Polymarket
Polymarket is the world's largest prediction market by its own description — and it is really two venues under one brand: an international crypto exchange settling in USDC-backed pUSD on Polygon with UMA oracle resolution, and Polymarket US, a CFTC-designated contract market (QCX LLC) that relaunched US trading in December 2025 with USD accounts and rule-based settlement. Neither venue sells investments: every contract is a priced position against another trader. Between the $1.64 billion ICE has invested, an active CFTC probe opened in June 2026, a Nevada restraining order, and the same state-law war Kalshi is fighting, understanding which Polymarket you are using — and what each one's rules actually say — matters more here than on any platform AltStreet covers.

No platform response on record for this review. Is this your platform? Respond or claim it.
What the data actually shows - TL;DR
Polymarket operates some of the world's largest and most liquid prediction markets — particularly on its international venue — and documents its venues well — published rulebooks, complete fee schedules with worked examples, an open notice archive, open APIs, and (offshore) settlement anyone can verify onchain. It is also the only venue in AltStreet's coverage with a resolved federal enforcement action behind it and an active federal probe in front of it: a $1.4 million CFTC settlement in 2022, an FBI raid on its CEO in 2024, investigations closed without charges in 2025, and a new, broad CFTC probe opened June 26, 2026 over its marketing and beyond.
Read the full assessmentShow less
The essential fact most coverage misses is that 'Polymarket' is two different products. The international venue runs on crypto rails — self-custodied wallets, USDC-backed pUSD, UMA oracle resolution where disputed outcomes are decided by token-holder votes. Polymarket US is a CFTC-designated contract market where retail users become their own clearing members, deposits are USD-only at an unnamed settlement bank, and fees have been raised three times in seven months. Nothing on either venue is an investment in a productive asset; the honest uses are hedging and information, and the honest costs are spreads, fees that now exist on both venues, and a legal map that is being redrawn monthly.
Polymarket International (crypto: pUSD on Polygon, self-custody, UMA oracle resolution, restricted in the US) and Polymarket US (QCX LLC, a CFTC-designated contract market since July 9, 2025; USD accounts, rule-based resolution, live since December 2, 2025) are separately operated products with different fees, custody, and legal posture. An April 2026 application to let US users onto the main exchange is pending. Any analysis that treats them as one platform — including most of what ranks in search — is wrong somewhere.
Cash ICE (the NYSE's parent) has actually invested per its own filings: $1.0B Series D (October 2025), $600M Series E (March 2026), and a $40M common-stock tender — carrying value ~$2.0B after a markup, ~22% of outstanding shares, one board seat, and disclosed 'significant influence.' None of it appears in any Blockratize Form D: the issuer's own EDGAR record shows ~$226M sold across two offerings, understating its known capitalization roughly tenfold.
Polymarket US's current taker-fee coefficient (since July 1, 2026) in the same formula family Kalshi uses — after three increases in seven months (1bp at launch, 10bp in January, 0.05 in March, 0.06 in July). The international venue now charges category-based taker fees too (crypto 0.07, sports 0.05, politics 0.04, geopolitics free). 'Polymarket has no fees' stopped being true on both venues in 2026.
Polymarket US's complete exchange-notice archive — a genuinely transparent operational record that also documents seven-plus technical-issue notices, two market halts, and five compensation-credit notices in June and July 2026 alone, plus an incentive-program layer churning fast enough that two programs were withdrawn in August. The disclosure is excellent; what it discloses is a nine-month-old venue still shaking out.
The 2022 CFTC civil penalty (operating an unregistered event-binary facility; US users to be blocked) — and the one active federal probe, opened June 26, 2026, reportedly spanning marketing practices (a WSJ review found roughly 70% of 1,105 paid creator videos showed simulated trades) and other operations. The DOJ and CFTC closed their prior investigations without charges in July 2025. Nothing in the new probe is adjudicated; it is also the only active CFTC probe AltStreet identified among platforms in its coverage as of August 30, 2026.
Financial data: Blockratize Inc.'s Form D record ($226.3M across two offerings, final amended figures) is ingested into AltStreet's data layer as filing snapshots; the ICE investment figures come from ICE's 10-Qs and prospectus (the only filing-verified source). AltStreet's markets pipeline collects Polymarket activity daily. Market-quality claims here rest on venue documentation and attributed third-party data — AltStreet's published 15,685-market microstructure study covered Kalshi only and is not extrapolated to Polymarket. Open-interest and volume comparisons are attributed to their sources and dates. Legal matters are pending unless stated otherwise; status as of August 30, 2026.
Quick Verdict
Is this platform right for you?
Polymarket runs some of the world's largest and most liquid prediction markets across two very different venues, documents both well, and carries the heaviest conduct file in AltStreet's prediction-market coverage: a 2022 federal settlement behind it, an active CFTC probe in front of it, a Nevada injunction, and the same state war Kalshi is fighting — against the strongest institutional endorsement in the category, ICE's $1.64 billion and a board seat. Nothing on either venue is an investment in a productive asset, and 'no fees' stopped being true on both in 2026.
Read the full assessmentShow less
For US users, the practical product is Polymarket US: a nine-month-old regulated venue with USD custody at an unnamed bank, harder terms than its FAQ suggests, and a fee schedule that has moved three times in seven months. For everyone, the durable value is the information: event prices among the most cited in the world, free to read. Trade it only knowing which venue you are on, what its rulebook actually reserves, and what its resolution rules actually say.
Best for
- Information consumers: the probabilities are free, open via API, and among the most widely cited event prices anywhere
- Hedgers with a specific event exposure, on the venue they are eligible for, after checking depth at size and resolution rules
- Readers of primary documents: both venues publish rulebooks, complete fee schedules with worked examples, and (US) a full notice archive
- Traders who want maker rebates: Polymarket US pays makers, and the international venue never charges them
Avoid if
- You are looking for an investment, yield, or a durable trading edge
- You are a US person tempted to use the international venue, or a resident of a litigating state (Nevada is enjoined now)
- You need named-bank, insured, or refundable custody — neither venue offers it
- You would trade offshore perps, or sports at stakes that matter, with money you cannot lose entirely
Top strengths
- Among the largest and most liquid prediction markets anywhere, with settlement that is independently verifiable onchain (international venue)
- Strong product documentation on both venues: rulebooks, fee schedules with worked examples, a complete 110-notice archive, open APIs
- Real US regulation since December 2025: CFTC-designated exchange and clearinghouse, segregated USD accounts, rule-based resolution, 1099-B reporting
- Filing-verified institutional oversight: ICE's ~22% stake, board seat, and significant influence, disclosed in ICE's 10-Qs
- Genuinely useful free information layer, distributed globally through ICE, X, and Stocktwits
Key limitations
- Conduct record unique in this coverage: a resolved 2022 CFTC settlement and an active, broad CFTC probe (June 2026) — pending, not adjudicated
- Two-venue complexity that most users (and most published guides) get wrong, with US access to the deep venue still pending
- Custody gaps: unnamed US settlement bank, no disclosed insurance treatment, no-refund and float-retention clauses; self-custody on unregulated rails offshore
- Fee instability: three US taker increases in seven months, churning incentive programs, confidential fee exhibits
- No financial statements anywhere in the stack, and an issuer EDGAR record that omits the company's largest financing
Quick Answers
What most investors want to know first
The highest-signal facts first: minimums, liquidity reality, K-1 timing, and whether distributions are actually part of the experience.
Liquidity
Polymarket IS the market — continuous central limit order books on both venues, with the brand's liquidity concentrated on the international side. The honest caveats: liquidity is venue-split (attributed June 2026 open interest: ~$488.5M international, ~$91.6M US, versus ~$1.02B on Kalshi), concentrated in headline markets, and the bid-ask spread — which the venue's own price-impact documentation explains candidly — is the real cost of every round trip.
K-1 Timing
No K-1s. Polymarket US provides 1099-B reporting; the international venue provides no US tax documentation — traders there carry the full recordkeeping burden (both venues' APIs export complete histories).
Distributions
No distributions exist. Contracts settle in cash ($1/$0) when outcomes resolve — undisputed offshore resolutions finalize roughly two hours after proposal; disputed ones take four to six days through UMA voting; Polymarket US settles per contract rules after resolution.
Overview
Platform Overview
A concise read on what the platform is, how the structure works, and where the practical friction shows up for real investors.
Blockratize Inc. (New York, CIK 0002041378; founded 2020 by Shayne Coplan) operates Polymarket, the largest prediction-market brand globally, across two venues. The international venue is a central limit order book on crypto rails: users trade binary outcome tokens priced $0.01-$0.99 that settle at $1 or $0, collateralized in pUSD (an ERC-20 wrapper over USDC on Polygon, enforced onchain), with outcomes resolved through the UMA Optimistic Oracle — proposals bonded at ~$750, a two-hour challenge window, and disputed outcomes decided by UMA token-holder votes over four to six days. It also offers leveraged crypto perpetual futures with volume-tiered fees.
The venue is restricted in the US and other jurisdictions. Polymarket US is a different animal: QCX LLC, a CFTC-designated contract market (designated July 9, 2025, acquired with clearinghouse QC Clearing LLC in a reported $112 million deal), relaunched US trading December 2, 2025. There, retail users contract directly with the exchange and become their own clearing members; deposits are USD-only (debit, ACH via Aeropay, wire) into segregated Member Property Accounts at a settlement bank the public documents do not name; contracts are fully collateralized with no margin; resolution follows each contract's published rules; and fees follow a Kalshi-style formula (taker 0.06 × C × p × (1 − p), maker rebate −0.0125) after three increases in seven months.
Distribution reaches beyond polymarket.com: ICE distributes Polymarket's event data globally, SEGG's Sports.com licenses its technology, and it is the official prediction-market partner of X and Stocktwits. Nothing on either venue pays yield or represents a claim on a productive asset: every contract is a priced position against another trader, minus fees and spread.
The 2024 election made it a household name (its presidential market alone was reported around $3.6 billion in volume) and put it back in Washington's crosshairs: the FBI raided CEO Shayne Coplan's home days after the election, and the DOJ and CFTC investigated whether US users had kept trading. Both probes closed without charges on July 15, 2025 — and Polymarket immediately bought its way back into the perimeter, acquiring QCEX (a licensed exchange-and-clearinghouse pair) for a reported $112 million. QCX LLC was designated a contract market on July 9, 2025, an amended designation enabling intermediated access followed in November, and Polymarket US relaunched for US traders on December 2, 2025 — USD accounts, KYC, users as their own clearing members, and a Kalshi-style fee formula that has since been raised three times.
Capital followed scale: ICE, parent of the NYSE, invested $1.0 billion in October 2025 and $600 million more in March 2026 (plus a $40 million common tender), ending with ~22% of outstanding shares, a board seat, disclosed 'significant influence,' and a global distribution deal for Polymarket's event data; SEGG licensed the technology for Sports.com ahead of the World Cup; X and Stocktwits made it their official prediction-market partner. The law is running the other way at state level: Nevada's gaming regulator won a restraining order in January 2026, Rhode Island sued both Polymarket and Kalshi in May, Kentucky sued in June, and Polymarket has filed preemption suits of its own against Michigan (TRO denied), Massachusetts, and New Mexico — all riding the same federal circuit split Kalshi created. And on June 26, 2026, the CFTC — the same agency that designated QCX — opened a broad probe into Polymarket, reportedly starting with paid-creator marketing that presented simulated trades as real wins. Everything about this venue is large: the markets, the money, the documentation, and the unresolved questions.
Founded & Structure
Founded 2020; Blockratize Inc. (CIK 0002041378, HQ New York) parent, d/b/a Polymarket. US regulated entities: QCX LLC d/b/a Polymarket US (CFTC-designated contract market, July 9, 2025) and QC Clearing LLC d/b/a Polymarket Clearing (derivatives clearing organization). Founder and CEO Shayne Coplan. ICE holds ~22% of outstanding shares with one board seat and disclosed significant influence (per ICE's 10-Q).
The Two Venues
Polymarket International: crypto exchange — pUSD (USDC-backed ERC-20) on Polygon, self-custodied wallets, UMA oracle resolution, crypto perpetuals, restricted in the US and other jurisdictions. Polymarket US: CFTC DCM — USD-only accounts, retail users as their own clearing members at QC Clearing, rule-based resolution, fractional contracts, block trades, RFQ. Separately operated; an April 28, 2026 CFTC application to give US users access to the main exchange is pending.
Platform Scale
Self-described as the world's largest prediction market; the 2024 presidential market alone was reported around $3.6B in volume (press figures). Attributed cross-venue data (Allium, June 18, 2026): open interest ~$488.5M on Polymarket International and ~$91.6M on Polymarket US, versus ~$1.02B on Kalshi; The Block's July 2026 monthly data showed Kalshi leading volume. Metric and date matter — volume, open interest, and depth rank the venues differently.
Products
Binary event contracts ($0.01-$0.99, settle at $1/$0): politics, sports (the dominant visible surface — roughly two-thirds of a crawl of polymarket.com's pages were sports or esports), crypto, economics, culture, weather, mentions, geopolitics. Parlay-style combos. Crypto perpetual futures (international venue; volume-tiered fees, leverage tiers with market maximums — the venue's own examples use 20x). Polymarket US adds fractional contracts, block trading (June 2026), and RFQ (July 2026).
Eligibility
Polymarket US: US individuals 18+ (age of majority in their state) after KYC; unavailable in Nevada under a January 2026 restraining order; institutional-employee restrictions on MNPI holders. Polymarket International: restricted in the US and a jurisdiction-dependent list including sanctioned regions; access rules change without notice per the participant terms.
Fees (both venues — changed materially in 2026)
Polymarket US (since July 1, 2026): Fee = 0.06 × C × p × (1 − p) taker (peaks at $1.50 per 100 contracts at 50¢); maker REBATE −0.0125 (receives up to $0.31 per 100); volume-tiered taker rebates 10-50%; an 'Accelerated Tier' honors proof of volume on another prediction market; block trades 50bp/15bp per contract. International: taker-only by category — crypto 0.07 ($1.75 per 100 at 50¢, the same as Kalshi's standard), sports/economics/culture/weather 0.05 ($1.25), finance/politics/mentions/tech 0.04 ($1.00), geopolitics free; makers never charged; no venue fee on USDC deposits/withdrawals. All formulas peak at 50¢ because p(1−p) is largest there. The real cost on thin markets remains the spread.
Custody & Clearing
International: self-custody — pUSD in the user's wallet, USDC backing enforced onchain by audited wrap/unwrap contracts (with an admin pause gate); no bank, no insurance, no regulator. Polymarket US: USD in segregated Member Property Accounts at QC Clearing via an approved settlement bank the public documents do not name; no deposit-insurance treatment disclosed; contracts fully collateralized (no margin, no default fund — QC Clearing states it maintains no financial resource package); deposits and withdrawals can each take up to three settlement-bank business days.
Member Terms Worth Knowing (Polymarket US)
No right to refund, reversal, or return of funds used to fund the account; the clearinghouse may invest or commingle member cash without notice and retain any profits (CFTC Reg 1.25/39.15(e)); withdrawals may be declined for the protection of the clearinghouse; liability capped at the lesser of purchase price or total deposits plus a ~$50K all-causes annual cap; members who unsuccessfully sue the clearinghouse pay its legal costs above $50K; unilateral amendments on notice; a worldwide, perpetual, sublicensable license to your trading data; consent to electronic 1099-B delivery.
Resolution & Settlement
International: UMA Optimistic Oracle — anyone proposes with a ~$750 bond, two-hour challenge window, disputed outcomes escalate to UMA token-holder votes (four to six days), rare 'Unknown/50-50' resolutions redeem every token at $0.50; clarifications published onchain. Polymarket US: resolution per each contract's published rules with exchange emergency powers; contracts settle at $1/$0. Read the rules, not the market title — on both venues, and especially before comparing prices across venues.
Market Quality
AltStreet's published 15,685-market microstructure study covered Kalshi only — its no-edge finding is not extrapolated to Polymarket. What the documentation itself supports: Polymarket's own risk materials warn that liquidity providers 'may not' be present in some or all contracts at all times; spreads and depth vary enormously by market; and the venue's price-impact and slippage pages explain why displayed probabilities are not executable prices at size. Treat zero-sum arithmetic and execution costs as the base case for directional trading absent a durable informational edge.
Tax Treatment
Polymarket US: consent to electronic IRS Form 1099-B delivery is in the participant agreement; character questions (Section 1256 versus ordinary treatment for event contracts) remain unsettled among practitioners, as with Kalshi. International: no US tax forms; USDC/pUSD trading raises crypto property-transaction treatment on top of the gains themselves. Keep independent records on either venue and resolve treatment with a tax adviser before scale.
Should You Use Polymarket?
Consider it if||you want some of the world's largest and most liquid event markets for information or precision hedging and you have verified which venue you are legally using; you treat directional trading as entertainment priced at spread plus fees; you read resolution rules before trading and understand UMA's dispute process (offshore) or the contract rules (US); and you size balances to custody you have verified — your own wallet offshore, an unnamed settlement bank in the US.||Avoid it if||you are looking for an investment, yield, or an edge; you live in a state actively litigating event contracts (Nevada is enjoined now); you cannot tolerate funds or positions caught in regulatory crossfire; you would rely on the FAQ's custody assurances without reading the rulebook's reserved powers; or you would trade offshore perps with money you cannot lose entirely.
Regulatory Snapshot (August 30, 2026 — changes quickly)
For Polymarket: QCX's CFTC designation (July 9, 2025) and amended order (November 2025); DOJ/CFTC investigations closed without charges (July 15, 2025); trial-level preemption wins in the broader category; the CFTC's pro-preemption posture in the Kalshi cases benefits it. Against: an ACTIVE broad CFTC probe (June 26, 2026); Nevada TRO (January 29, 2026); Rhode Island AG suit naming both Polymarket and Kalshi (May 21, 2026); Kentucky suits (June 2026); its own preemption suits pending against Michigan (TRO denied March 10), Massachusetts (filed February 9), and New Mexico (filed July 2); the 2022 settlement on the record; and the Third-versus-Ninth Circuit split that will likely be resolved above everyone's heads. Nothing in the current wave is finally adjudicated.
The Pre-IPO Ecosystem
Polymarket equity is a top pre-IPO name in AltStreet's tracked universe: eight Hiive series (~$39.5M offered, December 2025-August 2026, $25-50K minimums), MW LSV Polymarket ($100M offered, $10.4M sold at a $250K minimum), Dominari, Opulentia, Allocations, and Vessel vehicles — and a PTC Polymarket SPV that raised $3.0M back in June 2021. Buying those is a venture bet on Blockratize the company, evaluated under pre-IPO discipline — an entirely different decision from trading on the venues, and outside this review's scope.
Investor Operations
The practical questions investors actually care about: when tax documents arrive, how cash distributions work, and whether capital can be exited before the underlying asset is sold.
Tax Documents
K-1 Timing
What to expect
No K-1s. Polymarket US provides 1099-B reporting; the international venue provides no US tax documentation — traders there carry the full recordkeeping burden (both venues' APIs export complete histories).
Delay signals
- Not applicable — no partnership reporting exists.
- International-venue traders should maintain independent records: no forms will arrive.
Extension risk
Not applicable.
Confidence: High
Cash Flow
Distributions
Timing
No distributions exist. Contracts settle in cash ($1/$0) when outcomes resolve — undisputed offshore resolutions finalize roughly two hours after proposal; disputed ones take four to six days through UMA voting; Polymarket US settles per contract rules after resolution.
Consistency
Settlement operates continuously at scale on both venues. The located caveats are structural rather than missed payments: disputed UMA resolutions (including rare 50/50 outcomes) on the international venue, and Polymarket US's June-July 2026 run of technical-issue notices with five compensation-credit notices — disclosed and compensated, and part of a nine-month-old venue's record.
Confidence: High
Liquidity
Exit Reality
Holding period
None. Positions can be closed at market whenever the order book is open (early exit costs the spread). Offshore withdrawals are onchain (unwrap pUSD to USDC). Polymarket US withdrawals are USD with up to three settlement-bank business days, only from excess over margin, and subject to the clearinghouse's reserved right to decline.
Exit options
- Sell any position back into the order book at the prevailing bid — depth varies enormously by market on both venues; headline markets are deep, the long tail is thin, and the venue's own risk disclosure warns liquidity providers may be absent.
- Hold to settlement: cash at $1 or $0 after resolution (subject to UMA dispute timelines offshore).
- International: unwrap pUSD to USDC.e onchain and withdraw over crypto rails (no venue fee; intermediaries may charge).
- Polymarket US: USD withdrawal to the funding source, up to three settlement-bank business days.
- Perpetuals (international): close at market or be liquidated — a materially different exit profile than binary contracts.
Secondary market
Polymarket IS the market — continuous central limit order books on both venues, with the brand's liquidity concentrated on the international side. The honest caveats: liquidity is venue-split (attributed June 2026 open interest: ~$488.5M international, ~$91.6M US, versus ~$1.02B on Kalshi), concentrated in headline markets, and the bid-ask spread — which the venue's own price-impact documentation explains candidly — is the real cost of every round trip.
Confidence: Medium
Investment Structures
Polymarket offers no investments. Its products are trading instruments: binary event contracts (yes/no positions priced $0.01-$0.99, settling at $1 or $0, fully collateralized so maximum loss is defined at entry) across politics, sports, crypto, economics, culture, weather, and geopolitics; parlay-style combos; and, on the international venue, leveraged crypto perpetual futures with liquidation risk. Nothing creates an ownership interest, contractual yield, or claim on operating cash flows: every contract is a priced position against another trader, minus published fees and the spread. The defensible uses for this site's audience are information (its probabilities are widely cited for good reason) and precision hedging of event risk; directional trading without a durable informational edge should be priced as entertainment.
- Event contracts: defined-risk yes/no positions, fully collateralized on both venues; taker fees now apply on both (US: 0.06 × C × p × (1 − p); International: 0.04-0.07 by category, geopolitics free); zero-sum as trades, usable as hedges.
- Combos: multi-leg parlay-style contracts, mostly sports — the segment state gambling regulators target most directly on every venue in this category.
- Crypto perpetuals (international venue only): leverage tiers with market maximums, volume-tiered fees on notional, funding flows, liquidation mechanics — a different risk class entirely, on unregulated rails.
- Market-maker, liquidity, and incentive programs on both venues: rebates and rewards whose full economics are not published — assume the other side of your trade may have better terms than you.
- Polymarket (Blockratize) equity trades separately as a pre-IPO name through SPVs (eight Hiive series in 2025-26, MW LSV at $100M offered) — a venture investment decision outside this review's scope.
Risk
Risk Structure
This is where the marketplace pitch gives way to the actual operating reality: delayed exits, limited disclosure, fee drag, and path-dependent outcomes.
Legality is unresolved where you live — and split across two venues
The central risk, shared with the whole category. Polymarket US operates under CFTC designation while Nevada has it enjoined (TRO January 29, 2026), Rhode Island and Kentucky are suing, and its own preemption suits against Michigan, Massachusetts, and New Mexico are pending — all under the same Third-versus-Ninth Circuit split driving the Kalshi cases toward the Supreme Court. The international venue sits outside the US perimeter entirely: using it from restricted jurisdictions violates its terms, and its history — the 2022 order arose from exactly that — shows the perimeter is enforced retroactively.
Two custody models, two different tails
Offshore custody is self-custody: pUSD in your wallet, USDC backing enforced by audited contracts with an admin pause gate — verifiable by anyone, insured by no one, and dependent on smart-contract integrity. US custody is a segregated Member Property Account under CFTC segregation rules at a settlement bank no public document names, with no deposit-insurance treatment described; QC Clearing maintains no default fund by design (full collateralization is the protection model), and deposits and withdrawals can each take up to three settlement-bank business days. Kalshi, for comparison, names its bank and discloses its FDIC limitations verbatim — the absence of equivalent disclosure here is itself a finding.
The rulebook's reserved powers exceed the FAQ's assurances
Polymarket US's FAQ says customer funds are separate and that it 'cannot access or use your money.' The clearing rulebook reserves the right to invest or commingle member cash without notice and retain the profits (as CFTC Regulation 1.25 permits, in enumerated safe instruments), to decline withdrawals for the clearinghouse's protection, and to treat failed-withdrawal collateral as clearinghouse property; the participant agreement adds a no-refund clause, a lesser-of liability cap plus a ~$50K annual aggregate cap, and a loser-pays clause for members who sue. Both documents can be operated lawfully at once; the rulebook is the one that binds.
Resolution risk: token-holder votes offshore, exchange powers onshore
Offshore outcomes are decided, when disputed, by UMA token-holder votes after bonded proposals and challenge windows — a mechanism with a public history of contested resolutions, occasional 'Unknown/50-50' outcomes redeeming everything at $0.50, and evidence threads running through Discord. Polymarket US resolves per published contract rules with exchange emergency powers over payout determination. Identically titled markets on different venues can settle differently — the first thing to check before any cross-venue price comparison or arbitrage attempt.
A conduct record unique in this coverage
The 2022 CFTC settlement is a resolved federal enforcement action ($1.4M; the facility was unregistered and US users were to be blocked). The 2024-25 DOJ/CFTC investigations closed without charges. The active probe opened June 26, 2026 is broad — reportedly beginning with paid-creator marketing in which roughly 70% of 1,105 reviewed videos showed simulated trades presented as real, and extending into other operations — and is pending, not adjudicated.
Alongside it: two incentive programs withdrawn in August 2026, and a chief compliance officer change within the US venue's first six months. Each fact is documented; AltStreet draws no causal line between them.
Concentrated, integrated, and financially opaque — with one large outside check
One private company controls both venues, the US exchange, and its clearinghouse; publishes no financial statements; discloses ~$226M of capital in its own filings while ICE's filings document ~$1.64B invested for ~22% ownership; and monetizes float, data, and fees on terms only partially public. The counterweight is ICE itself: significant influence, a board seat, and institutional reporting discipline one step removed. Users still extend the operating company more trust than its own disclosures earn.
Regulatory & Legal Posture
Security Status
Not securities. On Polymarket US, event contracts are CFTC-jurisdiction derivatives traded on a designated contract market (QCX LLC, July 9, 2025) and cleared by a registered DCO (QC Clearing LLC); no SEC registration or SIPC coverage applies, and whether state gambling law also reaches sports contracts is the contested question in multiple states. On the international venue, contracts are outcome tokens on Polygon outside the US regulatory perimeter; their US-law status is what the 2022 settlement addressed, and the venue remains restricted to US users pending the April 2026 application.
The US framework is genuine: DCM core principles, a public rulebook and notice archive, product certifications under Part 40, KYC/AML, and CFTC oversight of both exchange and clearinghouse. The perimeter history is equally genuine: the 2022 order found the predecessor facility unregistered, and re-entry came through acquiring an already-licensed exchange rather than de novo designation. The pending application to open the main exchange to US users would collapse the two-venue structure — and is the single most consequential regulatory decision ahead.
Disclosure Quality
Venue-level disclosure is strong on both surfaces: rulebooks, agreements, complete fee schedules with worked examples, a 110-notice archive, open APIs, and onchain verifiability offshore. Corporate-level disclosure is near-zero, the settlement bank is unnamed, fee exhibits carry confidential-treatment requests, and the issuer's EDGAR record omits its largest financing. The gap between product transparency and corporate opacity is wider here than anywhere in AltStreet's coverage.
Custody Model
Two models. International: self-custodied wallets holding pUSD (USDC-backed ERC-20 on Polygon, backing enforced onchain, admin pause gate on wrap/unwrap). Polymarket US: segregated Member Property Accounts at QC Clearing through an approved but unnamed settlement bank; FCM customer lanes under Reg 1.20; full collateralization with no clearinghouse default fund; USD only.
Regulatory Backing
International: none — smart contracts and their audits are the protection. Polymarket US: CFTC segregation rules govern; no deposit-insurance treatment is disclosed, no SIPC applies, and the clearinghouse's stated model is full collateralization rather than a financial resource package. Neither venue's custody has been tested by an operator-side failure; the Nevada injunction shows positions can be caught by jurisdiction even while custody functions normally.
Tax Treatment
Account Suitability
Taxable
The only realistic account type, and the venue matters. Polymarket US delivers IRS Form 1099-B electronically per the participant agreement; the unsettled character question (Section 1256's 60/40 treatment versus ordinary income) matters for active traders, as it does on Kalshi. The international venue provides no US tax forms, and trading in pUSD/USDC layers crypto property-transaction treatment on top of the gains themselves — genuinely messier. Keep independent records on either venue; consult a tax adviser before scale.
Roth IRA
Unavailable and unsuitable: no custodian supports event-contract trading on either venue, and zero-sum wagering-shaped positions are a poor use of tax-advantaged space regardless.
Traditional IRA
Same as Roth: effectively unavailable, and unsuitable in any case.
HSA
Not suitable.
Before You Invest
Get Polymarket investor insights before you invest
K-1 timing, distribution updates, yield insights, and risk signals for Polymarket and similar platforms.
- Weekly platform research focused on tax timing and liquidity reality.
- Signals on distributions, risks, and structural tradeoffs before capital is locked up.
- Coverage of adjacent platforms so you can compare better options faster.
Get weekly platform signals
Track fee changes, liquidity updates, risk flags, and adjacent platforms before you invest.
Independent intelligence from AltStreet. No hype. No sponsor spin.
AltStreet Data Layer
What the data actually shows
AltStreet holds Blockratize's filing record, the complete Polymarket US notice archive, both venues' fee documentation, and daily activity collection. Key findings:
The issuer's EDGAR record omits its largest financing
Blockratize's complete Form D record shows ~$226M sold across two offerings (final amended figures, through August 2025). ICE's own filings document $1.64B invested since October 2025 — Series D, Series E, and a common tender — for ~22% of outstanding shares. No Blockratize filing reflects any of it.
What this means
A Form D is not required for every lawful private placement, so this is an absence, not a violation. But it means the venue's public issuer-side record understates its known capitalization roughly tenfold, and the only filing-verified window into the company's capital structure belongs to its investor.
Three US taker-fee increases in seven months
The CFTC notice trail documents the arc: 1 basis point of premium at launch, 10 basis points certified January 8, 2026, a restructured formula at Θ=0.05 in March, and Θ=0.06 effective July 1 — alongside an incentive-program layer amended monthly, with two programs withdrawn in August.
What this means
Fee disclosure is excellent and fee levels are unstable. Any cost comparison against Kalshi (a steady 0.07 formula) or the international venue (0.04-0.07 by category) is dated the day it is written — which is why this review's numbers all carry effective dates.
The notice archive doubles as an operational-risk series
110 exchange notices since launch include seven-plus technical-issue notices, two market halts, and five compensation-credit notices (June-July 2026), plus rulebook updates shipping fractional contracts, block trades, and RFQ inside nine months.
What this means
The disclosure practice is genuinely strong — few venues publish their own incident-and-compensation trail. What it discloses is a young venue iterating fast, with the operational shakeout that implies. Kalshi's located record, for comparison, contains no equivalent incident trail.
Polymarket equity rivals Kalshi as a pre-IPO name in our tracked universe
Fifteen Form D filings reference Polymarket SPVs: eight Hiive series (~$39.5M offered, December 2025-August 2026), MW LSV at $100M offered ($10.4M sold, $250K minimum), Dominari ($6.7M), Opulentia, Allocations, Vessel — and a PTC Polymarket vehicle from June 2021, three years before the US relaunch.
What this means
Retail-adjacent demand for Blockratize equity now runs through more SPV doors than Kalshi's ($39.5M vs $33M offered via Hiive alone). The equity bet is a venture wager on the operator surviving its docket and its probe — different risk, different diligence, different review.
Polymarket in AltStreet's live markets pipeline
AltStreet's prediction-market activity series collects Polymarket daily. Cross-venue comparisons require methodology care: attributed June 2026 open interest ran ~$488.5M (international) and ~$91.6M (US) versus ~$1.02B on Kalshi, while attributed July volume data showed Kalshi leading — different metrics rank the venues differently, sometimes in the same month.
What this means
“Which has more liquidity” has no one-word answer: volume, open interest, spread, and depth are different questions. AltStreet cites each with its source, metric, and date — and treats venue-published aggregates as platform-reported.
The crawl shows what the venue promotes
Of 100 crawled polymarket.com pages (August 30, 2026), 49 were sports, 14 esports, and 28 individual event pages — roughly two-thirds of the homepage link graph lands on sports and esports surfaces.
What this means
As at Kalshi, the product surface that dominates distribution is the one state regulators are litigating — and the information-rich politics and economics markets that anchor the venue's public value are a minority of what it promotes.
Data as of 2026-08-30 . AltStreet review evidence layer . Public-source analysis
Full datasetDecision Fit
Investor Fit
Who this works for, who it does not, and what level of patience and complexity tolerance the platform really demands.
Alternative-asset investors hedging specific event exposures
Some of the world's largest event markets can hedge election, policy, macro-print, and event risk with defined maximum loss — if you are eligible for the venue you plan to use, the specific market has depth at your size, and you have read its resolution rules. US users get the newer, thinner Polymarket US book; the brand's deeper international books sit on a venue US persons are restricted from using. Size as insurance, not position.
Traders looking for an edge in prediction markets
Polymarket's prices are widely cited precisely because they aggregate information efficiently — which is the problem for edge-seekers. Absent a durable informational or structural edge, the baseline for directional trading is a zero-sum payoff before costs and a negative expected return after fees (now charged on both venues) and execution costs. AltStreet's no-edge microstructure study covered Kalshi, not Polymarket; the zero-sum arithmetic does not need extrapolation.
Sports bettors drawn by the exchange model
Sports and combos dominate the visible surface (roughly two-thirds of a crawl of polymarket.com landed on sports or esports pages) and are exactly what Nevada's injunction, Rhode Island's and Kentucky's suits, and the wider state war target. Whatever the courts ultimately decide about their legal classification, these contracts retain wagering-like zero-sum economics and should be sized accordingly.
Information consumers and researchers
The genuinely strong free use case: Polymarket's probabilities are among the most-cited event prices in the world, the data is open via API, and consuming them requires no account, no custody exposure, and no fee. Understand the caveats — thin markets are noisy, and a price is a claim about a specific resolution rule, not the headline question.
Investors considering the pre-IPO SPVs (Hiive, MW LSV, and others)
Buying Blockratize equity through SPVs is a venture bet on the company growing through an active federal probe and a state-law war into valuations that appear in no filing (ICE's disclosed ~$8B pre-money entry is the only filing-adjacent mark). Evaluate under pre-IPO discipline; this review's venue analysis is context, not a recommendation either way.
Crypto traders eyeing the international venue and its perpetuals
The international venue's perps carry leverage, funding, and liquidation risk on rails no regulator stands behind — and using the venue from a restricted jurisdiction violates its terms, which is precisely the conduct the 2022 order punished. If used at all where lawful, treat as high-risk speculation with money whose total loss is acceptable.
Tradeoffs
Key Tradeoffs
The attraction of pre-IPO access is real, but every benefit comes bundled with a corresponding liquidity, transparency, or pricing cost.
Market depth vs split access
The brand's liquidity lives mostly on the international venue; the venue US users may lawfully access is nine months old and much thinner. The pending application to merge access would change this — and it is pending before the same agency now probing the company.
Onchain verifiability vs regulatory protection
Offshore, you can verify every contract and collateral balance yourself — and no regulator, bank, or insurer stands behind any of it. Onshore, CFTC segregation rules apply — and the bank is unnamed and the insurance treatment undisclosed. Pick your form of trust; neither venue offers both.
Institutional embrace vs federal probe
ICE's $1.64 billion, board seat, and data partnership are the strongest institutional endorsement in the category — extended to the only operator in it with a prior federal settlement and an active CFTC probe. Both facts are load-bearing; neither cancels the other.
Excellent product documentation vs corporate opacity
Rulebooks, fee tables with worked examples, a complete notice archive, open APIs — and no financial statements anywhere in the stack, an unnamed settlement bank, and an EDGAR record that omits the company's largest financing.
Transparent fees vs unstable fees
You can compute either venue's fee to the cent today; the US coefficient has changed three times in seven months and the incentive layer churns monthly. Every cost comparison here carries a date.
Avoid
Who This Is Not For
This section should be read as a filter, not an afterthought. If you need income, simplicity, or near-term access to capital, the structure is working against you.
Anyone treating Polymarket as an investment
Polymarket's contracts are not investments in productive assets: they create no ownership interest, contractual yield, or claim on operating cash flows. They are zero-sum derivative positions settling at $1 or $0 — and both venues now charge fees on top.
US residents tempted by the international venue
The deep markets are there; US access is restricted there. Circumventing the restriction is the exact conduct the 2022 settlement punished and the 2024-25 investigations examined. Use Polymarket US or wait for the pending application — the perimeter is real and enforced in hindsight.
Residents of states litigating event contracts
Nevada is enjoined today; Rhode Island and Kentucky are suing; Michigan, Massachusetts, and New Mexico are contested. Positions and access can change with a docket entry, as Nevada users learned in January.
Anyone who needs custody certainty
Offshore custody is your own wallet on unregulated rails; US custody is an unnamed settlement bank with no disclosed insurance treatment, a no-refund clause, and a clearinghouse that may invest your cash and retain the profits. If those sentences bother you, read the rulebook before funding — or don't fund.
Arbitrageurs assuming cross-venue prices are the same contract
A Polymarket market and a Kalshi market with identical titles can differ in resolution source, deadline, edge-case language, and dispute mechanics — UMA token-holder votes on one side, exchange rules on the other. Price gaps that ignore rule gaps are not arbitrage; they are basis risk.
Leverage-seekers using offshore perps as a strategy
Leveraged crypto perpetuals on self-custodied, unregulated rails are speculation, full stop — and jurisdictional restrictions apply before any trade does.
Editorial View
AltStreet Perspective
The compressed version of the review: what matters, what marketing tends to obscure, and how we would frame the platform for a serious allocator.
Verdict
Among the category's largest markets and its best-known prices, run by its most-investigated operator — reviewed as infrastructure, because nothing on either venue is an investment in a productive asset
Positioning
Polymarket forces the same category question Kalshi did — how do you evaluate a venue whose product is a market? — plus one Kalshi doesn't: which Polymarket are we even talking about? The answer this review takes is to hold the two venues apart everywhere, because every claim that matters — fees, custody, resolution, legality, taxes — is true of one and false of the other. Judged as infrastructure, the product work is genuinely impressive: the international order books are among the deepest in the category, the US venue shipped fractional contracts, block trading, and RFQ inside nine months, and both venues publish documentation most regulated exchanges would recognize. Judged as an institution, the file is harder. This is the only operator in AltStreet's coverage that has already settled with its regulator once, and the only one under an active federal probe now — opened by the same agency that granted its US designation, while its application to bring US users onto the main exchange sits pending. The money around it has made its choice: ICE wired $1.64 billion, took a board seat, and is distributing the data. The states are making theirs docket by docket. Three things would most change this review: resolution of the CFTC probe in either direction; a decision on the pending application, which would collapse the two-venue structure that generates half this review's caveats; and custody disclosure worthy of the funds involved — a named settlement bank and stated insurance treatment would cost a paragraph. Until then: read the prices freely, hedge on the venue you are eligible for after reading its rules, price everything else as entertainment, and keep balances sized to custody you have personally verified — because on one venue that means your own wallet, and on the other it means a bank nobody will name.
The Bottom Line
The world's event prices, worth reading every day — and two venues worth trading only after you've read which one you're on, and what its rulebook reserves.
Action
Next Steps
If you still want to engage after reading the review, these are the practical next moves that reduce avoidable mistakes.
Establish which venue you can lawfully use before anything else: US persons use Polymarket US (not available in Nevada); the international venue is restricted in the US and elsewhere — and the restriction has been enforced in hindsight.
Read the participant agreement and clearing rulebook before funding Polymarket US — the no-refund, float-retention, withdrawal-discretion, liability-cap, and loser-pays clauses this review quotes are all in plain text at polymarketexchange.com.
Read the resolution rules of any specific market before trading it — offshore, also understand UMA's bond/challenge/vote process and the possibility of 50/50 resolutions; the market title is not the contract.
Compute your fee with the venue's own published tables: US taker 0.06 × C × p × (1 − p) (peaks $1.50 per 100 at 50¢, makers receive $0.31); International 0.04-0.07 by category (geopolitics free, makers never charged). Fees peak at 50¢ because p(1−p) does.
Check depth at your intended size before relying on any market — the venue's own risk disclosure says liquidity providers may be absent, and its price-impact page explains why displayed probability is not executable price.
For any cross-venue comparison or arbitrage idea, compare resolution sources, deadlines, and dispute mechanics before comparing prices — identical titles are not identical contracts.
On the international venue, treat custody as your own responsibility: wallet security, the pUSD wrap/unwrap mechanics, and the admin pause gate are all documented — verify rather than assume.
On Polymarket US, plan around settlement timing: deposits and withdrawals can each take up to three settlement-bank business days, and withdrawals come only from excess over margin.
Resolve tax treatment before scale: 1099-B on Polymarket US with the Section 1256 character question unsettled; no US forms plus crypto property-transaction treatment offshore. Export your trade history via API either way.
Watch the four catalysts: the CFTC probe's outcome, the pending application to open the main exchange to US users, the Nevada preliminary-injunction track, and the Supreme Court path out of the circuit split — each can redraw this map quickly.
AltStreet Research Desk
About to invest in Polymarket, or in an offering we haven't covered?
Commission an independent diligence report: the same filing-based analysis behind this review, applied to the specific investment in front of you before you wire the money.
- Built from primary sources: SEC filings, court records, capital structure, and marketing-versus-filings comparison.
- From $750; full reports from $1,495. Fixed price confirmed up front, delivery in 3-5 business days.
- Independent by design: we work for investors and accept no compensation from the companies we cover.
Want this on every new deal, not one? Deal Intelligence sends the alert the day a new offering appears on a covered platform and follows with an analyst-approved investment committee memo.
Deal Intelligence →Appendix
Sources, Disclosures, and Supporting Context
The lower section is structured like a report appendix: relationship context first, adjacent reading second, and evidence last.
Report Appendix
Disclosure
Relationship and compensation context
+
Report Appendix
Disclosure
Relationship and compensation context
Report Appendix
Comparison Guides
Head-to-head guides featuring Polymarket
+
Report Appendix
Comparison Guides
Head-to-head guides featuring Polymarket
Report Appendix
Related Resources
Adjacent platform comparisons, frameworks, and category links
+
Report Appendix
Related Resources
Adjacent platform comparisons, frameworks, and category links
Further Reading
Related Resources
Adjacent frameworks and reviews that help place the platform in a broader allocation or due-diligence context.
Explore Asset Class
Prediction Markets — Binary Event Contracts and Crypto PerpetualsDeep Dive Guide
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts Category HubFrameworks
- ->Polymarket Litigation Map: 23 Federal Dockets and the Entities Named
- ->Kalshi Litigation Map: 80 Federal Dockets and the Entities Named
- ->Polymarket vs Kalshi: The Full Comparison Guide
- ->Kalshi Review (the direct category peer)
- ->AltStreet's Kalshi Microstructure Study (category context; Kalshi-only data)
- ->Hiive Review (the pre-IPO wrapper for Polymarket equity SPVs)
- ->Alternative Assets Due Diligence
Report Appendix
SEC Filers Behind Polymarket
The largest issuers linked to Polymarket on EDGAR, by total reported sold; each page carries the filing record and the related persons
+
Report Appendix
SEC Filers Behind Polymarket
The largest issuers linked to Polymarket on EDGAR, by total reported sold; each page carries the filing record and the related persons
- Blockratize Inc.2024 · $226M · 64 investors
Report Appendix
Evidence & Methodology
Sources, scope, and how the review was assembled
+
Report Appendix
Evidence & Methodology
Sources, scope, and how the review was assembled
ASReview Evidence
Methodology
Review synthesized from: (1) primary venue documents — the Polymarket US Exchange Rulebook and Polymarket Clearing Rulebook (August 2026), the Individual Participant and Clearing Member Agreement (v1.4, August 6, 2026) read in full, the Risk Disclosure Statement, the complete 110-notice archive (every fee filing, incentive program, technical issue, halt, and compensation credit since the August 2025 rule submissions), and both venues' documentation sites captured August 30, 2026 (fees with worked examples, resolution, custody, deposits, restrictions, perpetuals); (2) regulatory records — CFTC DCM designation of QCX LLC (July 9, 2025) and rule filings; the 2022 CFTC settlement; (3) EDGAR — Blockratize Inc.'s complete Form D record, ICE's Q1/Q2 2026 10-Qs, November 2025 prospectus, and October 2025 press exhibit (the only filing-verified source for the investment), and SEGG Media's April 2026 8-K; (4) court records and attributed press for the state and federal proceedings, with both sides carried and pending status stated; (5) a 107-page Firecrawl capture of polymarket.com; (6) attributed third-party market data (Allium, The Block) with metric and date stated. AltStreet's own microstructure study covered Kalshi only and is cited solely as category context.
Scope
Two-venue corporate and regulated-entity structure; product surfaces including sports dominance, combos, fractional contracts, block trades, RFQ, and offshore perpetuals; both complete fee systems and their 2026 revision history; custody and clearing mechanics on both venues with verbatim agreement terms; resolution mechanics (UMA and rule-based) as cross-venue basis risk; the conduct record (2022 settlement, 2024-25 investigations, the active 2026 probe) with pending-status discipline; the ICE investment as filed; the venture and SPV capital record; the full legal landscape as of August 30, 2026; tax posture by venue; and the hedging and information use cases for alternative-asset investors.
Key Findings
- *CONFIRMED (EDGAR): Blockratize Inc. Form Ds — $86,187,000 offered / $82,203,608 sold to 28 investors (D, 2024-10-18; first sale 2024-10-04), amended to $91,203,500 / $90,948,943 / 41 investors (D/A, 2025-02-25); new offering $257,535,911 offered / $135,373,939 sold / 23 investors (D, 2025-08-01). All Rule 506(b). Final-figures total: ~$226.3M across two offerings. No filing after 2025-08-01 exists.
- *CONFIRMED (ICE 10-Qs, Q1+Q2 2026): $1.0B for 9.6M Series D preferred shares (Oct 7, 2025; ~17%/11% of outstanding/fully diluted at investment; 6% non-cumulative dividend if declared; board nomination right); $600M for ~4.2M Series E shares (Mar 26, 2026) — an observable price change on which ICE recorded a $389M gain; $40M common tender (April 2026) after which ICE concluded 'significant influence' and applies equity-method accounting to the common. As of June 30, 2026: carrying value ~$2.0B, ~22%/14% ownership. Cash invested: $1.64B. The Series D was funded by commercial paper (424(b)(5)). PRECISION: press reports of a 'completed $2B' conflate the agreement cap and carrying value with cash invested.
- *CONFIRMED (participant agreement v1.4, verbatim basis): no right to refund, reversal, or return of funds used to fund the account (I.7); cash may be 'invested or commingled' without prior notice per CFTC Reg 1.25/39.15(e) (I.12); consent to electronic delivery of 'IRS Form 1099-B' (I.23); liability capped at the lesser of purchase price or total deposits (VI); worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, sublicensable trading-data license (XI.4); unilateral amendment on notice (XI.8); 18+/age of majority (II.1).
- *CONFIRMED (Clearing Rulebook, Aug 14, 2026, verbatim basis): Rule 5.4 — member cash may be commingled or invested by the clearinghouse without notice, with 'no obligation to inform the Clearing Member of any such investments or of the results,' and the clearinghouse 'shall be entitled to retain any profits'; Rule 5.2 — USD only; deposits/withdrawals up to three Settlement Bank business days; withdrawals only from excess over margin and declinable for the clearinghouse's protection; Rule 3.3 — Member Property Accounts segregated and treated as belonging to Direct Clearing Members; Rule 3.1(i) — affiliates may clear with conflicts disclosed by website notice; Rule 3.14 — ~$50,000 all-causes annual liability cap and a loser-pays provision for unsuccessful member suits; 'Settlement Bank' defined only as 'a depository approved by the Clearinghouse.'
- *CONFIRMED (Polymarket Clearing site): QC Clearing 'clears only fully collateralized positions and does not employ a margin-setting methodology or maintain a financial resource package.'
- *CONFIRMED (fee documentation, both venues, captured 2026-08-30): Polymarket US effective July 1, 2026 — taker Θ=0.06 (max $1.50/100 at 50¢), maker rebate −0.0125 (max $0.31), taker-rebate tiers 10%/25%/50% at $250K/$1M/$10M prior-month notional paid weekly, 'Accelerated Tier Placement' honoring verifiable volume on another prediction market, banker's rounding; block trades 50bp taker/15bp maker per contract (June 2026). Fee arc per CFTC notices: 1bp at launch → 10bp (certified Jan 8, 2026) → 0.05 formula (March) → 0.06 (July 1). International — taker-only by category: crypto 0.07, sports/economics/culture/weather/other 0.05, finance/politics/mentions/tech 0.04, geopolitics 0; makers never charged; maker-rebate redistribution program; no venue fee on USDC deposits/withdrawals.
- *CONFIRMED (notice archive, 110 filings): technical-issue notices 6/08, 6/09, 6/11, 6/13, 8/27 (plus more); market halts 1/19 and 3/17; compensation credits — disruption account credits 6/14, 6/16, 6/24, duplicated-settlement credit 7/02, positions-data-delay credit 7/23; incentive programs repeatedly amended with two WITHDRAWN in August 2026; fractional contracts (5/19), RFQ (7/22, after a withdrawn 7/02 attempt); CCO signature changed from Andrew Clifford (January 2026) to Megan McGrath (June 2026).
- *CONFIRMED (UMA resolution documentation): ~$750 pUSD proposal bonds; 2-hour challenge window; disputed outcomes escalate through a second proposal to UMA token-holder votes (~48 hours after a 24-48 hour debate period; 4-6 days total); 'Unknown/50-50' resolutions redeem every token at $0.50; clarifications published onchain; UmaCtfAdapter audit published.
- *CONFIRMED (pUSD documentation): ERC-20 wrapper over USDC.e on Polygon, backing enforced by CollateralOnramp/Offramp contracts with an admin pause gate; not planned for external listing.
- *CONFIRMED (SEGG 8-K, Apr 27-28, 2026): Polymarket is the exclusive prediction-markets technology provider for Sports.com Predict; transaction-fee net-revenue share; initial term through June 30, 2029; SEGG may terminate on 15 days' notice.
- *CONFIRMED (conduct timeline): January 2022 CFTC settlement — $1.4M civil penalty, unregistered event-binary facility, US users to be blocked; November 2024 FBI raid on CEO Shayne Coplan; July 15, 2025 — DOJ and CFTC investigations closed without charges (CNBC, CoinDesk). ATTRIBUTED (WSJ via Bloomberg/CNBC, June 26-29, 2026): a new, broad CFTC probe including marketing practices — a WSJ review of 1,105 promotional videos found ~70% contained simulated trades, with creators paid ~$2-3K/month through a contractor without disclosure — and extending beyond marketing. Pending; not an enforcement action.
- *CONFIRMED (legal docket, pending unless stated): Nevada NGCB complaint 1/16/26, TRO granted 1/29/26 (Carson City District Court); Rhode Island AG sued Polymarket and Kalshi 5/21/26; Kentucky AG suits June 2026; Polymarket preemption suits — Michigan (TRO denied 3/10/26), Massachusetts (filed 2/9/26, after the state enjoined Kalshi 2/6/26), New Mexico (filed 7/2/26). QCX designated 7/9/25; amended order Nov 2025; US relaunch 12/2/25; application to open the main exchange to US users filed 4/28/26, pending.
- *ATTRIBUTED (third-party market data, metric and date stated): Allium (June 18, 2026) open interest — Kalshi ~$1.02B, Polymarket International ~$488.5M, Polymarket US ~$91.6M; The Block (July 2026) — Kalshi led monthly volume. The 2024 presidential market's ~$3.6B volume and the $112M QCEX purchase price are press figures. 'World's largest prediction market' is Polymarket's self-description, echoed by ICE.
- *MEASURED (AltStreet crawl, Aug 30, 2026): of 100 crawled polymarket.com pages, 49 were sports, 14 esports, and 28 individual event pages — the homepage link graph is roughly two-thirds sports and esports.
- *NOT LOCATED: any financial statements for Blockratize, QCX, or QC Clearing; the settlement bank's name or deposit-insurance treatment; market-maker/liquidity-program economics (fee exhibits carry confidential-treatment requests); any Form D for the ICE investment; a press-reported ~$3M hack (did not verify on targeted search and is excluded). Search results, not guarantees.
Primary Source Pages
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
High-intent search questions answered directly, without making users hunt through the full review.
What is Polymarket and how does it work?
Polymarket is widely described — including by itself — as the world's largest prediction market: you trade yes/no contracts on real-world outcomes — elections, sports, economics, crypto, culture — priced between $0.01 and $0.99, settling at $1 if you're right and $0 if you're wrong, against other traders on an order book. It operates two separate venues: the international exchange runs on crypto rails (self-custodied wallets, USDC-backed pUSD on Polygon, UMA oracle resolution) and is restricted in the US, while Polymarket US is a CFTC-regulated exchange (QCX LLC) with USD accounts, KYC, and rule-based settlement that launched December 2, 2025. Both venues now charge taker fees. It is a trading venue, not an investment platform: nothing pays yield, and every dollar won is another trader's dollar lost.
Is Polymarket legal in the US?
Polymarket US is — it operates under a CFTC designation (QCX LLC, designated July 9, 2025) and relaunched for US users on December 2, 2025, though it is unavailable in Nevada under a January 2026 restraining order and several states are litigating event contracts generally (Rhode Island sued both Polymarket and Kalshi in May 2026; Kentucky sued in June). The international venue is a different matter: it remains restricted to US users — the 2022 CFTC settlement required exactly that — and an application filed April 28, 2026 to let US users onto the main exchange is still pending. So the precise answer is: the US product is legal federally with active state fights; using the offshore product from the US violates its terms and the history of enforcement here is real.
What is the difference between Polymarket and Polymarket US?
They are separately operated venues under one brand. Polymarket International is the original crypto exchange: funds live in your own wallet as pUSD (a USDC-backed token on Polygon), outcomes resolve through the UMA Optimistic Oracle (disputed cases are decided by token-holder votes), fees are taker-only by category (0.04-0.07, geopolitics free), and US users are restricted. Polymarket US (QCX LLC) is a CFTC-designated contract market: USD-only deposits into segregated accounts, retail users become their own clearing members, resolution follows each contract's published rules, fees are 0.06 × C × p × (1 − p) for takers with maker rebates, and you get a 1099-B. Custody, fees, resolution, taxes, and legal exposure all differ — most guides that treat 'Polymarket' as one platform are wrong about at least one of these.
Is Polymarket gambling or investing?
Neither label fits cleanly. It is clearly not investing in the portfolio sense: event contracts create no ownership interest, yield, or claim on any asset — they are zero-sum derivative positions against other traders. Whether the sports contracts are legally gambling is the exact question in litigation across the category: Nevada's regulator won a restraining order against Polymarket, Rhode Island and Kentucky are suing, Polymarket has preemption suits pending against three states, and the federal circuits split on the same question in the Kalshi cases in 2026. Economically, hedging a real exposure with an event contract is risk transfer; buying sports parlays is wagering-like zero-sum economics on exchange rails, and should be sized accordingly whatever the courts decide.
Can you make money on Polymarket?
Some traders do — it is a zero-sum market, so every winner is matched by a loser, now minus fees on both venues. The honest base case: Polymarket's prices are widely cited precisely because they aggregate information well, which makes durable edges rare; absent a genuine informational or structural edge, expect a zero-sum payoff before costs and a negative return after fees and the spread. AltStreet's own 15,685-market microstructure study — which found four apparent edges that all dissolved as sampling artifacts — analyzed Kalshi, not Polymarket, so we do not extrapolate it here; the zero-sum arithmetic, however, is venue-independent. The defensible uses are information and hedging, not profit-seeking.
Is my money safe on Polymarket?
It depends entirely on which venue. On the international venue, you custody your own funds: pUSD in your wallet, USDC backing enforced by audited smart contracts (with an admin pause gate) — no bank, no insurance, no regulator; wallet security is your job. On Polymarket US, funds are USD in a segregated Member Property Account under CFTC segregation rules — but the settlement bank is not named in any public document, no deposit-insurance treatment is disclosed, the participant agreement contains a no-refund clause, and the clearing rulebook lets the clearinghouse invest or commingle member cash without notice and retain the profits, and decline withdrawals for its own protection. The FAQ's assurance that Polymarket US 'cannot access or use your money' should be read alongside those reserved powers; the rulebook is the binding document.
What are Polymarket's fees?
Both venues now charge trading fees — the 'no fees' era ended in 2026. Polymarket US (since July 1, 2026): takers pay 0.06 × contracts × price × (1 − price), peaking at $1.50 per 100 contracts at 50¢; makers receive a rebate (−0.0125, up to $0.31 per 100); high-volume takers earn 10-50% rebates, and there's an 'Accelerated Tier' honoring proof of volume on another prediction market. The international venue charges takers by category — crypto 0.07 ($1.75 per 100 at 50¢, the same as Kalshi's standard), sports and economics 0.05 ($1.25), politics and finance 0.04 ($1.00), geopolitics free — and never charges makers; USDC deposits and withdrawals carry no venue fee. All formulas peak at 50¢ because p(1−p) is largest there. On thin markets, the spread usually costs more than the fee.
How does Polymarket make money?
Four documented ways. Trading fees, now on both venues (the US taker fee has been raised three times in seven months; the international venue charges 0.04-0.07 by category). Data distribution: ICE — which invested $1.64 billion and holds about 22% of the company — distributes Polymarket's event-driven data to institutional customers globally. Technology licensing: SEGG's Sports.com Predict runs exclusively on Polymarket's stack under a revenue-share through 2029, and Polymarket is the official prediction-market partner of X and Stocktwits. And float: the US clearing rulebook explicitly reserves the right to invest member cash and retain the profits. What each stream earns is unknown — no entity in the stack publishes financial statements.
What happened with the FBI raid and the CFTC investigations?
Three separate chapters. In January 2022, Polymarket's parent Blockratize settled with the CFTC for $1.4 million over operating an unregistered event-binary facility and agreed to block US users. In November 2024, days after the election, the FBI raided CEO Shayne Coplan's home as the DOJ investigated whether US users had kept trading; the DOJ and CFTC closed those investigations without charges on July 15, 2025. Then on June 26, 2026, the CFTC opened a new, broad probe — first reported by the Wall Street Journal, whose review of 1,105 paid promotional videos found roughly 70% showed simulated trades presented as real wins — extending beyond marketing into other operations. The new probe is pending and is not an enforcement action; it is also the only active CFTC probe AltStreet identified among platforms in its coverage as of August 30, 2026.
How are Polymarket winnings taxed?
By venue. Polymarket US delivers IRS Form 1099-B electronically (it's in the participant agreement), and the open question is character — whether event contracts get Section 1256's 60/40 futures treatment or ordinary treatment is unsettled among practitioners, the same debate as on Kalshi. The international venue sends no US tax forms at all, and because trading runs through pUSD/USDC, crypto property-transaction treatment can layer on top of the trading gains themselves — genuinely messier, with the full recordkeeping burden on you. Both venues' APIs export complete trade histories; do that, and resolve treatment with a tax adviser before trading at scale.
Polymarket vs Kalshi — what's the difference?
Three surfaces, not two. Kalshi is one US-regulated stack (CFTC exchange, bank custody at a named bank, 1099s, a steady 0.07 fee formula). Polymarket is two venues: the international crypto exchange (among the largest and most liquid event markets anywhere, self-custody, UMA resolution, 0.04-0.07 category fees, US-restricted) and Polymarket US (CFTC-designated, USD custody at an unnamed bank, 0.06 taker fee with maker rebates after three increases in seven months). At 50¢, 100 contracts cost $1.75 in taker fees on Kalshi, $1.50 on Polymarket US, and $1.00-$1.75 (or $0 in geopolitics) internationally. Attributed June 2026 open interest ran ~$1.02B on Kalshi versus ~$488.5M international and ~$91.6M on Polymarket US — while July volume data showed Kalshi leading; the liquidity answer depends on the metric. Conduct records differ sharply: our Kalshi scan located no CFTC action; Polymarket has a 2022 settlement and an active probe. And identical-looking markets can resolve differently — compare resolution rules before comparing prices. AltStreet's full Kalshi review covers the other side of this comparison.
Can you arbitrage Polymarket and Kalshi?
Price gaps between the venues exist and traders pursue them — but a same-titled market is not the same contract. Before treating a combined YES+NO price below $1 as arbitrage, verify: the exact question wording, the deadline and time zone, the resolution source (UMA proposals and token-holder votes on Polymarket International; contract rules on Polymarket US; exchange rules on Kalshi), edge-case and clarification language, the bid/ask and depth at your size (not the last trade), both venues' fees, halt and cancellation rules, and whether you can even legally hold both legs from your jurisdiction. Differently resolving contracts turn 'arbitrage' into basis risk with two sets of costs — the trade is real only after the rules match.
Who owns Polymarket?
Blockratize Inc., a private New York-based company founded by CEO Shayne Coplan, doing business as Polymarket; it owns the international venue and, since the July 2025 QCEX acquisition (reported at $112 million), the US-regulated QCX exchange and QC Clearing clearinghouse. Its disclosed Form D record shows about $226 million raised across two offerings — but the dominant outside shareholder is ICE, the NYSE's parent, which per its own filings invested $1.64 billion for roughly 22% of outstanding shares, one board seat, and 'significant influence.' No financial statements are published; press-reported valuations ($8 billion pre-money at ICE's 2025 entry, higher figures since) appear in no Blockratize filing. An active SPV ecosystem — eight Hiive series, MW LSV, Dominari, and others — resells its equity to accredited investors.
