Platform Comparison Guide · Updated September 2026

tZERO vs Securitize 2026: Which Tokenized Securities Platform Actually Trades?

The two most-cited regulated tokenization platforms in the United States, now suing each other over patents, compared on FINRA's weekly trade data for both of their ATSs, the audited capital of tZERO's broker-dealers, the offering documents behind each shelf, and the platforms' own disclosures rather than the directory pages that score them.

Guide Thesis

One is a transfer agent with BlackRock on it. The other is a license stack still waiting for scale.

Securitize moved $30 million through its ATS in seven months of 2026, mostly institutional blocks in VBILL and BUIDL plus $6.7 million in a Singapore-issued Blockchain Capital security, and sells feeders whose wrappers leave investors without votes or quantified fees. tZERO moved $1.6 million, mostly its own token before it stopped trading, and sells a shelf of pre-revenue issuers through broker-dealers with under $650,000 of net capital each.

The comparison pages AltStreet reviewed put tZERO in New York, estimate an AUM it does not publish, quote listing and placement fees that appear in no offering document, and score the two platforms without a single volume, fee or capital figure.

What the record shows instead: FINRA's data has Securitize Markets at $11.3 million of notional in 2025 and $30.3 million in 2026 through August 3, and the tZERO ATS at $5.9 million and $1.6 million, 96% of it tZERO's own TZROP token until that token converted in May; tZERO's two customer-facing broker-dealers hold $521,737 and $635,723 of net capital and depend on a parent with a going-concern note; Securitize's feeders hand all 100 voting shares to an affiliate that in one document can only be removed by itself.

tZERO vs Securitize tokenized securities platform comparison 2026

Three signals that decide this

Secondary Trading (FINRA data)

Notional: Securitize. Retail liquidity: neither

Securitize Markets: $11.3M of notional in 2025, $30.3M in 2026 through August 3, mostly institutional blocks in VBILL and BUIDL plus $6.7M in a Singapore-issued Blockchain Capital security; its retail Treasury fund traded $60. tZERO ATS: $5.9M in 2025 (96% its own TZROP), $1.6M in 2026, and tens to a few thousand shares a week since TZROP stopped trading in May.

Product Shelf

Securitize

Ten tracked vehicles from BlackRock, VanEck, Hamilton Lane, Apollo and KKR, from a $1,000 registered Treasury fund to $5M institutional cash funds. tZERO: four current offerings from pre-revenue or going-concern issuers, one with no Form D, and twelve prior cards of which five have no SEC filing.

What You Can Read About the Operator

Tie, differently

Securitize Corp. is NYSE-listed with Exchange Act reporting and no enforcement history, but its feeder PPMs leave fees unquantified and managers unremovable. tZERO publishes two audited broker-dealer balance sheets a year and a 163-page consent statement, and what they show is $521,737 and $635,723 of net capital, a willful 2022 Reg ATS order and a parent with a going-concern note.

Who each platform is for

Both are regulated rails for securities that live on a blockchain. The choice is between institutional fund exposure on a public operator's rails and a licensed venue for individual security tokens.

Securitize is better for

  • → Tokenized cash management at scale: BUIDL ($2.7B) and VBILL redeem daily at a target $1.00 NAV
  • → Brand-name private-market exposure (Hamilton Lane, Apollo, KKR) at $10,000 to $50,000 minimums for investors who read the feeder PPM
  • → A retail entry at $1,000 through a registered Treasury fund with an independent board (ArCoin)
  • → Issuers who need the transfer agent NYSE chose and the roster BlackRock validated

tZERO is better for

  • → Holders of Aspen Digital, Curzio, EnergyFunders or the Beyond brand tokens, which trade nowhere else
  • → Accredited investors who have underwritten a specific tZERO-placed issuer from its PPM and EDGAR file and need a licensed US venue to subscribe through
  • → Issuers who want placement, escrow, custody, transfer agency and an ATS listing bundled, with the fee stack itemized in advance
  • → Investors who want a published investor fee schedule (1% per trade, no account fees) and will hold what they buy

$30.3M vs $1.6M

ATS notional traded in 2026 through August 3: Securitize Markets vs the tZERO ATS (FINRA weekly data)

Securitize: VBILL $19.4M in 22 trades, BUIDL $4.2M in 8, a Singapore Blockchain Capital token $6.7M in 428, ArCoin $60. tZERO: TZROP $1.5M before its last week on May 4; tens to a few thousand shares a week since.

96%

Share of the tZERO ATS's 2025 notional that was tZERO's own TZROP token

$5.6M of $5.9M; 5,907 of 6,891 trades. TZROP's contingent dividend was never declared and holders converted it into Series B and common in May 2026.

$521,737 / $635,723

Net capital of tZERO Securities and tZERO Digital Asset Securities at Dec 31, 2025

Above minimums by $271,737 and $385,723; 40% and 74% of revenue from TZROP; both economically dependent on a parent whose last public audit carried a going-concern note. Securitize Corp. is NYSE-listed with Exchange Act reporting.

0 of 100

Voting shares held by investors in Securitize's Apollo and SF6 feeders

All 100 voting management shares sit with Securitize Capital, an exempt reporting adviser, which in SF6's document 'can only be removed by itself'. Two PPMs disclaim advisor diligence on the underlying fund.

Claims check

What the tZERO vs Securitize comparisons get wrong

The comparison pages AltStreet reviewed were written by a tokenization marketing site (March 2026) and software directories, and they carry figures no filing supports. Each claim below is set against the primary source AltStreet read, along with the platforms' own marketing where the record answers it.

The claimWhere it appearsWhat the record says
tZERO is headquartered in 'New York, NY'Tokenization marketing site, March 2026tZERO's offices are at 10 West Broadway, Salt Lake City and 525 Washington Blvd, Jersey City (tzero.com; FOCUS reports). tZERO Group was formed inside Overstock.com in Utah in 2014.
tZERO 'Estimated Total AUM: $300M+'Tokenization marketing site, March 2026tZERO publishes no assets-under-custody figure. Its custodian, tZERO Digital Asset Securities, reported $152,010 of custodial-services revenue for 2025 and $635,723 of net capital; the ATS traded $1.6 million of notional in 2026 through August 3.
tZERO 'ATS listing fee: $50,000 to $100,000+'Tokenization marketing site, March 2026No offering document AltStreet read names an ATS listing fee. The BRYTR PPM (April 2026) itemizes tZERO's charges: 4% placement plus 1% broker of record, $25,000 advisory, $1,000 escrow, $10,000 platform setup, $2,000 a month, $20 per investor, 35 bps custody with a $1,500 monthly minimum, $7,500 smart-contract assessment.
Securitize 'Estimated Total AUM: $1B+'Tokenization marketing site, March 2026BlackRock's BUIDL alone reported $2.7 billion of live AUM in August 2026; Securitize reports $4 billion or more across its tokenized funds (platform-reported). The estimate is low by a multiple.
Securitize charges '1% to 3% of capital raised' for primary issuanceTokenization marketing site, March 2026The Securitize feeder PPMs AltStreet ingested reference placement and affiliate service fees without quantifying them; fee disclosure was rated 'minimal' in most. No document states a 1% to 3% placement fee. The only published investor-side figure is the 1% ATS trade commission.
tZERO 2.4 vs Securitize 3.3 (comparison scores)Software directory comparison page, 2026The page lists no fees, volumes, capital or minimums for either platform. FINRA's ATS data, the X-17A-5 filings and the offering documents, which decide the comparison, are absent.
tZERO is 'a leader among tokenized securities ATSs in the US by total trades'tzero.com/tradeOn trade count for 2025, FINRA's data agrees: 6,891 trades on the tZERO ATS against 864 on Securitize Markets. 5,907 of tZERO's 6,891 were in its own TZROP token, which stopped trading in May 2026. On notional, Securitize Markets was about twice tZERO's size in 2025 ($11.3M vs $5.9M) and about twenty times in 2026 to August 3 ($30.3M vs $1.6M).
Securitize Markets is an operating secondary market for retail tokenized fundsPlatform materials (implied); Securitize review findingFINRA data for 2026 to August 3: VBILL $19.4M across 22 trades, BUIDL $4.2M across 8 trades, a Singapore Blockchain Capital token $6.7M across 428 trades, ArCoin $60 across one trade. The venue moves institutional blocks in $1.00-NAV cash funds; the retail fund barely trades.

AltStreet Terminal

Check the venue before you trust the license.

Every volume figure on this page came out of FINRA's weekly ATS data, every capital figure out of an audited X-17A-5, and every product term out of an offering document. AltStreet Terminal tracks the filings, fee structures, redemption terms, broker-dealer capital and trading-venue data behind 100+ alternative-investment platforms, so the next comparison you run starts from the record.

Comparison hub

Head-to-head decision map

The same regulatory vocabulary, the same blockchain settlement claims, and two businesses that share almost nothing but a courtroom.

Four dimensions separate the platforms: what business each one is in, what FINRA says actually trades, what is on the shelf and on what terms, and what the operator's capital, record and conflicts look like.

Same regulatory vocabulary, different business

tZERO vs Securitize: A License Stack Waiting for Scale vs a Transfer Agent With BlackRock on It

Both companies describe themselves with the same nouns: SEC-registered transfer agent, FINRA broker-dealer, regulated ATS, tokenization rails. The businesses underneath are not alike. Securitize (founded 2017 by Carlos Domingo and Jamie Finn; NYSE: SECZ since July 2, 2026) is the issuance and record-keeping layer for other managers' funds: its transfer agent keeps the official register, its exempt reporting adviser sponsors feeder funds into Hamilton Lane, Apollo and KKR products, and its broker-dealer runs an ATS that, per FINRA, mostly moves blocks of BlackRock's BUIDL and VanEck's VBILL. The company reports $4 billion or more in tokenized fund assets and 575,000 investor accounts, and its parent now files 10-Qs. tZERO (formed inside Overstock.com in 2014, deconsolidated in 2021, 22% directly owned by Beyond, Inc. with ICE as a significant minority holder) built the most complete license set in the category, including the 2024 special purpose broker-dealer custody approval, and fills it with a placement shelf of small token offerings and an ATS whose dominant listing was, until May 2026, tZERO's own TZROP preferred. Its broker-dealers reported $418,088 and $204,121 of revenue for 2025, 40% and 74% of it from TZROP, and its parent's last public audit (FY2023) showed $1.6 million of revenue, a $29.5 million net loss and a going-concern note.

Practical answer

Want tokenized exposure to institutional funds on rails whose operator files with the SEC as a public company? Securitize, with each feeder's PPM open beside the platform page. Need a licensed venue for a specific security token you have already underwritten, or hold one that trades nowhere else? tZERO, with FINRA's weekly print for that symbol open beside the order screen. Neither company's license list tells you anything about the security you are buying.

Decision factorWhat changes
Corporate statusSecuritize Corp.: NYSE-listed (SECZ) since July 2, 2026, Exchange Act reporting. tZERO Group: private; Beyond, Inc. 22% direct (38.7% combined), ICE significant minority; parent financials public only through FY2023.
Regulated entitiesSecuritize: SEC transfer agent (Securitize, LLC), FINRA BD and ATS (Securitize Markets), exempt reporting adviser (Securitize Capital). tZERO: FINRA BD and ATS (tZERO Securities, CRD 123421), SPBD custodian (tZERO DAS, CRD 316189), SEC transfer agent, exempt reporting adviser, CFTC introducing broker; DCO and DCM applications pending.
Who the client isSecuritize: asset managers issuing tokenized funds (BlackRock, VanEck, Hamilton Lane, Apollo, KKR) and the investors in them. tZERO: issuers of security tokens (a solar-credit SPV, a Swiss gaming token, a SocialFi startup, two Beyond brand tokens) and the investors who subscribe or trade.
Scale (platform-reported)Securitize: $4B+ tokenized fund AUM, 575K+ investor accounts, BUIDL $2.7B (Aug 2026). tZERO: no AUM, volume or investor count published; Bloomberg (Oct 2025): 50+ employees, about $200M raised, unprofitable.
RelationshipSecuritize v. tZERO Group and tZERO IP (D. Del. 1:26-cv-00722, filed June 22, 2026): declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement, counterclaims July 17, 2026, pending. ICE reported as a partner of both (TechTimes, Aug 31, 2026).

Neither venue publishes volume; FINRA does

tZERO vs Securitize: What FINRA Says Actually Trades

Both ATSs report weekly to FINRA's OTC transparency program under legacy identifiers a retail investor would not know to search: PROS for the tZERO ATS, SMKT for Securitize Markets. The tZERO ATS reported $28.9 million of notional in 2022, $9.5 million in 2023, $6.0 million in 2024, $5.9 million in 2025 and $1.6 million in 2026 through August 3. TZROP was 96% of 2025 notional (1.64 million shares, 5,907 of the venue's 6,891 trades) and last traded the week of May 4, 2026; the week after, the whole venue reported 32 shares and $20.40, and subsequent weeks range from 63 to 3,917 shares across Aspen Digital, Curzio, EnergyFunders and the Overstock brand token. Securitize Markets reported $1.4 million in 2022, $0.2 million in 2023, $0.2 million in 2024, $11.3 million in 2025 and $30.3 million in 2026 through August 3. Its 2026 flow is VanEck's VBILL ($19.4 million across 22 trades, a $1.00 cash fund moving in blocks), BlackRock's BUIDL ($4.2 million across 8 trades, including a single $7.3 million week in June that combined both), and a Singapore-issued Blockchain Capital token ($6.7 million across 428 trades); Arca's ArCoin, the registered retail Treasury fund, traded $60 in one trade. Neither venue is a retail market. Securitize's is an institutional transfer mechanism for cash funds that happens to be an ATS; tZERO's is a regulated order book without counterparties.

Practical answer

If your exit matters, look up the symbol in FINRA's weekly ATS data before you buy on either platform, and read the row for that symbol, not the firm total. On Securitize, daily liquidity on BUIDL and VBILL comes from the fund's redemption at NAV, not from the ATS; the feeders are monthly, quarterly or locked by their documents. On tZERO, assume no exit at the quoted price; the operator itself moved its own preferred to semi-annual auctions because continuous trading had no depth.

Decision factorWhat changes
Notional traded, 2025tZERO ATS: $5,851,828 (TZROP $5,608,845). Securitize Markets: $11,309,388 (Blockchain Capital token $8.5M; VBILL $2.8M).
Notional traded, 2026 to Aug 3tZERO ATS: $1,605,480 (TZROP $1,516,476, last week May 4). Securitize Markets: $30,311,718 (VBILL $19.4M, Blockchain Capital token $6.7M, BUIDL $4.2M, ArCoin $60).
Trades, 2025 / 2026tZERO: 6,891 / 2,605. Securitize: 864 / 466. tZERO's trade count is the basis of its 'leader by total trades' claim; 86% of the 2025 trades were TZROP.
Post-May 2026 weekstZERO: 32 to 3,917 shares a week; zero volume on every listing on the Sept 12, 2026 screen; bid-ask gaps 5% to 118% of the bid. Securitize: 4,373 to 1,011,741 shares a week, 8 to 10 trades a week.
Where daily liquidity comes fromSecuritize: fund redemption at target $1.00 NAV (BUIDL, VBILL); monthly windows with gates (SCOPE, ArCoin); locked (SF6, EOV, KKR). tZERO: the ATS or the issuer's own call and redemption terms; semi-annual auctions for the former TZROP.

Institutional funds with weak wrappers vs pre-revenue issuers with full disclosure

tZERO vs Securitize: The Product Shelf and Its Terms

Securitize's shelf is the strongest roster in tokenization and the weakest governance AltStreet has documented on a conventional platform. The ten vehicles tracked run from BlackRock's BUIDL ($5 million minimum, Qualified Purchasers, daily $1.00 NAV, $2.7 billion) and VanEck's VBILL (0.20% unitary fee, Big 4 auditor) through Hamilton Lane's SCOPE ($10,000, monthly NAV redemption with gates) to feeders whose documents issue non-voting participating shares while all 100 voting management shares sit with Securitize Capital, which in SF6's document 'can only be removed by itself'; two PPMs (Apollo ACRED, the AAA CLO fund) state the advisor has not conducted and does not intend to conduct due diligence on the fund it feeds; fee disclosure was rated 'minimal' in most; and the tiny Arca ArCoin carried a 95.56% gross expense ratio before waivers. tZERO's shelf is four current cards and twelve prior. The current ones, in their own documents: BRYTR (CarbonEnfo's 12%-of-net-platform-revenue token, $4.5 million at $1.00, a $3.00 per-token cap, no material revenue at the marketplace, $49,000 of cash and a $1.42 million deficit at the operator, no sales at the April 2026 Form D), Kondoo Digital (400 million Amana gaming tokens from a Zug GmbH, no equity, dividend or information rights, 70 million pre-issued to insiders, 5% of gross to the owners, no Form D), KNOWPIA (preferred at $0.01, past-due liabilities, may go out of business without the raise, Form D showing nothing sold since 2023) and C3 Bullion (a $40 million Reg A+ with a going-concern paragraph and a July 2026 share-surrender settlement, listed inactive). The prior cards' filed outcomes run from Spirits Capital's $35 million Reg A+ that sold zero shares to the Overstock brand token's $466,520; five prior cards have no SEC filing under their names.

Practical answer

On Securitize the manager is the reason to invest and the wrapper is the reason to hesitate: read the feeder PPM for redemption gates, non-voting shares, unquantified fee layers and the advisor's diligence disclaimer before the BlackRock logo does its work. On tZERO the venue is not a reason for anything: underwrite the issuer from its PPM and EDGAR file, and treat a missing Form D as the finding.

Decision factorWhat changes
MinimumsSecuritize: $1,000 (ArCoin) to $5,000,000 (BUIDL); feeders $10,000 to $50,000. tZERO: $500 (C3 Bullion Reg A+) to $100,000 (Kondoo); BRYTR and KNOWPIA $10,000.
Who issuesSecuritize: BlackRock, VanEck, Hamilton Lane, Apollo, KKR, Arca, Mantle, plus Securitize-sponsored feeders. tZERO: BRYTR LLC / CarbonEnfo, Kondoo Digital GmbH, KNOWPIA Inc., C3 Bullion; prior: Beyond subsidiaries, Aurox, Spirits Capital, Invest Inc.
Governance of the wrapperSecuritize feeders: non-voting participating shares, 100 voting shares with Securitize Capital, amendment without consent, manager removal practically impossible (SF6). tZERO tokens: non-voting, no inspection rights (BRYTR); no equity, dividend or information rights (Kondoo).
Fee disclosureSecuritize: 'minimal' in most ingested PPMs; 0.20% (VBILL) to ~3.5% combined (ACRED); SF6 fee basis ambiguous. tZERO: issuer stack itemized in every PPM; investor 1% per trade and up to 7% primary processing.
Audit and diligenceSecuritize: Big 4 on VBILL, independent board on ArCoin; two PPMs disclaim advisor diligence; parent has an unresolved change-in-accountant filing. tZERO: CarbonEnfo SSARS review only; KNOWPIA unaudited non-GAAP; C3 Bullion audited with going-concern paragraph.

A public company with clean rails vs a private one with small, parent-dependent ones

tZERO vs Securitize: Capital, Record and Conflicts at the Operator

Securitize's operator-level record is the strongest part of its picture: no enforcement history in AltStreet's review, an NYSE listing that brings Exchange Act reporting, a transfer-agent mandate from the exchange itself, and a Big 4 auditor on its largest fund. The conflicts sit in structure rather than conduct: the exempt reporting adviser that sponsors the feeders is an affiliate of the transfer agent and the broker-dealer, the feeders' voting shares belong to that affiliate, and the ATS is the only venue for their shares. tZERO's operator record is public in unusual detail and unflattering in most of it. Its ATS operator was censured by the SEC in January 2022 for willfully violating Regulation ATS (order-book information shared with two third parties without timely Form ATS disclosure; no written fair-access standards), an $800,000 penalty and the sole BrokerCheck disclosure on CRD 123421. Its FY2023 FOCUS filing carried a material-weakness flag. Its two customer-facing broker-dealers ended 2025 with $521,737 and $635,723 of net capital, above their minimums by $271,737 and $385,723, earning 40% and 74% of their revenue from the parent's TZROP and stating economic dependence on the parent. The parent's last public audit showed a going-concern note; its April 2026 financing was a non-binding $10 million convertible note from Beyond, unfunded at June 30; ICE's August 2026 investment is undisclosed in size. And the group's treatment of its own retail token is on the record: TZROP's contingent 10% revenue dividend was never declared in eight years, and in April 2026 holders exchanged it, the $10 redemption floor and continuous trading for 3 Series B plus 8 common shares per token (Dahn Consulting separately estimated one token as 1.13 Series B or 2.76 common). Every role from placement to custody to trading sits in one group, and two of the three Reg CF raises it placed in 2025 were subsidiaries of its largest shareholder.

Practical answer

Weight the platform-specific risk differently on each. On Securitize the operator is legible and much of the platform-specific risk sits in the wrapper: your recourse against a feeder's manager is whatever the PPM leaves you, which is usually little, alongside the underlying manager's own performance. On tZERO the wrapper is legible and more of the platform-specific risk sits in the venue and custody stack: the custodian holding your token has $635,723 of net capital, above its minimum but small, warns that SIPC may not apply, and depends on a parent that has never been profitable, while issuer risk remains the dominant exposure. Hold tZERO-placed tokens outside the affiliate custodian where the issuer permits.

Decision factorWhat changes
Regulatory recordSecuritize: no enforcement history located. tZERO: SEC File 3-20699 (Jan 2022), willful Reg ATS violation, $800,000, censure; SEC investigations of the TZROP offering 2018 to 2023 ended without an order or closing letter.
Operator financialsSecuritize Corp.: Exchange Act reporter since July 2026 (first 10-Q with Q2 2026 results). tZERO Group: last public audit FY2023, revenue $1.63M, net loss $29.5M, cash $43.2M, going-concern note; Beyond carries 26% at $15.5M.
Broker-dealer capitalSecuritize Markets: not analyzed in AltStreet's review. tZERO Securities: net capital $521,737 (excess $271,737), revenue $418,088. tZERO DAS: $635,723 (excess $385,723), revenue $204,121. Both economically dependent on the parent.
Own-security historySecuritize: none as a fund issuer; its own NYSE stock is tokenized on its rails. tZERO: TZROP, $75.9M from 920 investors (2018), dividend never declared, converted May 2026 into Series B and common, semi-annual auctions replace continuous trading.
CustodySecuritize: official record at the transfer agent; fund assets held by the funds' custodians. tZERO: affiliate SPBD custodian controls wallets and keys; Form CRS warns SIPA protections may not apply; self-custody permitted for some tokens.

Primary-data deep dives

The tZERO figures come from FINRA's weekly ATS transparency data for MPID PROS, the FY2024 and FY2025 X-17A-5 filings of tZERO Securities and tZERO Digital Asset Securities, the April 2026 TZROP consent solicitation, Beyond, Inc.'s 10-K and 10-Q filings with tZERO Group's Rule 3-09 audited statements, and the offering documents behind all sixteen listed deals, documented in the AltStreet tZERO review. The Securitize figures come from FINRA's data for MPID SMKT, the seven offering documents AltStreet ingested across ten tracked vehicles, a 31-entity EDGAR sweep and the platform's post-listing corporate record, documented in the AltStreet Securitize review. Platform-reported figures (Securitize's $4B+ AUM and 575K+ accounts; tZERO's 'leader by total trades' and Bloomberg's $200M raised) are labeled as such and are not like-for-like. Trades and notional are FINRA's weekly totals by firm and by symbol; symbol rows can differ slightly from firm rows where an issue lacks a symbol.

Scenario Analysis

What $10,000 costs to enter, hold and exit on each platform

Illustrative, under each platform's disclosed terms as of September 2026, using the product on each shelf that a $10,000 accredited investor could actually buy: Hamilton Lane's SCOPE feeder on Securitize ($10,000 minimum) and CarbonEnfo's BRYTR token on tZERO ($10,000 minimum). Costs the investor pays directly are separated from costs inside the vehicle.

Securitize (Hamilton Lane SCOPE feeder, $10,000)

  • At purchase: no stated platform fee to the investor; payment through Zero Hash at $18 per domestic wire; placement and affiliate service fees referenced in the PPM but not quantified
  • Ongoing: feeder-level fees plus the underlying Hamilton Lane fund's management fee and carry, disclosed as layers rather than a single number; AltStreet's review rates fee disclosure 'minimal' across most Securitize PPMs
  • Governance: non-voting participating shares; voting shares with Securitize Capital; amendment without consent
  • Exit: monthly NAV redemption with gates per the offering document; the Securitize Markets ATS is aspirational for the feeders ('no guarantee') and traded $60 of the retail ArCoin in 2026
  • Shape: the manager is real and the redemption window is written down; the fee stack and your rights are what the PPM leaves out

tZERO (CarbonEnfo BRYTR token, $10,000)

  • At purchase: a non-refundable processing fee of up to 7% per commitment, set per deal; the issuer separately pays tZERO 4% plus 1% of gross and about $36,000 of fixed and monthly charges, out of the $4.5 million raise
  • Ongoing: 12% of Net Platform Revenue shared across 4.5 million tokens, paid in stablecoin to staked tokens, capped at $3.00 per token; the marketplace had no material revenue at December 31, 2025
  • Custody: tZERO Digital Asset Securities ($635,723 net capital; SIPC caveat) or a permitted Cardano wallet; 35 bps a year of custody billed to the issuer
  • Exit: whitelisted transfers only, no listing commitment; if listed, the ATS at 1% commission on a venue reporting tens to a few thousand shares a week; the company holds a call option at 3x less distributions paid
  • Shape: every fee is written down and every risk is disclosed; what is missing is revenue, a market, and any reason the venue's licenses should enter the decision

The shape of this comparison: Securitize charges the investor little visibly and leaves the vehicle's fee layers unquantified; tZERO itemizes every charge and places a security whose payout depends on a marketplace that has not yet earned. On exit, SCOPE's monthly window is the only defined redemption mechanism in this pairing, subject to its gates; BRYTR's exit is a whitelist, a call option and an ATS that FINRA shows barely trading.

tZERO vs Securitize: every question we could find searchers asking

Short answer

Institutional funds on a public operator's rails, with wrappers that leave you without votes, quantified fees or, on four of ten vehicles, an exit before maturity: Securitize, read against FINRA data showing its ATS moving $30 million of cash-fund blocks in 2026 while its retail fund traded $60. A complete license stack, a published fee schedule and a shelf of pre-revenue issuers on a venue that reported 32 shares the week after its own token stopped trading: tZERO, read against $521,737 and $635,723 of broker-dealer net capital, a willful 2022 Reg ATS order and a parent with a going-concern note. Both: the security you buy is issued by someone else, and neither platform's licenses say anything about it.

Is tZERO or Securitize the better tokenized securities platform?+

They sell different things, and the records make each specific. Securitize is the tokenization rail behind institutional funds: BlackRock's BUIDL, VanEck's VBILL, Hamilton Lane, Apollo and KKR feeders, with an SEC-registered transfer agent, a FINRA broker-dealer running the Securitize Markets ATS, an exempt reporting adviser that sponsors the feeders, and a parent that listed on the NYSE in July 2026. tZERO is a license stack for security tokens that has been waiting for scale since 2014: a FINRA broker-dealer running an SEC-regulated ATS since 2019, a special purpose broker-dealer custodian approved in 2024, a transfer agent, and a placement business whose shelf is four current offerings and twelve prior cards. FINRA's data settles the trading question: Securitize Markets reported $11.3 million of notional in 2025 and $30.3 million in 2026 through August 3, most of it block movements in the VanEck and BlackRock cash funds; the tZERO ATS reported $5.9 million in 2025, 96% of it tZERO's own TZROP token, and $1.6 million in 2026, with the venue moving tens to a few thousand shares a week since TZROP converted in May. An investor who wants institutional fund exposure on compliant rails has a case for Securitize with its wrapper governance priced in; an investor who already holds a token that trades only on tZERO, or who has underwritten a tZERO-placed issuer from its own filing, has a case for tZERO with its liquidity and capital figures priced in. Neither venue is a reason to buy a security.

Which platform has real secondary-market liquidity, tZERO or Securitize?+

Neither has a retail market in the everyday sense; Securitize has institutional flow. FINRA's weekly ATS transparency data, which neither company publishes, shows Securitize Markets (MPID SMKT) trading $1.4 million of notional in 2022, $0.2 million in 2023, $0.2 million in 2024, $11.3 million in 2025 and $30.3 million in 2026 through August 3. The 2026 figure is dominated by VanEck's VBILL ($19.4 million across 22 trades) and BlackRock's BUIDL ($4.2 million across 8 trades), which are $1.00-NAV cash funds moving in blocks, plus a Singapore-issued Blockchain Capital token ($6.7 million across 428 trades). ArCoin, the retail Treasury fund the Securitize review identifies as the one product with an operating secondary venue, traded $60 in 2026. The tZERO ATS (MPID PROS) traded $28.9 million in 2022, $9.5 million in 2023, $6.0 million in 2024, $5.9 million in 2025 and $1.6 million in 2026 through August 3; TZROP was 96% of 2025 notional and last traded the week of May 4, 2026, after which the venue reported between 32 and 3,917 shares a week across Aspen Digital, Curzio, EnergyFunders and the Overstock brand token. On the September 12, 2026 screen every tZERO listing showed zero volume, with quoted gaps such as $1.10 bid against $2.40 ask. tZERO's marketing calls it 'a leader among tokenized securities ATSs in the US by total trades', and on trade count FINRA's 2025 data supports it (6,891 trades against 864 on Securitize Markets), 86% of them in TZROP; on notional, Securitize Markets was twice tZERO's size in 2025 and about twenty times in 2026.

What fees do tZERO and Securitize charge investors?+

tZERO publishes its schedule in the customer agreement effective September 4, 2026: 1% commission per ATS execution on securities priced at $3.00 a share or more, $0.03 a share below that, a non-refundable processing fee of up to 7% per primary-offering commitment, no account, maintenance or retail custody fees, $25 domestic and $50 international wires, and debit balances at Fed Funds plus 125 basis points. Securitize Markets charges a 1% ATS trade commission and routes payments through Zero Hash at $18 per domestic wire; the fund-level costs are what matter there, and they range from a 0.20% unitary fee on VBILL to roughly 3.5% combined on the Apollo ACRED feeder, with AltStreet's review rating fee disclosure 'minimal' in most of the PPMs it ingested because underlying-fund fees, placement fees and affiliate service fees are referenced but not quantified. On the issuer side tZERO's stack appears verbatim in the BRYTR PPM (4% placement plus 1% broker of record, $25,000 advisory, $1,000 escrow, $10,000 setup, $2,000 a month, $20 per investor, 35 basis points of custody with a $1,500 monthly minimum, $7,500 per smart contract); the third-party comparison pages that quote a tZERO 'ATS listing fee of $50,000 to $100,000+' or a Securitize placement fee of '1% to 3%' cite no document, and AltStreet found neither figure in any PPM or Form C it read.

Is tZERO legit? Is Securitize legit?+

Both are real, licensed, audited operators, and the records differ in what stands behind the licenses. Securitize's operating entities show no enforcement history in AltStreet's review, its parent Securitize Corp. has been an NYSE-listed Exchange Act reporter since July 2, 2026, and NYSE named Securitize, LLC its first digital transfer agent in March 2026; the caveats sit in the product wrappers, where several BVI feeders issue non-voting shares, permit amendment without consent and make manager removal practically or literally impossible, and where two PPMs state the advisor does not conduct diligence on the fund it feeds. tZERO's operating broker-dealer carries one regulatory event, the SEC's January 2022 order finding tZERO ATS willfully violated Regulation ATS by sharing order-book data with two third parties without timely Form ATS disclosure and lacking fair-access standards, settled for $800,000 and censure; its two customer-facing broker-dealers ended 2025 with $521,737 and $635,723 of net capital, above their regulatory minimums but small in absolute terms, earning 40% and 74% of revenue from the parent's own token and disclosing economic dependence on a parent whose last public audit (FY2023) carried a going-concern note. tZERO's own TZROP token, sold to 920 investors for $75.9 million, never had its contingent dividend declared and was converted in 2026 into Series B preferred and common. The two companies are also in court with each other: Securitize filed for a declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement in Delaware on June 22, 2026 and tZERO counterclaimed in July; the case is pending and commercial.

What can I actually buy on each platform?+

On Securitize, tokenized shares of funds run by other managers: BlackRock's BUIDL ($5 million minimum, Qualified Purchasers, daily $1.00-NAV liquidity), VanEck's VBILL ($100,000 or $1 million by chain), Hamilton Lane's SCOPE ($10,000, monthly windows with gates) and its locked SF6 and EOV feeders ($20,000), Apollo's ACRED ($50,000, quarterly and interval-fund dependent), a KKR health-care growth feeder, an AAA CLO fund and the Mantle Index Four digital-asset fund ($100,000), plus Arca's ArCoin, a registered retail Treasury fund at $1,000, and tokenized public stocks including Securitize's own. On tZERO, the four current offerings on September 12, 2026 were CarbonEnfo's BRYTR revenue-participation token ($4.5 million at $1.00, $10,000 minimum, 12% of a solar-credit marketplace's net platform revenue, no sales at its April 2026 Form D), Kondoo Digital's Amana gaming token ($100,000 minimum, no equity or dividend rights, no Form D on EDGAR), KNOWPIA's preferred stock ($0.01 a share, $3 million maximum, a PPM that says the company may go out of business without the raise) and C3 Bullion's $40 million Reg A+ (listed inactive); the secondary listings were six tokens with zero volume. Securitize's shelf is institutional product with weak wrapper terms; tZERO's is a placement shelf of pre-revenue issuers on a venue with almost no trading.

How are tZERO and Securitize regulated, and who owns them?+

Securitize: Securitize, LLC is an SEC-registered transfer agent; Securitize Markets, LLC is a FINRA and SIPC member broker-dealer operating the Securitize Markets ATS; Securitize Capital, LLC, which sponsors and advises the feeder funds, is an exempt reporting adviser rather than an SEC-registered investment adviser; Securitize Corp. has been NYSE-listed (SECZ) since July 2, 2026 through a combination with Cantor Equity Partners II valued at about $1.25 billion. tZERO: tZERO Securities, LLC (CRD 123421) is a FINRA and SIPC member broker-dealer operating the tZERO Securities ATS, self-clearing for conventional securities and approved in September 2025 to trade corporate debt; tZERO Digital Asset Securities, LLC was approved in September 2024 as a special purpose broker-dealer to custody digital asset securities, one of two by the company's account; the group also holds an SEC transfer-agent registration, an exempt reporting adviser and a CFTC introducing broker, with DCO and DCM applications pending. tZERO Group is 22% directly owned by Beyond, Inc. (38.7% with its indirect stake), with Intercontinental Exchange a significant minority holder since its 2022 Series B and, per an August 31, 2026 memorandum, a design partner and licensee of tZERO's patents. TechTimes reported the same week that ICE now partners with both companies while they litigate each other's patents.

What do the tZERO vs Securitize comparison pages get wrong?+

The comparison pages AltStreet reviewed were written by software directories and a tokenization marketing site, and they carry figures no filing supports. One puts tZERO's headquarters in New York (its offices are in Salt Lake City and Jersey City), estimates tZERO's 'total AUM' at '$300M+' (tZERO publishes no AUM; its custodian's entire 2025 custody revenue was $152,010), quotes a tZERO 'ATS listing fee' of '$50,000 to $100,000+' (no offering document AltStreet read names one; the BRYTR PPM's fees are $10,000 setup, $2,000 a month and $7,500 per smart contract), estimates Securitize's AUM at '$1B+' (BlackRock's BUIDL alone was $2.7 billion in August 2026), and quotes a Securitize placement fee of '1% to 3% of capital raised' (the PPMs AltStreet ingested reference placement fees without quantifying them). Another scores tZERO 2.4 and Securitize 3.3 with no volume, fee or capital data behind either number. What neither page uses is the public record that decides the comparison: FINRA's weekly ATS data for both venues, the X-17A-5 capital of tZERO's broker-dealers, the TZROP consent solicitation, and the offering documents behind each shelf.

Who should use tZERO, and who should use Securitize?+

Securitize: Qualified Purchasers and institutions using BUIDL or VBILL as tokenized cash, accredited investors who want Apollo, Hamilton Lane or KKR exposure at $10,000 to $50,000 minimums and will read the feeder PPM's governance and fee sections, retail investors comfortable with a small registered Treasury fund at $1,000, and issuers who need a transfer agent with the deepest institutional roster in tokenization. Skip Securitize if you assume 'tokenized' means liquid (four of the ten tracked vehicles are locked, and the retail ArCoin traded $60 on the ATS in 2026) or if you need voting or removal rights. tZERO: accredited investors who have underwritten a specific tZERO-placed issuer from its own PPM and EDGAR file and need a licensed US venue to subscribe and custody through, holders of tokens that trade nowhere else, and issuers who want a bundled placement agent, escrow, custodian, transfer agent and ATS listing and can afford the fee stack. Skip tZERO if you expect to sell (tens to a few thousand shares a week since May 2026), if you are reading a revenue-share token as income (the venue's own token paid nothing in eight years), or if you would rather not hold assets at an affiliate custodian with $635,723 of net capital and an SIPC caveat on digital securities.

Final read

Final Verdict

tZERO and Securitize use the same words to describe two different companies. Securitize is a transfer agent and fund administrator that asset managers chose: BlackRock, VanEck, Hamilton Lane, Apollo and KKR issue through it, NYSE named it a digital transfer agent, and its parent files quarterly reports as a listed company. FINRA's data shows its ATS doing what that business needs, moving $30 million of cash-fund blocks in seven months of 2026, while the retail products it sells barely trade and the feeders it sponsors hand every vote to an affiliate and leave the fee layers unquantified. tZERO is a license stack that has spent a decade waiting for the market to catch up with its licenses. The licenses are complete, the fee schedules are published, the broker-dealer filings are unusually detailed, and what they detail is $521,737 and $635,723 of net capital at the two firms that hold customer money, revenue that was 40% and 74% the parent's own token, a willful Regulation ATS order in 2022, a parent with a going-concern note, and an ATS that reported 32 shares in the week after that token stopped trading. The venue's own retail token, sold to 920 investors on a contingent revenue dividend, paid nothing in eight years and was converted in 2026 on the company's terms.

For most investors the choice is not between the platforms but between the securities on them, and the platforms matter only for what they cannot do for you. Securitize cannot make a feeder's wrapper fair; read the PPM for gates, votes and fees before the manager's name persuades you, and treat the ATS as irrelevant to your exit. tZERO cannot make an issuer solvent or a token liquid; underwrite the issuer from its own filing, treat a missing Form D as the answer, look up the symbol in FINRA's data before assuming an exit, and hold what you can outside the affiliate custodian. Both companies now claim ICE as a partner and each other as a patent defendant; neither fact changes what the record says about the securities you would actually hold.

Securitize wins on

Institutional roster and product depth (ten tracked vehicles from a $1,000 registered fund to $2.7B BUIDL), a public, Exchange Act-reporting operator with no enforcement history, defined redemption mechanisms on the cash and interval products, and an ATS that FINRA shows carrying real institutional flow.

tZERO wins on

Published investor and issuer fee schedules, the most complete license set in the category including SPBD custody and a transfer agent, closed-deal documents kept online, two audited broker-dealer balance sheets a year, and the only regulated venue for the handful of tokens listed there.

Related records on AltStreet

Disclosures:AltStreet has no commercial relationship with tZERO Group, Securitize, Beyond, Inc., Intercontinental Exchange or any affiliated entity or issuer named here, and received no compensation for this comparison. Trading figures for both venues are FINRA OTC Transparency weekly ATS totals (MPID PROS for the tZERO ATS, MPID SMKT for Securitize Markets) retrieved September 12, 2026, summed by AltStreet from weekly firm and symbol rows; the week of August 3, 2026 is the latest published. tZERO data sourced from the X-17A-5 annual reports of tZERO Securities, LLC and tZERO Digital Asset Securities, LLC (FY2024 and FY2025, audited by Haynie & Company; income statements not public), the TZROP Consent Solicitation Statement and related releases (April 2026), Beyond, Inc.'s 10-K and 10-Q filings and tZERO Group's Rule 3-09 audited statements (through FY2023), SEC File 3-20699, FINRA BrokerCheck, EDGAR filings for the sixteen listed issuers, the offering documents ingested into AltStreet's data layer, and a September 12, 2026 capture of tzero.com and its logged-out platform screens. Securitize data sourced from the seven offering documents and ten vehicle records in AltStreet's Securitize review, Securitize Corp.'s Exchange Act filings and a 31-entity EDGAR sweep, as documented there. Going-concern language at tZERO Group reflects the parent's FY2022 and FY2023 audits; its FY2024 and FY2025 audits are not public. The SEC order against tZERO ATS is a resolved 2022 matter. AltStreet's legal scans located no enforcement action against Securitize's operating entities; that is a search result, not a guarantee. The Securitize v. tZERO patent case is pending and its outcome is not predicted. Platform-reported figures (Securitize's AUM and account counts; tZERO's trade-leadership claim; Bloomberg's reporting on tZERO's funding) are labeled as such. Scenario figures are illustrative under disclosed terms as of September 2026 and may change; verify against current offering documents. This is not investment, legal, or tax advice. Investors should consult qualified advisers and read each offering document before investing.

Last updated: September 12, 2026 · https://altstreet.investments/guides/tzero-vs-securitize