates.

Fund by fund: every final amendment since 2025

Short answer

At each of the eight funds the shape is the same: a run of offers filled in full through late 2025 or early 2026, then a rise in shares tendered of two to four times relative to the stated 5% offer. Blue Owl Technology Income is the sharpest case at 100%, 14.4%, 13.1%, 12.8% over four consecutive offers.

Each table below lists the Schedule TO final amendments the fund has filed since the start of 2025 that AltStreet holds, in filing order, with the offer's expiration where the amendment states it. "Filled" is shares accepted as a percentage of shares validly tendered, as the amendment states it or as the two counts imply. Where a fund filed a second amendment for the same offer, the later one is shown. The accession number links to the filing on EDGAR; the fund name links to its AltStreet entity page, where the N-PORT, NAV and repurchase record sits.

Blackstone Private Credit Fund (BCRED)

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Feb 3, 202520,891,34720,891,347100%$25.42$530.9M0001193125-25-018909
May 2, 202523,024,37023,024,370100%$25.25$581.0M0001213900-25-038699
Aug 4, 202543,576,15843,576,158100%$25.17$1,096.0M0001213900-25-070890
Nov 3, 202531,791,04531,791,045100%$24.97$793.7M0001213900-25-104924
Feb 2, 202685,035,78985,035,789100%$24.79$2,107.5M0001213900-26-010557
May 1, 2026offer expired Mar 2, 2026133,689,552133,689,552100%$24.19$3,232.8M0001213900-26-050688Offer was for 96,013,428 shares; the fund accepted all tendered shares as permitted by Rule 13e-4(f)(1)
Aug 4, 2026offer expired May 29, 2026191,782,83493,100,27248.5%$23.65$2,201.8M0001213900-26-0849245% of shares outstanding at March 31, 2026, pro rata

Blue Owl Credit Income Corp. (OCIC)

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Jul 24, 202549,165,85749,165,857100%$9.42$464.2M0001628280-25-035964
Oct 24, 202533,832,73633,832,736100%$9.38$318.1M0001628280-25-046290
Jan 29, 2026108,153,110108,153,110100%$9.32$1,009.6M0001628280-26-003929
Apr 27, 2026offer expired Mar 31, 2026463,820,625105,851,99622.8%$9.08 to $9.11$963.6M0001628280-26-027580Tendered shares were 21.9% of shares outstanding at December 31, 2025
Jul 24, 2026offer expired Jun 30, 2026395,428,504105,249,08226.6%$9.05$955.0M0001628280-26-049601
Oct 26, 2026offer expired Sep 30, 2026341,389,461101,609,21129.8%$9.14 to $9.17$931.1M0001628280-26-067327Tendered shares were 16.8% of shares outstanding at June 30, 2026

Blue Owl Technology Income Corp. (OTIC)

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Jul 24, 202514,122,73214,122,732100%$10.37$146.5M0001628280-25-035965
Oct 24, 20258,657,1478,657,147100%$10.42$90.2M0001628280-25-046291
Jan 29, 2026offer expired Jan 8, 202650,787,51250,787,512100%$10.38$527.2M0001628280-26-00392815.4% of shares outstanding; the board raised the offer above its standard size
Apr 27, 2026offer expired Mar 31, 2026119,934,13517,246,88114.4%$9.82$169.4M0001628280-26-027573Tendered shares were 40.4% of the adjusted share count
Jul 24, 2026offer expired Jun 30, 2026109,888,74914,438,90613.1%$9.70$140.1M0001628280-26-04959938.1% of shares outstanding tendered
Oct 26, 2026offer expired Sep 30, 2026108,556,45713,926,86212.8%$9.85$137.2M0001628280-26-06733039% of shares outstanding tendered

Apollo Debt Solutions BDC

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Feb 10, 20252,513,3272,513,327100%$24.86$62.4M0001193125-25-023631
May 8, 20255,281,6425,281,642100%$24.65$130.1M0001193125-25-115957
Aug 15, 20258,422,6328,422,632100%$24.60$207.2M0001193125-25-181939
Nov 7, 202516,281,02416,281,024100%$24.52$399.1M0001193125-25-272337
Feb 13, 202628,217,05828,217,058100%$24.40$688.6M0001193125-26-051392
May 6, 202666,882,33230,261,08245.2%$23.90$722.6M0001193125-26-2089535% of shares outstanding at December 31, 2025
Aug 6, 2026offer expired Jun 15, 2026101,541,29730,224,15229.8%$23.83$720.2M0001193125-26-3379665% of shares outstanding at March 31, 2026

HPS Corporate Lending Fund

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Feb 3, 20254,330,004all tendered100%n/a$110.8M0001838126-25-000007Tendered shares below the 15,427,213-share offer; the amendment states the amount paid, not an accepted count
May 1, 20258,264,218all tendered100%n/a$210.4M0001838126-25-000025
Aug 1, 20257,399,230all tendered100%$25.22$186.6M0001838126-25-000048
Nov 3, 20256,983,778all tendered100%$25.27$176.4M0001838126-25-000067
Feb 3, 2026offer expired Dec 2, 202518,925,513all tendered100%$25.22$477.2M0001838126-26-000008Paid on or about January 30, 2026
May 1, 202645,605,29224,646,80254.0%$24.79$610.8M0001628280-26-0292825% of shares outstanding at December 31, 2025
Aug 4, 2026offer expired Jun 8, 202666,718,58625,076,90737.6%$24.42$612.1M0001628280-26-0520735% of shares outstanding at March 31, 2026

Ares Strategic Income Fund

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Jun 26, 20255,279,2665,279,266100%$27.42$144.5M0001104659-25-063043
Dec 29, 2025offer expired Dec 19, 202521,646,15821,646,158100%$27.47$594.5M0001104659-25-124880Offer was for 19,157,609 shares; all tendered shares accepted under Rule 13e-4(f)(1)
Apr 17, 2026offer expired Mar 20, 202645,344,91719,544,66243.1%$26.86$524.0M0001104659-26-044917Second amendment; the March 27 amendment carried 45,301,737 and 19,526,058
Jul 28, 202656,892,24819,767,19434.7%$27.00$533.6M0001104659-26-087531Second amendment; odd-lot priority for holders of fewer than 100 shares
Sep 25, 2026offer expired Sep 18, 202650,400,32519,264,13938.2%$26.74$515.1M0001104659-26-110962

Golub Capital Private Credit Fund

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Feb 10, 2025164,965164,965100%$25.14$4.1M0001104659-25-010867
Jun 25, 2025845,739845,739100%$25.05$21.1M0001104659-25-062498
Aug 12, 20251,542,7271,542,727100%$25.18$38.8M0001104659-25-076745
Nov 14, 20252,011,0712,011,071100%$25.16$50.5M0001104659-25-112256
Feb 11, 20262,520,3862,520,386100%$25.15$63.3M0001104659-26-013042
May 14, 2026offer expired May 1, 202615,148,9798,891,20058.7%$24.14$213.6M0001104659-26-0612585% of shares outstanding at December 31, 2025; paid in cash within five business days
Aug 11, 20269,042,1719,042,171100%$24.17$218.2M0001930087-26-000101Tendered shares fell below the 9,423,269-share offer

Monroe Capital Income Plus Corp.

Result filedShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledPricePaidFiling
Mar 6, 202615,179,052all tendered100%$9.87$149.8M0001742313-26-000018Offer was for 14,333,861 shares; the amount paid at $9.87 equals the full tendered count
Jun 5, 202625,287,14314,229,10156.3%$9.77$139.0M0001742313-26-000030
Sep 4, 2026offer expired Aug 31, 202617,848,95913,872,18377.7%$9.77$135.5M0001742313-26-000055

Two details in those tables matter for reading the headline numbers. First, the 100% rows of late 2025 and early 2026 were not small offers: Blackstone Private Credit Fund bought back 133.7 million shares for $3.23 billion in the offer that expired March 2, 2026, more than its stated 96.0 million share offer, by accepting every tendered share as Rule 13e-4(f)(1) permits; Blue Owl Technology Income raised its January offer to 15.4% of the fund to meet all demand; Ares Strategic Income accepted 21.6 million shares against a 19.2 million share offer in December 2025. Boards had room to enlarge, and used it, until the tendered volumes outran that room. Second, an acceptance rate should be read alongside the volume tendered: HPS Corporate Lending's tendered count went from 18.9 million shares in the offer that expired December 2, 2025 to 66.7 million by June 2026, Apollo Debt Solutions' from 28.2 million to 101.5 million, Blue Owl Credit Income's from 108.2 million to 463.8 million by March 2026 before easing to 341.4 million in September. Those volumes are shares tendered, not holders: later tenders may include shares previously submitted but not accepted, and the filings do not identify how much demand comes from repeat submissions, so a rising queue is not necessarily a rising number of investors seeking an exit.

The October results so far are the two Blue Owl funds, covered in AltStreet's news item on Blue Owl Technology Income Corp.'s 12.8% fill. Apollo Debt Solutions (offer opened August 14 for 29,368,950 shares), HPS Corporate Lending (24,668,750 shares), Blackstone Private Credit (90,421,330 shares) and Ares Strategic Income have offers outstanding whose final amendments will land in November and December; this page will be updated as they do.

Is the same thing happening at interval funds?

Short answer

Yes. Interval funds under Rule 23c-3 report the same thing in a different place, the notes to their annual and semiannual reports, and the private credit names among them show the same shape: Carlyle Tactical Private Credit 31.9%, Franklin BSP Private Credit 22.9% and 29.4%, First Eagle Credit Opportunities 25.9% and 33.3% even after using its 2% extension, BlackRock HPS Credit Strategies 32.9%.

An interval fund does not file a Schedule TO. It gives notice of each repurchase offer on Form N-23C3A, which states the percentage offered and the deadline but never the result, and reports what happened in the notes to its next Form N-CSR or N-CSRS. AltStreet extracts those notes with a model and checks the arithmetic, so these figures carry a lower confidence than the Schedule TO series above, and the offer each row describes belongs to the report's period rather than to a filing quarter. The rows below are the private credit interval funds whose reports filed between July and September 2026 state a prorated result, plus one venture fund as a comparison.

FundReportOfferShares tenderedShares acceptedFilledFiling
Carlyle Tactical Private Credit FundN-CSRS filed Aug 21, 20265%89,867,86928,703,00631.9%0001725472-26-000005
Franklin BSP Private Credit FundN-CSRS filed Sep 3, 2026 (two offers)n/a2,768,621 and 2,080,533632,585 and 612,19622.9% and 29.4%0001133228-26-012205
First Eagle Credit Opportunities FundN-CSRS filed Sep 4, 2026 (two offers)7% incl. 2% extension8,794,485 and 8,173,5572,273,419 and 2,720,14925.9% and 33.3%0001104659-26-105304
BlackRock HPS Credit Strategies FundN-CSRS filed Sep 3, 2026 (two offers)n/a10,218,181 and 9,398,5003,362,803 and 4,919,24432.9% and 52.3%0001193125-26-381476
Polen Credit Opportunities FundN-CSR filed Jul 9, 2026 (three offers)n/a820,528; 383,057; 341,257221,461; 226,847; 231,40627.0%, 59.2%, 67.8%0001193125-26-299826
The Private Shares FundN-CSRS filed Sep 8, 20265%2,601,0011,522,68358.5%0001213900-26-097906

The Private Shares Fund is included as a comparison from outside private credit: it holds late-stage venture positions rather than loans, its June 2026 offer filled 58.5%, and its four offers in fiscal 2025 filled between 42% and 62%, so its proration predates the credit cohort's and reflects a different market. Cliffwater's two credit interval funds, the largest in the group at $30.4 billion and $7.8 billion of net assets, report each offer's outcome in the notes to their annual reports as the percentage of shares repurchased (3.42%, 2.90%, 5.32% and 7.00% of Cliffwater Corporate Lending's shares across its fiscal 2026 offers, the last with the full 2% extension) but not the shares tendered, so no fill rate can be computed and they are left off the table; their review covers those results, including the $6.04 billion the fund repurchased in fiscal 2026.

Is money leaving private credit?

Short answer

This piece cannot say. The BDCs above report under the Exchange Act on Form 10-Q, not on Form N-PORT, so no filing series AltStreet holds gives a private credit flow total. What N-PORT does give is broader context: the 261 registered funds on the watch-list that report flows, most of them outside private credit, took in $16.6 billion of share sales against $7.8 billion of redemptions in the quarter to June 30, 2026.

Form N-PORT, which every registered fund files for each quarter end, carries three months of share sales, reinvested distributions and redemptions. Summed across the 261 interval, tender-offer and listed funds on the watch-list that reported them, the quarter to June 30, 2026 shows $16.56 billion of sales against $7.82 billion of redemptions on $270 billion of combined net assets; the quarter to March 31 shows $16.86 billion against $7.90 billion. That population is the registered-fund universe AltStreet tracks, not a private credit cohort: it includes municipal, equity, real estate and multi-strategy funds, and it excludes every BDC in the tables above.

So the figures support only a narrow statement: within the registered funds that report flows, sales exceeded redemptions in both quarters, and the largest net outflows in the latest quarter as a share of net assets were at Pomona Investment Fund (-6.6%, $124 million redeemed against $14 million sold) and Stone Ridge Trust V (-6.7%), neither of which is a private credit vehicle. Whether private credit as a sector is gaining or losing money would need the BDCs' 10-Q subscription and repurchase lines and a defined cohort, which is a separate exercise.

What this means for a holder

Short answer

Each offer's fill rate is an outcome, not a fixed term, and it is what sets how quickly a position can be exited. A holder of a prorated fund exits over several quarters at whatever rate each future offer produces, with the un-accepted shares remaining invested in between, repriced at each quarter's NAV, and eligible to be tendered again. The filings give you the rate; they do not tell you the next one.

The arithmetic is simple and worth doing. Assuming uniform proration and no applicable priority exceptions, a holder who tenders an entire position and submits every remaining share in each subsequent offer has, after n offers at a constant fill rate r, exited a fraction 1 minus (1 minus r) to the power n. At 30% that is 51% after two offers, 76% after four and 94% after eight. At Blue Owl Technology Income's filed rates of 13.1% and 12.8% in its June and September offers, the same holder would have had about 24% of the original position repurchased across the two; the rest remains invested and may be submitted in a subsequent offer, with acceptance and timing uncertain. None of this is a forecast: every rate on this page moved from the quarter before, in both directions, and a board can enlarge an offer, as several did in late 2025.

Settlement is a second term to read. Several of the BDCs above pay in non-interest-bearing promissory notes rather than cash at expiration; Apollo, HPS, Blackstone and both Blue Owl funds state this in their amendments, with the note paid in cash once the quarter-end price is determined. Ares Strategic Income and Golub state cash payment within days of expiration. The amendment reports the obligation, not the disbursement.

The third is price. The per-share price in each table is the NAV or net offering price at which the fund bought: Blue Owl Credit Income's moved from $9.42 in July 2025 to $9.14 in September 2026, Blue Owl Technology Income's from $10.42 to $9.85, Apollo's from $24.86 to $23.83, HPS's from $25.27 to $24.42, Blackstone's from $25.42 to $23.65. Shares not accepted in one offer remain invested and, if tendered again, are repurchased at that later price. The direction of the repurchase price over this period, at every one of the eight funds, was down; these are prices, not total returns, and they exclude the distributions each fund paid in between.

What the filings do not show

Short answer

Why anyone tendered. The amendments record volumes and outcomes; the reasons live in shareholder letters and trade press, which this piece does not use. They also do not show the un-accepted shares' later fate, the number of tendering holders, or results in the older amendment format that states an amount paid without an accepted count.

Three limits apply to every number here. The amendments state outcomes, not causes: nothing in a Schedule TO-I/A says why stockholders tendered, and AltStreet has not inferred it. The counts cover the final amendments reviewed across AltStreet's tracked funds, not every BDC in existence, and between five and ten offers per quarter use a format that reports the amount paid without an accepted count; those are counted as offers but excluded from the rate, which is conservative in this period since the format was mostly used by funds whose tendered count sat below the offer size. And the interval fund rows depend on a model's reading of report notes, with the arithmetic checked but the extraction not hand-verified line by line as the BDC tables were.

Method, for anyone who wants to reproduce it: AltStreet maintains a watch-list of 452 registered funds and BDCs, built from the EDGAR full index (every filer of a Rule 23c-3 notice or a Schedule TO-I, plus listed closed-end funds, non-traded REITs and the funds behind the platforms it reviews). For each it reads every N-23C3A, SC TO-I and SC TO-I/A from the submissions feed, and every N-PORT, N-CEN and N-CSR. The parser takes the tendered and accepted counts from the Rule 13e-4(c)(4) sentence of the final amendment and the fill rate as stated or as the ratio of the two; multi-class results are summed per class. The series then reduces amendments to offers: 124 BDC final amendments since June 2025 become 121 offers once second amendments for the same offer are merged, dated by the expiration each amendment states (four Blue Owl amendments were dated by hand), and grouped by the quarter the offer expired. Every BDC row above was then checked by hand against the amendment text on October 30, 2026. The same figures sit on each fund's entity page and on the registered funds hub.

Follow the series

Every fund's tender record, repurchase notices and quarterly flows, as the filings land.

Registered funds on AltStreet

452 interval funds, tender-offer funds, BDCs, listed closed-end funds and non-traded REITs: net assets, the share of holdings at Level 3 or at NAV, the latest repurchase offer and the newest NAV print, from N-PORT, N-CEN and the funds' own filings.

Browse the funds

Terminal Pro

Eight quarters of shareholder flows and every tender result per fund, the filing calendar with the next N-PORT and N-CSR due dates, and the signals that fire when an outflow or a proration lands.

See the terminal

Investor questions

What does it mean when a tender offer is prorated?

A non-traded BDC or tender-offer fund offers to buy back a fixed amount of its shares each quarter, usually 5% of the shares outstanding. If stockholders tender more than that, the fund generally allocates acceptances pro rata, subject to the offer's exceptions, and the rest stays with its holders. A result of 29.8%, as at Apollo Debt Solutions in the offer that expired June 15, 2026, means a stockholder who tendered 1,000 shares had 298 bought and kept 702. Nothing about the shares not accepted changes; they remain invested and may be tendered again in a later offer, with no guarantee of acceptance then either.

Is proration the same as a fund gating or suspending redemptions?

No. The offer ran, the cap applied, and the fund bought exactly what it said it would. Proration is the mechanism these vehicles are built around, disclosed in every prospectus, and it is what happens when more holders want out than the quarterly cap allows. A suspension would be a board declining to make an offer at all, which none of the funds on this page did in the period covered. The practical effect for a holder is similar, though: the time it takes to exit a position stretches with the proration rate.

Which funds filled every tender in full?

Through the end of 2025, every fund with a readable result did. For offers that expired April to June 2026, eight of the seventeen readable results still bought every share tendered, and for July to September so far six of ten, including Barings Private Credit Corp., Fidelity Private Credit Fund, Silver Point Private Credit Fund, Ares Core Infrastructure Fund and Golub Capital Private Credit Fund in its July offer. The prorated group includes several large retail private-credit funds.

How long would it take to exit a fully prorated position?

It depends on the rate in each future offer, which nobody knows in advance. As arithmetic only: at a constant 5% cap and a constant volume of tenders, a holder who re-tenders every quarter at a 30% fill rate has about 76% of the original position bought back after four quarters and about 94% after eight. At Blue Owl Technology Income's filed rates of 13.1% and 12.8% in its last two offers, a holder who tendered everything in June and re-tendered every remaining share in September would have had roughly 24% repurchased. These are hypotheticals, not forecasts, and the rates have moved every quarter.

Why did the rates fall so quickly in 2026?

The filings record the outcome, not the cause. What they show is the volume of shares tendered rising sharply relative to the funds' stated offer sizes: at HPS Corporate Lending Fund tenders went from 18.9 million shares in the offer that expired December 2, 2025 to 45.6 million and then 66.7 million in the next two; at Apollo Debt Solutions from 28.2 million to 66.9 million to 101.5 million; at Blue Owl Credit Income from 108.2 million to 463.8 million. Later tenders may include shares previously submitted but not accepted; the filings do not identify how much demand comes from repeat submissions, so the volumes are tenders, not a count of investors seeking an exit. Why stockholders tendered is a question for the funds' own shareholder letters and the trade press, neither of which this piece relies on.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the SEC's EDGAR system. A non-traded BDC files a Schedule TO-I when it launches a quarterly tender offer and a final amendment, Schedule TO-I/A, reporting the result under Rule 13e-4(c)(4): shares validly tendered, shares accepted, the price and the amount paid. Interval funds (Rule 23c-3) report their repurchase offer results in the notes to their annual and semiannual reports on Form N-CSR. AltStreet reads both forms for every fund on its watch-list, counts one event per offer dated by its expiration, and links each figure here to the filing it came from.

Are investors still putting money into private credit funds?

The filings used here cannot answer that for private credit as a sector. BDCs report subscriptions and repurchases on Form 10-Q, which this piece does not aggregate. For the broader registered-fund universe AltStreet tracks, Form N-PORT shows 261 funds with flow data took in $16.6 billion of share sales against $7.8 billion of redemptions in the quarter to June 30, 2026, and $16.9 billion against $7.9 billion in the quarter to March 31; most of those funds are outside private credit, so the total is context, not a sector verdict.

Sources

  • Schedule TO-I/A final amendments filed on EDGAR by Blackstone Private Credit Fund (CIK 1803498), Blue Owl Credit Income Corp. (1812554), Blue Owl Technology Income Corp. (1869453), Apollo Debt Solutions BDC (1837532), HPS Corporate Lending Fund (1838126), Ares Strategic Income Fund (1918712), Golub Capital Private Credit Fund (1930087), Monroe Capital Income Plus Corp. (1742313) and BlackRock Private Credit Fund (1902649), each linked by accession number in the tables above, read October 30, 2026.
  • Schedule TO-I offer documents of the same funds for the offer sizes and payment terms, in particular Blue Owl Technology Income Corp.'s offer to purchase filed August 26, 2026 (0001628280-26-059107) for the promissory note mechanism.
  • Forms N-CSR and N-CSRS of Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund, Franklin BSP Private Credit Fund, First Eagle Credit Opportunities Fund, BlackRock HPS Credit Strategies Fund, Polen Credit Opportunities Fund and The Private Shares Fund, repurchase offer notes, linked above.
  • Form N-PORT monthly net flow blocks (sales, reinvestments, redemptions) of the 261 registered funds on AltStreet's watch-list reporting for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2026, summed by AltStreet.
  • AltStreet 1940 Act fund watch-list, 452 funds as of October 29, 2026, its Schedule TO parser (n40rep-v2) and N-CSR extraction, and the offer-expiration dating of 124 BDC final amendments, with counts as of October 30, 2026.

This research is information, not investment advice. AltStreet has no relationship with any fund or adviser named here. Fill rates are as stated in each filing or computed from the counts it states; where a fund states its rate to one decimal place that figure is used.

Related records on AltStreet

Related Resources

Published 2026-10-30. Figures read from EDGAR on October 30, 2026. Report a correction.